Interaction of somatostatin receptors with G proteins and cellular effector systems

Somatostatin induces its multiple biological actions by interacting with a family of receptors, referred to as sstr1-sstr5. To determine the molecular mechanisms of action of somatostatin, we have investigated the interaction of the different cloned receptors with G proteins and cellular effector systems. sstr2, sstr3 and sstr5 associate with pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins and are able to mediate the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity by somatostatin. Two forms of sstr2, sstr2A and sstr2B, are generated by alternative splicing and differ in their C-terminal amino acid sequence. sstr2B couples to adenylyl cyclase whereas sstr2A does not. To investigate the basis for the differential coupling to adenylyl cyclase, we truncated sstr2B to the point of amino acid sequence divergence from sstr2A. The truncated sstr2B mediated the inhibition of cAMP formation by somatostatin, indicating that the C-terminus is not needed for coupling sstr2 to adenylyl cyclase. It is likely that the C-terminus of sstr2A hinders coupling to adenylyl cyclase. sstr2A associates with Gi alpha 3 and G(o) alpha but does not effectively interact with Gi alpha 1, a G protein that is necessary for coupling somatostatin receptors to adenylyl cyclase. The differential association of the splice variants with Gi alpha 1 may explain their contrasting effects on adenylyl cyclase activity. sstr3 also couples to adenylyl cyclase. Gi alpha 1 links sstr3 to adenylyl cyclase and mutagenesis studies have shown that the C-terminus of Gi alpha 1 is necessary for this coupling. The C-terminus of the Gi alpha proteins differ by only a few amino acid residues and only Gi alpha 1 couples sstr3 to adenylyl cyclase.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Differential regulation of the cloned kappa and mu opioid receptors

To directly compare the regulation of the cloned kappa and mu opioid receptor, we expressed them in the same cells, the mouse anterior pituitary cell line AtT-20. The coupling of an endogenous somatostatin receptor to adenylyl cyclase and an inward rectifier K+ current has been well characterized in these cells, enabling us to do parallel studies comparing the regulation of both the kappa and the mu receptor to this somatostatin receptor. We show that the kappa receptor readily uncoupled from the K+ current and from adenylyl cyclase after a 1 h pretreatment with agonist, as indicated by the loss in the ability of the agonist to induce a functional response. The desensitization of the kappa receptor was homologous, as the ability of somatostatin to mediate inhibition of adenylyl cyclase or potentiation of the K+ current was not altered by kappa receptor desensitization. The mu receptor uncoupled from the K+ current but not adenylyl cyclase after a 1 h pretreatment with agonist. Somatostatin was no longer able to potentiate the K+ current after mu receptor desensitization, thus this desensitization was heterologous. Interestingly, pretreatment with a somatostatin agonist caused uncoupling of the mu receptor but not the kappa receptor from the K+ current. These results show that in the same cell line, after a 1 h pretreatment with agonist, the kappa receptor displays homologous regulation, whereas the mu receptor undergoes only a heterologous form of desensitization. mu receptor desensitization may lead to the alterations of diverse downstream events, whereas kappa receptor regulation apparently occurs at the level of the receptor itself. Broad alterations of non-opioid systems by the mu receptor could be relevant to the addictive properties of mu agonists. Comparison of kappa and mu receptor regulation may help define the properties of the mu receptor which are important in the development of addiction, tolerance, and withdrawal to opioid drugs. These are the first studies to directly compare the coupling of the kappa and mu receptors to two different effectors in the same mammalian expression system.

Molecular regulation of opioid receptors

Opioid actions are initiated at membrane receptors which couple to cellular effectors through G protein-mediated pathways. In the central nervous system opioids reduce neuronal activity through the inhibition of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels, the activation of K+ channels and the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. A significant clinical limitation to opioid therapy is the development of tolerance, a biological event that has been linked to agonist effects at the receptor level. Molecular studies on the consequences of opioid receptor regulation will provide a better understanding of the cellular mechanisms involved in the agonist-mediated events in tolerance development.

Evidence that a novel somatostatin receptor couples to an inward rectifier potassium current in AtT-20 cells

The recent cloning of five somatostatin receptors has made it possible to begin screening for selective ligands in order to begin characterization of these receptor subtypes expressed endogenously. We have recently reported the characterization of ligands selective for SSTR2 and SSTR5 [Raynor K. et al. (1993) Molec. Pharmac. 43, 838-844; 44, 385-392]. Both of these somatostatin receptor subtypes are endogenously expressed in the mouse pituitary cell line AtT-20 [O'Carroll A.-M. et al. (1992) Molec. Pharmac. 42, 939-946; Patel Y. C. et al. (1994) J. biol. Chem. 269, 1506-1509; Tallent M. et al. (1996) Neuroscience 71, 1073-1081]. Using these selective ligands, as well as other somatostatin analogs, we have characterized the somatostatin receptor which couples to the inward rectifier K+ current in AtT-20 cells. This receptor is sensitive to hexapeptide analogs of somatostatin, but insensitive to octapeptide analogs. This pharmacological profile is distinct from any of the cloned somatostatin receptors and therefore may represent a novel receptor. Somatostatin has been shown to potentiate an inward rectifying K+ channel in many different types of neuronal and non-neuronal cells. The activation of this current is thought to be an important mechanism by which somatostatin inhibits neuronal firing and decreases neurotransmitter and hormone release [Mihara S. et al. (1987) J. Physiol. 390, 335-355]. Therefore, the novel somatostatin receptor coupling to the inward rectifier in AtT-20 cells may be important in somatostatin's role in regulating neurotransmission and hormone release.

Molecular and functional properties of somatostain receptor subtypes

Identification of the ligand binding domains of the somatostain (SRIF) receptors may facilitate the rational development of new SRIF ligands. To identify ligand-binding domains of sst1, and sst2, we tested a series of chimeras. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we found that to bind with high affinity to sst2, the sst2 agonists MK678 and SMS-201-995 require a four amino acid sequence (FDFV) at the border of the third extracellular loop and transmembrane 7. Transference of residue 294 in msst2 to sst1 conferred onto sst1 the ability to bind SMS-201-995 and other octapeptides. Cyclic peptides with a phenylalanine adjacent to the D-Trp appear to interact with Phe294 of sst2, whereas hexapeptides with a tyrosine adjacent to the D-Trp, such as MK 678 and BIM 23027, did not interact with the Phe294. We have recently identified a peptide that selectively binds to human (h)sst1, with 100-fold higher affinity than for the other cloned SRIF receptor subtypes. The second extracellular loop of sst1 is critical for this peptide to bind. This contrasts with the sites involved in binding of sst2 agonists and indicates that the two receptors have distinct ligand-binding domains. G proteins couple SRIF receptors to multiple cellular effector systems, including adenylyl cyclase and ionic conductance channels. A critical cellular action of SRIF is the inhibition of Ca2+ influx, which may be responsible for its blockade of hormone and neurotransmitter release. Various studies suggest that both sst2 and sst5 endogenously expressed in AtT-20 cells can couple to L-type Ca2+ channels; the coupling was pertussis toxin-sensitive. The coupling of sst2 to the Ca2+ channels was relatively resistant to desensitisation; 5 hours of pretreatment with MK 678 did not attenuate MK 678 inhibition of the Ca2+ current. In contrast, the sst5 receptors were desensitised by 1 hour of pretreatment with BIM 23052. Thus, the coupling of the two receptors to the Ca2+ channel could be differentially regulated. The SRIF receptor subtype coupling to the Ca2+ channel could also be distinguished by a unique antagonist, the peptide L362,855, which binds with high affinity to cloned sst5.

Somatostatin receptor subtypes SSTR2 and SSTR5 couple negatively to an L-type Ca2+ current in the pituitary cell line AtT-20

The somatostatin receptor subtypes SSTR2 and SSTR5 mediate distinct endocrine and exocrine functions of somatostatin and may also be involved in mediating the neuromodulatory actions of somatostatin in the brain. To investigate whether these receptors couple to voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels, SSTR2 and SSTR5 selective agonists were tested for their effects on AtT-20 cells using whole cell patch clamp techniques. The SSTR2 selective agonist MK 678 inhibited Ca2+ currents in AtT-20 cells. The effects of MK 678 were reversible and blocked by pertussis toxin pretreatment, suggesting that SSTR2 couples to the L-type Ca2+ channels via G proteins. Other SSTR2-selective agonists, including BIM 23027 and NC8-12, were able to inhibit the Ca2+ currents in these cells. The SSTR5 selective agonist BIM 23052 also inhibited the Ca2+ currents in these cells and this effect was reversible and blocked by pertussis toxin treatment. The ability of SSTR5 to mediate inhibition of the Ca2+ current was greatly attenuated by pretreatment with the SSTR5-selective agonist BIM 23052, whereas SSTR2-mediated inhibition of the Ca2+ current was not altered by pretreatment with the SSTR2-selective agonist MK 678. Thus, the SSTR2 and SSTR5 couplings to the Ca2+ current are differentially regulated. The peptide L362,855, which we previously have shown to have high affinity for the cloned SSTR5, had minimal effects on Ca2+ currents in AtT-20 cells at concentrations up to 100 nM and did not alter the ability of MK 678 to inhibit Ca2+ currents. However, it completely antagonized the effects of the SSTR5-selective agonist BIM 23052 on the Ca2+ currents. L362,855 is an antagonist/partial agonist at SSTR5 since it can reduce Ca2+ currents in these cells at concentrations above 100 nM. L362,855 is also an antagonist/partial agonist at the cloned rat SSTR5 expressed in CHO cells since it is able to block the inhibition of cAMP accumulation induced by somatostatin at concentrations below 100 nM but at higher concentrations can inhibit cAMP formation itself. Structural analysis of L362,855 reveals that only a single hydroxyl group at residue seven in the peptide is needed to convert the compound from an antagonist/partial agonist to a full agonist at SSTR5. These studies reveal that two different somatostatin receptor subtypes, SSTR2 and SSTR5, can mediate the inhibition of an L-type Ca2+ channel in AtT-20 cells by somatostatin. The receptor subtype responses can be distinguished by selective agonists and antagonists and are regulated differently by agonist pretreatment. The inhibition of Ca2+ influx into endocrine cells and neurons may be a major cellular mechanism by which somatostatin modulates hormone and neurotransmitter release. Our results reveal that at least two receptor subtypes can mediate this cellular response.

The cloned kappa opioid receptor couples to an N-type calcium current in undifferentiated PC-12 cells

We have recently reported the cloning of a mouse kappa opioid receptor cDNA. Following transfection of the kappa receptor cDNA into COS-1 cells, a receptor is expressed with the pharmacological specificity of a kappa opioid receptor. To further analyse its functional properties, we have stably expressed the kappa opioid receptor in undifferentiated PC-12 cells, a pheochromocytoma clonal cell line, which do not endogenously express this receptor. We have previously shown that kappa opioid agonists selectively bind to these PC-12 membranes with high affinity. Here we show that kappa selective agonists are able to inhibit accumulation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate in a stereoselective manner. Further, the kappa agonist U-50,488 is able to inhibit an N-type calcium current in a pertussis toxin sensitive manner; this inhibition is blocked by the kappa-selective antagonist norbinaltorphimine. Inhibition of the calcium current via the kappa receptor is stereoselective as the agonist levorphanol is able to mediate inhibition whereas in the same cells dextrorphan is ineffective. This is the first demonstration that the cloned kappa opioid receptor functionally couples to a calcium current, as has been reported for kappa receptors expressed endogenously in the nervous system. Kappa opioid receptors are thought to be important in pain pathways, learning and memory deficits, and seizure activity. A major physiological action of the dynorphins, the endogenous ligands of the kappa receptor, is thought to be inhibition of neurotransmitter release at presynaptic terminals. N-type calcium channels may be important in neurotransmitter release.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Gi alpha 1 selectively couples somatostatin receptors to adenylyl cyclase in pituitary-derived AtT-20 cells

Somatostatin (SRIF) receptors are coupled to the catalytic subunit of adenylyl cyclase via pertussis toxin-sensitive guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins (G proteins). To identify which G proteins link SRIF receptors to adenylyl cyclase, G(o) alpha, Gi alpha, and its different subtypes were individually blocked in AtT-20 cell membranes with G alpha subtype-selective antisera. Antiserum directed against the carboxyl-terminal region of Gi alpha blocked SRIF inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity, and this effect was prevented by the peptide to which the antiserum was generated. However, antiserum directed against the carboxyl-terminal region of G(o) alpha did not affect SRIF inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity, indicating that Gi alpha couples SRIF receptors to adenylyl cyclase but G(o) alpha does not. Peptide-directed antisera against Gi alpha 1 completely blocked SRIF inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity. In contrast, antisera directed against either Gi alpha 2 or Gi alpha 3 did not affect the actions of SRIF. The results of these studies indicate that Gi alpha 1 selectively couples SRIF receptors to the catalytic subunit of adenylyl cyclase in AtT-20 cell membranes. Because previous studies have shown that SRIF receptors are able to couple to Gi alpha 1, Gi alpha 3, and G(o) alpha, the results suggest that different G proteins may specify the coupling of SRIF receptors to distinct cellular effector systems.