Comparative adherence of macitentan versus ambrisentan and bosentan in Australian patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a retrospective real-world database study

AIM

Bosentan, ambrisentan, and macitentan are endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), currently available in Australia for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This study assessed the comparative adherence of these ERAs for PAH in Australian patients.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study used data for adults with PAH from the Services Australia 10% Pharmaceuticals Benefits Scheme (PBS) dataset (01/2006-10/2020). The primary outcome was treatment adherence (i.e. receiving ≥80% of ERA doses over 12 months). Secondary outcomes were time to treatment change (add-on or switch) and overall survival.

RESULTS

The study included 436 patients who took bosentan (n = 200), ambrisentan (n = 69), or macitentan (n = 167). Treatment adherence was significantly greater in patients who received macitentan (65.3%) versus ambrisentan (56.5%) and bosentan (58.0%), with odds ratios (ORs; 95% CI) of 0.51 (0.30-0.88; p = 0.016) for bosentan versus macitentan and 0.48 (0.24-0.96; p = 0.037) for ambrisentan versus macitentan. The median time to treatment change was 47.2 and 43.4 months for bosentan and ambrisentan, respectively (not calculated for macitentan because of insufficient duration of data).

LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

Real-world data for Australian patients with PAH showed that treatment adherence for ERAs was suboptimal. Adherence was higher for macitentan compared with ambrisentan and bosentan.

Comparative Treatment Persistence and Adherence to Endothelin Receptor Antagonists Among Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Japan: A Real-World Administrative Claims Database Study

INTRODUCTION

Real-world data on the comparative effectiveness of endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs; macitentan, bosentan, ambrisentan) for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), particularly in Asian countries, are scarce. We evaluated the persistence of these ERAs before and after macitentan approval in Japan (2015).

METHODS

We used real-world data from the Japanese Medical Data Vision administrative claims database between April 2008 and November 2020. Patients with PAH were identified from the dataset. Persistence to ERA treatment before and after approval of macitentan in Japan was defined as the time between start of the index ERA and treatment discontinuation or death. Propensity score adjustment was applied to minimize confounding effects among treatment groups.

RESULTS

In the pre-macitentan approval cohort, 153 and 51 patients received bosentan and ambrisentan, respectively. In the post-macitentan approval cohort, 331, 284, and 91 patients received macitentan, bosentan, and ambrisentan, respectively. Unadjusted median persistence for ambrisentan- and bosentan-treated patients was 19 and 10 months, respectively (adjusted HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.61-1.24]; P = 0.434 [bosentan as reference]). In the post-macitentan approval cohort, unadjusted median persistence was 18 months for macitentan-treated patients versus 6 and 8 months for ambrisentan- and bosentan-treated patients, respectively. Adjusted HRs for ambrisentan and bosentan were 1.48 (95% CI 1.12-1.95; P = 0.006) and 1.63 (95% CI 1.30-2.04; P < 0.001 [macitentan as reference]), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world data for Japanese patients with PAH showed that persistence was significantly higher for macitentan, versus ambrisentan and bosentan, since its approval.

Antidepressant prescribing patterns in Australia

BACKGROUND

The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for mood disorders (MDcpg²⁰¹⁵ and MDcpg²⁰²⁰) provide evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for managing mood disorders.

AIMS

We examined Australian real-world prescribing habits to determine whether management in clinical practice aligned with MDcpg²⁰¹⁵ recommendations.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients ≥16 years old who had been dispensed a Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS)-listed antidepressant between July 2013 and June 2019 was conducted using Australian Commonwealth Department of Human Services PBS 10% sample data.

RESULTS

Between July 2013 and June 2019, 239 944 patients in Australia commenced antidepressant treatment. Of these, 22% (52 694 patients) received a second treatment (a new class of treatment after a period of discontinuation or additional antipsychotic therapy) and 6% (15 741 patients) received a third treatment. Patients were initially prescribed primarily selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs; 52% of prescriptions) or tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs; 25%), even though TCAs are not recommended for first-line treatment. Fewer than one-quarter of patients were prescribed serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (13%) or other agents (10%). General practitioners (GPs) were more likely to initiate TCAs than psychiatrists (22% v. 7%).Once initiated, the overall median time patients remained on treatment was 4.5 months; this was highest with SSRIs (5.8 months) and lowest with TCAs (0.9 months).

CONCLUSIONS

First-line prescribing broadly follows guidelines. GP and psychiatrist prescribing patterns differ, perhaps reflecting different patient groups and the need to tailor treatment to individuals. Future guidelines should aim to capture the different presentations and complexity of depression.

An Australian Real-World Study of Treatment Persistence of Ustekinumab in Crohn's Disease

Introduction

Real-world treatment persistence to ustekinumab for Crohn’s disease (CD) was studied using Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) data. Demographic and treatment pattern characteristics were also investigated.

Methods

Our retrospective cohort analysis included PBS 10% sample data for ustekinumab from September 2017 to March 2020, and for other biologics from October 2007 to capture earlier line(s) of therapy. Included patients received ustekinumab for CD prescribed by a gastroenterologist. Treatment persistence overall and by prior biologic experience, mono- or combination therapy, sex and age were estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of age, sex and line of therapy on persistence.

Results

Data were available for 301 patients. Of these, 58.8% were female and 76.7% were aged 26–65 years. Median follow-up from first ustekinumab dispense was 16 months. Median persistence to ustekinumab had not been reached. Twelve-month persistence to ustekinumab was 82.6% (95% CI 78.1–87.5%). Patients receiving ustekinumab as their first biologic therapy had 12-month persistence of 88.0% (80.8–95.9%) compared to 80.6% (75.0–86.6%) for patients who had previously received other biologic therapies (p=0.059). The adjusted analysis showed a trend to longer persistence for patients receiving ustekinumab as their first biologic therapy compared to biologic experienced patients (HR 1.86 (95% CI 0.95–3.63), p=0.070). Males had higher persistence to ustekinumab than females (HR 0.36 (0.20–0.66), p<0.001). Receiving ustekinumab as a monotherapy or in combination with azathioprine, mercaptopurine, 5ASAs, methotrexate, or corticosteroids had no effect on persistence (p=0.22).

Conclusion

In an Australian real-world setting, persistence to ustekinumab was demonstrated to be over 80% at 12 months. Use as monotherapy or in combination with other therapy for CD did not affect persistence. Differences in treatment persistence by gender and previous biologic use warrant further investigation as further long-term data becomes available.

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

https://youtu.be/e0qOSMerQ_8