1
|
Charles CM, Noles M, Munezero A, Gallardo N, Bahamondes L, Bento SF, de Pádua KS, Nhauche M, Metelus S, Cecatti JG, Souza RT, Pacagnella RC. Risk factors related to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine additional doses hesitancy among pregnant and non-pregnant people of reproductive age and partners: A Brazilian cross-sectional study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2024. [PMID: 38532554 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Revised: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the predictors of acceptance and hesitancy of additional doses of any SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccine among pregnant or recently pregnant and non-pregnant people of reproductive age and partners in Brazil. METHODS We conducted an online cross-sectional study from June 2022 to April 2023 and invited women and partners between 18 and 49 years old to participate. We employed a snowball strategy to reach all potential eligible participants. Our primary outcome was the acceptance rate of the COVID-19 booster vaccine. We estimated the frequency and percentage for the three groups and compared categorical variables using the Chi-square test. Moreover, bivariate, backward stepwise regression, and subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors and predictors of COVID-19 vaccine booster hesitancy. We reported the effect size as OR with a 95% CI. RESULTS We included 1487 participants, and among them, 334 (22.5%) were pregnant or recently pregnant people, 905 (60.8%) were non-pregnant people, and 247 (16.6%) were male partners. Pregnant and recently pregnant people showed greater hesitancy for the COVID-19 vaccine booster than non-pregnant people (28% vs 15%, P < 0.001) and male partners (28% vs 16%, P < 0.001). Non-pregnant women accepted the COVID-19 vaccine more often than pregnant or recently pregnant people (OR 1.75; 95% CI: 1.13-2.70). The associated factors to the reduced COVID-19 vaccine booster acceptance were family income between US$ 566-945.00 (54%), evangelic religion (65%), concern about vaccine safety (80%) and perceived common vaccine importance (93%). CONCLUSION Pregnant people were more hesitant than non-pregnant people to accept the COVID-19 booster vaccine. Family income, religious beliefs, vaccine safety concerns, and perceived common vaccine importance were significant barriers to accepting COVID-19 booster vaccines. The impact of these factors was more evident among pregnant or recently pregnant people, emphasizing the harmful effect of misinformation among this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles M Charles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
- Provincial Health Administration, DPS Manica, Chimoio, Mozambique
| | - Marcelo Noles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Aline Munezero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Negli Gallardo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Luis Bahamondes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
- Campinas Reproductive Health Research Center (CEMICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
| | - Silvana F Bento
- Campinas Reproductive Health Research Center (CEMICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
- Women's Hospital "Prof. Dr. José A Pinotti" - Center for Integral Attention to Women (CAISM), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Karla S de Pádua
- Campinas Reproductive Health Research Center (CEMICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
- Women's Hospital "Prof. Dr. José A Pinotti" - Center for Integral Attention to Women (CAISM), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Marta Nhauche
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - Sherly Metelus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - José G Cecatti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
- Campinas Reproductive Health Research Center (CEMICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
| | - Renato T Souza
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
- Campinas Reproductive Health Research Center (CEMICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
| | - Rodolfo C Pacagnella
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|