Evolution of clinical nature, treatment and survival of locally recurrent rectal cancer: Comparative analysis of two national cross-sectional cohorts

BACKGROUND

In the Netherlands, use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer declined after guideline revision in 2014. This decline is thought to affect the clinical nature and treatability of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Therefore, this study compared two national cross-sectional cohorts before and after the guideline revision with the aim to determine the changes in treatment and survival of LRRC patients over time.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection of primary rectal cancer in 2011 (n = 2094) and 2016 (n = 2855) from two nationwide cohorts with a 4-year follow up were included. Main outcomes included time to LRRC, synchronous metastases at time of LRRC diagnosis, intention of treatment and 2-year overall survival after LRRC.

RESULTS

Use of neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for the primary tumour decreased from 88.5% to 60.0% from 2011 to 2016. The 3-year LRRC rate was not significantly different with 5.1% in 2011 (n = 114, median time to LRRC 16 months) and 6.3% in 2016 (n = 202, median time to LRRC 16 months). Synchronous metastasis rate did not significantly differ (27.2% vs 33.7%, p = 0.257). Treatment intent of the LRRC shifted towards more curative treatment (30.4% vs. 47.0%, p = 0.009). In the curatively treated group, two-year overall survival after LRRC diagnoses increased from 47.5% to 78.7% (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Primary rectal cancer patients in 2016 were treated less often with neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy, while LRRC rates remained similar. Those who developed LRRC were more often candidate for curative intent treatment compared to the 2011 cohort, and survival after curative intent treatment also improved substantially.

MR-Guided Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Pancreatic Oligometastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Patients with pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have been reported to have an unusually favorable prognosis. Traditionally, treatment for these pancreatic oligometastases comprises either surgical resection or systemic therapy. However, stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SAbR) may be an effective, non-invasive alternative strategy, provided that it shows acceptable toxicity and high local control rates among treated patients.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We reviewed all patients treated with MR-guided SABR for pancreatic oligometastases from renal cell carcinoma at a single institute. We explored adverse events (AE), freedom from local progression (FFLP), progression-free survival (PFS), and freedom from start of systemic therapy (FFST) among treated patients. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to describe the time-to-event endpoints.

RESULTS

From June 2019 to September 2022, we identified 11 patients treated with MR-guided SAbR to 31 pancreatic oligometastases from RCC. Patients had a mean age of 65.6 years (±6.8) and had a median of 3 irradiated pancreatic metastases (range 1-7). Metastases were treated with 5 fractions of 7 Gy (n = 1 metastasis) or 8 Gy (n = 30 metastases) per fraction. One grade 3 adverse event (bleeding) was observed. At a median follow-up of 10.5 months (range 5-46 months), estimated FFLP at 1 year was 100%. 1y-PFS was 83% (95% CI 58-100%), and 1y-FFST was 91% (95% CI 75-100%).

CONCLUSION

First exploration of MR-guided SAbR to pancreatic oligometastases from RCC indicates that it can be an effective and safe treatment option. Moreover, MR-guided SAbR may facilitate deferral of systemic therapy initiation in this select group of patients with favorable prognosis.

Interobserver Variation in Tumor Delineation of Liver Metastases using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Magnetic Resonance (MR-) guided stereotactic body radiotherapy enables accurate treatment of liver metastases. Despite the accuracy of treatment delivery, one of the main uncertainties is the variation in tumor delineation, which requires additional treatment margins. The aim of this study was to quantify the interobserver variation (IOV) in MRI based delineation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) of liver metastases.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A cohort of 20 liver metastases treated on a MR-Linac were consecutively selected per primary tumor (colorectal (6), breast (6) and lung (8)). Planning MRI scans (T1 weighted with IV-contrast) were collected and anonymized. GTV delineation guidelines and case-specific information were provided to 8 radiation oncologists from 8 institutions. All cases were quantitatively reviewed and delineations with major violations of the guidelines were marked as outliers (such as contours including a vein or excluding obvious parts of a tumor). IOV was quantified by comparing individual delineations with the median contour and calculating the standard deviation (SD) and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95). Analyses were conducted on all delineations and on a subgroup excluding outliers per case to distinguish between accuracy of delineation and individual guideline interpretation. Sphericity was calculated from the volume and surface area of all delineations. Correlation between SD and sphericity was determined using Spearman's rs. Differences in SD between primary tumors were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

The median volume of all metastases was 6.5 cc (IQR 3.7 - 29.8 cc) and sphericity was 0.84 (IQR 0.80 - 0.87) based on all contours (Table 1). The SD was 1.6 mm and the median HD95 was 2.7 mm. In the subgroup analysis, one (in 15 cases) or two (in 5 cases) delineations were excluded. Subgroup analyses showed a SD of 1.1 mm and median HD 95 of 2.6mm. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed no difference (p = 0.59) in SD between primary tumors. There was a significant negative correlation between IOV (SD) and sphericity (rs = -0.70; p = 0.008). Table 1: Overview of SD (mm), HD95 (mm) and volume (cc) of all observers and subgroup per primary tumor and in total CONCLUSION: MRI based GTV delineation variation of liver metastases is 1.1 - 1.6 mm, which is smaller than anticipated, although significant outliers (HD95 up to 3.9 mm) were present. Use of common delineation guidelines will ensure consistency in contouring and have the potential to decrease treatment margins when taking IOV into account.

Outcomes of Tolerability, Acute Toxicity and Quality of Life from MR-Guided Radiation Therapy (1.5T MR-Linac) for Liver Metastases in the MOMENTUM Study

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) offers an important treatment option for metastatic liver tumors. The introduction of magnetic resonance (MR) guided SBRT has paved the way for optimal tumor visualization and daily plan adaptation. The purpose of this study is to review tolerability of MR-guided SBRT of liver metastases and to present early toxicity and quality of life outcomes.

MATERIALS/METHODS

All patients with liver metastases who were treated on a 1.5T MR-Linac and enrolled in the MOMENTUM study (NTC04075305) were included. Patients were treated between April 2019 and December 2022 in 5 different institutes across 3 countries. Descriptive statistics were used to present the tolerability of treatment, toxicity (CTCAE v5.0) and quality of life outcomes (QLQ C30 and EQ 5D-5L) at baseline and 3 months after treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 127 patients with liver metastases were included in the analysis. There were 64 females and 63 men, with a median age of 66 years (range 31 to 93). The median ECOG-score was 0 (range 0-2). The most common primary origin was colorectal cancer (66%), followed by bronchus and lung cancer (12%), with ocular melanoma, pancreatic and breast cancer being joint third (all 6-7%). Fractionation schedules ranged from 12 - 67.5 Gy in 2 - 12 fractions. The most commonly prescribed fractionation dose was 60 Gy in 3-5 fractions (53% and 13% respectively) and 50 Gy in 5 fractions (11%). Completion data was available for 116 patients. 112 patients (97%) received all fractions. 4 Patients (3%) did not complete treatment due to technical issues and 2 of the 4 receiving no treatment on the MR-Linac. Physician reported toxicity at 3 months was recorded for 82 patients (66%). No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were reported. There were 12 grade 3 toxicities reported in 6 (7%) patients with 5 deemed radiation therapy related (Table 1) and 34 grade 2 toxicities in 21 (26%) patients.

CONCLUSION

We have presented the largest cohort (to our knowledge) of 127 patients treated using 1.5 Tesla MR Guidance for metastatic liver tumors. 97% of treatments were completed successfully with all treatments being well tolerated. Acute grade 3 toxicity was reported in 7% of patients with no grade 4 or 5 toxicities present. These outcomes suggest radiotherapy on the MR-Linac is a safe and promising treatment for patients with liver metastases. Additional prospective follow up is ongoing for late toxicity events and long-term control data. Table 1: Grade ≥3 toxicity at 3 months related to radiation therapy (total No. of patients was 82) There was QLQ-C30 data on 89 patients at baseline and on 62 patients at 3 months. At 3 months the median score was worse for physical functioning, VAS score and pain.

Toward Global Consensus for MR-Guided Treatment Planning for Pancreatic Tumors on a 1.5 T MR-Linac

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

MR-guided SBRT with a 1.5 T MR-Linac is a relatively new therapy for pancreatic tumors with varying expertise levels. Moreover, treatment planning in the upper abdomen can be challenging as target coverage is often compromised by dosimetric constraints of abutting bowel structures. This may lead to large differences between centers in protocols, practices. To increase harmonization a worldwide consortium was founded among 1.5 T MR-Linac users. In this work we report on the outcome of the first phase within this collaboration, which is the assessment of the baseline variation between the treatment planning protocols and subsequent dose distributions.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Twelve centers across three continents (North America, Europe, and Australia) participated in this consortium. Each center was sent the same two anonymized data sets reflecting two cases of locally advanced pancreatic cancer of different complexity levels. The data sets included a CT scan, a predefined structure set containing the gross target volume (GTV) and the OARs, a brief medical history, tumor motion characteristics, and auxiliary CT and MR imaging. Centers were asked to create an MRgRT treatment plan according to their clinical five-fraction SBRT protocol, using their institutional margin structures, beam setup, target prescriptions, and OAR constraints. Key DVH parameters that were evaluated are D99%, D90%, D50%, D1% for the GTV and D0.5cc for the duodenum, small bowel, and stomach.

RESULTS

In general, large variations were observed in planning objectives and machine settings yielding widely varying inhomogeneous dose distributions to both the tumor and organs at risk (Table 1). This was especially manifest for case 2 where the tumor abutted with both the duodenum and small bowel over a trajectory of multiple centimeters. Not only were different trade-offs between target coverage and OAR sparing observed, but also different strategies for optimizing the integral dose to the tumor.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate a large variety in the treatment planning strategies that could well translate to differences in outcome. Based on this first evaluation, the consortium will work towards a collective consensus protocol with a second evaluation round after internal discussions.

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Rectal Cancer Patients Treated on a 1.5T MR-Linac within the MOMENTUM Study

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

With the 1.5 MR-Linac, planning target volume (PTV) margins for the treatment of rectal cancer can be reduced by 1/3 compared to conventional radiotherapy techniques. This allows better sparing of surrounding tissues, potentially resulting in less toxicity and greater patient comfort. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after rectal cancer treatment on a 1.5T MR-Linac have not yet been reported. Through international collaboration, the 'Multi-OutcoMe EvaluatioN of radiation Therapy Using the MR-Linac (MOMENTUM)' registry provides the unique opportunity to study these outcomes in a relatively large patient cohort. The aim of this study is to assess PROs of rectal cancer patients treated on a 1.5T MR-Linac within MOMENTUM.

MATERIALS/METHODS

An international, prospective, observational cohort study was performed, including all patients with rectal cancer who were treated with 25 Gy in five fractions on an MR-Linac in three institutions located in the Netherlands (2019-2022). Patient-reported outcomes were measured using the general EORTC QLQ-C30 and colorectal cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaires. Scores were calculated according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. A high score for a functional scale represents a high functioning level, while a high score for a symptom scale represents a high symptomatology level. Outcomes were measured at regular time points (i.e., at baseline and after three, 6 and 12 months follow-up). Patients who underwent tumor resection were censored at the date of surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 152patients were included, with a median follow-up of 17 (interquartile range [IQR] 11-27) months. Of these, six patients (4%) had American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I disease, 11 patients (7%) stage II, 85 patients (56%) stage III, and 12 patients (8%) stage IV. A total of 87 patients (57%) reached three months follow-up without surgery, 60 patients (39%) six months, and 40 patients (26%) twelve months. At six months follow-up, 25/132 patients (19%) had received additional chemotherapy. The median global health score was 83 (interquartile range [IQR] 67-83) at baseline, 75 (IQR 58-83) at three months, 75 (IQR 58-83) at six months and 83 (IQR 83-100) at twelve months. In most QLQ-C30 domains, functional and symptom scores deteriorated during the first six months after treatment, but returned to or exceeded baseline scores at 12 months. Overall, treatment resulted in improved QLQ-CR29 scores after 12 months follow-up. Most frequently reported symptoms were blood and mucus in stool, urinary frequency, stool frequency and anxiety.

CONCLUSION

This study presents patient-reported outcomes in the currently largest cohort of patients with rectal cancer who received treatment on a 1.5T MR-Linac. Overall, treatment resulted in improved symptom management, and stabilized or improved quality of life outcomes after twelve months of follow-up.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy or best supportive care in patients with localized pancreatic cancer not receiving chemotherapy and surgery (PANCOSAR): a nationwide multicenter randomized controlled trial according to a TwiCs design

BACKGROUND

Significant comorbidities, advanced age, and a poor performance status prevent surgery and systemic treatment for many patients with localized (non-metastatic) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). These patients are currently treated with 'best supportive care'. Therefore, it is desirable to find a treatment option which could improve both disease control and quality of life in these patients. A brief course of high-dose high-precision radiotherapy i.e. stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) may be feasible.

METHODS

A nationwide multicenter trial performed within a previously established large prospective cohort (the Dutch Pancreatic cancer project; PACAP) according to the 'Trial within cohorts' (TwiCs) design. Patients enrolled in the PACAP cohort routinely provide informed consent to answer quality of life questionnaires and to be randomized according to the TwiCs design when eligible for a study. Patients with localized PDAC who are unfit for chemotherapy and surgery or those who refrain from these treatments are eligible. Patients will be randomized between SABR (5 fractions of 8 Gy) with 'best supportive care' and 'best supportive care' only. The primary endpoint is overall survival from randomization. Secondary endpoints include preservation of quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30 and -PAN26), NRS pain score response and WHO performance scores at baseline, and, 3, 6 and 12 months. Acute and late toxicity will be scored using CTCAE criteria version 5.0: assessed at baseline, day of last fraction, at 3 and 6 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months following SABR.

DISCUSSION

The PANCOSAR trial studies the added value of SBRT as compared to 'best supportive care' in patients with localized PDAC who are medically unfit to receive chemotherapy and surgery, or refrain from these treatments. This study will assess whether SABR, in comparison to best supportive care, can relieve or delay tumor-related symptoms, enhance quality of life, and extend survival in these patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trials, NCT05265663 , Registered March 3 2022, Retrospectively registered.

A nationwide randomized controlled trial on additional treatment for isolated local pancreatic cancer recurrence using stereotactic body radiation therapy (ARCADE)

BACKGROUND

Disease recurrence is the main cause of mortality after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In 20-30% of resected patients, isolated local PDAC recurrence occurs. Retrospective studies have suggested that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) might lead to improved local control in these patients, potentially having a beneficial effect on both survival and quality of life. The "nationwide randomized controlled trial on additional treatment for isolated local pancreatic cancer recurrence using stereotactic body radiation therapy" (ARCADE) will investigate the value of SBRT in addition to standard of care in patients with isolated local PDAC recurrence compared to standard of care alone, regarding both survival and quality of life outcomes.

METHODS

The ARCADE trial is nested within a prospective cohort (Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Project; PACAP) according to the 'Trials within Cohorts' design. All PACAP participants with isolated local PDAC recurrence after primary resection who provided informed consent for being randomized in future studies are eligible. Patients will be randomized for local therapy (5 fractions of 8 Gy SBRT) in addition to standard of care or standard of care alone. In total, 174 patients will be included. The main study endpoint is survival after recurrence. The most important secondary endpoint is quality of life.

DISCUSSION

It is hypothesized that additional SBRT, compared to standard of care alone, improves survival and quality of life in patients with isolated local recurrence after PDAC resection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT04881487 . Registered on May 11, 2021.

Impact of dose-escalated chemoradiation on quality of life in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: two year follow-up of the randomized RECTAL-BOOST trial

BACKGROUND

Dose-escalated chemoradiation (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) did not result in higher complete response rates, but initiated more tumor regression in the randomized XXXXX trial (Clinicaltrials.gov XXXXX). This study compared patient reported outcomes (PROs) between patients who received dose-escalated CRT (5 × 3Gy boost + CRT) or standard CRT for two years following randomization.

METHODS

Patients with LARC, participating in the XXXXX trial, filled out EORTC QLQ-C30 and CR29 questionnaires on quality of life (QoL) and symptoms at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months following start of treatment. Between-group differences in functional QoL domains were estimated using a linear mixed-effects model and expressed as effect size (ES). Symptom scores were compared using Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Patients treated with dose-escalated CRT (boost group, n=51) experienced a significantly stronger decline in global health at 3 and 6 months (ES -0,4 and ES -0,4), physical functioning at 6 months (ES -1,1), role functioning at 3 and 6 months (ES -0,8 and ES -0,6) and social functioning at 6 months (ES -0,6) compared to patients treated with standard CRT (control group, n=64). The boost group reported significantly more fatigue at 3 and 6 months (83% vs. 66% resp. 89% vs. 76%), pain at 3 and 6 months (67% vs. 36% resp. 80% vs. 44%) and diarrhea at 3 months (45% vs. 29%) compared to the control group. From 12 months onwards, QoL and symptoms were similar between groups, apart from more blood/mucus in stool in the boost group.

CONCLUSION

In patients with LARC, dose-escalated CRT resulted in a transient deterioration in global health, physical, role, and social functioning and more pain, fatigue and diarrhea at 3 and 6 months following start of treatment compared to standard CRT. From 12 months onwards, the impact of dose-escalated CRT on QoL largely resolved.

Microscopic resection margin status in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - A nationwide analysis

INTRODUCTION

First, this study aimed to assess the prognostic value of different definitions for resection margin status on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Second, preoperative predictors of direct margin involvement were identified.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This nationwide observational cohort study included all patients who underwent upfront PDAC resection (2014-2016), as registered in the prospective Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit. Patients were subdivided into three groups: R0 (≥1 mm margin clearance), R1 (<1 mm margin clearance) or R1 (direct margin involvement). Survival was compared using multivariable Cox regression analysis. Logistic regression with baseline variables was performed to identify preoperative predictors of R1 (direct).

RESULTS

595 patients with a median OS of 18 months (IQR 10-32 months) months were analysed. R0 (≥1 mm) was achieved in 277 patients (47%), R1 (<1 mm) in 146 patients (24%) and R1 (direct) in 172 patients (29%). R1 (direct) was associated with a worse OS, as compared with both R0 (≥1 mm) (hazard ratio (HR) 1.35 [95% and confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.70); P < 0.01) and R1 (<1 mm) (HR 1.29 [95%CI 1.01-1.67]; P < 0.05). No OS difference was found between R0 (≥1 mm) and R1 (<1 mm) (HR 1.05 [95% CI 0.82-1.34]; P = 0.71). Preoperative predictors associated with an increased risk of R1 (direct) included age, male sex, performance score 2-4, and venous or arterial tumour involvement.

CONCLUSION

Resection margin clearance of <1 mm, but without direct margin involvement, does not affect survival, as compared with a margin clearance of ≥1 mm. Given that any vascular tumour involvement on preoperative imaging was associated with an increased risk of R1 (direct) resection with upfront surgery, neoadjuvant therapy might be considered in these patients.

Technical feasibility of magnetic resonance fingerprinting on a 1.5T MRI-linac

Hybrid MRI-linac (MRL) systems enable daily multiparametric quantitative MRI to assess tumor response to radiotherapy. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) may provide time efficient means of rapid multiparametric quantitative MRI. The accuracy of MRF, however, relies on adequate control over system imperfections, such as eddy currents and [Formula: see text], which are different and not as well established on MRL systems compared to diagnostic systems. In this study we investigate the technical feasibility of gradient spoiled 2D MRF on a 1.5T MRL. We show with phantom experiments that the MRL generates reliable MRF signals that are temporally stable during the day and have good agreement with spin-echo reference measurements. Subsequent in-vivo MRF scans in healthy volunteers and a patient with a colorectal liver metastasis showed good image quality, where the quantitative values of selected organs corresponded with the values reported in literature. Therefore we conclude that gradient spoiled 2D MRF is feasible on a 1.5T MRL with similar performance as on a diagnostic system. The precision and accuracy of the parametric maps are sufficient for further investigation of the clinical utility of MRF for online quantitatively MRI-guided radiotherapy.

Pathological Complete Response Following Different Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is associated with better survival, less local recurrence, and less distant failure. Furthermore, pCR indicates that the rectum may have been preserved. This meta-analysis gives an overview of available neoadjuvant treatment strategies for LARC and analyzes how these perform in achieving pCR as compared with the standard of care.

Methods

Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Central bibliographic databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials in which patients received neoadjuvant treatment for MRI-staged nonmetastatic resectable LARC were included. The primary outcome was pCR, defined as ypT0N0. A meta-analysis of studies comparing an intervention with standard fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation (CRT) was performed.

Results

Of the 17 articles included in the systematic review, 11 were used for the meta-analysis. Addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine-based CRT resulted in significantly more pCR compared with fluoropyrimidine-based CRT only (OR 1.46), but at the expense of more ≥ grade 3 toxicity. Other treatment strategies, including consolidation/induction chemotherapy and short-course radiotherapy (SCRT), did not improve pCR rates. None of the included trials reported a benefit in local control or OS. Five-year DFS was significantly worse after SCRT-delay compared with CRT (59% vs. 75.1%, HR 1.93).

Conclusions

All included trials fail to deliver high-level evidence to show an improvement in pCR compared with standard fluoropyrimidine-based CRT. The addition of oxaliplatin might result in more pCR but at the expense of more toxicity. Furthermore, this benefit does not translate into less local recurrence or improved survival.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-08615-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The effect of neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and delayed surgery versus chemoradiation on postoperative outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer patients - A propensity score matched nationwide audit-based study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate differences in postoperative outcomes between short-course radiotherapy and delayed surgery (SCRT-delay) and chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

BACKGROUND

Previous trials suggest that SCRT-delay could serve as an adequate neoadjuvant treatment for LARC. Therefore, in frail LARC patients SCRT-delay is recommended as an alternative to CRT. However, data on postoperative outcomes after SCRT-delay in comparison to CRT is scarce.

METHODS

This was an observational study with data from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit (DCRA). LARC patients who underwent surgery (2014-2017) after an interval of ≥6 weeks were included. Missing values were replaced by multiple imputation. Propensity score matching (PSM), using age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, cT-stage and surgical procedure, was applied to create comparable groups. Differences in postoperative outcomes were analyzed using Chi-square test for categorical variables, independent sample t-test for continuous variables and Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric data.

RESULTS

2926 patients were included. In total, 288 patients received SCRT-delay and 2638 patients underwent CRT. Patients in the SCRT-delay group were older and had more comorbidities. Also, ICU-admissions and permanent colostomies were more common, as well as pulmonic, cardiologic, infectious and neurologic complications. After PSM, both groups comprised 246 patients with equivalent age, comorbidities and tumor stage. There were no differences in postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative complications were not increased in LARC patients undergoing SCRT-delay as neoadjuvant treatment. Regarding treatment-related complications, SCRT-delay is a safe alternative neoadjuvant treatment option for frail LARC patients.

Population-based study of morbidity risk associated with pathological complete response after chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer

Background

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer may induce a pathological complete response (pCR) but increase surgical morbidity due to radiation-induced fibrosis. In this study the association between pCR and postoperative surgical morbidity was investigated.

Methods

Patients in the Netherlands with rectal cancer who underwent nCRT followed by total mesorectal excision between 2009 and 2017 were included. Data were stratified into patients who underwent resection with creation of a primary anastomosis and those who had a permanent stoma procedure. The association between pCR and postoperative morbidity was investigated in univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

Results

pCR was observed in 976 (12·2 per cent) of 8003 patients. In 3472 patients who had a primary anastomosis, the presence of pCR was significantly associated with surgical complications (122 of 443 (27·5 per cent) versus 598 of 3029 (19·7 per cent) in those without pCR) and anastomotic leak (35 of 443 (7·9 per cent) versus 173 of 3029 (5·7 per cent) respectively). Multivariable analysis also showed associations between pCR and surgical complications (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1·53, 95 per cent c.i. 1·22 to 1·92) and pCR and anastomotic leak (adjusted OR 1·41, 1·03 to 2·05). Of 4531 patients with a permanent stoma, surgical complications were observed in 120 (22·5 per cent) of 533 patients with a pCR, compared with 798 (20·0 per cent) of 3998 patients with no pCR (adjusted OR 1·17, 0·94 to 1·46).

Conclusion

Patients with a pCR in whom an anastomosis was created were at increased risk of developing an anastomotic leak.

Postoperative surveillance of pancreatic cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to collect the best available evidence for diagnostic modalities, frequency, and duration of surveillance after resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

PDAC guidelines published after 2015 were collected. Furthermore, a systematic search of the literature on postoperative surveillance was performed in PubMed and Embase from 2000 to 2019. Articles comparing different diagnostic modalities and frequencies of postoperative surveillance in PDAC patients with regard to survival, quality of life, morbidity and cost-effectiveness were selected.

RESULTS

The literature search resulted in 570 articles. A total of seven guidelines and twelve original clinical studies were eventually evaluated. PDAC guidelines increasingly recommend a combination of tumor marker testing and computed tomography (CT) imaging every three to six months during the first two years after resection. These guidelines are, however, based on expert opinion and other low-level evidence. Prospective studies comparing different surveillance strategies are lacking. According to recent studies, surveillance with tumor markers and imaging at regular intervals results in the detection of PDAC recurrence before the onset of symptoms and more frequent administration of further therapy, such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence for recurrence-focused surveillance after PDAC resection is limited and contradictory. Consequently, recommendations on surveillance are conflicting. To define the clinical merit of recurrence-focused surveillance, patients who are most likely to benefit from early detection and treatment of PDAC recurrence need to be identified. To this purpose, well-designed prospective studies are needed, accounting for both economical and psychosocial implications of surveillance.

Inter-observer agreement in GTV delineation of bone metastases on CT and impact of MR imaging: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The use of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for bone metastases is increasing rapidly. Therefore, knowledge of the inter-observer differences in tumor volume delineation is essential to guarantee precise dose delivery. The aim of this study is to compare inter-observer agreement in bone metastases delineated on different imaging modalities.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients with bone metastases treated with SBRT were selected. All patients received CT and MR imaging in treatment position prior to SBRT. Five observers from three institutions independently delineated gross tumor volume (GTV) on CT alone, CT with co-registered MRI and MRI alone. Four contours per imaging modality per patient were available, as one set of contours was shared by 2 observers. Inter-observer agreement, expressed in generalized conformity index [CIgen], volumes of contours and contours center of mass (COM) were calculated per patient and imaging modality.

RESULTS

Mean GTV delineated on MR (45.9±52.0cm³) was significantly larger compared to CT-MR (40.2±49.4cm³) and CT (34.8±41.8cm³). A considerable variation in CIgen was found on CT (mean 0.46, range 0.15-0.75) and CT-MRI (mean 0.54, range 0.17-0.71). The highest agreement was found on MRI (mean 0.56, range 0.20-0.77). The largest variations of COM were found in anterior-posterior direction for all imaging modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Large inter-observer variation in GTV delineation exists for CT, CT-MRI and MRI. MRI-based GTV delineation resulted in larger volumes and highest consistency between observers.