2
|
Gaudry M, Porto A, Guivier-Curien C, Blanchard A, Bal L, Resseguier N, Omnes V, De Masi M, Ejargue M, Jacquier A, Gariboldi V, Deplano V, Piquet P. Results of a prospective follow-up study after type A aortic dissection repair: a high rate of distal aneurysmal evolution and reinterventions. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 61:152-159. [PMID: 34355742 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We investigated the anatomical evolution of residual aortic dissection after type A repair and factors associated with poor prognosis at a high-volume aortic centre. METHODS Between 2017 and 2019, all type A aortic dissections were included for prospective follow-up. Patients without follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan available for radiological analysis and patients without residual aortic dissection were excluded from this study. The primary end point was a composite end point defined as dissection-related events including aneurysmal evolution (increased diameter > 5 mm/year), aortic reintervention for malperfusion syndrome, aortic diameter >55 mm, rapid aortic growth >10 mm/year or aortic rupture and death. The secondary end points were risk factors for dissection-related events and reintervention analysis. All immediate and last postoperative CT scans were analysed. RESULTS Among 104 patients, after a mean follow-up of 20.4 months (8-41), the risk of dissection-related events was 46.1% (48/104) and the risk of distal reintervention was 17.3% (18/104). Marfan syndrome (P < 0.01), aortic bicuspid valve (P = 0.038), innominate artery debranching (P = 0.025), short aortic cross-clamp time (P = 0.011), initial aortic diameter >40 mm (P < 0.01) and absence of resection of the primary entry tear (P = 0.015) were associated with an increased risk of dissection-related events or reintervention during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Residual aortic dissection is a serious disease requiring close follow-up at an expert centre. This study shows higher reintervention and aneurysmal development rates than currently published. To improve long-term outcomes, the early demographic and anatomic poor prognostic factors identified may be used for more aggressive treatment at an early phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marine Gaudry
- Department of Vascular Surgery, APHM, Timone Hospital, Timone Aortic Center, Marseille, France
| | - Alizée Porto
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, APHM, Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Carine Guivier-Curien
- Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Ecole Centrale Marseille, IRPHE UMR 7342, Marseille, France
| | - Arnaud Blanchard
- Department of Vascular Surgery, APHM, Timone Hospital, Timone Aortic Center, Marseille, France
| | - Laurence Bal
- Department of Vascular Surgery, APHM, Timone Hospital, Timone Aortic Center, Marseille, France
| | - Noemie Resseguier
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health Cost, APHM, Marseille, France
| | - Virgile Omnes
- Department of Vascular Surgery, APHM, Timone Hospital, Timone Aortic Center, Marseille, France
| | - Mariangela De Masi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, APHM, Timone Hospital, Timone Aortic Center, Marseille, France
| | - Meghann Ejargue
- Department of Vascular Surgery, APHM, Timone Hospital, Timone Aortic Center, Marseille, France
| | - Alexis Jacquier
- Department of Radiology, APHM, Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Vlad Gariboldi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, APHM, Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Valérie Deplano
- Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Ecole Centrale Marseille, IRPHE UMR 7342, Marseille, France
| | - Philippe Piquet
- Department of Vascular Surgery, APHM, Timone Hospital, Timone Aortic Center, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gaudry M, Ejargue M, Porto A, Omnes V, de Masi M, Bolomey S, Gariboldi V, Leveille L, Soler R, Barral PA, Jacquier A, Bal L, Piquet P. Anatomical evolution of residual type B aortic dissections and associated prognostic factors: One year results of the prospective follow-up in an expert center. Ann Vasc Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
4
|
Jean-Baptiste E, Feugier P, Cruzel C, Sarlon-Bartoli G, Reix T, Steinmetz E, Chaufour X, Chavent B, Salomon du Mont L, Ejargue M, Maurel B, Spear R, Midy D, Thaveau F, Desgranges P, Rosset E, Hassen-Khodja R, Bureau P, Ravoux M, Bozzetto C, Sevestre-Pietri MA, Terriat B, Favier C, Degeilh M, Le Hello C, Favre JP, Rinckenbach S, Loppinet A, Goueffic Y, Connault J, Alimi Y, Barthélémy P, Magne JL, Seinturier C, Choukroun ML, Rouyer O, Bitton L, Becquemin JP. Computed Tomography-Aortography Versus Color-Duplex Ultrasound for Surveillance of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2020; 13:e009886. [DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.119.009886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background
Color-duplex ultrasonography (DUS) could be an alternative to computed tomography-aortography (CTA) in the lifelong surveillance of patients after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), but there is currently no level 1 evidence. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of DUS as an alternative to CTA for the follow-up of post-EVAR patients.
Methods
Between December 16, 2010, and June 12, 2015, we conducted a prospective, blinded, diagnostic-accuracy study, in 15 French university hospitals where EVAR was commonly performed. Participants were followed up using both DUS and CTA in a mutually blinded setup until the end of the study or until any major aneurysm-related morphological abnormality requiring reintervention or an amendment to the follow-up policy was revealed by CTA. Database was locked on October 2, 2017. Our main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratios of DUS against reference standard CTA. CIs are binomial 95% CI.
Results
This study recruited prospectively 659 post-EVAR patients of whom 539 (82%) were eligible for further analysis. Following the baseline inclusion visit, 940 additional follow-up visits were performed in the 539 patients. Major aneurysm-related morphological abnormalities were revealed by CTA in 103 patients (17.2/100 person-years [95% CI, 13.9–20.5]). DUS accurately identified 40 patients where a major aneurysm-related morphological abnormality was present (sensitivity, 39% [95% CI, 29–48]) and 403 of 436 patients with negative CTA (specificity, 92% [95% CI, 90–95]). The negative predictive value and positive predictive value of DUS were 92% (95% CI, 90–95) and 39% (95% CI, 27–50), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 4.87 (95% CI, 2.9–9.6). DUS sensitivity reached 73% (95% CI, 51–96) in patients requiring an effective reintervention.
Conclusions
DUS had an overall low sensitivity in the follow-up of patients after EVAR, but its performance improved meaningfully when the subset of patients requiring effective reinterventions was considered.
Registration
URL:
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov
; Unique identifier: NCT01230203.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elixène Jean-Baptiste
- Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire, INSERM U1065, CHU de Nice, Université Côte D’Azur, Nice, France (E.J.-B., R.H.-K.)
| | - Patrick Feugier
- Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire, CHU Edouard Herriot, Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, Lyon, France (P.F.)
| | - Coralie Cruzel
- Délégation à la Recherche Clinique et à l’innovation, CHU de Nice, Université Côte D’Azur, Nice, France (C.C.)
| | - Gabrielle Sarlon-Bartoli
- C2VN, APHM, CHU Timone, Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France (G.S.-B.)
| | - Thierry Reix
- Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire, CHU Amiens-Picardie, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France (T.R.)
| | - Eric Steinmetz
- Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France (E.S.)
| | - Xavier Chaufour
- Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire et angiologie, CHU de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (X.C.)
| | - Bertrand Chavent
- Service de Chirurgie Cardio-Vasculaire, CHU de Saint-Etienne, Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France (B.C.)
| | - Lucie Salomon du Mont
- Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire et Endovasculaire, CHU de Besançon, Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France (L.S.d.M.)
| | - Meghann Ejargue
- AP-HM, Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Nord, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France (M.E.)
| | - Blandine Maurel
- CHU Nantes, l’institut du thorax, service de chirurgie vasculaire, Inserm-UN UMR-957, Nantes, France (B.M.)
| | - Rafaelle Spear
- Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire, CHU de Grenoble, Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France (R.S.)
| | - Dominique Midy
- Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France (D.M.)
| | - Fabien Thaveau
- Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire, CHU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France (F.T.)
| | - Pascal Desgranges
- Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire, CHU Henri Mondor, Créteil, France (P.D.)
| | - Eugenio Rosset
- Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Université d’Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France (E.R.)
| | - Réda Hassen-Khodja
- Service de Chirurgie Vasculaire, INSERM U1065, CHU de Nice, Université Côte D’Azur, Nice, France (E.J.-B., R.H.-K.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|