Fractal analysis of dental periapical radiographs: A revised image processing method

OBJECTIVE

To assess trabecular bone structure as calculated with fractal analysis by 2 binarization processes: White and Rudolph's original method (WR.o) and a revised version (WR.r). Fractal dimension (FD) values calculated with WR.r (FD.r) and a gray-scale-based method (FD.f) were also compared. FD, histogram parameters, and lacunarity were compared by dentate status, jaw location, and sex.

STUDY DESIGN

Regions of interest from digital periapical radiographs were defined below the teeth roots and in the edentulous sites of 37 patients. Histograms were assessed for pixel values. Binarization was performed with WR.o and then with WR.r, in which the outliers were removed. FD was assessed using WR.r (FD.r) and (FD.f). Histograms were assessed to obtain pixel values. Lacunarity was calculated.

RESULTS

WR.r revealed fewer trabeculae, branches, and junctions than WR.o (P < .0001). The majority of the mean differences between FD.r and FD.f were within the 95% CI. Dentate areas had greater mean gray levels than partially edentulous areas (P = .0027). FD.f was higher in the mandible (P = .01), but gray-level SD (P < .0001) and lacunarity (P = .02) were greater in the maxilla. FD.f and lacunarity were higher (P = .0005) and lower (P = .0014) in males, respectively.

CONCLUSION

WR.r was effective in revealing skeletonized bone trabeculae by removing non-trabecular noise. FD.r and FD.f revealed good agreement. FD.f, histogram parameters, and lacunarity differed based on dentate status, jaw location, and sex.

Narrow-Diameter Implants for Partial Fixed and Removable Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To answer the following focus question: Are narrow-diameter implants feasible to support fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and partial removable dental prostheses (PRDPs)?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review followed the PRISMA statement and was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42020153729). Six databases and the gray literature were searched through October 2021 without language, publication time, or follow-up restrictions. The main outcomes were survival, success, and marginal bone loss (MBL). Risk of bias was assessed for each study design, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed (α = .05).

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and 3 were included in the meta-analyses. In total, 1,624 NDIs and 339 standard-diameter implants (SDIs) were placed in 1,060 patients. Follow-up varied from 1 to 10 years, and 17 failures (implant loss) were recorded. No differences in survival rate for FDPs supported by NDIs vs SDIs were found (odds ratio [OR] = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.18 to 1.92, P = .38). However, Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluating only NDI performance revealed a higher survival rate of NDIs ≥ 3.3-mm diameter (P = .002), placed with delayed loading (P = .024), and placed in the maxilla (P = .014). FDPs supported by NDIs vs SDIs presented similar success rates (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 0.41 to 5.34, P = .55); however, MBL was lower in the NDI group (mean difference = -0.23 mm, 95% CI: -0.41 to -0.06, P = .01). Insufficient data regarding PRDPs were available.

CONCLUSION

Despite the limited studies available, FDPs supported by NDIs presented survival and success rates comparable to those supported by SDIs, with slightly lower MBL. For PRDPs, strong conclusions were not possible.

Failures in Single Extra-Short Implants (≤ 6 mm): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to compare the survival rate of single crowns supported by extra-short implants (≤ 6 mm) to those supported by conventional implants, with or without previous maxillary sinus augmentation. The proportion of failures was described according to the type of complication and follow-up periods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomized and prospective clinical trials were selected from six databases and gray literature. The risk of bias was evaluated by Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist, and the certainty of the evidence was analyzed with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Meta-analyses were processed with RevMan and MedCalc Statistical Software.

RESULTS

Single crowns supported by extra-short implants had a similar risk of failure to those supported by conventional implants, regardless of previous maxillary sinus augmentation (P > .05). Overall failure proportion of extra-short implants was 5.19%, but it varied according to follow-up (1.18% before loading, 1.56% at 12 months, 1.20% at 24 months, 2.10% at 48 months). Biologic failure complications were 37.90% for bleeding on probing, 22.45% for peri-implantitis, and 11.29% for infection. Prosthodontics failure complications were 14.88% for abutment failures and 14.73% for prosthetic screw loosening. Considering the risk of bias, most studies were classified at moderate risk.

CONCLUSION

The risk of failure of single crowns supported by extra-short implants is similar to those supported by conventional implants, regardless of previous maxillary sinus augmentation or follow-up period. The most frequent biologic and prosthetic complications were bleeding on probing and abutment failures, respectively.

Possibilidades conservadoras para controle de osteoartrite em articulação temporomandibular: um relato de caso

Introdução: As desordens temporomandibulares (DTM’s) são um conjunto de condições que afetam as articulações temporomandibulares (ATM’s), os músculos da mastigação e estruturas associadas. Existem várias subclassificações das DTM’s que podem ocorrer de forma isolada ou combinadas. A osteoartrite é definida como uma condição inflamatória que resulta na erosão da cartilagem articular e degeneração do osso subcondral adjacente. Os sinais e sintomas clínicos incluem a crepitação, limitação dos movimentos mandibulares e dor articular intermitente. Objetivo: O objetivo deste trabalho foi relatar um caso clínico sobre osteoartrite na ATM e avaliar a eficácia do plano de tratamento indicado para o caso. Relato de Caso: Paciente do sexo feminino, 19 anos, compareceu à clínica Odontológica da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora – Campus Governador Valadares, com a seguinte queixa: “dores na região de cabeça, pescoço e ombros, sensação de cansaço e sensibilidade a luz”, que se iniciaram há cinco anos. A avaliação da paciente consistiu na anamnese, aplicação de questionários: questionário baseado na Academia Americana de Dor Orofacial, hipervigilância, catastrofização e qualidade do sono, e exame físico. A partir dos dados obtidos, foi realizado o diagnóstico de osteoartrite e mialgia centralmente mediada. Diante do quadro, foi escolhido um tratamento conservador com a utilização de medicamentos, exercícios de alongamento muscular, termoterapia e higiene do sono e em especial para a osteoartrite a redução de carga por meio de orientação da paciente e uso, durante o sono, de dispositivo interoclusal. Conclusão: A paciente apresentou melhora significativa em relação a sintomatologia dolorosa e amplitude de movimento.

Antibiofilm Activity of an Experimental Ricinus Communis Dentifrice on Soft Denture Liners

The disadvantage of liners materials is the difficulty of biofilm control. It was compared an experimental dentifrice contained Ricinus communis, with commercials dentifrices as antibiofilm activity against microorganisms on denture liner. Six hundred specimens were distributed in 5 groups (n=18/ microorganism): water; experimental dentifrice; specific dentifrice for denture and two conventional dentifrices against C. albicans; C. glabrata; S. mutans; S. aureus; E. coli. Each group had a negative (n=5; without contamination) and positive control (n=15/ microorganism; without cleaning). The antibiofilm activity was evaluated by the method of biofilm formation in triplicate. The specimens were contaminated in a standard way and incubated. After that, manual brushing was performed (60 s), washed with PBS, immersed in liquid culture medium for resuspension and sowing in solid medium. The results (mean of triplicates) were expressed in CFU/mL. The data was submitted to Shapiro-Wilk, ANOVA and Tukey test (p<0.05). The specific dentifrice (1.27±1.20) was the most effective against S. mutans, followed by conventional (Trihydral, 3.13±0.88; Colgate, 2.16±2.02) and experimental (3.81±1.37) dentifrices, which were similar to each other (p=0.008). All of them were different from water (4.79±1.42). The specific (0.21±0.21) and experimental (0.36±0.25) dentifrices were similar against S. aureus, with a higher mean of CFU when compared to conventional (Colgate, 0.06±0.13), which was more efficient (p=0.000). For C. albicans, C. glabrata and E. coli, all dentifrices were similar to water (p=0.186). It was concluded, that the experimental dentifrice was effective against S. aureus and had not efficacy against Candida spp.; S. mutans; E. coli, as occurred with the commercials dentifrices.

In Vitro Evaluation of Resilient Liner after Brushing with Conventional and Experimental Ricinus communis-Based Dentifrices

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of experimental (Ricinus communis) and commercial dentifrices used for denture cleaning on abrasiveness (gravimetric method; roughness), hardness, and color stability of a resilient relining material.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty circular (15 × 3 mm) specimens were distributed into four groups: C (control; brushing with water); CO (brushing with Colgate - for natural teeth); CB (brushing with Corega Brite - for complete dentures); RC (brushing with experimental dentifrice). Brushing was performed in a toothbrushing machine with a soft brush and a dentifrice suspension for 50 minutes, calculated to correspond to 1 year of regular brushing. Variables were measured initially and after the trial period. For the gravimetric method, the difference in mass was considered. The surface roughness was measured by a rugosimeter, and the hardness test was performed by a Shore A durometer. Color changes (ΔE; CIE L*a*b* and NBS systems) were measured by a portable spectrophotometer. Results were analyzed by ANOVA/Tukey's test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The largest mass variation (μg; p < 0.0001) occurred in C (-6.21 ± 3.18). Concerning roughness, CB (0.26 ± 0.04) showed the lowest value, followed by RC (0.29 ± 0.08) and CO (0.34 ± 0.24) (p < 0.0001). Group C produced the greatest surface roughness (0.72 ± 0.25). Hardness values decreased after brushing with water (p = 0.014). No significant differences were found among RC (50.31 ± 1.03), CO (49.11 ± 1.31), CB (49.17 ± 1.23), and C (48.02 ± 1.26). Color stability was similar in all groups (p = 0.135; C: 2.3 ± 0.77; CO: 2.6 ± 0.54; CB: 2.2 ± 0.44; RC: 2.9 ± 1.56).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of experimental dentifrice could be indicated, as it showed similar results to the specific dentifrice, keeping the resilient material properties within acceptable values.

Clinical trial for evaluation of Ricinus communis and sodium hypochlorite as denture cleanser

Objective

This study evaluated Ricinus communis and sodium hypochlorite solutions in terms of biofilm removal ability, remission of candidiasis, antimicrobial activity, and participant satisfaction.

Material and Methods

It was conducted a controlled clinical trial, randomized, double-blind, and crossover. Sixty-four denture wearers with (n=24) and without candidiasis (n=40) were instructed to brush (3 times/day) and immerse their dentures (20 min/day) in different storage solutions (S1 / S2: 0.25% / 0.5% sodium hypochlorite; S3: 10% R. communis; S4: Saline).The trial period for each solution was seven days and a washout period of seven days was used before starting the use of another solution. The variables were analyzed at baseline and after each trial period. The biofilm of inner surfaces of maxillary dentures was disclosed, photographed, and total and dyed areas were measured (Image Tool software). The percentage of biofilm was calculated. Remission of candidiasis was assessed by visual scale and score were attributed. Antimicrobial activity was assessed by the DNA-Checkerboard hybridization method. Patient satisfaction was measured using a questionnaire.

Results

S1 (4.41±7.98%) and S2 (2.93±5.23%) were more effective then S3 (6.95±10.93%) in biofilm remotion(P<0.0001). All solutions were different from the control (11.07±11.99%). S3 was the most effective solution in remission of candidiasis (50%), followed by S1 (46%). Concerning antimicrobial action, S1/S2 were similar and resulted in the lowest microorganism mean count (P=0.04), followed by S3. No significant differences were found with patient's satisfaction.

Conclusions

10% R. communis and 0.25% sodium hypochlorite were effective in biofilm removal, causing remission of candidiasis and reducing the formation of microbial colonies in denture surfaces. All solutions were approved by patients.

Antimicrobial activity of complete denture cleanser solutions based on sodium hypochlorite and Ricinus communis - a randomized clinical study

To preserve oral health and to maintain the prosthetic devices, it is important not only to improve the properties of commonly known hygiene products, but also to investigate new materials with antimicrobial action.

In Vitro Analysis of Surface Roughness of Acrylic Resin Exposed to the Combined Hygiene Method of Brushing and Immersion in Ricinus communis and Sodium Hypochlorite

PURPOSE

To evaluate a solution based on Ricinus communis (Castor oil) for denture cleansing, comparing it to sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) for the surface roughness of heat-polymerized acrylic resin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty polished and unpolished resin specimens (90 × 30 × 4 mm) were evaluated before and after their exposure to protocol hygiene: brushing the specimens with a specific denture brush and mild soap for 3 minutes, three times a day, and immersing them in hygiene solutions (0.25% NaOCl-S1 and 0.5% NaOCl-S2; 10% R. communis-S3; saline-S4: control) for 20 minutes. Surface roughness was evaluated by rugosimeter and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) before and after the protocol. For evaluation of surface roughness, polished and unpolished surfaces were used.

RESULTS

The roughness of the polished surface was not affected by time (p = 0.062), but was affected by solutions (p < 0.0001) and the interaction between factors (p = 0.005). For S1 and S4, the period did not influence the roughness. For S2, there was a change after 7 days, remaining stable after 14 days. For S3, there were changes, and stabilization occurred after 14 days. After 7 and 14 days, S2 and S3 promoted major changes, but after 21 days, there were no differences among solutions, except saline. The unpolished surface was not influenced by factors: period (p = 0.115), solution (p = 0.120), and their interaction (p = 0.382). SEM analysis showed similar results on the evaluation of surface roughness.

CONCLUSIONS

The polished surface of the prosthesis was more susceptible to changes when exposed to hygiene solutions, and although the 0.5% NaOCl solution promoted an increase in the surface roughness compared with the same solution at 0.25% and R. communis at 10%, the values are clinically acceptable.