[ABO incompatibility and complications in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation]

Background

Hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) can be performed regardless of the ABO group compatibility between donor and recipient. ABO incompatibility in HSCT is related to pure red cell aplasia (PRCA), or passenger lymphocyte syndrome. The impact of ABO incompatibility on graft-versus-host disease and transplant-related mortality is controversial due to the heterogeneity of procedures carried out in different transplant centers.

Objective

To determine the prevalence of ABO incompatibility and its complications in a hematopoietic stem transplant unit.

Material and methods

An observational, retrospective study was carried out in patients undergoing HSCT from January 2014 to January 2020. All trasplant patients were included. Qualitative variables were analyzed using chi-squared test, and Wilcoxon and Student's t tests were used for quantitative variables. A p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

124 patients undergoing HSCT were analyzed, out of which 31 had ABO incompatibility, with a punctual prevalence of 24.4%; among them, 54% presented with major incompatibility, 32% minor incompatibility and 13% bidirectional incompatibility. Three cases of PRCA were reported. There were no differences in survival at one year in both groups.

Conclusions

The ABO incompatibility ant its complications were not related to the increase in mortality. Randomized prospective studies are required to define the role of ABO incompatibility in HSCT prognosis.

Utility of capsule endoscopy in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a complication of hematopoietic cell transplantation, and the small bowel is one of the main targets in the gastrointestinal tract. Capsule endoscopy is a safe procedure and can be useful in the diagnosis of GvHD. The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy with the histopathologic findings in GvHD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective diagnostic test study included all the patients with suspected GvHD that underwent gastroscopy and colonoscopy, with histopathologic evaluation of the biopsies taken, and capsule endoscopy, within the time frame of July 2015 and July 2019. Capsule endoscopy findings were compared with the histopathologic diagnosis, considered the gold standard.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with GvHD (7 [33%] women; 37 ± 11.9 years of age) were included, 20 (95%) of whom had acute GvHD. The median gastric transit time of the capsule was 55 minutes (20-113) and the median small bowel transit time was 261 minutes (238-434). The entire small bowel was visualized through capsule endoscopy in 17 cases (80.95%). The histopathologic findings and capsule endoscopy findings resulted in the diagnosis of GvHD in 17 and 16 cases, respectively. There was agreement between the histopathologic and capsule endoscopy findings in 18 cases (15 positive and 3 negative). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy were 88%, 75%, 94%, 60%, and 85%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Capsule endoscopy is a safe tool for the diagnosis of GvHD, with high sensitivity and positive predictive value, as well as moderate agreement with histopathologic findings.