1
|
Schmid P, Abraham J, Chan S, Brunt AM, Nemsadze G, Baird RD, Park YH, Hall P, Perren T, Stein RC, Mangel L, Ferrero JM, Phillips M, Conibear J, Cortes J, Foxley A, de Bruin E, McEwen R, Nikolaou M, Stetson D, Dougherty B, Prendergast A, McLaughlin-Callan M, Burgess M, Lawrence C, Cartwright H, Mousa K, Turner N, Wheatley D. Abstract PD1-11: Mature survival update of the double-blind placebo-controlled randomised phase II PAKT trial of first-line capivasertib plus paclitaxel for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-pd1-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: In the PAKT study, addition of the oral AKT inhibitor capivasertib to 1st-line paclitaxel therapy for metastatic TNBC resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint; Schmid, J Clin Oncol 2020). The stratified PFS hazard ratio was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.50-1.08; one-sided P=0.06; predefined significance level of 0.10, one-sided; median PFS 5.9 vs 4.2 months with capivasertib vs placebo). Overall survival (OS) results were immature at the primary analysis with 53% of events but suggested long OS with capivasertib (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.37-0.99; two-sided P=0.04). Here we report final results.
Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase II trial, recruited women with untreated, metastatic TNBC. Total of 140 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to paclitaxel 90mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15) with either capivasertib (400mg twice daily) or placebo (days 2-5, 9-12, 16-19) every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints included OS in the ITT population and in patients with and without PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-alterations.
Results: With a median F/U of 40.0 months, median OS was longer in the capivasertib arm (19.1 vs 13.5 months, stratified HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.47-1.05, p=0.085). In contrast to the earlier analysis, no meaningful differences were seen in terms of benefit with capivasertib between patients with or without alterations of PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN. Median OS numerically favoured capivasertib vs placebo both in the PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered (stratified HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.21-1.58, p=0.290) and PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN non-altered subgroup (stratified HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.47-1.18, p=0.207). The safety profile of capivasertib plus paclitaxel was unchanged.
Conclusions: Final OS results show a numerical trend favouring capivasertib; effects were observed regardless of PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations. Consistent with the previously observed PFS benefit, these findings support further evaluation of first-line Capivasertib plus paclitaxel for metastatic TNBC in the ongoing Capitello290 randomised phase III trial in patients with and without PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations.
Citation Format: Peter Schmid, Jacinta Abraham, Stephen Chan, Adrian Murray Brunt, Gia Nemsadze, Richard D Baird, Yeon Hee Park, Peter Hall, Timothy Perren, Robert C Stein, László Mangel, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Melissa Phillips, John Conibear, Javier Cortes, Andrew Foxley, Elza de Bruin, Robert McEwen, Myria Nikolaou, Daniel Stetson, Brian Dougherty, Aaron Prendergast, Max McLaughlin-Callan, Matthew Burgess, Cheryl Lawrence, Hayley Cartwright, Kelly Mousa, Nicholas Turner, Duncan Wheatley. Mature survival update of the double-blind placebo-controlled randomised phase II PAKT trial of first-line capivasertib plus paclitaxel for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-11.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Schmid
- 1Barts Cancer Institute, StBartholomew’s Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Stephen Chan
- 3Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Richard D Baird
- 6Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Peter Hall
- 8Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy Perren
- 9Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Robert C Stein
- 10National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - László Mangel
- 11Medical University of Pécs, Institute of Oncology, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Jean-Marc Ferrero
- 12Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Melissa Phillips
- 13Barts Cancer Institute, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - John Conibear
- 13Barts Cancer Institute, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Andrew Foxley
- 15IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elza de Bruin
- 15IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert McEwen
- 15IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, London, United Kingdom
| | - Myria Nikolaou
- 15IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Stetson
- 15IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Aaron Prendergast
- 13Barts Cancer Institute, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Max McLaughlin-Callan
- 13Barts Cancer Institute, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Burgess
- 13Barts Cancer Institute, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cheryl Lawrence
- 13Barts Cancer Institute, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hayley Cartwright
- 13Barts Cancer Institute, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kelly Mousa
- 13Barts Cancer Institute, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas Turner
- 16Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schmid P, Abraham J, Chan S, Wheatley D, Brunt AM, Nemsadze G, Baird RD, Park YH, Hall PS, Perren T, Stein RC, Mangel L, Ferrero JM, Phillips M, Conibear J, Cortes J, Foxley A, de Bruin EC, McEwen R, Stetson D, Dougherty B, Sarker SJ, Prendergast A, McLaughlin-Callan M, Burgess M, Lawrence C, Cartwright H, Mousa K, Turner NC. Capivasertib Plus Paclitaxel Versus Placebo Plus Paclitaxel As First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: The PAKT Trial. J Clin Oncol 2019; 38:423-433. [PMID: 31841354 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 200] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling pathway is frequently activated in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The AKT inhibitor capivasertib has shown preclinical activity in TNBC models, and drug sensitivity has been associated with activation of PI3K or AKT and/or deletions of PTEN. The PAKT trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding capivasertib to paclitaxel as first-line therapy for TNBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II trial recruited women with untreated metastatic TNBC. A total of 140 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15) with either capivasertib (400 mg twice daily) or placebo (days 2-5, 9-12, 16-19) every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), PFS and OS in the subgroup with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations, tumor response, and safety. RESULTS Median PFS was 5.9 months with capivasertib plus paclitaxel and 4.2 months with placebo plus paclitaxel (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.08; 1-sided P = .06 [predefined significance level, 1-sided P = .10]). Median OS was 19.1 months with capivasertib plus paclitaxel and 12.6 months with placebo plus paclitaxel (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.99; 2-sided P = .04). In patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors (n = 28), median PFS was 9.3 months with capivasertib plus paclitaxel and 3.7 months with placebo plus paclitaxel (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.79; 2-sided P = .01). The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events in those treated with capivasertib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel, respectively, were diarrhea (13% v 1%), infection (4% v 1%), neutropenia (3% v 3%), rash (4% v 0%), and fatigue (4% v 0%). CONCLUSION Addition of the AKT inhibitor capivasertib to first-line paclitaxel therapy for TNBC resulted in significantly longer PFS and OS. Benefits were more pronounced in patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors. Capivasertib warrants further investigation for treatment of TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Schmid
- Barts ECMC, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.,Barts Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jacinta Abraham
- Velindre National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Chan
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Adrian Murray Brunt
- University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - Gia Nemsadze
- Institute of Clinical Oncology, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Richard D Baird
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Peter S Hall
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy Perren
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Robert C Stein
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - László Mangel
- Institute of Oncology, Medical University of Pécs, Pecs, Hungary
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Shah-Jalal Sarker
- Barts ECMC, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Aaron Prendergast
- Barts ECMC, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Max McLaughlin-Callan
- Barts ECMC, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Burgess
- Barts ECMC, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Cheryl Lawrence
- Barts ECMC, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hayley Cartwright
- Barts ECMC, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kelly Mousa
- Barts ECMC, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas C Turner
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.,Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|