Circulating endothelial cells and risk of progression in patients with hepatocellular cancer receiving sorafenib

Aim

We investigated the behavior of circulating endothelial cells (CEC) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving sorafenib, and whether CEC levels were associated with time to progression (TTP).

Materials & methods

CECs in advanced HCC patients receiving sorafenib were counted at baseline and every 4 weeks.

Results

Twenty four HCC patients were enrolled in the study. Median TTP was 3.2 months (1-6). Median baseline CEC levels were 67 cells/ml, with an increase of 169.8% after 4 weeks of treatment. Any time CEC levels in patients with a TTP lower than 4 months were higher, but not statistically significant, compared with those in patients with TTP more than 4 months.

Conclusion

Treatment with sorafenib changed CEC levels in HCC patients.

The clinical relevance of early anti-adalimumab antibodies detection in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis: A prospective multicentre study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the relevance of anti-adalimumab (anti-ADA) antibodies (Abs) and their relationship with clinical/laboratory features in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients affected with RA, AS and PsA were prospectively enrolled. Clinical/laboratory characteristics, disease activity, anti-ADA, anti-nuclear (ANA), anti-double strand (ds)DNA, anti-extractable nuclear antigens (anti-ENA) and anti-phospholipid Abs (aPL) were evaluated at baseline, 4, 12 and 24 weeks of adalimumab treatment.

RESULTS

Anti-ADA Abs were observed in 11/58 (19%) patients; they were detected within the 4th week of therapy in 90.9% of the positive subjects. Anti-ADA positivity was associated with significantly lower mean adalimumab serum levels (P<0.05). Treatment failure was observed in 20/58 (34.5%) patients and was significantly associated with anti-ADA Abs (P<0.05). Mean adalimumab serum levels were significantly lower in patients with treatment failure than in the responders one, both in the whole cohort (P<0.01) and in the group of anti-ADA positive patients (P<0.01). Adverse events happened more often in anti-ADA positive then in anti-ADA negative patients (27.3% vs 14.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-ADA abs could be considered an early marker associated to a poor clinical response to adalimumab treatment. Routine ANA/anti-ENA/aPL monitoring did not reveal as useful tools to predict the development of anti-ADA abs.