1
|
Buschermöhle Y, Höltershinken MB, Erdbrügger T, Radecke JO, Sprenger A, Schneider TR, Lencer R, Gross J, Wolters CH. Comparing the performance of beamformer algorithms in estimating orientations of neural sources. iScience 2024; 27:109150. [PMID: 38420593 PMCID: PMC10901088 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
The efficacy of transcranial electric stimulation (tES) to effectively modulate neuronal activity depends critically on the spatial orientation of the targeted neuronal population. Therefore, precise estimation of target orientation is of utmost importance. Different beamforming algorithms provide orientation estimates; however, a systematic analysis of their performance is still lacking. For fixed brain locations, EEG and MEG data from sources with randomized orientations were simulated. The orientation was then estimated (1) with an EEG and (2) with a combined EEG-MEG approach. Three commonly used beamformer algorithms were evaluated with respect to their abilities to estimate the correct orientation: Unit-Gain (UG), Unit-Noise-Gain (UNG), and Array-Gain (AG) beamformer. Performance depends on the signal-to-noise ratios for the modalities and on the chosen beamformer. Overall, the UNG and AG beamformers appear as the most reliable. With increasing noise, the UG estimate converges to a vector determined by the leadfield, thus leading to insufficient orientation estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Buschermöhle
- Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
- Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Malte B Höltershinken
- Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
- Institute for Analysis and Numerics, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Tim Erdbrügger
- Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
- Institute for Analysis and Numerics, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Jan-Ole Radecke
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
- Center of Brain, Behavior and Metabolism, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Andreas Sprenger
- Center of Brain, Behavior and Metabolism, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
- Institute of Psychology II, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Till R Schneider
- Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rebekka Lencer
- Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
- Center of Brain, Behavior and Metabolism, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
- Institute of Translational Psychiatry, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Joachim Gross
- Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
- Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| | - Carsten H Wolters
- Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
- Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|