1
|
Slotegraaf AI, de Kruif AJTCM, Agasi-Idenburg CS, van Oers SMD, Ronteltap A, Veenhof C, Gerards MHG, Verburg AC, Hoogeboom TJ, de van der Schueren MAE. Understanding recovery of people recovering from COVID-19 receiving treatment from primary care allied health professionals: a mixed-methods study. Disabil Rehabil 2024:1-10. [PMID: 38318773 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2311330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To quantitatively assess changes in recovery of people recovering from COVID-19 treated by a primary care allied health professional, and to qualitatively describe how they dealt with persistent complaints. MATERIALS AND METHODS This mixed-methods study is part of a Dutch prospective cohort study, from which thirty participants were selected through purposive sampling. Quantitative data on recovery were collected at start of treatment and 6 months. Additionally, by use of semi-structured interviews participants were asked on how persistent complaints influenced their lives, and how they experienced received primary care allied health treatment. RESULTS Despite reported improvements, most participants still experienced limitations at 6 months. Hospital participants reported a higher severity of complaints, but home participants reported more diverse complaints and a longer recovery. Most participants were satisfied with the primary care allied healthcare. Tender loving care and a listening ear, learning to manage limits, and support and acceptance of building up in small steps were perceived as contributing most to participants' recovery. CONCLUSION Although improvements were reported on almost all outcomes, most participants suffered from persistent complaints. Despite these persistent complaints, many participants reported being better able to cope with persistent complaints because they had decreased substantially in their intensity. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov registry (NCT04735744).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne I Slotegraaf
- Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Anja J Th C M de Kruif
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Lifestyle, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Carla S Agasi-Idenburg
- Research Group Innovation of Movement Care, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sonja M D van Oers
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Lifestyle, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Amber Ronteltap
- Research Group Innovation of Movement Care, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cindy Veenhof
- Research Group Innovation of Movement Care, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sport, Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Marissa H G Gerards
- Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Physiotherapy, Maastricht university medical centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Arie C Verburg
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas J Hoogeboom
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marian A E de van der Schueren
- Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Lifestyle, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Slotegraaf AI, Gerards MHG, Verburg AC, de van der Schueren MAE, Kruizenga HM, Graff MJL, Cup EHC, Kalf JG, Lenssen AF, Meijer WM, Kool RA, de Bie RA, van der Wees PJ, Hoogeboom TJ. Evaluation of Primary Allied Health Care in Patients Recovering From COVID-19 at 6-Month Follow-up: Dutch Nationwide Prospective Cohort Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023; 9:e44155. [PMID: 37862083 PMCID: PMC10592721 DOI: 10.2196/44155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients recovering from COVID-19 often experience persistent problems in their daily activities related to limitations in physical, nutritional, cognitive, and mental functioning. To date, it is unknown what treatment is needed to support patients in their recovery from COVID-19. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the primary allied health care of patients recovering from COVID-19 at 6-month follow-up and to explore which baseline characteristics are associated with changes in the scores of outcomes between baseline and 6-month follow-up. METHODS This Dutch nationwide prospective cohort study evaluated the recovery of patients receiving primary allied health care (ie, dietitians, exercise therapists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech and language therapists) after COVID-19. All treatments offered by primary allied health professionals in daily practice were part of usual care. Patient-reported outcome measures on participation, health-related quality of life, fatigue, physical functioning, and psychological well-being were assessed at baseline and at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Linear mixed model analyses were used to evaluate recovery over time, and uni- and multivariable linear regression analyses were used to examine the association between baseline characteristics and recovery. RESULTS A total of 1451 adult patients recovering from COVID-19 and receiving treatment from 1 or more primary allied health professionals were included. For participation (Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation range 0-100), estimated mean differences of at least 2.3 points were observed at all time points. For the health-related quality of life (EuroQol Visual Analog Scale, range 0-100), the mean increase was 12.3 (95% CI 11.1-13.6) points at 6 months. Significant improvements were found for fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale, range 1-7): the mean decrease was -0.7 (95% CI -0.8 to -0.6) points at 6 months. However, severe fatigue was reported by 742/929 (79.9%) patients after 6 months. For physical functioning (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function Short Form 10b, range 13.8-61.3), the mean increase was 5.9 (95% CI 5.9-6.4) points at 6 months. Mean differences of -0.8 (95% CI -1.0 to -0.5) points for anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale range 0-21) and -1.6 (95% CI -1.8 to -1.3) points for depression were found after 6 months. A worse baseline score, hospital admission, and male sex were associated with greater improvement between baseline and 6-month follow-up, whereas age, the BMI, comorbidities, and smoking status were not associated with mean changes in any outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS Patients recovering from COVID-19 who receive primary allied health care make progress in recovery but still experience many limitations in their daily activities after 6 months. Our findings provide reference values to health care providers and health care policy makers regarding what to expect from the recovery of patients who receive health care from 1 or more primary allied health professionals. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04735744; https://tinyurl.com/3vf337pn. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.2340/jrm.v54.2506.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne I Slotegraaf
- Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Marissa H G Gerards
- Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Arie C Verburg
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Marian A E de van der Schueren
- Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Lifestyle, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Hinke M Kruizenga
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maud J L Graff
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Department of Rehabilitation, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Edith H C Cup
- Department of Rehabilitation, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Johanna G Kalf
- Department of Rehabilitation, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Antoine F Lenssen
- Department of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Willemijn M Meijer
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Nivel, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Renée A Kool
- Lung Foundation Netherlands, Amersfoort, Netherlands
| | - Rob A de Bie
- Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Philip J van der Wees
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Department of Rehabilitation, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Thomas J Hoogeboom
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McCrum C, Bhatt TS, Gerards MHG, Karamanidis K, Rogers MW, Lord SR, Okubo Y. Perturbation-based balance training: Principles, mechanisms and implementation in clinical practice. Front Sports Act Living 2022; 4:1015394. [PMID: 36275443 PMCID: PMC9583884 DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1015394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the mid-2000s, perturbation-based balance training has been gaining interest as an efficient and effective way to prevent falls in older adults. It has been suggested that this task-specific training approach may present a paradigm shift in fall prevention. In this review, we discuss key concepts and common issues and questions regarding perturbation-based balance training. In doing so, we aim to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the current evidence on the mechanisms, feasibility and efficacy of perturbation-based balance training for researchers and practitioners. We address this in two sections: "Principles and Mechanisms" and "Implementation in Practice." In the first section, definitions, task-specificity, adaptation and retention mechanisms and the dose-response relationship are discussed. In the second section, issues related to safety, anxiety, evidence in clinical populations (e.g., Parkinson's disease, stroke), technology and training devices are discussed. Perturbation-based balance training is a promising approach to fall prevention. However, several fundamental and applied aspects of the approach need to be further investigated before it can be widely implemented in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher McCrum
- Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Neuromotor Rehabilitation Research Group, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tanvi S. Bhatt
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Marissa H. G. Gerards
- Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Physiotherapy, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Kiros Karamanidis
- Sport and Exercise Science Research Centre, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark W. Rogers
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Stephen R. Lord
- Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Yoshiro Okubo
- Falls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
De Bie RA, Verburg K, Agasi-Idenburg C, Cup EHC, Dekker C, Van Dongen JM, Geleijn E, Gerards MHG, Graff M, Van Heerde R, Kalf H, Kammerer M, De Kruif A, Kruizenga HM, Van der Leeden M, Lenssen TAF, Meijer WM, Ostelo R, Ronteltap A, Van der Schaaf M, Van Oers S, De van der Schueren MAE, Slotegraaf AI, Veenhof C, Hoogeboom TJ, Van der Wees P. Evaluation of Allied Healthcare in Patients Recovering from Covid-19: Study Protocol and Baseline Data of a National Prospective Cohort Study. J Rehabil Med 2022; 54:jrm00309. [PMID: 35735900 PMCID: PMC9422882 DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v54.2506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To report the study protocol and baseline characteristics of a prospective cohort study to evaluate longitudinal recovery trajectories of patients recovering from COVID-19 who have visited a primary care allied health professional. Design Report of the protocol and baseline characteristics for a prospective cohort study with a mixed-methods approach. Patients Patients recovering from COVID-19 treated by primary care dietitians, exercise therapists, occupational therapists, physical therapists and/or speech and language therapists in the Netherlands. Methods The prospective study will measure primary outcome domains: participation, health-related quality of life, fatigue, physical functioning, and costs, at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Interviews, on the patients’ experiences with allied healthcare, will be held with a subsample of patients and allied health professionals. Results The cohort comprises 1,451 patients (57% female, mean age 49 (standard deviation 13) years). Preliminary results for the study cohort show that 974 (67%) of the participants reported mild/moderate severity symptoms during the infection period and patients reported severe restrictions in activities of daily living compared with previous research in other patient populations. Both quantitative and qualitative, will provide insight into the recovery of patients who are treated by allied health professionals. Conclusion In conclusion, this will be the first comprehensive study to longitudinally evaluate the recovery trajectories and related costs of patients recovering from COVID-19 who are treated by allied health professionals in the Netherlands. This study will provide evidence for the optimal strategy to treat patients recovering from COVID-19 infection, including which patients benefit, and to what extent, from treatment, and which factors might impact their recovery course over time. The preliminary results of this study demonstrated the severity of restrictions and complaints at the start of therapy are substantial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Koen Verburg
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gerards MHG, Sieben J, Marcellis R, de Bie RA, Meijer K, Lenssen AF. Acceptability of a perturbation-based balance training programme for falls prevention in older adults: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e056623. [PMID: 35210345 PMCID: PMC8883254 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Perturbation-based balance training (PBT) is reported to effectively reduce falls in older adults and may even be superior compared with various exercise programmes. Due to the nature of the intervention, requiring unpredictable balance perturbations, the question arises whether acceptability is an issue in PBT. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the acceptability of PBT in older adults with a recent history of falls. DESIGN, METHOD, PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING This is a qualitative study in which semistructured interviews were conducted in 16 older adults (14 women and 2 men, mean age 73.6±6.0 years) who completed a three-session PBT protocol as part of another study in a university medical centre in the Netherlands. Typical case and purposive sampling strategies were applied. Interviews were based on the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA) alongside context-specific factors and analysed using a template analysis approach. RESULTS The results indicate that this PBT protocol is perceived as acceptable by older adults with a recent history of falls and highlight key areas for potential future modifications. Enjoyment of the novel training and technology, being able to feel safe during training, and perceived impact of increased self-efficacy and balance confidence were identified as facilitating factors. Potential issues included initial apprehension or anxiety during training and perceived impact being predominantly psychological instead of physical. Complementary to the TFA one additional theme emerged which described challenges regarding the training setting, such as preference for group training in some participants and travel to the training location. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that PBT is perceived acceptable by older adults with a history of falls. Increasing the social aspect of training and sharing the experiences of peers may be considered to enhance acceptability to new participants who initially feel apprehensive or anxious about their ability to participate in future implementation of PBT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER The article is linked to a randomised clinical trial registered on https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7680, NL7680; Results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa H G Gerards
- Department of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith Sieben
- Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Marcellis
- Department of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rob A de Bie
- Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kenneth Meijer
- Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Antoine F Lenssen
- Department of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gerards MHG, Meijer K, Karamanidis K, Grevendonk L, Hoeks J, Lenssen AF, McCrum C. Adaptability to Balance Perturbations During Walking as a Potential Marker of Falls History in Older Adults. Front Sports Act Living 2021; 3:682861. [PMID: 34095828 PMCID: PMC8169998 DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2021.682861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Given that falls most commonly occur during walking due to unexpected balance perturbations like trips and slips, walking-based balance assessment including walking stability and adaptability to such perturbations could be beneficial for fall risk assessment in older adults. This cross-sectional study reanalyzed data from two larger studies conducted with the same walking protocol. Participants completed unperturbed walking trials at speeds of 0.4 m/s up to 1.8 m/s in 0.2 m/s steps. Ten unannounced treadmill belt acceleration perturbations were then applied while participants walked at equivalent stability, assessed using the margins of stability. Retrospective (12 months) falls incidence was collected to divide participants into people with and without a history of falls. Twenty older adults (mean age 70.2 ± 2.9 years) were included in this analysis; eight people with one or more recent falls and 12 people without, closely matched by sex, age and height. No significant differences were found in unperturbed walking parameters or their variability. Overall perturbation-recovery step behavior differed slightly (not statistically significant) between the groups after the first perturbation and differences became more pronounced and significant after repetition of perturbations. The No-Falls group significantly reduced the number of recovery steps needed across the trials, whereas the Falls group did not show these improvements. People with a previous fall tended to have slightly delayed and more variable recovery responses after perturbation compared to non-fallers. Non-fallers demonstrate more signs of adaptability to repeated perturbations. Adaptability may give a broader indication of the ability of the locomotor system to respond and improve responses to sudden walking perturbations than unperturbed walking variability or recovery to a single novel perturbation. Adaptability may thus be a more useful marker of falls history in older adults and should be considered in further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa H G Gerards
- Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Department of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Kenneth Meijer
- Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Kiros Karamanidis
- Sports and Exercise Science Research Centre, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lotte Grevendonk
- Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.,TI Food and Nutrition, Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Joris Hoeks
- Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.,TI Food and Nutrition, Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Antoine F Lenssen
- Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Department of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Christopher McCrum
- Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gerards MHG, Marcellis RGJ, Poeze M, Lenssen AF, Meijer K, de Bie RA. Perturbation-based balance training to improve balance control and reduce falls in older adults - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:9. [PMID: 33407204 PMCID: PMC7788687 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01944-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Falls are a common cause of injuries and hospitalization among older adults. While conventional balance training appears effective in preventing falls, a relatively large number of training sessions are needed and retention of the effects after the training period is hard to accomplish. This may be because these interventions are not sufficiently task-specific for the mechanism of falls. Many falls in older adults occur due to unexpected external perturbations during gait, such as trips. Therefore, there is increasing interest in perturbation-based balance training (PBT), which is a more task-specific intervention to improve reactive balance control after unexpected perturbations. The literature suggests that PBT may be more effective and require fewer training sessions to reduce falls incidence in older adults, than conventional balance training. We aim to evaluate the effect of a three-session PBT protocol on balance control, daily life falls and fear of falling. Secondly, we will evaluate the acceptability of the PBT protocol. Methods This is a mixed-methods study combining a single-blind (outcome assessor) randomized controlled trial (RCT) using a parallel-group design, and qualitative research evaluating the acceptability of the intervention. The study sample consists of community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years and older who have recently fallen and visited the MUMC+ outpatient clinic. Subjects are randomized into two groups. The control group (n = 40) receives usual care, meaning referral to a physical therapist. The intervention group (n = 40) receives usual care plus three 30-min sessions of PBT in the Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment. Subjects’ balance control (Mini-BESTest) and fear of falling (FES-I) will be assessed at baseline, and 4 weeks and 3 months post-baseline. Daily life falls will be recorded with falls calendars until 6 months after the first follow-up measurement, long-term injurious falls will be recorded at 2-years’ follow-up via the electronic patient record. Acceptability of the PBT protocol will be evaluated with semi-structured interviews in a subsample from the intervention group. Discussion This study will contribute to the evidence for the effectiveness of PBT using a training protocol based on the available literature, and also give much needed insights into the acceptability of PBT for older adults. Trial registration Nederlands Trial Register NL7680. Registered 17-04-2019 – retrospectively registered. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-020-01944-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa H G Gerards
- Department of Physical therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+), Peter Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands. .,Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Peter Debyeplein 1, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands. .,Care and Public Health Research Institute CAPHRI, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Rik G J Marcellis
- Department of Physical therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+), Peter Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn Poeze
- Department of Surgery, division of Trauma surgery, MUMC+, Peter Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism NUTRIM, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Antoine F Lenssen
- Department of Physical therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+), Peter Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Peter Debyeplein 1, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute CAPHRI, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kenneth Meijer
- School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism NUTRIM, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Movement Sciences, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Rob A de Bie
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Peter Debyeplein 1, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute CAPHRI, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McCrum C, Gerards MHG, Karamanidis K, Zijlstra W, Meijer K. A systematic review of gait perturbation paradigms for improving reactive stepping responses and falls risk among healthy older adults. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act 2017; 14:3. [PMID: 28270866 PMCID: PMC5335723 DOI: 10.1186/s11556-017-0173-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2016] [Accepted: 02/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Falls are a leading cause of injury among older adults and most often occur during walking. While strength and balance training moderately improve falls risk, training reactive recovery responses following sudden perturbations during walking may be more task-specific for falls prevention. The aim of this review was to determine the variety, characteristics and effectiveness of gait perturbation paradigms that have been used for improving reactive recovery responses during walking and reducing falls among healthy older adults. Methods A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE and CINAHL databases in December 2015, repeated in May 2016, using sets of terms relating to gait, perturbations, adaptation and training, and ageing. Inclusion criteria: studies were conducted with healthy participants of 60 years or older; repeated, unpredictable, mechanical perturbations were applied during walking; and reactive recovery responses to gait perturbations or the incidence of laboratory or daily life falls were recorded. Results were narratively synthesised. The risk of bias for each study (PEDro Scale) and the levels of evidence for each perturbation type were determined. Results In the nine studies that met the inclusion criteria, moveable floor platforms, ground surface compliance changes, or treadmill belt accelerations or decelerations were used to perturb the gait of older adults. Eight studies used a single session of perturbations, with two studies using multiple sessions. Eight of the studies reported improvement in the reactive recovery response to the perturbations. Four studies reported a reduction in the percentage of laboratory falls from the pre- to post-perturbation experience measurement and two studies reported a reduction in daily life falls. As well as the range of perturbation types, the magnitude and frequency of the perturbations varied between the studies. Conclusions To date, a range of perturbation paradigms have been used successfully to perturb older adults’ gait and stimulate reactive response adaptations. Variation also exists in the number and magnitudes of applied perturbations. Future research should examine the effects of perturbation type, magnitude and number on the extent and retention of the reactive recovery response adaptations, as well as on falls, over longer time periods among older adults. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s11556-017-0173-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher McCrum
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Department of Human Movement Science, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Institute of Movement and Sport Gerontology, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marissa H G Gerards
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Department of Human Movement Science, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,azM Herstelzorg Centre for Geriatric Rehabilitation and Care, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kiros Karamanidis
- Institute of Movement and Sport Gerontology, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Sport and Exercise Science Research Centre, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | - Wiebren Zijlstra
- Institute of Movement and Sport Gerontology, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kenneth Meijer
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Department of Human Movement Science, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|