Association Between Wearable Device Measured Activity and Patient-Reported Outcomes for Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Wearable devices are increasingly used in research and clinical care though the relevance of their data in the context of validated outcomes remains unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to characterize the relationship between smartwatch activity and patient-centered outcomes in patients with heart failure.

METHODS

CHIEF-HF (Canagliflozin: Impact on Health Status, Quality of Life and Functional Status in Heart Failure) was a randomized-controlled clinical trial that enrolled participants with heart failure and a compatible smartphone. Participants were provided a Fitbit Versa 2 and completed serial Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaires (KCCQs) through a smartphone application. We evaluated the relationship between daily step count and floors climbed and KCCQ total symptom (TS) and physical limitation (PL) scores at baseline and their respective changes between 2 and 12 weeks using linear regression models, with restricted cubic splines for nonlinear associations.

RESULTS

In total, 425 patients were included: 44.5% women, 40.9% with reduced ejection fraction. Baseline daily step count increased across categories of KCCQ-TS scores (2,437.6 ± 1,419.5 steps/d for scores 0 to 24 vs 4,870.9 ± 3,171.3 steps/d for scores 75 to 100; P < 0.001) with similar results for KCCQ-PL scores. This relationship remained significant for KCCQ-TS and KCCQ-PL scores after multivariable adjustment. Importantly, changes in daily step count were significantly associated with nonlinear changes in KCCQ-TS (P = 0.004) and KCCQ-PL (P = 0.003) scores. Floors climbed was associated with baseline KCCQ scores alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Daily step count was nonlinearly associated with health status at baseline and over time in patients with heart failure. These results may inform interpretation of wearable device data in clinical and research contexts. (A Study on Impact of Canagliflozin on Health Status, Quality of Life, and Functional Status in Heart Failure [CHIEF-HF]; NCT04252287).

Recruitment Strategies of a Decentralized Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial: The Canagliflozin Impact on Health Status, Quality of Life and Functional Status in Heart Failure (CHIEF-HF) Trial

BACKGROUND

There has been growing Interest in patient-centered clinical trials using mobile technologies to reduce the need for in-person visits. The CHIEF-HF (Canagliflozin Impact on Health Status, Quality of Life and Functional Status in Heart Failure) trial was designed as a double-blind, randomized, fully decentralized clinical trial (DCT) that identified, consented, treated, and followed participants without any in-person visits. Patient-reported questionnaires were the primary outcome, which were collected by a mobile application. To inform future DCTs, we sought to describe the strategies used in successful trial recruitment.

METHODS

This article describes the operational structure and novel strategies employed in a completely DCT by summarizing the recruitment, enrollment, engagement, retention, and follow-up processes used in the execution of the trial at 18 centers.

RESULTS

A total of 18 sites contacted 130,832 potential participants, of which 2572 (2.0%) opened a hyperlink to the study website, completed a brief survey, and agreed to be contacted for potential inclusion. Of these, 1333 were eligible, and 658 consented; there were 182 screen failures, due primarily to baseline Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores' not meeting inclusion criteria, resulting in 476 participants' being enrolled (18.5%). There was significant site-level variation in the number of patients invited (median = 2976; range 73-46,920) and in those agreeing to be contacted (median = 2.4%; range 0.05%-16.4%). At the site with the highest enrollment, patients contacted by electronic medical record portal messaging were more likely to opt into the study successfully than those contacted by e-mail alone (7.8% vs 4.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

CHIEF-HF used a novel design and operational structure to test the efficacy of a therapeutic treatment, but marked variability across sites and strategies for recruiting participants was observed. This approach may be advantageous for clinical research across a broader range of therapeutic areas, but further optimization of recruitment efforts is warranted.

REGISTRATION

NCT04252287 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04252287.

The SGLT2 inhibitor canagliflozin in heart failure: the CHIEF-HF remote, patient-centered randomized trial

Large traditional clinical trials suggest that sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors improve symptoms in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In the midst of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic, we sought to confirm these benefits in a new type of trial that was patient centered and conducted in a completely remote fashion. In the CHIEF-HF trial ( NCT04252287 ), 476 participants with HF, regardless of EF or diabetes status, were randomized to 100 mg of canagliflozin or placebo. Enrollment was stopped early due to shifting sponsor priorities, without unblinding. The primary outcome was change in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Total Symptom Score (KCCQ TSS) at 12 weeks. The 12-week change in KCCQ TSS was 4.3 points (95% confidence interval, 0.8-7.8; P = 0.016) higher with canagliflozin than with placebo, meeting the primary endpoint. Similar effects were observed in participants with HFpEF and in those with HFrEF and in participants with and without diabetes, demonstrating that canagliflozin significantly improves symptom burden in HF, regardless of EF or diabetes status. This randomized, double-blind trial, conducted without in-person interactions between doctor and patient, can serve as a model for future all-virtual clinical trials.

Association of Recent Use of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants With Intracranial Hemorrhage Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated With Alteplase

IMPORTANCE

Current guidelines recommend against use of intravenous alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke who are taking non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and functional outcomes of intravenous alteplase among patients who were taking NOACs prior to stroke and compare outcomes with patients who were not taking long-term anticoagulants.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective cohort study of 163 038 patients with acute ischemic stroke either taking NOACs or not taking anticoagulants prior to stroke and treated with intravenous alteplase within 4.5 hours of symptom onset at 1752 US hospitals participating in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke program between April 2015 and March 2020, with complementary data from the Addressing Real-world Anticoagulant Management Issues in Stroke registry.

EXPOSURES

Prestroke treatment with NOACs within 7 days prior to alteplase treatment.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurring within 36 hours after intravenous alteplase administration. There were 4 secondary safety outcomes, including inpatient mortality, and 7 secondary functional outcomes assessed at hospital discharge, including the proportion of patients discharged home.

RESULTS

Of 163 038 patients treated with intravenous alteplase (median age, 70 [IQR, 59 to 81] years; 49.1% women), 2207 (1.4%) were taking NOACs and 160 831 (98.6%) were not taking anticoagulants prior to their stroke. Patients taking NOACs were older (median age, 75 [IQR, 64 to 82] years vs 70 [IQR, 58 to 81] years for those not taking anticoagulants), had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities, and experienced more severe strokes (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 10 [IQR, 5 to 17] vs 7 [IQR, 4 to 14]) (all standardized differences >10). The unadjusted rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 3.7% (95% CI, 2.9% to 4.5%) for patients taking NOACs vs 3.2% (95% CI, 3.1% to 3.3%) for patients not taking anticoagulants. After adjusting for baseline clinical factors, the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was not significantly different between groups (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.88 [95% CI, 0.70 to 1.10]; adjusted risk difference [RD], -0.51% [95% CI, -1.36% to 0.34%]). There were no significant differences in the secondary safety outcomes, including inpatient mortality (6.3% for patients taking NOACs vs 4.9% for patients not taking anticoagulants; adjusted OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.01]; adjusted RD, -1.20% [95% CI, -2.39% to -0%]). Of the secondary functional outcomes, 4 of 7 showed significant differences in favor of the NOAC group after adjustment, including the proportion of patients discharged home (45.9% vs 53.6% for patients not taking anticoagulants; adjusted OR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.06 to 1.29]; adjusted RD, 3.84% [95% CI, 1.46% to 6.22%]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous alteplase, use of NOACs within the preceding 7 days, compared with no use of anticoagulants, was not associated with a significantly increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage.

Efficacy of a centralized, blended electronic, and human intervention to improve direct oral anticoagulant adherence: Smartphones to improve rivaroxaban ADHEREnce in atrial fibrillation (SmartADHERE) a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Improving adherence to direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is challenging, and simple text messaging reminders have not been effective.

METHODS

SmartADHERE was a randomized trial that tested a personalized digital and human direct oral anticoagulant adherence intervention compared to usual care. Eligibility required age ≥ 18, newly-prescribed (≤90 days) rivaroxaban for atrial fibrillation (AF), 1 of 4 at-risk criteria for nonadherence, and a smartphone. The intervention consisted of combination of a medication management smartphone app, daily app-based reminders, adaptive text messaging, and phone-based counseling for severe nonadherence. The primary outcome was the proportion of days covered by rivaroxaban (PDC) at 6 months. There were 25 U.S. sites, all cardiology and electrophysiology outpatient practices, activated for a target sample size of 378, but the study was terminated by the sponsor prior to reaching target enrollment.

RESULTS

There were 139 participants (age 65±9.6 years, 30% female, median CHA₂DS₂-VASc score 3 with IQR 2 to 4, mean total medication burden 7.7±4.4). DOAC adherence was high in both arms with no difference in the primary outcome (PDC 0.86±0.25 intervention vs 0.88±0.25 control, p=0.62) or in secondary outcomes including PDC ≥ 0.80 and medication persistence. Per protocol analyses had similar results. Because of the high overall PDC, the likelihood to answer the primary hypothesis was only 51% even if target enrollment were achieved. There were no study-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a centralized digital and human adherence intervention was feasible across multiple sites. Overall adherence was much higher than expected despite prescreening for at-risk individuals. SmartADHERE illustrates the challenges of trials of behavioral and technology interventions, where enrollment itself may lead to selection bias or treatment effects. Pragmatic study designs, such as cluster randomization or stepped-wedge implementation, should be considered to improve enrollment and generalizability.

Novel Trial Design: CHIEF-HF

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

The expense of clinical trials mandates new strategies to efficiently generate evidence and test novel therapies. In this context, we designed a decentralized, patient-centered randomized clinical trial leveraging mobile technologies, rather than in-person site visits, to test the efficacy of 12 weeks of canagliflozin for the treatment of heart failure, regardless of ejection fraction or diabetes status, on the reduction of heart failure symptoms.

Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and other antimicrobials in patients with Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infections

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin is commonly used to treat staphylococcal infections, but there has not been a definitive analysis of the pharmacokinetics of this antibacterial in relation to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) that could be used to determine a target pharmacodynamic index for treatment optimisation.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify relationships between vancomycin dosage, serum concentration, MIC and antimicrobial activity by using data gathered from a therapeutic monitoring environment that observes failures in some cases.

METHODS

We investigated all patients with a Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infection at a 300-bed teaching hospital in the US during a 1-year period. Clinical and pharmacokinetic information was used to determine the following: (i) whether steady-state 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24) divided by the MIC (AUC24/MIC) values for vancomycin could be precisely calculated with a software program; (ii) whether the percentage of time vancomycin serum concentrations were above the MIC (%Time>MIC) was an important determinant of vancomycin response; (iii) whether the time to bacterial eradication differed as the AUC24/MIC value increased; (iv) whether the time to bacterial eradication for vancomycin differed compared with other antibacterials at the same AUC24/MIC value; and (v) whether a relationship existed between time to bacterial eradication and time to significant clinical improvement of pneumonia symptoms.

RESULTS

The median age of the 108 patients studied was 74 (range 32-93) years. Measured vancomycin AUC24/MIC values were precisely predicted with the A.U.I.C. calculator in a subset of our patients (r2 = 0.935). Clinical and bacteriological response to vancomycin therapy was superior in patients with higher (> or = 400) AUC24/MIC values (p = 0.0046), but no relationship was identified between vancomycin %Time>MIC and infection response. Bacterial eradication of S. aureus (both methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant) occurred more rapidly (p = 0.0402) with vancomycin when a threshold AUC24/MIC value was reached. S. aureus killing rates were slower with vancomycin than with other antistaphylococcal antibacterials (p = 0.002). There was a significant relationship (p < 0.0001) between time to bacterial eradication and the time to substantial improvement in pneumonia score.

CONCLUSIONS

Vancomycin AUC24/MIC values predict time-related clinical and bacteriological outcomes for patients with lower respiratory tract infections caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

Clinical pharmacodynamics of linezolid in seriously ill patients treated in a compassionate use programme

OBJECTIVE

To characterise the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships for linezolid efficacy.

DESIGN AND STUDY POPULATION

Retrospective nonblinded analysis of severely debilitated adult patients with numerous comorbid conditions and complicated infections enrolled under the manufacturer's compassionate use programme.

METHODS

Patients received intravenous or oral linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours. Plasma concentrations were obtained and a multicompartmental pharmacokinetic model was fitted. Numerical integration of the fitted functions provided the area under the concentration-time curve over 24 hours (AUC), the ratio of AUC to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) and the percentage of time that plasma concentrations exceeded the MIC (%T>MIC).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Modelled pharmacodynamic outcomes of efficacy included probabilities of eradication and clinical cure (multifactorial logistic regression, nonparametric tree-based modelling, nonlinear regression) and time to bacterial eradication (Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression). Factors considered included AUC/MIC, %T>MIC, site of infection, bacterial species and MIC, and other medical conditions.

RESULTS

There were 288 cases evaluable by at least one of the efficacy outcomes. Both %T>MIC and AUC/MIC were highly correlated (Spearman r2 = 0.868). In our analyses, within specific infection sites, the probability of eradication and clinical cure appeared to be related to AUC/MIC (eradication: bacteraemia, skin and skin structure infection [SSSI], lower respiratory tract infection [LRTI], bone infection; clinical cure: bacteraemia, LRTI) and %T>MIC (eradication: bacteraemia, SSSI, LRTI; clinical cure: bacteraemia, LRTI). Time to bacterial eradication for bacteraemias appeared to be related to the AUC, %T>MIC and AUC/MIC. For most sites, AUC/MIC and %T>MIC models performed similarly.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher success rates for linezolid may occur at AUC/MIC values of 80-120 for bacteraemia, LRTI and SSSI. Chance of success in bacteraemia, LRTI and SSSI also appear to be higher when concentrations remain above the MIC for the entire dosing interval.

Linezolid in the Treatment of Osteomyelitis: Results of Compassionate Use Experience

BACKGROUND

This case series examines osteomyelitis patients enrolled into a prospective, open label, noncomparative, non-randomized compassionate use program. Patients received 600 mg bid iv or po linezolid.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

89 patients were enrolled into the compassionate use program with the diagnosis of osteomyelitis and were evaluated for clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability. Informed consent was obtained from the patients or their guardians and guidelines for human experimentation of the US Department of Health and Human Services and/or those of the investigators' institutions were followed in the conduct of this clinical research.

RESULTS

55 cases of osteomyelitis met the inclusion criteria for clinical assessment. The 55 courses included long bone (53%), diabetic foot (18%), sternal wound (14.5%) and vertebral osteomyelitis (15%). Clinical assessment at longterm follow-up occurred at a median of 195 days after the last dose, and the clinical cure rate in 22 evaluable cases was 81.8% and failure rate 18.2%. The most common clinical adverse drug events (ADEs) were gastrointestinal disturbances. Reduction in hemoglobin/hematocrit and in platelet counts were the most common laboratory ADEs.

CONCLUSION

Linezolid iv or po was successful in treating patients with osteomyelitis caused by resistant grampositive organisms or those with intolerance or nonresponsiveness to other potentially effective treatments. Larger comparator controlled studies should be performed to confirm these findings.

Safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of linezolid for treatment of resistant Gram-positive infections in cancer patients with neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Linezolid is a recently approved oxazalidinone with extended activity against Gram-positive bacteria. We evaluated the results of linezolid therapy in neutropenic cancer patients with Gram-positive bacterial infections from a compassionate-use program.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, open-label, non-comparative, non-randomized compassionate-use treatment program in patients with serious Gram-positive infections. To qualify for enrollment patients were required to have an infection resistant to available antimicrobial agents, or in whom available agents had failed or to which they were intolerant. Patients with absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) <500 cells/mm(3) or <1000 cells/mm(3) and expected to decrease to <500 cells/mm(3), and who received linezolid 600 mg twice daily were included. Plasma samples for population pharmacokinetic analysis were collected. Clinical and microbiological assessments of outcomes were made at the end of therapy and at short-term follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the patients in the compassionate-use trial, 103 were neutropenic. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] age was 50.1 (17.5) years, 47% were female, and 47.6% had a baseline ANC </=100 cells/mm(3). The mean (SD) duration of linezolid therapy was 14.6 (11.4) days. The most common site of infection was the bloodstream (90.3%), and the most commonly identified pathogen was vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (83%). A total of 83 (80.5%) and 52 (50.4%) patients were evaluable for clinical and microbiological outcomes at the end of therapy, respectively. Clinical and microbiological cure rates in the evaluable patients were 79% and 86%, respectively. Linezolid was well-tolerated in this patient population, with an overall adverse event rate of 17.5%; 5% of patients required discontinuation of the drug due to side-effects. The pharmacokinetics of linezolid in patients with neutropenia did not differ from the overall compassionate-use population.

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid was safe and effective in treating resistant Gram-positive infections in neutropenic cancer patients. Comparative clinical trials to evaluate further the effectiveness and safety of linezolid in this patient population are warranted.

Clinical experience with linezolid for the treatment of nocardia infection

Linezolid is an oxazolidinone that has activity against most gram-positive bacteria, including in vitro activity against all Nocardia species and strains. We describe 6 clinical cases of nocardiosis that were successfully treated with linezolid. Two patients had underlying X-linked chronic granulomatous disease, and 2 patients were receiving chronic corticosteroid therapy. Four of 6 patients had disseminated disease, and 2 of these 4 patients had multiple brain abscesses. Four patients primarily received monotherapy; for the fifth patient, linezolid was added to a failing multiple-drug regimen, and, for the sixth patient, it was used as part of combination therapy. All 6 patients were successfully treated, although 1 patient had a presumed relapse of central nervous system infection after premature discontinuation of the drug. Linezolid appears to be an effective alternative for the treatment of nocardiosis.

Population pharmacokinetics of linezolid in patients treated in a compassionate-use program

Data obtained from 318 adult patients treated under the linezolid compassionate-use protocol were used to develop a population model of the pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral linezolid. All of the patients received 600 mg of linezolid every 12 h, intravenously and/or orally. Blood samples (2 to 10 per patient; median, 4) were obtained and assayed for linezolid by high-performance liquid chromatography. These data and patient covariates were modeled by iterative two-stage analysis, and model discrimination was done by Akaike's information criterion. Of the patient covariates considered (age, sex, ideal body weight, baseline serum albumin, hepatic or renal dysfunction, underlying malignancy, organ transplantation, surgical status, global severity of illness, site of infection, route of administration, and location of care [intensive-care unit, general floor, or outpatient]), only normalized creatinine clearance (CL(CR)) and body weight explained significant portions of the variance and were incorporated into the pharmacokinetic model. The final model included central and peripheral compartments with parallel capacity-limited (nonrenal) and first-order (renal [CL(R)]) clearances. Volumes and clearances were normalized to the ideal body weight, and CL(R) was modeled as proportional to CL(CR). Compared to previously studied adult volunteers, intrinsic clearance was approximately 60% higher and the maximum rate of metabolism was twice as high in these debilitated patients, resulting in lower area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) values (P < 0.001). The derived 24-h AUC, averaged over the first 7 days of treatment, ranged between 57 and 871 (median, 191) micro g/ml. 24 h. Despite these variations, linezolid provided high rates of clinical cure, as well as microbiological success, in the patients treated in the compassionate-use program. The mechanism(s) of these pharmacokinetic differences is unknown and requires further mechanistic study.

Linezolid for the treatment of multidrug-resistant, gram-positive infections: experience from a compassionate-use program

Linezolid was provided for treatment of multidrug-resistant, gram-positive infections through a compassionate-use program. Patients (n=796) received 600 mg of linezolid intravenously or orally every 12 h (828 treatment courses). Bacteremia was present in 46% of infections, endocarditis was present in 10.6%, and line-related infections were present in 31.1%. Other infections included intraabdominal infections (15.1%), complicated skin and skin-structure infections (13.3%), and osteomyelitis (10.7%). Causative pathogens included vancomycin-resistant enterococci (66.3%) and methicillin-resistant staphylococci (22.1%). Clinical intent-to-treat (ITT) outcomes in the evaluable population were as follows: cure, 73.3%; failure, 6.8%; and indeterminate, 19.9%. Microbiological ITT outcomes in evaluable patients were as follows: cure, 82.4%; failure, 14.1%; and indeterminate, 3.5%. At the test of cure assessment, the clinical cure and microbiological success rates were 91.5% and 85.8%, respectively. The most common adverse events possibly related to linezolid use were gastrointestinal disturbances (9.8% of cases), thrombocytopenia (7.4% of cases), decreased hemoglobin/hematocrit levels (4.1% of cases), and cutaneous reactions (4.0% of cases). Linezolid provided high rates of clinical cure and microbiological success in this complicated patient population, with very good overall tolerance.

The efficacy and safety of linezolid as treatment for Staphylococcus aureus infections in compassionate use patients who are intolerant of, or who have failed to respond to, vancomycin

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus continues to increase annually. Unfortunately, only a few therapeutic agents are available for the treatment of patients with such infections and all of the existing drugs have limitations. A pressing need exists, therefore, to identify new antibiotics for use in this clinical setting. The efficacy and safety of linezolid were studied in a compassionate use treatment programme and the results of treating a subset of patients with S. aureus infections are presented here.

METHODS

Patients received linezolid in a dosage of 600 mg intravenously (iv) and/or orally twice daily. Clinical and bacteriological responses were assessed after a minimum of 7 days and following completion of therapy.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and ninety-six patients who suffered 828 episodes of infection were enrolled in the linezolid compassionate use protocol. Of these, 183 patients received linezolid for 191 infections caused by S. aureus; in 151 cases, patients were intolerant of vancomycin, had a mixed S. aureus/vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infection or had no iv access, and, in 40 cases, patients had failed to respond to treatment with vancomycin. The median age of the patients was 57 years (range 14-93 years) and 53.9% were female. The predominant sites of infection were as follows: bone or joint (27.2%); skin and skin structure (25.1%); bloodstream (20.9%); and lower respiratory tract (12.6%). The clinical success rates in the clinically evaluable and all-treated populations were 83.9% and 62.3%, respectively, whereas the bacteriological eradication rates were 76.9% and 70.2% in the bacteriologically evaluable and all-treated populations, respectively. Linezolid was well tolerated. In 76 (39.8%) of the 191 episodes of infection, patients experienced one or more adverse events or exhibited one or more abnormal laboratory results; in 35 (18.3%) of the 191 cases it was necessary to discontinue treatment. Gastrointestinal tract-related symptoms (nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea) were the most common possibly or probably related adverse events and the most common reasons for drug discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid was effective and well tolerated in patients with S. aureus infections who were enrolled in this compassionate use protocol.

Area under the inhibitory curve and a pneumonia scoring system for predicting outcomes of vancomycin therapy for respiratory infections by Staphylococcus aureus

Treatment factors predictive of clinical and microbiological outcomes and the relationship between a pneumonia scoring system and clinical outcomes in vancomycin-treated patients with a Staphylococcus aureus-associated lower-respiratory-tract infection (LRTI) were studied. A computer database review identified patients for whom S. aureus was isolated from a respiratory-tract specimen between January 1 and December 31, 1998, and who had antimicrobials ordered within 72 hours of isolation of that organism. Through further review of individual patient charts, this group was restricted to those treated with vancomycin for a documented S. aureus-associated LRTI. Classification-and-regression-tree (CART) modeling was performed to determine which clinical variables were correlated with clinical outcomes and microbiological outcomes. Median changes in clinical pneumonia scores from baseline in two patient groups (those with clinical success and those with clinical failure) were compared. Seventy patients met the study criteria. CART modeling found that both outcomes were associated with area under the inhibitory curve (AUIC). The pneumonia scoring system was predictive of eventual clinical success as early as day 3 of treatment; having at least a 4-point decrease in the pneumonia score by day 3 was correlated with an 87% clinical success rate. Both AUIC and a pneumonia scoring system were useful for predicting clinical and microbiological outcomes of vancomycin therapy in patients with LRTIs caused by S. aureus.

E5 murine monoclonal antiendotoxin antibody in gram-negative sepsis: a randomized controlled trial. E5 Study Investigators

CONTEXT

Knowledge and understanding of gram-negative sepsis have grown over the past 20 years, but the ability to treat severe sepsis successfully has not.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of E5 in the treatment of patients with severe gram-negative sepsis.

DESIGN

A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 136 US medical centers from April 1993 to April 1997, designed with 90% power to detect a 25% relative risk reduction, incorporating 2 planned interim analyses.

SETTING

Intensive care units at university medical centers, Veterans Affairs medical centers, and community hospitals.

PATIENTS

Adults aged 18 years or older, with signs and symptoms consistent with severe sepsis and documented or probable gram-negative infection.

INTERVENTION

Patients were assigned to receive 2 doses of either E5, a murine monoclonal antibody directed against endotoxin (n = 550; 2 mg/kg per day by intravenous infusion 24 hours apart) or placebo (n = 552).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was mortality at day 14; secondary end points were mortality at day 28, adverse event rates, and 14-day and 28-day mortality in the subgroup without shock at presentation.

RESULTS

The trial was stopped after the second interim analysis. A total of 1090 patients received study medication and 915 had gram-negative infection confirmed by culture. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality between the E5 and placebo groups at either day 14 (29.7% vs 31.1%; P = .67) or day 28 (38.5% vs 40.3%; P = .56). Patients presenting without shock had a slightly lower mortality when treated with E5 but the difference was not significant (28.9% vs 33.0% for the E5 and placebo groups, respectively, at day 28; P = .32). There was a similar profile of adverse event rates between E5 and placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite adequate sample size and high enrollment of patients with confirmed gram-negative sepsis, E5 did not improve short-term survival. Current study rationale and designs should be carefully reviewed before further large-scale studies of patients with sepsis are conducted.

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of moxifloxacin

Moxifloxacin is a recently developed fluoroquinolone antibiotic. It is rapidly absorbed following oral administration, reaching a mean peak drug plasma concentration (C(max)) of approximately 3.56 mg/l within 2 h after a 400 mg dose. The rate and extent of absorption are not significantly affected by food or elevated gastric pH. Moxifloxacin binds weakly to plasma proteins and penetrates well into most tissue and fluid compartments, with generally higher drug concentrations in tissue and fluid compartments than those observed in plasma. Moxifloxacin is metabolized to an N-sulfate conjugate and an acyl glucuronide in humans. The N-sulfate and the unchanged moxifloxacin are detected in plasma, urine and feces. The acyl-glucuronide is detected in plasma and urine, but not in feces. The plasma elimination half-life ranges from 8.2-15.1 h in healthy individuals. The urinary excretion of the unchanged drug accounts for 19-22% of the given dose. Neither renal nor hepatic impairment significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin.

Ciprofloxacin concentrations in lung tissue following a single 400 mg intravenous dose

Intravenous ciprofloxacin is frequently prescribed for the treatment of infections due to nosocomially acquired gram-negative organisms, including those originating in the respiratory tract. In this study, the concentrations of ciprofloxacin in serum and lung tissue were determined by HPLC in patients undergoing lung surgery. A total of 22 patients scheduled for lung surgery received a single 400 mg i.v. dose of ciprofloxacin administered as a 1 h infusion. A specimen of healthy lung tissue was obtained from resected lung from 18 of the patients for analysis of ciprofloxacin concentration during the following time intervals after infusion (one sample/patient): 0-2, 2-4, 4-8 and 8-12 h. Corresponding mean serum and tissue concentrations were 2.37 mg/L and 3.84 mg/kg (0-2 h), 1.18 mg/L and 1.92 mg/kg (2-4 h), 0.69 mg/L and 1.77 mg/kg (4-8 h), and 0.13 mg/L and 0.67 mg/kg (8-12 h). Ciprofloxacin distributed rapidly to lung tissue, as seen by the high concentrations in the lung tissue as early as 2 h after infusion. Concentrations in lung tissue were generally higher than those in serum (tissue:serum ratios ranged from 1.7 to 7.1). The mean tissue concentrations found in this study remained above the MIC for most susceptible organisms.

Genesis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), how treatment of MRSA infections has selected for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, and the importance of antibiotic management and infection control

We extensively studied the epidemiology and time course of endemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the Millard Fillmore Hospital, a 600-bed teaching hospital in Buffalo. The changeover from methicillin-susceptible S. aureus to MRSA begins on the first hospital day, when patients are given cefazolin as presurgical prophylaxis. Under selective antibiotic pressure, colonizing flora change within 24 to 48 hours. For patients remaining hospitalized, subsequent courses of third-generation cephalosporins further select and amplify the colonizing MRSA population. Therefore, managing antibiotic selective pressure might be essential. Other strategies include attention to dosing, so that serum concentrations of drug exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration, and antibiotic cycling. Although there are some promising new antibiotics on the horizon, it is necessary to deal with many resistance patterns by using the combined strategies of infection control and antibiotic management.

Assessing antibacterial pharmacoeconomics in the intensive care unit

Intensive care units (ICUs) represent areas of high use of antibacterials and other pharmacy goods and services. Many institutions view their ICUs as a target for drug-use surveillance and cost-containment programmes. Economic assessment of antibacterial interventions in the ICU should include all direct costs and patient outcomes. Nonetheless, many of these institutions focus their efforts at reducing antibacterial costs without considering the consequences of these actions. It is possible that devoting more resources to antibacterials can have an overall positive economic impact if more appropriate antibacterial use reduces length of stay, decreases bacterial resistance or lowers frequency of adverse complications. Two consequences of antibacterial use which can result in substantial economic burdens to institutions are drug-induced complications (toxicities and adverse events) and the development of antibacterial-resistant organisms. These events are logical targets for performing pharmacoeconomic studies to evaluate appropriate and inappropriate antibacterial use. Either of these problems can increase length of stay, which is the single most important variable influencing the overall cost of patient care. The primary goal of patient care is to hasten patients' clinical improvement. This will result in decreased antibacterial acquisition costs, decreased lengths of ICU and hospital stays, and ultimately decreased consumption of hospital resources. These can be accomplished by using strategies to guide antibacterial use in order to reduce failures, adverse events, toxicity and antimicrobial resistance.

In nosocomial pneumonia, optimizing antibiotics other than aminoglycosides is a more important determinant of successful clinical outcome, and a better means of avoiding resistance

In in vitro and animal models, antibiotics show good relationships between concentration and response, when response is quantified as the rate of bacterial eradication. The strength of these in vitro relationships promises their utility for dosage regimen design and predictable cure of infections such as nosocomial pneumonia. In spite of their intuitive logic, close relationships between dosage and bacterial eradication have not been easy to show in clinical studies of nosocomial pneumonia. Presumably, a variety of patient, disease, bacterial, and pharmacokinetic variables cloud these relationships in patients, and delay their elucidation in patient trials. Patients with serious infections like nosocomial pneumonia require bactericidal antimicrobial activity. Studies in our laboratory show that the minimum effective antimicrobial action is an area under the inhibitory titer (AUIC) of 125, in which AUIC is calculated as the 24 hour serum area under the curve (AUC) divided by the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen. This target AUIC may be achieved with either a single antibiotic or it can be the sum of AUIC values of two or more antibiotics. There is considerable variability in the actual AUIC value for patients when antibiotics are administered in their usual recommended dosages. Examples of this variance will be provided using aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and beta-lactams. The achievement of minimally effective antibiotic action, consisting of an AUIC of at least 125, is associated with bacterial eradication in about 7 days for beta-lactams and quinolones. Adding an aminoglycoside to beta-lactams may produce a slight increase in their rate of bacterial killing in vivo, but because of their narrow therapeutic window, and the associated low doses in relation to MIC, there are situations in which the aminoglycosides may be unable to add sufficient additional AUIC. Antibiotic activity indices allow clinicians to evaluate individualized patient regimens. Furthermore, antibiotic activity is a predictable clinical endpoint with predictable clinical outcome. This value also is highly predictive of the development of bacterial resistance. Antimicrobial regimens that do not achieve an AUIC of at least 125 cannot prevent the selective pressure that leads to overgrowth of resistant bacterial subpopulations. The methods based on the determination of AUIC have clinical applicability in routine practice, through software developed for this purpose. These indices can assist with patient management strategies in a prospective manner because they can identify patients at high risk of therapeutic failure or acquired resistance early in therapy before therapy fails. Our studies show that calculations of AUIC can be used to prospectively target regimens to improve the chances of cure with nosocomial pneumonia and other serious infections. A clinical intervention team has been organized to optimize antimicrobial regimens as early in therapy as possible, to lower the high cost events such as failure and acquired bacterial resistance.

Changing the infection control paradigm from off-line to real time: the experience at Millard Fillmore Health System

In 1993, several departments at Millard Fillmore Health System joined efforts to initiate a new approach to infection control. The main emphasis of this program is to move infection control to a real-time mode to manage patient outcomes daily. The principal objective was to decrease the number of nosocomial infections by 10%, with a particular emphasis on surgical-site infections. Besides real-time surveillance, we are critically evaluating several aspects of the management of nosocomial infections. High-level computer support has been the frame-work upon which this program was built. We have microcomputers that are linked directly to microbiology, pharmacy, billing, and admissions, downloading data several times daily. An expert software system merges all of the data, and from this we can target patients for real-time interventions. The computer system allows all inpatients to be screened for either infection control or antibiotic management interventions on a daily basis, with minimal time being spent on data collection and maximal efforts devoted to interventions at the bedside. Additionally, the infection management program will assist in maintaining the extraordinarily low expenditures on antimicrobial agents. During 1993, the Millard Fillmore Health System spent $924,884 on antibiotics, an amount approximately 50% that of comparably sized hospitals.

Use of benchmarking techniques to justify the evolution of antibiotic management programs in healthcare systems

OBJECTIVE

To apply basic benchmarking techniques to hospital antibiotic expenditures and clinical pharmacy personnel and their duties, to identify cost savings strategies for clinical pharmacy services.

DESIGN

Prospective survey of 18 hospitals ranging in size from 201 to 942 beds. Each was asked to provide antibiotic expenditures, an overview of their clinical pharmacy services, and to describe the duties of clinical pharmacists involved in antibiotic management activities. Specific information was sought on the use of pharmacokinetic dosing services, antibiotic streamlining, and oral switch in each of the hospitals.

RESULTS

Most smaller hospitals (< 300 beds) did not employ clinical pharmacists with the specific duties of antibiotic management or streamlining. At these institutions, antibiotic management services consisted of formulary enforcement and aminoglycoside and/or vancomycin dosing services. The larger hospitals we surveyed employed clinical pharmacists designated as antibiotic management specialists, but their usual activities were aminoglycoside and/or vancomycin dosing services and formulary enforcement. In virtually all hospitals, the yearly expenses for antibiotics exceeded those of Millard Fillmore Hospitals by $2,000-3,000 per occupied bed. In a 500-bed hospital, this difference in expenditures would exceed $1.5 million yearly. Millard Fillmore Health System has similar types of patients, but employs clinical pharmacists to perform streamlining and/or switch functions at days 2-4, when cultures come back from the laboratory.

CONCLUSIONS

The antibiotic streamlining and oral switch duties of clinical pharmacy specialists are associated with the majority of cost savings in hospital antibiotic management programs. The savings are considerable to the extent that most hospitals with 200-300 beds could readily cost-justify a full-time clinical pharmacist to perform these activities on a daily basis. Expenses of the program would be offset entirely by the reduction in the actual pharmacy expenditures on antibiotics.

Mathematical examination of dual individualization principles (II): The rate of bacterial eradication at the same area under the inhibitory curve is more rapid for ciprofloxacin than for cefmenoxime

OBJECTIVE

To compare two antibiotics at equal ranges of area under the inhibitory curve (AUIC) exposure to determine if the rate of bacterial eradication differed between these antibiotics.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparison of two previously collected studies of similar patients with nosocomial pneumonia.

SETTING

Hospitalized patients, most intubated in critical care units with nosocomial pneumonia.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients treated with either i.v. ciprofloxacin (n = 74) or the i.v. third-generation cephalosporin cefmenoxime (n = 43) were compared for their length of treatment required to eradicate bacterial pathogens from their respective infection sites, using serial cultures from the site of infection. All patients were also assessed for clinical outcomes. Serum samples were obtained to evaluate individual patient antibiotic pharmacokinetics, which were used to model pharmacodynamics of response. The HPLC assay used for each antibiotic had interday coefficients of variation < 10 percent. Serum concentration versus time profiles were fit using the computer program ADAPT II to determine pharmacokinetic parameters for each patient. The primary drug exposure measure that related to response was the AUIC, calculated as steady-state AUC0-24/minimum inhibitory concentration.

RESULTS

AUIC values in the patients ranged from 6.0 to more than 7000, yet the AUIC value was highly predictive of time to bacterial eradication (p < 0.001). Although more than 75 percent of patients eventually achieved eradication of pathogens from tracheal aspirate cultures, ciprofloxacin and cefmenoxime differed significantly in the time required to sterilize these cultures. At appropriate AUIC values (> 250) for ciprofloxacin, the median time to eradication was two days, while cefmenoxime (also at AUIC values > 250) required six days to achieve the same result.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the more rapid in vitro bacterial killing, which is characteristic of ciprofloxacin at optimal AUIC values, can manifest in vivo as more rapid clearance of bacteria from the respiratory tract of patients, even when both agents are controlled for initial antibacterial exposure (i.e., same AUIC).

The development of a bedside algorithm capable of targeting anti-endotoxins to the responder subpopulations

The published selection criteria for use of anti-endotoxin antibodies are modeled on the criteria used in protocol enrollment of patients. These criteria are not suitable for therapeutic decision-making, because the trials themselves prove that the enrollment criteria have both low sensitivity and low specificity. In order to develop a selection method with greater sensitivity and specificity, we examined the charts and records of 23 patients that we enrolled in the multicenter trials of E5 and HA-1A. We retrospectively determined that seven of our 23 enrolled patients were optimal candidates, based on a pattern of rapid clinical deterioration followed by improvement in 24-96 h. We then explored a variety of different modes of bedside patient selection, in search of a method to select as many of the seven optimal candidates as possible while at the same time rejecting the greatest number of the 16 who showed no benefit when treated. None of the resulting selection methods has perfect performance, but nearly all were better than the original protocol enrollment criteria. In our patients, bacteremia had 57% sensitivity and 56% specificity, which was quite similar to the findings in the HA-1A multicenter trial. Shock had 100% sensitivity and 44% specificity, while a baseline organ dysfunction score of > or = 5 had 100% sensitivity and 69% specificity. A new algorithm that we developed based on a patient's need for vasopressors and baseline organ dysfunction had 100% sensitivity and 81% specificity. This algorithm could identify all seven of the optimal candidates, plus three more.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patients

Seventy-four acutely ill patients were treated with intravenous ciprofloxacin at dosages ranging between 200 mg every 12 h and 400 mg every 8 h. A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis relating drug exposure (and other factors) to infectious outcome was performed. Plasma samples were obtained and assayed for ciprofloxacin by high-performance liquid chromatography. Samples from patients were frequently cultured so that the day of bacterial eradication could be determined. The pharmacokinetic data were fitted by iterative two-stage analysis, assuming a linear two-compartment model. Logistic regression was used to model ciprofloxacin exposure (and other potential covariates) versus the probabilities of achieving clinical and microbiologic cures. The same variables were also modelled versus the time to bacterial eradication by proportional hazards regression. The independent variables considered were dose, site of infection, infecting organism and the MIC for it, percent time above the MIC, peak, peak/MIC ratio, trough, trough/MIC ratio, 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), AUC/MIC ratio (AUIC), presence of other active antibacterial agents, and patient characteristics. The most important predictor for all three measures of ciprofloxacin pharmacodynamics was the AUIC. A 24-h AUIC of 125 SIT-1.h (inverse serum inhibitory titer integrated over time) was found to be a significant breakpoint for probabilities of both clinical and microbiologic cures. At an AUIC below 125 (19 patients), the percent probabilities of clinical and microbiologic cures were 42 and 26%, respectively. At an AUIC above 125 (45 patients), the probabilities were 80% (P < 0.005) and 82% (P < 0.001), respectively. There were two significant breakpoints in the time-to-bacterial-eradication data. At an AUIC below 125 (21 patients), the median time to eradication exceeded 32 days; at an AUIC of 125 to 250 (15 patients), time to eradication was 6.6 days: and at AUIC above 250 (28 patients), the median time to eradication was 1.9 days (groups differed; P < 0.005). These findings, when combined with pharmacokinetic data reported in the companion article, provide the rationale and tools needed for targeting the dosage of intravenous ciprofloxacin to individual patients' pharmacokinetics and their bacterial pathogens' susceptibilities. An a priori dosing algorithm (based on MIC, patient creatine clearance and weight, and the clinician-specified AUIC target) was developed. This approach was shown, retrospectively, to be more precise than current guidelines, and it can be used to achieve more rapid bacteriologic and clinical responses to ciprofloxacin, as a consequence of targeting the AUIC.

Development of a population pharmacokinetic model and optimal sampling strategies for intravenous ciprofloxacin

Data obtained from 74 acutely ill patients treated in two clinical efficacy trials were used to develop a population model of the pharmacokinetics of intravenous (i.v.) ciprofloxacin. Dosage regimens ranged between 200 mg every 12 h and 400 mg every 8 h. Plasma samples (2 to 19 per patient; mean +/- standard deviation = 7 +/- 5) were obtained and assayed (by high-performance liquid chromatography) for ciprofloxacin. These data and patient covariates were modelled by iterative two-stage analysis, an approach which generates pharmacokinetic parameter values for both the population and each individual patient. The final model was used to implement a maximum a posteriori-Bayesian pharmacokinetic parameter value estimator. Optimal sampling theory was used to determine the best (maximally informative) two-, three-, four-, five-, and six-sample study designs (e.g., optimal sampling strategy 2 [OSS2] was the two-sample strategy) for identifying a patient's pharmacokinetic parameter values. These OSSs and the population model were evaluated by selecting the relatively rich data sets, those with 7 to 10 samples obtained in a single dose interval (n = 29), and comparing the parameter estimates (obtained by the maximum a posteriori-Bayesian estimator) based on each of the OSSs with those obtained by fitting all of the available data from each patient. Distributional clearance and apparent volumes were significantly related to body size (e.g., weight in kilograms or body surface area in meters squared); plasma clearance (CLT in liters per hour) was related to body size and renal function (creatinine clearance [CLCR] in milliliters per minute per 1.73 m2) by the equation CLT = (0.00145.CLCR + 0.167).weight. However, only 30% of the variance in CLT was explained by this relationship, and no other patient covariates were significant. Compared with previously published data, this target population had smaller distribution volumes (by 30%; P < 0.01) and CLT (by 44%; P < 0.001) than weight- and CLCR- matched stable volunteers. OSSs provided parameter estimates that showed good to excellent estimates of CLT (or area under the concentrations-time curve [AUC]) were unbiased and precise (e.g., r2 for AUC for all data versus AUC for OSS2 was > 0.99) and concentration-time profiles were accurately reconstructed. These results will be used to model the pharmacodynamic relationships between ciprofloxacin exposure and response and to aid in developing algorithms for individual optimization of ciprofloxacin dosage regimens.