364 Zero Itch in Eyes Treated With Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution, 0.2% in Bilateral Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Studies

Purpose

To further assess the prevention of ocular itching with olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution, 0.2% (OLO) in patients with allergic conjunctivitis.

Methods

This was a post-hoc analysis of 85 patients participating in 2 prospective, randomized, double-masked bilateral conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) studies. Patients received OLO in one eye and placebo (vehicle) in the contralateral eye. Ocular itching was self-assessed by patients and rated on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (severe). To assess onset of action, eligible patients were challenged with antigen 27 minutes after dosing. To assess duration of action, patients were challenged with allergen 16 hours after dosing. The percentage of eyes with zero itching in both studies was assessed at 3 minutes post allergen challenge.

Results

The percentage of eyes with zero itch at the 3 minutes timepoint after the onset of action allergen challenge was 60.0% for OLO-treated eyes compared with 5.9% for vehicle-treated eyes (P < .0001, OLO vs vehicle). The percentage of eyes with zero itch at 3 minutes post allergen challenge following the 16-hour dosing was 59.8% for OLO-treated eyes compared with 22.0% for vehicle-treated eyes (P < .0001, OLO vs vehicle).

Conclusions

In bilateral CAC studies, ocular itching was prevented in a higher percentage (P < .0001) of eyes treated with 0.2% olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution when compared with vehicle as early as 30 minutes and for at least 16 hours post dosing.

Inhalation developmental neurotoxicity study of ethylbenzene in Crl-CD rats

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to evaluate the potential adverse effects of whole-body inhalation exposure of F0 and F1 parental animals from a 2-generation reproduction study of ethylbenzene on nervous system functional and/or morphologic end points in the F2 offspring from four groups of male and female Crl:CD (SD)IGS BR rats.

METHODS

Thirty rats/sex/group for F0 and 25/sex/group for F1 were exposed to 0, 25, 100, and 500 ppm ethylbenzene for six hours daily for at least 70 consecutive days prior to mating for the F0 and F1 generations. Inhalation exposure for the F0 and F1 females continued throughout mating and gestation through Gestation Day (GD) 20. On lactation days (LD) 1-4, the F0 and F1 females received no inhalation exposure, but instead were administered ethylbenzene in corn oil via oral gavage at dosages estimated to result in similar internal maternal exposure based upon PBPK modeling estimates (0, 26, 90, and 342 mg/kg/day, respectively, divided into three equal doses, approximately two hours apart). Inhalation exposure of the F0 and F1 females was reinitiated on LD 5 and continued through weaning on postnatal day (PND) 21. Survival, body weights, and physical landmarks were assessed in selected F2 offspring. Neurobehavioral development of one F2-generation treatment derived offspring/sex/litter was assessed in a functional observational battery (FOB; PND 4, 11, 22, 45, and 60), motor activity sessions (PND 13, 17, 21, and 61), acoustic startle testing (PND 20 and 60), a Biel water maze learning and memory task (initiated on PND 26 or 62), and in evaluations of whole-brain measurements and brain morphometric and histologic assessments (PND 21 and 72).

RESULTS

There were no adverse effects on reproductive performance in either the F0 or F1 parental generations exposed to up to 500 ppm ethylbenzene [Faber et al. Birth Defects Res Part B 77:10-21, 2006]. In the current developmental neurotoxicity component, parental ethylbenzene exposure did not adversely affect offspring survival, clinical condition, body weight parameters, or acquisition of developmental landmarks of the F2-generation treatment derived offspring. There were no alterations in FOB parameters, motor activity counts, acoustic startle endpoints, or Biel water maze performance in offspring attributed to parental ethylbenzene exposure. A few isolated instances of statistically significant differences obtained in the treatment-derived groups occurred sporadically, and were attributed to unusual patterns of development and/or behavior in the concurrent control group. There were no exposure-related differences in any neuropathology parameters in the F2-generation treatment derived offspring.

CONCLUSIONS

The no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for maternal reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity, and developmental neurotoxicity in this study was considered to be 500 ppm/342 mg/kg/day ethylbenzene, the highest exposure level tested in the study.

Two generation reproduction study of ethylbenzene by inhalation in Crl-CD rats

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to evaluate the potential adverse effects of ethylbenzene (EB) on reproductive capability from whole-body inhalation exposure of F0 and F1 parental animals.

METHODS

Four groups of Crl:CD(SD)IGS BR rats (30/sex/group for F0 and 25/sex/group for F1) were exposed to 0, 25, 100, and 500 ppm EB for 6 hr/day for at least 70 consecutive days before mating. Inhalation exposure for the F0 and F1 females continued throughout mating, gestation through gestation day (GD) 20, and lactation days (LD) 5-21. On LD 1-4, females received EB in corn oil via oral gavage at dose levels of 26, 90, and 342 mg/kg/day (divided into three equal doses, approximately 2 hr apart), as calculated from a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to provide similar maternal blood area-under-concentration (AUC) as provided by inhalation. Pups were weaned on postnatal day (PND) 21 and exposure of the F1 generation started on PND 22. Estimates of internal exposure were determined by measuring EB concentrations in blood collected from F1 dams (4/group) and their culled pups 1 hr after the last gavage dose on PND 4. On PND 22, blood was collected from these same F1 dams and their weanlings for EB analysis 1 hr after a 6-hr inhalation exposure. The remainder of the F2 generation was not directly exposed.

RESULTS

EB exposure did not affect survival or clinical observations. Male rats in the 500 ppm group in both generations gained weight more slowly than the controls. There were no indications of adverse effects on reproductive performance in either generation. Male and female mating and fertility indices, pre-coital intervals, spermatogenic endpoints, ovarian follicle counts, reproductive organ weights, lengths of estrous cycle and gestation, live litter size, pup weights, developmental landmarks, and postnatal survival were unaffected. No adverse exposure-related macroscopic pathology was noted at any level.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased liver weights were found in the animals exposed to 500 ppm. F1 maternal whole blood EB concentrations of 0.49, 3.51, or 18.28 mg/L were found 1 hr after administration of a composite oral dose of 26, 90, or 342 mg/kg/day, respectively, but no detectable EB was found in blood samples of their F2 PND 4 culled pups. F1 maternal mean whole blood EB levels 1 hr after a 6-hr inhalation exposure on postpartum day (PPD) 22 was 0.11 mg/L (25 ppm), 0.56 mg/L (100 ppm), and 11 mg/L (500 ppm). For the offspring exposed with their dams on PND 22, F2 pup blood EB concentrations ranged from 0.017-0.039 mg/L (25 ppm), 0.165-0.465 mg/L (100 ppm), and 8.82-15.74 mg/L (500 ppm). Because decreased weight gain in the 500 ppm males was transient and no histopathological changes were associated with the increased liver weights in the 500 ppm male and female groups, these changes were not considered adverse. Therefore, for parental systemic toxicity, 100 ppm was considered a NOEL and 500 ppm a NOAEL in this study. The 500 ppm exposure concentration was considered a NOAEL for F0 and F1 reproductive toxicity and offspring developmental endpoints.

Control of a symmetry-breaking process in the course of the morphogenesis of plantlets of Bidens pilosa L

A mechanism involving transport, storage and retrieval of a symmetry-breaking message controls the relative growth rate of the cotyledonary buds of plantlets of Bidens pilosa L. The asymmetry was induced by administering a few needle pricks to one cotyledon of each plant. The storage of the symmetry-breaking message was independent of the number of pricks ("all or nothing" process) and irreversible. However, various treatments could render the plants either able to retrieve the stored symmetry-breaking message (in which case, the bud opposite to the pricked cotyledon began to elongate statistically sooner than the one associated with the stimulated cotyledon) or not (both buds then had an equal chance to be the first to start to grow). The retrieval process was also associated with a temporal oscillation. At the level of the whole plants, bud growth was observed only after the removal of apical dominance, and its degree of asymmetry was expressed by use of a parameter g ranging from zero (symmetrical case) to ± 1 (full asymmetry in favor of one of the cotyledonary buds). The highest g-values observed in the present contribution were of the order of 0.5. At the cellular level, the pricking of one cotyledon caused a number of cells, which were within the meristem of the bud associated with the pricked cotyledon and were in cell-cycle phases S or G2, to undergo cellular division and then be blocked in phase G1, whereas the cells of the opposite bud were practically unchanged.