TBCRC 030: a phase II study of preoperative cisplatin versus paclitaxel in triple-negative breast cancer: evaluating the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) biomarker

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin and paclitaxel are active in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Despite different mechanisms of action, effective predictive biomarkers to preferentially inform drug selection have not been identified. The homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) assay (Myriad Genetics, Inc.) detects impaired double-strand DNA break repair and may identify patients with BRCA1/2-proficient tumors that are sensitive to DNA-targeting therapy. The primary objective of TBCRC 030 was to detect an association of HRD with pathologic response [residual cancer burden (RCB)-0/1] to single-agent cisplatin or paclitaxel.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective phase II study enrolled patients with germline BRCA1/2 wild-type/unknown stage I-III TNBC in a 12-week randomized study of preoperative cisplatin or paclitaxel. The HRD assay was carried out on baseline tissue; positive HRD was defined as a score ≥33. Crossover to an alternative chemotherapy was offered if there was inadequate response.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-nine patients were evaluable for response, including 88 (63.3%) who had surgery at 12 weeks and 51 (36.7%) who crossed over to an alternative provider-selected preoperative chemotherapy regimen due to inadequate clinical response. HRD results were available for 104 tumors (74.8%) and 74 (71.1%) were HRD positive. The RCB-0/1 rate was 26.4% with cisplatin and 22.3% with paclitaxel. No significant association was observed between HRD score and RCB response to either cisplatin [odds ratio (OR) for RCB-0/1 if HRD positive 2.22 (95% CI: 0.39-23.68)] or paclitaxel [OR for RCB-0/1 if HRD positive 0.90 (95% CI: 0.19-4.95)]. There was no evidence of an interaction between HRD and pathologic response to chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective preoperative trial in TNBC, HRD was not predictive of pathologic response. Tumors were similarly responsive to preoperative paclitaxel or cisplatin chemotherapy.

Abstract PD3-07: A phase II pre-surgical trial of lapatinib for the treatment of women with HER2 positive or EGFR positive ductal carcinoma in situ

Background: Estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors and human epidermal growth factor 2-Neu (HER2) positive breast cancers are known to be more clinically aggressive subtypes of breast cancer and account for 30% of all breast cancers. Women with HER2 + breast cancers, whether ER+ or ER -, require cytotoxic chemotherapy with a HER2-targeting agent, and often have adverse outcomes. Thus, preventive agents are needed to reduce the incidence of these subtypes of aggressive breast cancer. Lapatinib, a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor, inhibits epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR) and HER2 kinases and has shown to decrease breast cell proliferation in invasive breast cancer and adjacent premalignant lesions. Therefore, we conducted a multi-institutional randomized Phase II clinical trial to study the effects of the signal transduction inhibitor lapatinib in women with HER2-positive or EGFR-positive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Methods: Randomized participants received either lapatinib (750mg, 1000mg, or 1500mg) or placebo daily for 2-6 weeks prior to their surgery. After minimal accrual, the trial was later amended to lapatinib 1000mg or placebo. Pre-treatment breast tissue was obtained from initial diagnostic core biopsy and post-treatment breast tissue was obtained from surgical excision specimen. Blood was obtained prior to surgery to assess serum lapatinib level. Participants kept a daily symptom assessment log and had a cardiac assessment at baseline and prior to surgery. Patients were instructed to take drug up to and including the day before surgery. The dual primary endpoint for this study was change in proliferation in pre- versus post-treatment biopsies between the two treatment arms, as measured by Ki67 as well as toxicity assessment. Secondary endpoints included incidence of DCIS at surgery and modulation of tissue biomarker expression in growth factor receptors (EGFR, ErbB2); phosphorylated growth factor receptor (phospho-ErbB2); signal transduction markers (MAPK, phospho-MAPK); hormone receptors (ER, PR); and p27.

Results:Twenty-two women (mean age: 51; range: 32-66) with HER2+ or EGFR+ DCIS were treated with lapatinib (1,000 or 1,500 mg) or placebo for 2–6 weeks prior to surgical excision. Ki67 expression was significantly decreased in the lapatinib treatment arms compared to placebo (p=0.0122). Diarrhea, fatigue, and skin reactions were notable adverse events that occurred predominately in the lapatinib arm compared to placebo. No grade 3 or 4 events related to the study drug were noted during the study. No changes were noted in cardiac function. DCIS was present in all surgical specimens in both arms. Invasive breast cancer was noted in 1 patient on lapatinib 1000mg and 3 patients on placebo. No statistically significant changes were noted in signal transduction biomarkers

Conclusion:These results demonstrate the effectiveness of lapatinib in reducing proliferation in women with EGFR+ or HER2+ DCIS. Even low-grade toxicities can deter use of an agent in the prevention setting. This and the lack of a risk model for HER2+ and triple negative breast cancer make the development of larger scale clinical prevention trials of lapatinib for the prevention a challenge.

Citation Format: Thomas PS, Contreras A, Pruthi S, Krontiras H, Rimawi M, Garber J, Wang T, Hilsenbeck SG, Vornik LA, Gilmer T, Friedman R, Heckman-Stoddard BM, Dunn B, Kuerer H, Brown PH. A phase II pre-surgical trial of lapatinib for the treatment of women with HER2 positive or EGFR positive ductal carcinoma in situ [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-07.

Abstract ES1-3: Advanced HER2-positive breast cancer: Overcoming treatment resistance

For two decades, HER2 has been an attractive therapeutic target. Anti-HER2 agents have transformed the care of HER2+ breast cancer and greatly improved its outcomes. However, treatment resistance remains a considerable clinical problem, and some patients still recur and progress despite optimal treatment. A particular challenge in advanced HER2+ breast cancer remains to be CNS metastasis. Special attention needs to be given to this devastating event given its serious sequelae, and its prevalence among patients battling this disease. As more agents are being approved in the early setting, improving outcomes in this setting, patients who suffer a recurrence may have more limited options and more resistant disease.

The good news is that there is a number of anti-HER2 agents being explore in the advanced setting of HER2+ breast cancer. They fit into three major categories: new or optimized monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. There is also great interest in studying other classes of agents in combination with anti-HER2 treatment, like immune-oncology agents, in this space.

The plethora of agents being developed in this setting highlights the importance to understand more about potential mechanisms of resistance. This will help guide development strategies, deliver tailored treatment approaches, and design more effective agents and regimen.

Resistance may be the end result of many possible molecular changes that mediate its emergence, and a variety of strategies are needed to elucidate them. That includes comprehensive in depth molecular profiling, as well as functional validation of detected alterations. Moreover, each tumor may have many underlying molecular changes in different cell sub-populations.

It is therefore mandatory that development strategies for new agents and combinations should rely on clinical and biologic factors to help improve outcomes for patients with advanced HER2+ breast cancer.

Citation Format: Rimawi M. Advanced HER2-positive breast cancer: Overcoming treatment resistance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr ES1-3.

Abstract GS3-02: PALLET: A neoadjuvant study to compare the clinical and antiproliferative effects of letrozole with and without palbociclib

Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors, such as palbociclib, are used to treat ER+ metastatic breast cancer in combination with endocrine therapy with trials ongoing in patients with primary disease. No biomarkers exist to identify those who do/do not benefit from added CDK4/6 inhibition. PALLET is an investigator-initiated/led phase II randomized trial collaboration between UK and NSABP investigators evaluating the biological and clinical effects of palbociclib with letrozole combination as neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods: Postmenopausal women with ER+ primary breast cancer and tumors >2.0cm (ultrasound) were randomized to one of 4 treatment groups (3:2:2:2 ratio): Group A: letrozole (2.5mg/d) for 14 weeks; Group B: letrozole for 2 weeks followed by letrozole + palbociclib to 14 weeks; Group C: palbociclib for 2 weeks followed by letrozole + palbociclib to 14 weeks; Group D: letrozole + palbociclib for 14 weeks. Palbociclib was given 125mg/d PO on a 21 days on, 7 days off schedule. Post-14 week treatment was at the discretion of the treating clinician including letrozole until surgery. Core-cut biopsies were taken at baseline, 2 weeks and 14 weeks. Co-primary endpoints for letrozole alone vs palbociclib groups (Group A vs Groups B+C+D) were: (i) change in Ki67 (IHC) between baseline and 14 weeks (log-fold change, Mann-Whitney test); (ii) clinical response (ultrasound) after 14 weeks (4 group, ordinal, Mann-Whitney test). Complete cell-cycle arrest (CCCA) (Ki67≤2.7%) was analyzed using a logistic regression model adjusting for recruitment region. Pre-specified exploratory biomarkers included c-PARP (apoptosis).

Results: 307 patients were recruited between 27 Feb 2015 and 08 Mar 2018; 103 were randomized to letrozole alone and 204 to letrozole + palbociclib. 279 (90.9%) patients were evaluable for 14 week clinical response. Clinical response was not significantly different between letrozole vs letrozole + palbociclib groups [(p=0.20; CR+PR 49.5% (46/93) vs 54.3% (101/186) and PD 5.4% (5/93) vs 3.2% (6/186)] nor was the small proportion of patients with pathological CR (1/87, 1.1% vs 6/180, 3.3%; p=0.43). 190 (61.9%) patients were evaluable for 14 week change in Ki67. The median log-fold change in Ki67 was greater with letrozole + palbociclib vs letrozole alone (-4.1 vs -2.2; p<0.001) corresponding to a geometric mean change of -97.4% vs -88.5%. Similarly, a greater proportion of patients who received letrozole + palbociclib achieved CCCA (90% vs 59%, p<0.001). 146 (47.6%) patients were evaluable for c-PARP and the log-fold change (suppression) was greater with letrozole + palbociclib vs letrozole alone (-0.80 vs -0.42; p=0.003) corresponding to a geometric mean change of -56.8% vs -31.4%. Other biomarkers of response / resistance are being evaluated. A higher proportion of patients had a grade ≥3 toxicity on letrozole + palbociclib than letrozole alone (49.8% vs 17.0%; p<0.001) mainly due to asymptomatic neutropenia.

Conclusion: Adding palbociclib to letrozole markedly enhanced the suppression of malignant cell proliferation as assessed by Ki67 but did not substantially increase the clinical response of primary ER+ breast cancer over a 14-week period. Concurrent reductions in cell death may have reduced the speed of tumor shrinkage.

Citation Format: Dowsett M, Jacobs S, Johnston S, Bliss J, Wheatley D, Holcombe C, Stein R, McIntosh S, Barry P, Dolling D, Snowdon C, Perry S, Batten L, Dodson A, Martins V, Modi A, Cornman C, Puhalla S, Wolmark N, Julian T, Pogue-Geile K, Robidoux A, Provencher L, Boileau JF, Shalaby I, Thirlwell M, Fisher K, Huang Bartlett C, Koehler M, Osborne K, Rimawi M. PALLET: A neoadjuvant study to compare the clinical and antiproliferative effects of letrozole with and without palbociclib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-02.

Abstract OT3-02-08: Scalp cooling alopecia prevention trial (SCALP) for patients with early stage breast cancer

Background

Adjuvant chemotherapy treats micro-metastatic disease and decreases the risk of breast cancer recurrence. However, it may be associated with distressing side effects, including alopecia. Women with breast cancer rate chemotherapy-induced alopecia as one of the most severe, troublesome, and distressing side effects of chemotherapy. In many countries, scalp cooling has been introduced to prevent or reduce chemotherapy-induced alopecia. The theory is that scalp cooling causes cutaneous vasoconstriction, which reduces blood flow to the hair follicles during peak plasma concentrations of the chemotherapeutic agents and therefore reduces cellular uptake of these agents. It also results in reduced biochemical activity, which makes hair follicles less susceptible to the damage of the chemotherapy agents. Historically success rates are have been variable, but based on non-randomized studies, scalp cooling appears to be effective in preventing chemotherapy-induced alopecia especially in more recent studies.

Methods

We are conducting a prospective multi-center randomized controlled non-blinded trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Orbis Paxman Hair Loss Prevention System in reducing the incidence of chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Women with stage I-II breast cancer who will receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant anthracycline- or taxane-based chemotherapy, for at least four cycles are eligible. Participants are randomized in a 2:1 ratio to scalp-cooling or no cooling. Scalp-cooling is done using the Orbis Paxman Hair Loss Prevention System prior to, during and after each chemotherapy administration. The primary efficacy endpoints are hair preservation, defined as CTCAE v4 alopecia <2, and device safety. Two hundred and thirty five (235) patients are planned to be enrolled which will provide 85% power to detect a 20% difference in hair preservation, 15% in control group and 35% in scalp-cooling group . Secondary endpoints include: wig/scarf use and quality of life assessed by the EORTC QLQ-30, HADS and BIS. Study participants will be followed for 5 years post-study for time to first recurrence, overall survival, site of first recurrence, and incidence of isolated scalp metastasis.

Citation Format: Nangia JR, Wang T, Rude M, Osborne C, Papish S, Abraham J, Holmes F, Savin M, Paxman R, Hilsenbeck SG, Osborne CK, Rimawi M. Scalp cooling alopecia prevention trial (SCALP) for patients with early stage breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-02-08.

Effects of a green tea extract, Polyphenon E, on systemic biomarkers of growth factor signalling in women with hormone receptor-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Observational and experimental data support a potential breast cancer chemopreventive effect of green tea.

METHODS

We conducted an ancillary study using archived blood/urine from a phase IB randomised, placebo-controlled dose escalation trial of an oral green tea extract, Polyphenon E (Poly E), in breast cancer patients. Using an adaptive trial design, women with stage I-III breast cancer who completed adjuvant treatment were randomised to Poly E 400 mg (n = 16), 600 mg (n = 11) and 800 mg (n = 3) twice daily or matching placebo (n = 10) for 6 months. Blood and urine collection occurred at baseline, and at 2, 4 and 6 months. Biological endpoints included growth factor [serum hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)], lipid (serum cholesterol, triglycerides), oxidative damage and inflammatory biomarkers.

RESULTS

From July 2007-August 2009, 40 women were enrolled and 34 (26 Poly E, eight placebo) were evaluable for biomarker endpoints. At 2 months, the Poly E group (all dose levels combined) compared to placebo had a significant decrease in mean serum HGF levels (-12.7% versus +6.3%, P = 0.04). This trend persisted at 4 and 6 months but was no longer statistically significant. For the Poly E group, serum VEGF decreased by 11.5% at 2 months (P = 0.02) and 13.9% at 4 months (P = 0.05) but did not differ compared to placebo. At 2 months, there was a trend toward a decrease in serum cholesterol with Poly E (P = 0.08). No significant differences were observed for other biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest potential mechanistic actions of tea polyphenols in growth factor signalling, angiogenesis and lipid metabolism.

Abstract P4-01-11: Limits of [18F]-FLT PET as a clinical biomarker of proliferation in breast cancer

Background:

Imaging biomarkers of cellular division offer promise as non-invasive measures of tumor response. 3’-deoxy-3’[18F]-fluorothymidine ([18F]-FLT) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging generally correlates with pathology-based measurements of cancer proliferation, especially the Ki67 score. Though clinical studies have associated changes in [18F]-FLT uptake with therapeutic response, clinical studies validating its ability to assess cell proliferation are comparatively lacking. The goal of this study was to determine quantitative relationships between [18F]-FLT compared with molecular and cellular metrics of proliferation during treatment for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

Methods:

Baseline [18F]−FLT-PET scans were obtained prior to the initiation of chemotherapy for LABC from patients enrolled at several academic oncology study sites. MRI scans, and transmission CT scans were obtained. Core needle biopsies were obtained to determine Ki-67 indices using immuno-histochemistry and to assess an mRNA signature based measurement of proliferation. Prospectively specified quantitative relationships between PET, Ki67 immunohistochemistry and the mRNA signature were evaluated using image-matched tumor specimens. Correlations between volumetric MRI changes and pathologic responses were evaluated in a post-hoc exploratory analysis.

Results:

Motivated by the hypothesis that effective chemotherapies should decrease tumor cell proliferation, FLT-PET was compared with biomarkers of proliferation including Ki67 and the mRNA signature during neoadjuvant treatment for LABC. [18F]-FLT correlated both with the Ki67 labeling index (SUVmean r = 0.53) and with the proliferation signature (SUVmean r = 0.7), validating the principle of thymidine analogue imaging. However, variability in the [18F]-FLT PET and tumor cell proliferation measures likely contributed to correlations less than pre-specified target values considered appropriate for clinical use (r > 0.78). Moreover, none of the proliferation biomarkers predicted pathologic complete responses at the end of neoadjuvant therapy ∼16 weeks after the 3 week response scan. In contrast, an evaluation of change in tumor volume measured by MRI after 3 weeks of therapy confirmed its superior ability to predict pCR and tumor re-staging.

Conclusion:

With large numbers of cancer drugs entering therapeutic pipelines, early efficacy measures remain critical for drug development. The 3-4 month neoadjuvant treatment paradigm for LABC offers unique opportunities for drug evaluation. Functional imaging using [18F]-FLT has been advanced as an assessor of cellular proliferation, potentially offering a non-invasive approach to response evaluation. While [18F]-FLT generally correlated with proliferation, its lack of association with patient responses likely limit its clinical utility. On the other hand, the predictive value of MRI offers unique opportunities for future trial designs and confirms previous reports (1).

1. N. M. Hylton et al., Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Radiology 263, 663 (2012).

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P4-01-11.

Abstract P5-18-24: Population pharmacokinetics of trastuzumab emtansine, a HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: clinical implications of the effect of various covariates

Background: Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is a HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate composed of the humanized monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, the potent cytotoxic agent DM1 (a microtubule inhibitor), and a stable thioether linker. To estimate typical pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter values and interpatient variability, a population PK model for T-DM1 was previously developed from 1 phase 1 (0.3 to 4.8 mg/kg in qw or q3w regimens) and 2 phase 2 (3.6 mg/kg q3w) trials (Gupta, J Clin Pharmacol 2012). The model reported here has been updated with additional data from 2 randomized trials (phase 2 TDM4450g and phase 3 EMILIA, 3.6 mg/kg q3w). Another phase 2 trial (TDM4688g) was used for external validation of the model. The effect of demographic and pathophysiological covariates on the PK of T-DM1 was explored to better understand the clinical factors that might affect exposure and clinical outcome for individual patients.

Methods: For the current analysis, 9934 T-DM1 serum concentration-time data points from 671 patients were simultaneously fitted using NONMEM® software. T-DM1 concentration-time data to date are best described using a 2-compartment linear model. All relevant and plausible covariates likely to have an effect on T-DM1 systemic exposure, or likely to have clinical relevance, were explored for possible correlation with the key T-DM1 PK parameters of clearance (CL) and central volume of distribution (Vc). These covariates include those related to demographics, renal and hepatic function, disease status, and treatment history.

Results: The estimated CL for T-DM1 is 0.68 L/day, Vc is 3.13 L, and the terminal half-life is 3.94 days. Interindividual variability (IIV) of the base model is 25.6% and 17.5% for CL and Vc, respectively. Patients with greater body weight, sum of longest dimension of target lesions, serum concentration of shed HER2 extracellular domain, and aspartate aminotransferase concentrations, as well as patients with lower serum albumin and baseline trastuzumab concentrations, have statistically faster CL. Patients with greater body weight also have statistically larger Vc. Incorporation of these covariates (P<0.001 by likelihood ratio test) decreased IIV of CL and Vc to 19.1% and 11.7%, respectively. All covariates together explain 44.4% and 55.8% of IIV in CL and Vc, respectively. The model sensitivity analysis suggests that a patient with a statistically significant PK covariate value at the 5th or 95th percentile of the population will have a <20% difference in cumulative exposure (as represented by area under the T-DM1 concentration-time curve) compared with a typical patient with a median covariate value.

Conclusions: A relatively small IIV for the estimated T-DM1 PK parameters of CL and Vc was observed. None of the evaluated covariates had a clinically meaningful magnitude of effect on T-DM1 exposure (<20% difference for patients with 5th and 95th percentiles vs patients with median value of covariates) that would justify a further dose adjustment. The body weight–based dose of 3.6 mg/kg q3w without further correction for other factors is considered appropriate in ongoing clinical trials.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-18-24.

A BRCA1-Like, 25-Gene Assay Predicts for Anthracycline-Chemosensitivity in Sporadic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Background Studies have shown higher chemosensitivity to anthracyclines in BRCA1-associated breast cancer (BABC) when compared to sporadic triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC), possibly due to differences in DNA repair function. We hypothesized that a subset of TNBC with acquired BRCA1 deficiency and defective DNA repair function will benefit most from DNA-damaging agents, such as anthracyclines. Methods We applied a previously published BRCA1 gene expression signature that differentiates BABC from sporadic TNBC to three datasets of sporadic TNBC from Baylor College of Medicine (BCM, n=68), GSE2034 (n=49), and the Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI2, n=40). The signature separated the sporadic TNBC samples into those with a gene expression profile similar to BABC, or BRCA1-like, versus those with an expression pattern similar to sporadic TNBC, nonBRCA1-like. A list of 92 genes was obtained from the overlap of the most differentially expressed genes between the BRCA1-like samples and nonBRCA1-like samples in each of the three datasets. We then confirmed a subset of the 25 most differentially expressed genes by quantitative RTPCR. We validated the predictive value of this BRCA1-based, 25-gene assay in anthracycline response in three neoadjuvant studies of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC 6 cycles, n=53), doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC 4 cycles, n=12), and T-FAC (paclitaxel-FAC, n=16). Results We determined gene expression of the 92 candidate genes by RT-PCR on 30 available samples of the BCM database. 25 genes were found to have the highest correlation between the microarray and RTQPCR gene expression. Gene expression profile using these 25-gene assay was obtained for three databases which included neoadjuvant anthracycline response data. The 25-gene assay predicted for anthracycline response in sporadic triple-negative breast cancers. In a neoadjuvant FEC study, this assay predicted for pathologic complete response (pCR) in 14/25 patients with BRCA1-like pattern, vs. 7/25 with sporadic-like pattern, p<0.05. In the AC study, 6/9 patients in the BRCA1-like group achieved pCR, vs. 0/3 in nonBRCA1-like group, p<0.05. Finally, in the T-FAC study, 5/7 patients in the BRCA1-like group achieved pCR vs. 3/9 patients in the nonBRCA1-like group, p=0.15. Analysis of the microarray data of triple negative breast cancer revealed higher PARP1 expression levels in the BRCA1-like group when compared to nonBRCA1-like group. Conclusion We present a promising BRCA1-based 25-gene assay that can be used on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue that may guide therapy in triple- negative breast cancer. The assay differentiates TNBC that are very sensitive to anthracyclines, and it should now be tested and validated prospectively in clinical trials with anthracyclines, other DNA-damaging agents, and PARP1 inhibitors.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 110.

Different Mechanisms for Acquired Resistance to Trastuzumab and Lapatinib in HER2 Positive Breast Cancers: Role of ER and HER2 Reactivation

About 25% of human breast cancers are amplified for HER2 with half of these tumors also expressing estrogen receptor (ER). Therapies targeting HER2 are very effective in the metastatic and the adjuvant settings, especially, although de novo or acquired resistance are still major problems. Trastuzumab (T) and lapatinib (L) are approved drugs now used in the clinic for treatment of HER2+ tumors. Data suggest that T works primarily by blocking signals generated by HER2 homodimers, while L is a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that more completely blocks the pathway by inhibiting HER1 in addition to HER2. In the clinic, these drugs demonstrate incomplete cross-resistance since L is active in some patients with T-resistant tumors. However, the mechanisms for this resistance have not been clarified.To investigate the mechanisms for acquired resistance, we developed a panel of HER2+ cell lines resistant to T, L, and L+T by long-term exposure to increasing drug concentration in vitro. Two of these lines, BT474 and UACC812, are amplified for HER2 and also express ER, and they, together with subclones resistant to L, T, and L+T, were used to better understand potential resistance mechanisms. Western blot analysis of the parental BT474 and its resistant subclones showed that subclones resistant to T had reactivated the HER2 signaling pathway, while subclones resistant to L or L+T in which the HER receptor layer was more completely inhibited showed continued complete blockade of the HER2 pathway at the receptor layer but high levels of ER activity and phosphorylated-AKT. L, but not L+T, subclones after more prolonged time in culture did reactivate the HER pathway. UACC812 resistant cells were similar to BT474: T-resistant clones showed evidence of reactivation of HER signaling while L and L+T resistant clones showed enhanced ER activity. These cells showed no reactivation of HER signaling even after prolonged exposure in vitro. Consistent with these data, both BT474 and UACC812 T-resistant clones were still sensitive to and cell proliferation was inhibited by L. L-resistant clones, however, were also resistant to T. The potent anti-estrogen fulvestrant (F) was used to evaluate the role of ER in these resistant clones. T-resistant clones from both parental lines were resistant to F, indicating that ER had no role in resistance. In contrast, L and L+T-resistant clones, but not parental cells, were extremely sensitive to F with significant inhibition of cell proliferation in vitro.These data demonstrate that only partial inhibition of the HER2 pathway in breast cancer cells by T can be overcome by activating other components of the HER pathway. Resistance to more complete HER2 blockade with L or L+T requires reactivation of a redundant cell survival pathway, in this case ER, which is upregulated by HER2 blockade. Optimal therapy in those tumors may require both ER and HER2-targeted therapy.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 708.

Targeting Intrinsically-Resistant Breast Cancer Stem Cells with Gamma-Secretase Inhibitors

Background: We showed previously that tumorigenic, mammosphere-forming human breast cancer cells characterized by high CD44 and low or undetectable CD24 levels (CD44+/CD24-/low) are intrinsically resistant to conventional chemotherapy, and therefore may be responsible for cancer relapse. Our goal is identify novel drugs that selectively target these chemotherapy-resistant, tumor-initiating cells. Gene expression analysis of CD44+/CD24-/low cells vs. non-tumorigenic cells implicated the Notch, PI3K, and Hedgehog signaling pathways in regulating CD44+/CD24-/low cells. Thus, Notch, PI3K-AKT, and/or Hedgehog inhibitors may eliminate this unique subpopulation of cancer cells, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, and could improve patient outcome. To test this hypothesis, we are carrying out a series of preclinical and clinical studies using a gamma-secretase inhibitor (GSI) to target the Notch pathway. Methods: For preclinical studies, stable xenograft lines were generated by transplantation of human tumor biopsy fragments into immunocompromised mice. Mice with tumors (n = 32, 150-300 mm3) were randomized to four treatment groups: 1) vehicle control, 2) chemotherapy: docetaxel 3) drug: GSI (MRK-003, Merck) or 4) combination: docetaxel + MRK-003. During treatment, mice were monitored for tumor volume and body weight. At the end of the treatment cycle, residual tumors were characterized by FACS for the percentage of CD44+/CD24-/low cells, as well as for mammosphere-forming efficiency (MSFE) and tumor-initiating capacity. In a complementary clinical trial, breast cancer biopsies taken before and after treatment with GSI (MK-0752, Merck) were characterized for expression of CD44, CD24, and ALDH by FACS and for MSFE. Results and Conclusions: In preclinical studies using two independent triple negative xenograft lines, Notch pathway inhibition reduced mammosphere formation but did not affect tumor volume, with no consistent change in marker expression by FACS. In patient samples, MSFE also declined after the first cycle of GSI/chemotherapy and remained low after subsequent cycles. This response corresponded with a stasis of metastatic growth during five cycles of treatment, but metastatic burden began to increase coincident with the sixth cycle of treatment. Marker analysis suggests that GSI treatment chemo-sensitizes a significant proportion of the otherwise chemo-resistant CD44+/CD24-/low cell population indicating that they are dependent on the Notch pathway for survival. The decrease of MSFE in both preclinical and clinical studies suggests that inhibition of the Notch pathway by GSI may reduce the number of tumorigenic cancer cells that would otherwise remain after chemotherapy.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 48.

Combination antiHER therapeutics — efficacy of alternative dosing regimens in ER+/HER2+ breast cancer xenografts

Abstract #706

Background In preclinical studies of HER2 positive breast cancer, combination antiHER therapy with lapatinib (L) and trastuzumab (T), is more promising than monotherapy. To reduce side effects, cost and increase patient compliance, we investigated novel dosing and scheduling of the L and T combination to find alternative treatment approaches.
 Methods Mice bearing xenograft tumors of BT474 (ER+/HER2-amplified) cells were treated with control estrogen supplementation, with estrogen withdrawal alone, or with estrogen withdrawal in combination with one or two HER inhibitors (T-10mg/Kg biweekly, L-100mg/Kg 5d/wk) continuously. Alternative dosing regimens included limited treatment duration (14, 42 days), intermittent administration (14 days on/ 14 days off L+T treatment), and dose adjustments (1/2L + 1/2T). Tumor volumes and weights were evaluated weekly. Results were analyzed with the Fisher's exact test or survival analysis methods (Kaplan-Meier estimates) and generalized Wilcoxon test. Group sizes were designed to rule out relatively large decrements in efficacy [i.e. 99% complete regression (CR) vs 65% CR]. All statistical tests were two-sided.
 Results At day 140 of the experiment, BT474 xenografts demonstrate de novo resistance to estrogen deprivation (ED) and respond more rapidly to the drug combination (L+T) compared to L or T alone. CR rates for xenograft tumors treated for 14 or 42 days are similar to full therapy, although relapses occur earlier (47% relapses at day 140 for 14 day treatment, compared to 20% and 0% for 42 day or full treatment, respectively). Intermittent treatment is as effective as full dose (one mouse demonstrating small palpable growth following CR died before confirmation of relapse). Decreasing the dose did not substantially change the percentage of tumors that undergo complete regression (CR) and did not accelerate treatment failure [Progression Free Survival (PFS) at day 140], but was associated with longer time to complete tumor regression (TTR).
 
 Conclusion Intermittent treatment with combined T and L is a promising strategy that warrants further investigation. Though 42 days of therapy led to complete tumor regression, our preliminary data suggest that a sustained response is more likely to be achieved by treatment >42 days. Longer follow up is needed to determine the effectiveness of decreased dose regimens.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 706.

BRCA1 gene expression signature predicts for anthracycline-chemosensitivity in triple-negative breast cancer

Abstract #6039

Background: We used a previously published gene expression signature that can identify tumors from BRCA1 mutation carriers to evaluate its predictive value in triple-negative breast cancer as a marker for chemosensitivity to anthracycline-based chemotherapy. We proposed that based on preclinical evidence suggesting that BRCA1-deficient breast cancer cells are sensitive to DNA damaging drugs such as cisplatin and anthracyclines this gene expression profile may identify tumors with anthracycline chemosensitivity. Two previously published studies defined a gene expression signature associated with BRCA1 germline mutation.(1,2) In these studies, sporadic tumors were misclassified as BRCA1 tumors and further analysis revealed methylation of the BRCA1 promoter region and decreased BRCA1 gene expression. This finding suggests the possibility of identifying sporadic tumors with decreased BRCA1 activity.
 Methods: We selected from our database of a locally advanced breast cancer neoadjuvant trial all cases of triple negative breast cancer that received 4 cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide(AC, 60/200 mg/m2, every 3 weeks) prior to surgery. Pathologic response to chemotherapy was disappearance of all invasive cancer or microscopic residual disease. Tumoral gene expression profile previously obtained using Affymetrix U133A Chip was analyzed for an optimal set of 100 most differentially expressed genes distinguishing BRCA1 and sporadic triple negative tumors according to the previously identified gene signature by van't Veer et al.1 We performed unsupervised clustering to determine if this signature could classify a subtype of triple-negative tumors with "BRCAness" and to test our hypothesis that BRCA1-like tumors are more sensitive to AC. We then performed a supervised analysis to determine the most differentially expressed genes that could prospectively identify triple-negative sporadic tumors with “BRCAness” and tumors from BRCA1 germline carriers that are sensitive to anthracyclines.
 Results: Of the 66 patients enrolled in our neoadjuvant trial, 12 patient's tumors were triple negative and received preoperative AC. By unsupervised clustering, the gene expression pattern associated with BRCA1 cancers subdivided these sporadic cancers in to two groups: Group A(6/7 pathologic responders), and group B(5/5 non-pathologic responders). By supervised analysis, the most differentially overexpressed gene from the BRCA1 profile for AC sensitivity was YWHAH(14-3-3 eta polypeptide), while DKK3(Inhibitor of Wnt and Notch signaling pathway) and RPL23A were most overexpressed in all cases with adriamycin-resistance(p<0.01).
 Discussion: Triple negative sporadic breast cancer displaying “BRCAness” appear to be sensitive to AC chemotherapy. YWHAH, DKK3, and RPL23A are differentially expressed in anthracycline-sensitive versus resistant tumors. These three genes can potentially identify triple-negative breast cancers that exhibit “BRCAness” and sensitivity to DNA-damaging chemotherapy such as cisplatin, anthracycline, or PARP inhibitors.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6039.

Characteristics of a high-risk minority population

21141

Background: Black and Hispanic breast cancer patients have a worse outcome when compared to Caucasians. This could be due to socioeconomic, cultural or biologic factors. We hypothesized that host and tumor biologic characteristics associated with a poor outcome may be found more often in minority women. Methods: Race/ethnicity, menopausal status, tumor histological features, and patient characteristics including age and body mass index (BMI) were reviewed from a prospective neoadjuvant trial of docetaxel vs. doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide at Baylor College of Medicine Breast Center, from September 2002 to September 2006. The data were analyzed using Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, while the Kruskal-Wallis method was used to analyze BMI. Results: Of the 167 patients, 63% (n=105) were Caucasian, 15% (n=26) were Hispanic and 22% (n=36) were Black. The mean age was 47.6 years (range: 30–72). Fifty-nine percent were premenopausal. Overall, mean BMI was 29, with Caucasians having a mean BMI of 27.5, Hispanics with 29.8 and Blacks with a BMI of 34.6 (P<0.001). Sixty-five percent of the Caucasians and 58% of Hispanics were ER+ or PR+ versus 44% of Blacks (P=0.09). Sixteen percent of Caucasians were HER-2 positive compared to 4% of Hispanics and 9% of Blacks (p=0.25). In addition, 22% of Caucasians and 38% of Hispanics were ER-, PR-, HER-2- compared to 50% of tumors from Blacks (p=0.007). There was a trend linking BMI and triple negative status in breast cancers, which did not achieve statistical significance (p=0.21). Conclusion: In this study we found that black and Hispanic women were more likely to be obese and have ER-, PR-, HER-2- tumor phenotypes, both of which have been associated with poorer outcomes. Ongoing studies are being performed to elucidate the link between clinical and biological characteristics and understand the underlying molecular mechanisms associated with these findings.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.