Is Metformin Associated with a Lower Prevalence of Polyps, Adenomas, and Colorectal Carcinoma in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus?

PURPOSE

Recent studies suggested a protective role of metformin in the development of colorectal cancer (CRC) and its precursors. We aimed to investigate if metformin was associated with a lower prevalence and number of colorectal polyps in diabetic patients and also adenomas, high-risk adenomas, and CRC.

METHODS

Retrospective study on adult patients with diabetes mellitus followed in our hospital with a total colonoscopy between 2015 and 2019, treated with either metformin for > 5 years or other antidiabetic agent (control group). We assessed the number, size, and histopathology examination of proliferative lesions detected on colonoscopy.

RESULTS

We included 401 patients aged 69 ± 9 years, 57% males, divided into two groups: treated with metformin (n = 260) and without (n = 141). The number of polyps detected was significantly lower in patients under metformin (p = 0.014). There was a nonsignificant trend towards lower polyp detection rates in the metformin compared to the control group both in unadjusted analysis (50% vs 60%, p = 0.058) and multivariable adjusted analysis (odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.09, p = 0.111). In the latter, we identified male gender (OR 2.24, 95%CI 1.44-3.49, p < 0.001), age (OR 1.35 for every 10 years, 95%CI 1.07-1.71, p = 0.012), glycated hemoglobin value (OR 1.20 for every 1% increase, 95%CI 1.06-1.37, p = 0.005), and hypertension (OR 1.76, 95%CI 1.01-3.08, p = 0.046) as factors associated with a higher prevalence of polyps. We saw no statistically significant differences regarding adenoma (p = 0.231), high-risk adenoma (p = 0.810), and CRC (p = 0.705) diagnoses between groups.

CONCLUSION

In our study, metformin was associated with less colorectal polyps in diabetic patients compared to other treatment modalities. We observed a nonsignificant trend towards lower polyp detection rates in the metformin group both in unadjusted and adjusted analyses.

Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Liver Injury on Admission in a Hospitalised Population with COVID-19 Infection

N/a.

The lifestyle influence on alcoholic pancreatitis versus alcoholic liver disease: a case-control study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of lifestyle with the development of alcoholic liver disease (ALD) or alcoholic pancreatitis (AlcP).

METHODS

A case-control study was conducted on 80 patients attending a tertiary university hospital, subdivided into three groups: ALD (n = 34), AlcP (n = 21) and a control (CT) group (n = 25) of alcohol abusers without clinical evidence of hepatic or pancreatic disease. Participants were interviewed regarding alcohol consumption, tobacco use and diet. A physical examination was concomitantly performed and we had access to their complementary investigation.

RESULTS

We included 10 females and 70 males (mean age 57 ± 10 years). The pure amount of alcohol consumed by the ALD group was significantly higher than the AlcP group, regarding both daily (grams/day) and lifetime (kilograms) consumptions (p = .018 and p = .009, respectively); no statistically significant differences were seen with the CT group. We found no differences regarding the beverage type or drinking outside meals. Smoking was very common in every study group, with higher consumptions and a significantly higher prevalence of ever smokers in the AlcP group, in comparison with ALD and CT patients (p = .033 and p = .036, respectively). There were significant differences in the patients' eating habits before the onset of disease between groups (p < .001), with ALD subjects reporting a less abundant diet and AlcP a more abundant diet in the past; most of the controls had unchanged habits.

CONCLUSION

We found differences in lifestyle between ALD and AlcP, not considered sufficient to explain the subjects' susceptibility to one disease or the other.