Rituximab impairs B-cell response but not T-cell response to COVID-19 vaccine in auto-immune diseases

Objective

Antibody response to the messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID‐19 vaccine has been shown to be diminished in rituximab (RTX)–treated patients. We undertook this study to compare humoral and T cell responses between healthy controls, patients with autoimmune diseases treated with RTX, and those treated with other immunosuppressants, all of whom had been vaccinated with 2 doses of the mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine.

Methods

We performed anti‐spike IgG and neutralization assays just before and 28 days after the second BNT162b2 (Pfizer‐BioNTech) vaccine dose. The specific T cell response was assessed in activated CD4 and CD8 T cells using intracellular flow cytometry staining of cytokines (interferon‐γ, tumor necrosis factor, and interleukin‐2) after stimulation with SARS–CoV‐2 spike peptide pools.

Results

A lower proportion of responders with neutralizing antibodies to the vaccine was observed in the RTX group (29%; n = 24) compared to the other immunosuppressants group (80%; n = 35) (P = 0.0001) and the healthy control group (92%; n = 26) (P < 0.0001). No patients treated with RTX in the last 6 months showed a response. Time since last infusion was the main factor influencing humoral response in RTX‐treated patients. The functional CD4 and CD8 cellular responses to SARS–CoV‐2 peptides for each single cytokine or polyfunctionality were not different in the RTX group compared to the other immunosuppressants group or the control group. In RTX‐treated patients, the T cell response was not different between patients with and those without a humoral response.

Conclusion

RTX induced a diminished antibody response to the mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine, but the functional T cell response was not altered compared to healthy controls and autoimmune disease patients treated with other immunosuppressants. Further work is needed to assess the clinical protection granted by a functionally active T cell response in the absence of an anti‐spike antibody response.

Response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in multiple myeloma is conserved but impaired compared to controls

Patients with multiple myeloma are at high risk of severe forms of COVID-19. Despite data showing diminished response to vaccine, the era of highly efficient mRNA vaccine might be a gamechanger. We sought to examine response to mRNA vaccine between healthy controls (n = 28) and multiple myeloma (MM) patients (n = 27). Response was analyzed 1 month after the second dose of anti-SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine. Multiple myeloma patients showed diminished levels of Anti-Spike IgG levels compared to controls, but with a high proportion of patients achieving a humoral response (89% vs. 97% in controls). Neutralizing antibodies were present in 74% of patients versus 96% of controls. Patients under current daratumumab treatment had neutralizing activity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Multiple myeloma patients show diminished response to SARS-COV-2 vaccine but with still high response rate. The main potential risk factor of non-response to COVID-19 vaccine was uncontrolled disease under treatment.

CXCR3 and CXCR5 are highly expressed in HIV-1-specific CD8 central memory T cells from infected patients

New ways of characterizing CD8⁺ memory T cell responses in chronic infections are based on the measurement of chemokine receptor expression (CXCR3, CXCR5, and CX3CR1). We applied these novel phenotyping strategies to chronic HIV infection by comparing healthy donors (HDs), HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART), and spontaneous HIV controllers (HICs). In all groups, the memory cells exhibited high proportion of CXCR3⁺ cells. Proportions of CXCR5⁺ and CX3CR1⁺ cells were preferentially observed among central memory cells (Tcm) and effector memory cells (Tem) respectively. Chronic controlled HIV infection impacted the chemokine receptor profile of both HIV-specific and nonspecific CD8⁺ T cells. In total CD8⁺ T cells, the proportions of CXCR3^- CXCR5^- CX3CR1^- Tcm and Tem were lower in HIV-infected patients than in HDs with subtle differences between ART and HICs. Such phenotyping strategy also revealed differences in exhaustion and senescence phenotypes, the CXCR3⁺ CXCR5⁺ CX3CR1^- being more exhausted and senescent than the CXCR3⁺ CXCR5^- CX3CR1^- Tcm fraction. Among HIV-specific CD8⁺ T cells, the vast majority of Tcm cells were CXCR3⁺ and CXCR5⁺ cells in contrast with their nonspecific counterparts. In conclusion, the addition of migration markers contributes to better characterize Tcm/Tem compartment.