1
|
Monroy-Iglesias MJ, Martin S, Cargaleiro C, Jones G, Steward L, Murtagh C, Bruno F, Millwaters J, Schizas A, Watson H, Haire A, Haire K, Moss CL, Russell B, Srirajaskanthan R, Van Hemelrijck M, Dolly S. Real-world data evaluating Guy's rapid diagnostic clinic as an alternate pathway for patients with FIT levels below 10. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e080285. [PMID: 38626962 PMCID: PMC11029265 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyse the effectiveness of rapid diagnostic clinics (RDCs) as an alternative pathway for patients with concerning symptoms and a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) result <10. Our primary endpoint was rate of colorectal cancer (CRC) detection. Second endpoints were rates of other cancers and gastrointestinal (GI) serious benign conditions. Finally, we analysed the specific pathway followed by FIT <10 patients with cancer at Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT) RDC. DESIGN A retrospective and prospective cohort study. SETTING GSTT RDC, one of England's largest single-centre RDCs. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of FIT <10 patients were analysed descriptively. PARTICIPANTS Patients with an FIT result <10, seen at GSTT RDC between 1 January 2020 and 5 May 2023. RESULTS A total of 1299 patients with an FIT<10 were seen at GSTT RDC between January 2020 and May 2023. Of these, 66% (n=861) reported weight loss, 62% (n=805) pain, 37% (n=481) fatigue, 34% (n=444) were anaemic and 23% (n=301) had nausea and vomiting. Among these patients, 7% (n=88) received a cancer diagnosis, 36% (n=462) were identified as having a serious benign condition. Within the patients with cancer, 9% (n=8) were diagnosed with CRC. Among patients with serious benign conditions, 7% (n=31) were referred to colorectal, hepatopancreatobiliary, or upper GI specialists. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the effectiveness of RDCs as an alternate pathway for FIT <10 patients with ongoing clinical concerns. These results contribute to enhancing patient care and optimising resource allocation within the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sabine Martin
- Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Carlos Cargaleiro
- Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Geraint Jones
- Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
- Southeast London Cancer Alliance, London, UK
| | - Lindsay Steward
- Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Colette Murtagh
- Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Flaminia Bruno
- Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Juliet Millwaters
- Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Alexis Schizas
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Harriet Watson
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Anna Haire
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Kate Haire
- Southeast London Cancer Alliance, London, UK
| | | | - Beth Russell
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Saoirse Dolly
- Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Van Hemelrijck M, Fox L, Beyer K, Fedaraviciute E, George G, Hadi H, Haire A, Handford J, Mera A, Monroy-Iglesias MJ, Moss CL, Perdek N, Russell B, Santaolalla A, Sztankay M, Wylie H, Jassem J, Zubaryev M, Anderson BO, Ortiz R, Ilbawi A, Camacho R, Ferreira-Borges C, Roitberg F, Dvaladze AE, Lasierra Losada M, Alves da Costa F, Aggarwal A, Lawler M, Kopetskiy S, Sullivan R. Cancer care for Ukrainian refugees: Strategic impact assessments in the early days of the conflict. J Cancer Policy 2022; 34:100370. [PMID: 36375808 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2022.100370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The invasion of Ukraine by Russia in February 2022 has resulted in destruction of healthcare infrastructure and triggered the largest wave of internally displaced populations and refugees since World War Two. Conflicts in transitioned countries such as Ukraine create new non-communicable disease (NCD) challenges, especially for cancer care for refugees and humanitarian assistance in host countries. In the early days, rapid attempts were made to model possible impacts. METHODS By evaluating open source intelligence used in the first three months of the conflict through snowball search methods, we aimed to address: (i) burden of cancer in Ukrainian population, specifically considering translating to the refugees population, and its cancer care capacity; ii) baseline capacity/strengths of cancer systems in initial host countries. Moreover, using a baseline scenario based on crude cancer incidence in Ukraine, and considering data from UNHCR, we estimated how cancer cases would be distributed across host countries. Finally, a surveillance assessment instrument was created, intersecting health system's capacity and influx of internally displaced populations and refugees. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The total new cancer patients per month in pre-conflict Ukraine was estimated as 13,106, of which < 1 % are paediatric cases. The estimated cancer cases in the refugee population (combining prevalent and incident), assuming 7.5 million refugees by July 2022 and a female:male ratio of 9:1, was 33,121 individuals (Poland: 19284; Hungary: 3484; Moldova: 2651; Slovakia: 2421; Romania: 5281). According to our assessments, Poland is the only neighbouring country classified as green/yellow for cancer capacity, i.e. sufficient ablility to absorb additional burden into national health system; Slovakia we graded as yellow, Hungary and Romania as yellow/red and Moldova as red.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Van Hemelrijck
- Centre for Cancer, Society and Public Health, King's College London & Global Oncology Group, London, UK.
| | - L Fox
- Centre for Cancer, Society and Public Health, King's College London & Global Oncology Group, London, UK.
| | - K Beyer
- Centre for Cancer, Society and Public Health, King's College London & Global Oncology Group, London, UK.
| | - E Fedaraviciute
- Centre for Cancer, Society and Public Health, King's College London & Global Oncology Group, London, UK.
| | - G George
- Centre for Cancer, Society and Public Health, King's College London & Global Oncology Group, London, UK.
| | - H Hadi
- Centre for Cancer, Society and Public Health, King's College London & Global Oncology Group, London, UK.
| | - A Haire
- Centre for Cancer, Society and Public Health, King's College London & Global Oncology Group, London, UK.
| | - J Handford
- Centre for Cancer, Society and Public Health, King's College London & Global Oncology Group, London, UK.
| | - A Mera
- Centre for Cancer, Society and Public Health, King's College London & Global Oncology Group, London, UK.
| | - M J Monroy-Iglesias
- Centre for Cancer, Society and Public Health, King's College London & Global Oncology Group, London, UK.
| | - C L Moss
- Centre for Cancer, Society and Public Health, King's College London & Global Oncology Group, London, UK.
| | - N Perdek
- Centre for Cancer, Society and Public Health, King's College London & Global Oncology Group, London, UK.
| | - B Russell
- Centre for Cancer, Society and Public Health, King's College London & Global Oncology Group, London, UK.
| | - A Santaolalla
- Centre for Cancer, Society and Public Health, King's College London & Global Oncology Group, London, UK.
| | - M Sztankay
- University Hospital of Psychiatry, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - H Wylie
- Centre for Cancer, Society and Public Health, King's College London & Global Oncology Group, London, UK.
| | - J Jassem
- Department of Oncology & Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk Mariana Smoluchowskiego, Gdańsk, Poland.
| | - M Zubaryev
- National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.
| | | | - R Ortiz
- World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - A Ilbawi
- World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - R Camacho
- World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | | | - F Roitberg
- World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | | - A Aggarwal
- Centre for Cancer, Society and Public Health, King's College London & Global Oncology Group, London, UK.
| | - M Lawler
- Queen's University, Belfast, UK.
| | | | - R Sullivan
- Centre for Cancer, Society and Public Health, King's College London & Global Oncology Group, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|