Improving Type 2 Diabetes Patient Health Outcomes with Individualized Continuing Medical Education for Primary Care

INTRODUCTION

This study provided physicians with continuing medical education (CME) related to type 2 diabetes and evaluated the effect on patient health outcomes.

METHODS

Physicians participated in multi-platform CME (live and online programs) and completed a 25 item questionnaire for patient baseline (3-months pre-CME activity) and follow-up visits (≥6-months post-CME activity). Changes in physician knowledge and patient health outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

34 physicians completed both phases of the CME curricula and submitted data for 264 patients. Significant improvements were observed in physician knowledge after the live (p < 0.05) and online programs (p < 0.0005). Mean patient glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) absolute reduction of 1.15% (p < 0.0001) was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

CME is an effective tool to close established practice gaps and potentially help improve patient health outcomes.

Abstract P1-10-07: Phase 3 comparison of APF530 versus ondansetron, each in a guideline-recommended 3-drug regimen for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting due to anthracycline + cyclophosphamide (AC)–based highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) regimens: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the MAGIC trial

Background:Managing delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) associated with HEC is an unmet need. AC-based HEC is often administered to breast cancer patients (pts), a mostly female, high-CINV-risk population. APF530, an extended-release formulation of granisetron, demonstrated superior complete response (CR; no emesis [vomiting, retching] + no rescue medication use) in delayed-phase (&gt;24-120 h) CINV with HEC (ASCO criteria) vs ondansetron (Ond) (65% vs 57%, P=0.014), each combined with a neurokinin-1 antagonist and dexamethasone (Dex) (NCT02106494). This post hoc analysis evaluated efficacy and safety of APF530 in pts receiving AC-based therapy.

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial, pts scheduled to receive single-day HEC were stratified by cisplatin ≥50 mg/m2 yes/no and randomized 1:1 to APF530 500 mg SC (granisetron 10 mg) or Ond 0.15 mg/kg IV. Pts received concomitant Dex 12 mg IV and fosaprepitant 150 mg IV on day 1 and oral Dex on days 2-4. The primary end point was CR in the delayed phase. Secondary and other end points included CR in acute (0-24 h) and overall (0-120 h) phases, and complete control (CC; CR and no more than mild nausea) and total response (TR; CR and no nausea) in acute, delayed, and overall phases. Rates were compared using 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for treatment differences; post hoc analysis was not powered to detect treatment differences in the AC subgroup. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), injection-site reactions (ISRs), laboratory parameters, and vital signs.

Results: A total of 589/902 pts (65%) in the modified intent-to-treat population received AC-based HEC (APF530 291, Ond 298). Baseline demographics were balanced between treatment arms. The majority of pts in the AC subgroup were female (APF530 99%, Ond 98%). Delayed-phase CR was higher with APF530 vs Ond, approaching statistical significance (APF530 64%, Ond 56%; P=0.062) in the AC subgroup, similar to the benefit seen in the larger study. No appreciable benefit of APF530 vs Ond was observed in the acute phase, and trends favorable to APF530 were observed in the overall phase (Table). APF530 was well tolerated. Most AEs were ISRs, generally mild or moderate, and resolved by end of study.

Phase, n (%)APF530OndansetronTreatment DifferenceN=291N=298(95% CI), %Complete responseDelayed185 (64)167 (56)8 (-0.4, 15.4)Overall163 (56)153 (51)5 (-3.4, 12.7)Acute205 (70)204 (69)1 (-5.4, 9.4)Complete controlDelayed171 (59)156 (52)7 (-1.6, 14.4)Overall149 (51)143 (48)3 (-4.9, 11.3 )Acute193 (66)191 (64)2 (-5.5, 9.9)Total responseDelayed119 (41)107 (36)5 (-2.9, 12.8)Overall100 (34)94 (32)2 (-4.8, 10.4)Acute164 (56)173 (58)-2 (-9.7, 6.3)

Conclusions: APF530 demonstrated an apparent clinical benefit in delayed-phase CR in pts receiving AC-based HEC, concordant with the statistically significant benefit seen in the overall study population. Prevention of CINV in this patient population continues to be a treatment challenge and further investigation is needed.

Citation Format: Schnadig I, Agajanian R, Dakhil S, Taylor C, Wilks S, Cooper W, Mosier M, Payne Y, Klepper M, Vacirca J. Phase 3 comparison of APF530 versus ondansetron, each in a guideline-recommended 3-drug regimen for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting due to anthracycline + cyclophosphamide (AC)–based highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) regimens: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the MAGIC trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-10-07.

Elevated endocan levels and its association with clinical severity in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine the levels of endocan and other biomarkers of inflammation in the systemic circulation of three groups of patients: 1) biopsy confirmed Stevens Johnson Syndrome, Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (SJS/TEN) subjects; 2) patients with allergic skin reactions but biopsy negative for SJS/TEN; and 3) normal controls. Besides, this paper aims to investigate the association of endocan levels with the extent of the skin lesions, the presence of purpura, and the degree of acute renal insufficiency, as well as to investigate endocan as a marker of clinical severity by correlating endocan levels with the SCORTEN results (a prognositic score for SJS/TEN).

METHODS

Sixteen patients over the age of 18 years who were referred to Loyola University Medical Center with severe allergic skin reactions were recruited over a two-year period from May 2012 to May 2014. A diagnosis of SJS or TEN was confirmed in 7 subjects by skin biopsy. Citrated plasma samples were assayed for endocan, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and C-reactive protein (CRP). The differences between SJS/TEN subjects, biopsy negative subjects, and normal controls (N.=23) were explored using ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test. Associations with other clinical variables were identified using linear and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Biopsy positive SJS/TEN subjects and biopsy negative subjects had higher endocan levels than normal controls (SJS/TEN: 3.01 ng/mL [IQR: 2.15-8.11]; biopsy negative: 3.96 ng/mL [IQR: 1.54-4.85]; normal controls: 1.79 ng/mL [IQR: 1.67-1.98]; ANOVA P=0.0038). Endocan levels were more strongly associated with SCORTEN in SJS/TEN subjects than in biopsy negative subjects (R2 SJS/TEN=0.5110; biopsy negative=0.0317). SJS/TEN subjects exhibited significantly higher levels of TNF-α compared to normal controls (P=0.0267). The TNF-α levels were significantly lower compared to biopsy negative subjects (P=0.0052). VEGF levels were also elevated among SJS/TEN and biopsy negative subjects compared to normal controls (SJS/TEN: 12.04 pg/mL: [IQR: 7.64-52.7]; biopsy negative: 10.54 pg/mL [IQR: 4.17-6.46]; normal controls: 4.94 pg/mL [IQR: 4.17-6.46]; ANOVA P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in VEGF levels between SJS/TEN and biopsy negative subjects (P=0.7110). Similarly, CRP levels were elevated among SJS/TEN patients and biopsy negative subjects compared to normal controls (SJS/TEN: 32.09 µg/mL [IQR: 31.49-52.08]; biopsy negative: 83.38 µg/mL [IQR: 44.74-145.38]; healthy normal: 1.08 µg/mL [IQR: 0.73-2.03]; ANOVA P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in CRP levels between SJS/TEN and biopsy negative subjects (P=0.2416).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate enodcan, a marker of endothelial dysfunction, in the systemic circulation of SJS/TEN patients. Elevated endocan levels were more strongly associated with disease severity among SJS/TEN subjects than among less severe allergic reactions with skin involvement.

The use of nicotine patches with minimal intervention

BACKGROUND

This paper describes a natural, prospective, open-label study designed to evaluate the impact of free nicotine patches with minimal support for smoking cessation.

METHODS

Surveys were administered to 223 participants who received nicotine patches from the American Lung Association. All participants received a 6-week supply of 15-mg/16-h transdermal nicotine patches, a self-help book Freedom from Smoking, and information about area smoking cessation classes. Follow-up telephone surveys were administered 6 weeks after the patches were distributed. Abstinence was measured through self-report exclusively.

RESULTS

The overall quit rate at 6-weeks was 21% (47/223). Among nonquitters, the mean number of cigarettes smoked per day dropped from 25 at baseline to 14 at 6 weeks. There was a significant difference in the average number of patches used by quitters and nonquitters (26 versus 11, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nicotine patches with minimal support can be effective in smoking cessation and smoking reduction. The availability of patches may have motivated participants to quit. Efforts to increase access to and use of nicotine patches may result in increased attempts to quit and successful quitting.

Dose-Response Study of Vigabatrin as add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled complex partial seizures

PURPOSE

This placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study examined the efficacy and safety of three daily doses of vigabatrin (VGB; 1, 3, or 6 g) as add-on therapy in 174 patients with previously uncontrolled complex partial seizures with or without secondary generalization.

METHODS

A 12-week pretreatment assessment period was followed by drug therapy with a 6-week titration period and a 12-week maintenance phase.

RESULTS

VGB doses of 3 and 6 g/day reduced median monthly frequency of seizures by 4.3 and 4.5 seizures, respectively, compared with 0.2 seizures for placebo (p = 0.0001). The percentages of patients classified as therapeutic successes (> or =50% reduction in seizure frequency) were 7% for placebo and 24, 51, and 54% for patients taking daily VGB doses of 1, 3, and 6 g, respectively; the comparison with placebo was significant for all treatment groups. The linear trend for dose response was highly significant (p< or =0.0001) for both median monthly seizure frequency and therapeutic success. Vigabatrin was well tolerated, causing no clinically significant changes in laboratory parameters, brain magnetic resonance imaging, evoked potentials, cognitive function, or psychosocial tests. Fatigue, drowsiness, and dizziness were the most common treatment-related adverse events in all treatment groups. Dropouts due to adverse events were higher in the 6-g/day group.

CONCLUSIONS

VGB was significantly more effective than placebo as add-on therapy in reducing seizure frequency. VGB at 3 and 6 g/day produced the best efficacy: however, adverse events may limit the use of the 6-g/day dose in some patients.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of vigabatrin three g/day in patients with uncontrolled complex partial seizures. Vigabatrin Protocol 024 Investigative Cohort

This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of vigabatrin 3/day as add-on therapy with that of placebo in patients with focal epilepsy whose complex partial seizures were difficult to control with established antiepilepsy drug therapy. We enrolled 203 patients; 182 (90 placebo; 92 vigabatrin) received drug therapy under double-blind conditions. We increased the daily dosage to 2.5 g/day during a 4-week titration segment and maintained it at 3 g/day during the 12-week maintenance segment. By analyses we found a statistically significant lower frequency of seizures (complex seizures plus partial seizures secondarily generalized) at the end of the study for patients receiving vigabatrin than for those receiving placebo. The median monthly frequency was reduced by three seizures per 28 days in the placebo group (baseline, 8.3; end of study, 7.5) (p = 0.0002). Therapeutic success (a 50% reduction from baseline in mean monthly seizure frequency) was attained in 40 of the vigabatrin patients (43%) compared with 17 of those treated with placebo (19%) (p < 0.001). Vigabatrin significantly increased the mean number of seizure-free days per 28 days (2.2 days) compared with placebo (0.5 days) (p = 0.0024). Mean trough serum vigabatrin concentration during therapy was 8.6 +/- 7.7 micrograms/ml. The oral clearance of vigabatrin was determined to be 7.8 L/hr, and the elimination half-life was 8.4 hours. No clinically important changes in MRI, evoked potential, or other laboratory tests were noted during vigabatrin treatment. The results of this study indicate that 3 g/day vigabatrin is more effective than placebo as add-on therapy. Vigabatrin was well tolerated, compliance was high with twice-daily administration, and therapy did not result in clinically relevant drug interactions.

Quantitative relationships between perceived and objective need for health care--dentistry as a model

To elaborate and refine a previously devised method for quantifying the relationship between perceived and objectively determined dental disease, data on a random sample of 588 patients in two towns in England were analyzed. The data included the number of decayed (D), missing (M), and filled (F) teeth, composite DMF scores, and patients' self-assessments of the state of their teeth and the need for treatment. The study method was a combination of bioassay and psychophysical techniques. Categorical self-assessments of the state of teeth and the need for treatment were dichotomized to yield proportions, which, when transformed into logits, resulted in a linear relation to increments of dental disease. A 50% point for each of the component D, M, and F scores was derived from the intercept of the line of best fit. The D50 for both the state of teeth and the need for treatment was found to be closest to the objective measure (Dx), with the smallest standard error. Although males had a significantly lower D50 (0.5) than females (D50=2.1) for need for treatment, with no differences in D50 for state of teeth, the females actually had a significantly lower Dx. These data indicate that males as a group had a lower threshold for perception of the need for treatment. This finding contrasts with the observation in other studies that males actually use dental services less than females.