Validation of PLASMIC score in a cohort of patients with suspected thrombotic microangiopathy in an academic medical centre

BACKGROUND

The PLASMIC score is a rapid and inexpensive clinical assessment tool for predicting severe ADAMTS13 deficiency (<10% activity) in patients with suspected thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). The score includes 7 parameters: absence of active cancer, patient not having received stem cell transplant or organ transplant, platelet count <30×10⁹/L, haemolysis, mean corpuscular volume <90 fl, International Normalized Ratio <1.5, and serum creatinine <2 mg/dL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we evaluated a cohort of 59 consecutive patients with suspected thrombotic microangiopathy who had been referred to the Hemostasis and Thrombosis Center of the "Federico II" University of Naples, Italy, for measurement of ADAMTS13 activity. Relevant clinical and laboratory information were collected for all patients.

RESULTS

The PLASMIC score was calculated in 52 of the 59 patients included in the study. In the high-risk group (PLASMIC score 6 or 7), 12 out of 20 patients (60%) had ADAMTS13 <10%. Interestingly, all 6 patients (100%) with PLASMIC score 7 had ADAMTS13 <5%. In the intermediate risk group (score 5), only one case out of 17 (5.9%) had ADAMTS 13 <10%. In the low-risk group (score 0-4), none of the patients had severe ADAMTS13 deficiency. The collected data enabled the sensitivity and specificity of PLASMIC score in TTP to be calculated, achieving 92% (95% CI: 0.80-0.98) and 79% (95% CI: 0.66-0.89), respectively. The PLASMIC score was seen to be a very efficient tool in distinguishing between patients with severe ADAMTS13 deficiency from those without, with an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.82-1.0; p<0.001).

DISCUSSION

In our cohort, a high-risk PLASMIC score successfully predicted patients with severe ADAMTS13 deficiency, allowing the clinician to quickly define the best therapeutic approach, especially useful for those clinicians not used to the diagnosis and treatment of thrombotic microangiopathies.

Paradigm shift for the treatment of hereditary haemophilia: Towards precision medicine

Patients with haemophilia A (HA) or B (HB) experience spontaneous limb- or life-threatening bleedings which are prevented by regular prophylactic intravenous infusions of the deficient coagulation factor (FVIII or FIX). Prophylaxis with subcutaneous long-acting non-factor products that improve in vivo thrombin generation is now under intensive investigation (concizumab, fitusiran) or successfully employed (emicizumab) in haemophilia patients. Both haemophilia patients with/without inhibitors take advantage of non-factor products employed alone. In those who also need bypassing agents (or FVIII concentrates) for breakthrough bleeds, thromboembolic events and/or thrombotic microangiopathy may occur. By enhancing thrombin generation, prothrombotic mutations co-segregating with FVIII/FIX gene mutations may trigger thrombotic episodes in HA patients carrying acquired thrombogenic factors (e.g. venous catheters). A thorough knowledge of individual needs increasingly contributed to improve comprehensive care and personalize treatments in haemophilia. Integrating genomics, lifestyle and environmental data is expected to be key to: 1) identify which haemophilia patients are less likely to benefit from a given intervention; 2) define optimal dosing and scheduling of bypassing agents (or FVIII) to employ in combination with non-factor products; 3) establish tests to monitor in vivo thrombin generation; 4) improve communication and deliver results to individuals. As individual outcomes will be improved and the risk of adverse events minimized, non-factor products will come into wider use within the haemophilia community, and patients will hopefully have no more risks of breakthrough bleeds. The risks of a normal life for a "former haemophilia patient" is likely to change the treatment landscape and the structure of haemophilia Centers.

Concomitant CXCR4 and CXCR7 expression predicts poor prognosis in renal cancer

CXCR4 is a chemokine receptor implicated in the metastatic process. The CXCR4 ligand, CXCL12, was shown to bind also the CXCR7 receptor, a recently deorphanized chemokine receptor whose signalling pathway and function are still controversial. This study was conducted to determine patients clinic-pathological factors and outcome according to the expressions of CXCR4 and CXCR7 in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). CXCR4 and CXCR7 expression was evaluated in 223 RCC patients through immunohistochemistry; moreover CXCR4 and CXCR7 was detected in 49 others consecutive RCC patients trough RT- PCR. CXCR4 expression was low in 42/223 RCC (18.8%), intermediate in 71/223 (31.9%) and high in 110/223 (49.3%). CXCR7 expression was low in 44/223 RCC patients (19.8%), intermediate in 65/223 (29.1%) and high in 114/223 (51.1%). High CXCR4 and high CXCR7 expression predicted shorter disease free survival. In multivariate analysis, high CXCR4 expression (p= 0.0061), high CXCR7 (p= 0.0194) expression and the concomitant high expression of CXCR4 and CXCR7 (p= 0.0235) are independent prognosis factors. Through RT-PCR, CXCR4 was overexpressed in 36/49 and CXCR7 in 33/49 samples correlating with symptoms at diagnosis and lymph nodes status. So we can hypothesize that CXCR4 and CXCR7, singularly evaluated and in combination, are valuable prognostic factors in RCC patients.