1
|
Drake M, Worthington J, Frost J, Sanderson E, Cotterill N, Fader M, Hashim H, Macaulay M, Rees J, Robles L, Taylor G, Taylor J, Ridd M, Macneill S, Noble S, Lane A. Conservative management of male LUTS in primary care: A cluster randomised trial TRIUMPH. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(23)00049-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
|
2
|
Gaunt DM, Metcalfe C, Ridd M. The Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure in young children: responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference. Allergy 2016; 71:1620-1625. [PMID: 27232584 PMCID: PMC5113674 DOI: 10.1111/all.12942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Background The Patient‐Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) has been recommended as the core patient‐reported outcome measure for trials of eczema treatments. Using data from the Choice of Moisturiser for Eczema Treatment randomized feasibility study, we assess the responsiveness to change and determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the POEM in young children with eczema. Methods Responsiveness to change by repeated administrations of the POEM was investigated in relation to change recalled using the Parent Global Assessment (PGA) measure. Five methods of determining the MCID of the POEM were employed; three anchor‐based methods using PGA as the anchor: the within‐patient score change, between‐patient score change and sensitivity and specificity method, and two distribution‐based methods: effect size estimate and the one half standard deviation of the baseline distribution of POEM scores. Results Successive POEM scores were found to be responsive to change in eczema severity. The MCID of the POEM change score, in relation to a slight improvement in eczema severity as recalled by parents on the PGA, estimated by the within‐patient score change (4.27), the between‐patient score change (2.89) and the sensitivity and specificity method (3.00) was similar to the one half standard deviation of the POEM baseline scores (2.94) and the effect size estimate (2.50). Conclusions The Patient‐Oriented Eczema Measure as applied to young children is responsive to change, and the MCID is around 3. This study will encourage the use of POEM and aid in determining sample size for future randomized controlled trials of treatments for eczema in young children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. M. Gaunt
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration School of Social and Community Medicine University of BristolBristolUK
| | - C. Metcalfe
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration School of Social and Community Medicine University of BristolBristolUK
| | - M. Ridd
- Centre for Academic Primary Care School of Social and Community Medicine University of Bristol Bristol UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chalmers J, Simpson E, Apfelbacher C, Thomas K, Kobyletzki L, Schmitt J, Singh J, Svensson Å, Williams H, Abuabara K, Aoki V, Ardeleanu M, Awici‐Rasmussen M, Barbarot S, Berents T, Block J, Bragg A, Burton T, Bjerring Clemmensen K, Creswell‐Melville A, Dinesen M, Drucker A, Eckert L, Flohr C, Garg M, Gerbens L, Graff A, Hanifin J, Heinl D, Humphreys R, Ishii H, Kataoka Y, Leshem Y, Marquort B, Massuel M, Merhand S, Mizutani H, Murota H, Murrell D, Nakahara T, Nasr I, Nograles K, Ohya Y, Osterloh I, Pander J, Prinsen C, Purkins L, Ridd M, Sach T, Schuttelaar MA, Shindo S, Smirnova J, Sulzer A, Synnøve Gjerde E, Takaoka R, Vestby Talmo H, Tauber M, Torchet F, Volke A, Wahlgren C, Weidinger S, Weisshaar E, Wollenberg A, Yamaga K, Zhao C, Spuls P. Report from the fourth international consensus meeting to harmonize core outcome measures for atopic eczema/dermatitis clinical trials (HOME initiative). Br J Dermatol 2016; 175:69-79. [DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
4
|
Barbarot S, Abuabara K, Aubert H, Chalmers J, Flohr C, Hanifin J, Naldi L, Margolis D, Paul C, Rogers N, Ridd M, Schuttelaar ML, Simpson E, Tauber M, Volke A, Weidinger S, Wilkes S, Wollenberg A, Thomas K. Comment évaluer le contrôle à long terme de la dermatite atopique dans les essais randomisés ? Une revue systématique. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annder.2015.10.136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
5
|
Redaniel MT, Martin RM, Ridd M, Wade J, Jeffreys M. OP28 Association of diagnostic intervals with breast, prostate, lung and colorectal cancer survival in England: historical cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Br J Soc Med 2014. [DOI: 10.1136/jech-2014-204726.31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|