Multicenter study evaluating target attainment of anti-Factor Xa levels using various enoxaparin prophylactic dosing practices in adult trauma patients

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Enoxaparin is standard of care for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in adult trauma patients, but fixed-dose protocols are suboptimal. Dosing based on body mass index (BMI) or total body weight (TBW) improves target prophylactic anti-Xa level attainment and reduces VTE rates. A novel strategy using estimated blood volume (EBV) may be more effective based on results of a single-center study. This study compared BMI-, TBW-, EBV-based, and hybrid enoxaparin dosing strategies at achieving target prophylactic anti-Factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels in trauma patients.

DESIGN

Multicenter, retrospective review.

DATA SOURCE

Electronic health records from participating institutions.

PATIENTS

Adult trauma patients who received enoxaparin twice daily for VTE prophylaxis and had at least one appropriately timed anti-Xa level (collected 3 to 6 hours after the previous dose after three consecutive doses) from January 2017 through December 2020. Patients were excluded if the hospital-specific dosing protocol was not followed or if they had thermal burns with > 20% body surface area involvement.

INTERVENTION

Dosing strategy used to determine initial prophylactic dose of enoxaparin.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary end point was percentage of patients with peak anti-Xa levels within the target prophylactic range (0.2-0.4 units/mL).

MAIN RESULTS

Nine hospitals enrolled 742 unique patients. The most common dosing strategy was based on BMI (43.0%), followed by EBV (29.0%). Patients dosed using EBV had the highest percentage of target anti-Xa levels (72.1%). Multiple logistic regression demonstrated EBV-based dosing was significantly more likely to yield anti-Xa levels at or above target compared to BMI-based dosing (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.29-5.62, p < 0.001). EBV-based dosing was also more likely than hybrid dosing to yield an anti-Xa level at or above target (aOR 2.30, 95% CI 1.33-3.98, p = 0.003). Other pairwise comparisons between dosing strategy groups were nonsignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

An EBV-based dosing strategy was associated with higher odds of achieving anti-Xa level within target range for enoxaparin VTE prophylaxis compared to BMI-based dosing and may be a preferred method for VTE prophylaxis in adult trauma patients.

Overlapping Physiologic Signs of Sepsis and Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity After Traumatic Brain Injury: Exploring A Clinical Conundrum

BACKGROUND

Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) occurs in a subset of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and is associated with worse outcomes. Sepsis is also associated with worse outcomes after TBI and shares several physiologic features with PSH, potentially creating diagnostic confusion and suboptimal management of each. This is the first study to directly investigate the interaction between PSH and infection using robust diagnostic criteria.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with TBI admitted to a level I trauma center intensive care unit with hospital length of stay of at least 2 weeks. From January 2016 to July 2018, 77 patients diagnosed with PSH were 1:1 matched by age and Glasgow Coma Scale to 77 patients without PSH. Trauma infectious diseases subspecialists prospectively documented assessments corroborating diagnoses of infection. Extracted data including incidence, timing, classification, and anatomical source of infections were compared according to PSH diagnosis. We also evaluated daily PSH clinical feature severity scores and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria and compared values for patients with and without confirmed infection, stratified by PSH diagnosis.

RESULTS

During the first 2 weeks of hospitalization, there were no differences in rates of suspected (62%) nor confirmed (48%) infection between patients with PSH and controls. Specific treatments for PSH were initiated on median hospital day 7 and for confirmed infections on median hospital day 8. SIRS criteria could identify infection only in patients who were not diagnosed with PSH.

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of brain injury-induced autonomic nervous system dysregulation, the initiation and continuation of antimicrobial therapy is a challenging clinical decision, as standard physiologic markers of sepsis do not distinguish infected from noninfected patients with PSH, and these entities often present around the same time. Clinicians should be aware that PSH is a potential driver of SIRS, and familiarity with its diagnostic criteria as proposed by the PSH assessment measure is important. Management by a multidisciplinary team attentive to these issues may reduce rates of inappropriate antibiotic usage and misdiagnoses.

Impact of Enteral Albuterol on Bradycardic Events After Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

BACKGROUND

Acute cervical spinal cord injury (ACSCI) is commonly complicated by spinal shock, resulting in hemodynamic instability characterized by bradycardia and hypotension that can have fatal consequences. Current guidelines recommend the use of intravenous beta and dopamine agonists, such as norepinephrine and dopamine, respectively. We sought to determine whether enteral albuterol would be a safe and feasible treatment for bradycardia without an increase in the occurrence of known side effects of albuterol in patients with ACSCI.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with ACSCI admitted to an intensive care unit at a level I trauma center and treated with enteral albuterol was conducted. Patients were excluded for the following reasons: pure beta blocker use prior to injury, concurrent use of pacemaker, age of less than 18 years, or age more than 75 years. As part of the standard of care, all patients underwent mean arterial pressure (MAP) augmentation to reach a goal of greater than 85 mm Hg during the first 7 days post injury. All eligible patient charts were reviewed for demographic characteristics, daily minimum and maximum heart rate and MAP, and concomitant vasoactive medication use. Bradycardia and tachycardia were defined as heart rate less than 60 beats per minute (bpm) and greater than 100 bpm, respectively. Factors found to be associated with bradycardia on univariate analysis were entered into a multivariable generalized estimating equation analysis to determine factors independently associated with bradycardia during the study period.

RESULTS

There were 58 patients with cervical ASCI (age 45 ± 18 years, 76% men) admitted between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, that met the study criteria. The mean time to initiation of albuterol was 1.5 ± 1.7 days post injury, with a duration of 9.3 ± 4.5 days and a mean daily dosage of 7.8 ± 4.5 mg. Bradycardia was observed in 136 of 766 patient days (17%). There were a few episodes of hyperglycemia (1%) and tachycardia (3%), but no episodes of hypokalemia. In a multivariable analysis, female sex (P = 0.006) and American Spinal Cord Injury Association grade A, B, or C (P < 0.001) were associated with a higher risk of developing bradycardia, whereas dosage of albuterol (P = 0.009) and norepinephrine use (P = 0.008) were associated with a lower risk of developing bradycardia.

CONCLUSIONS

Albuterol administration in ASCI is a safe and feasible treatment for bradycardia, given that no significant side effects, such as hyperglycemia, hypokalemia, or tachycardia, were observed. The administration of enteral albuterol was well tolerated and, in a dose-dependent manner, associated with a lower occurrence of bradycardia. Further prospective trials for the use of enteral albuterol after SCI are warranted.

Factor Xa Inhibitor-Related Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background:

Since the approval of the oral factor Xa inhibitors, there have been concerns regarding the ability to neutralize their anticoagulant effects after intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Multiple guidelines suggest using prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) in these patients on the basis of research that includes a limited number of patients with ICH. Given this, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PCCs for factor Xa inhibitor–related ICH in a large, multicenter cohort of patients.

Methods:

This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study of patients with apixaban- or rivaroxaban-related ICH who received PCCs between January 1, 2015, and March 1, 2019. The study had 2 primary analysis groups: safety and hemostatic efficacy. The safety analysis evaluated all patients meeting inclusion criteria for the occurrence of a thrombotic event, which were censored at hospital discharge or 30 days after PCC administration. Patients with intracerebral, subarachnoid, or subdural hemorrhages who had at least 1 follow-up image within 24 hours of PCC administration were assessed for hemostatic efficacy. The primary efficacy outcome was the percentage of patients with excellent or good hemostasis on the basis of the modified Sarode criteria. Secondary outcomes included an evaluation of in-hospital mortality, length of stay, infusion-related reactions, and thrombotic event occurrence during multiple predefined periods.

Results:

A total of 663 patients were included and assessed for safety outcomes. Of these, 433 patients met criteria for hemostatic efficacy evaluation. We observed excellent or good hemostasis in 354 patients (81.8% [95% CI, 77.9–85.2]). Twenty-five (3.8%) patients had a total of 26 thrombotic events, of which 22 occurred in the first 14 days after PCC administration. One patient had documentation of an infusion-related reaction. For the full cohort of patients, in-hospital mortality was 19.0%, and the median intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were 2.0 and 6.0 days, respectively.

Conclusions:

Administration of PCCs after apixaban- and rivaroxaban-related ICH provided a high rate of excellent or good hemostasis (81.8%) coupled with a 3.8% thrombosis rate. Randomized, controlled trials evaluating the clinical efficacy of PCCs in patients with factor Xa inhibitor–related ICH are needed.

Oxandrolone in Patients on Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Case Series

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) induces a systemic inflammatory response, which may progress to persistent inflammation, immunosuppression, and catabolism syndrome (PICS). The anabolic steroid oxandrolone may improve the metabolic aberrations of PICS. We report our experience with 3 patients on VV ECMO who received oxandrolone after demonstrating refractory catabolism on serial nitrogen balance (NB) studies or persistent weakness. Patients in cases 1 and 3 were started on oxandrolone on VV ECMO days 45 and 29, respectively, for negative NB despite nutrition optimization. The case 2 patient started oxandrolone for persistent weakness 68 days after cannulation. All patients demonstrated improvements in NB results. One patient developed mild transaminitis while on oxandrolone, which did not alter his medication course and resolved after the medication was discontinued. The impact of oxandrolone on functional capacity varied between patients. Oxandrolone may be beneficial in persistently catabolic VV ECMO patients to improve NB results. In some patients, this may support functional recovery. Additional research is needed to identify optimal patients for therapy and to investigate the impact of oxandrolone in this population.

Collaborative Management Strategies for Drug Shortages in Neurocritical Care

Drug shortages have become all too familiar in the health care environment, with over 200 drugs currently on shortage. In the wake of Hurricane Maria in September 2017, hospitals across the USA had to quickly and creatively adjust medication preparation and administration techniques in light of decreased availability of intravenous (IV) bags used for compounding a vast amount of medications. Amino acid preparations, essential for compounding parenteral nutrition, were also directly impacted by the hurricane. Upon realization of the impending drug shortages, hospitals resorted to alternative methods of drug administration, such as IV push routes, formulary substitutions, or alternative drug therapies in hopes of preserving the small supply of IV bags available and prioritizing them for them most critical needs. In some cases, alternative drug therapies were required, which increased the risk of medication errors due to the use of less-familiar treatment options. Clinical pharmacists rounding with medical teams provided essential, patient-specific drug regimen alternatives to help preserve a dwindling supply while ensuring use in the most critical cases. Drug shortages also frequently occur in the setting of manufacturing delays or discontinuation and drug recalls, with potential to negatively impact patient care. The seriousness of the drug shortage crisis reached public attention by December 2017, when political and pharmacy organizations called for response to the national drug shortage crisis. In this article, we review institutional mitigation strategies in response to drug shortages and discuss downstream effects of these shortages, focusing on medications commonly prescribed in neurocritical care patients.

2256. Baloxavir Marboxil in Combination with Oseltamivir in Two Critically Ill Patients with Influenza A (H1N1; 2009 strain) on Veno-Venous Extra-Corporal Membranous Oxygenation

Background

Currently, there are no clinical data regarding the use of baloxavir marboxil in patients with complicated influenza infection. A study in a mouse model of influenza A infection suggested that there may be a potential benefit of combination therapy with neuraminidase inhibitors. We present the first reported use of baloxavir marboxil in combination with oseltamivir in two critically ill patients requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) support due to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by influenza AH1N1 2009.

Methods

Cases: (1) 56-year-old man with a history of coronary artery disease who was vaccinated for flu this season, presented with 5 days of cough and dyspnea and required cannulation for VV-ECMO due to severe ARDS. He was placed on continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for renal failure as well as vasopressor and inotropic support. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was positive for Influenza A H1N1 2009 strain. He received a dose of baloxavir 80 mg on Day 1 and a 7-day course of oseltamivir which was started on Day 0. Influenza PCR testing obtained 5 days after receipt of baloxavir was negative. The patient was decannulated on hospital day 7 and extubated at 14 days. (2) 50-year-old man with a history of hypertension and dyslipidemia who was not flu vaccinated, presented with symptoms of cough and dyspnea for 3 days. He was cannulated due to severe ARDS. He required CRRT for renal failure. BAL PCR tested positive for Influenza A H1N1 2009 strain. He was given two 80 mg doses of baloxavir on hospital days 1 and 5 and treated with oseltamivir for 10 days. Despite a negative PCR test for influenza on day 15, the patient remained critically ill on ECMO with multisystem organ failure.

Results

-

Conclusion

We describe the first reported clinical use of baloxavir in combination with oseltamivir for influenza A H1N1 infection in two critically ill patients with respiratory failure requiring VV ECMO. Further pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis is needed to determine optimal dosing in critically ill patients, and those requiring CRRT. Baloxavir synergy with the neuraminidase inhibitors may be of benefit in critically ill patients, and additional prospective clinical study is needed.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

2138. Impact of De-escalation of Antibiotic Surgical Prophylaxis in Lung Transplant Recipients

Background

Guidelines for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in lung transplantation (LT) are limited; since Pseudomonas colonization has been linked to acute graft rejection and development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, some centers utilize an anti-pseudomonal β-lactam as part of the surgical prophylaxis regimen. Internal data from our large academic medical center, a center that does not frequently transplant cystic fibrosis patients, identified low rates of Pseudomonascolonization and infection in LT patients. The surgical prophylaxis regimen was therefore narrowed from vancomycin/piperacillin–tazobactam (VPT) in 2013 to vancomycin/ceftriaxone (VCT). The purpose of this study was to examine the protocol change to on the incidence of Pseudomonas isolation in the post-operative period for lung transplant recipients.

Methods

This was a single-center, retrospective quasi-experimental before-after study of lung transplant recipients from July 2006 to February 2017 comparing patients who received VPT to VCT for surgical prophylaxis. Patients receiving other surgical prophylaxis regimens due to allergy or colonization history were excluded. Donor and recipient culture data from bronchoscopy samples were collected to determine the incidence of Pseudomonas in the 14-day post-transplant period. The secondary outcome was the incidence of post-transplant CDC-defined pneumonia. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.4 (Cary, NC).

Results

One hundred patients were included in the pre-protocol group (VPT), and 65 in the post-protocol group (VCT). Pseudomonas was recovered in recipient BALs on post-op day 2–14 in 8 (8%) patients in the VPT group compared with 5 (7.7%) patients in the VCT group (P = 1.0). Mean time to Pseudomonas isolation was 8.4 days in the VPT group compared with 5.4 days in the VCT group. Incidence of pneumonia on post-op day 2–14 was 6% in the VPT group vs. 3% in the VCT group (P = 0.48). Surgical site infections were rare in the VCT group with an incidence of 1.5% (1/65).

Conclusion

Isolation of Pseudomonas was rare in both time periods and an increase was not detected when anti-pseudomonal coverage was removed from the surgical prophylaxis regimen. Safe deescalation of surgical prophylaxis regimens are an important antimicrobial stewardship initiative.

Disclosures

E. Heil, ALK-Abelló: Grant Investigator, Research grant.

Impact of Ketamine Use on Adjunctive Analgesic and Sedative Medications in Critically Ill Trauma Patients

BACKGROUND

Ketamine may be used to manage pain and agitation that is refractory to what are usually considered traditional agents such as fentanyl, propofol, benzodiazepines, and dexmedetomidine; however, literature describing the use of ketamine continuous infusions for this purpose in critically ill trauma patients is limited.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to determine the impact of the initiation of a ketamine continuous infusion on sedative and analgesic use in critically ill trauma patients. Secondary objectives were to identify the patient population in which ketamine was initiated, assess the proportion of time patients were at their goal level of sedation, and determine the dosing patterns of adjunctive sedative agents.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective chart review over a 19-month period included critically ill mechanically ventilated adult trauma patients in whom a ketamine continuous infusion was initiated for management of sedation and agitation. Patients who received ketamine for other indications or by the acute pain management service were not included in this evaluation.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were included in the study. Patients in whom ketamine was initiated tended to be white men with blunt trauma. Overall, the initiation of ketamine was associated with a decrease in the amount of opioids and propofol used and an increase in the amount of ziprasidone and dexmedetomidine needed to achieve the goal Richmond Agitation Sedation Score. When compared with the time period before ketamine initiation, the proportion of time that patients achieved goal sedation was not significantly different after the addition of ketamine.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the use of ketamine in critically ill mechanically ventilated adult trauma patients was associated with decreased opioid use, it was also associated with increased use of dexmedetomidine and ziprasidone to achieve and maintain sedation. Further examination of clinical outcomes associated with these differences in drug use in a larger population of trauma patients is warranted before routine use of ketamine for analgesia and sedation can be recommended.

Impact on postoperative bleeding and cost of recombinant activated factor VII in patients undergoing heart transplantation

Background:

Cardiac transplantation can be complicated by refractory hemorrhage particularly in cases where explantation of a ventricular assist device is necessary. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) has been used to treat refractory bleeding in cardiac surgery patients, but little information is available on its efficacy or cost in heart transplant patients.

Methods:

Patients who had orthotopic heart transplantation between January 2009 and December 2014 at a single center were reviewed. Postoperative bleeding and the total costs of hemostatic therapies were compared between patients who received rFVIIa and those who did not. Propensity scores were created and used to control for the likelihood of receiving rFVIIa in order to reduce bias in our risk estimates.

Results:

Seventy-six patients underwent heart transplantation during the study period. Twenty-one patients (27.6%) received rFVIIa for refractory intraoperative bleeding. There was no difference in postoperative red blood cell transfusion, chest tube output, or surgical re-exploration between patients who received rFVIIa and those who did not, even after adjusting with the propensity score (P = 0.94, P = 0.60, and P = 0.10, respectively). The total cost for hemostatic therapies was significantly higher in the rFVIIa group (median $10,819 vs. $1,985; P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis of patients who underwent redo-sternotomy with left ventricular assist device explantation did not show any benefit for rFVIIa either.

Conclusions:

In this relatively small cohort, rFVIIa use was not associated with decreased postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing heart transplantation; however, it led to significantly higher cost.

Major publications in the critical care pharmacotherapy literature: January-December 2014

PURPOSE

Nine recently published articles and one guideline with important implications for critical care pharmacy practice are summarized.

SUMMARY

The Critical Care Pharmacotherapy Literature Update (CCPLU) group includes more than 40 experienced critical care pharmacists across the United States. Group members monitor 29 peer-reviewed journals on an ongoing basis to identify literature relevant to pharmacy practice in the critical care setting. After evaluation by CCPLU group members, selected articles are chosen for summarization and distribution to group members nationwide based on applicability to practice, relevance, and study design and strength. Hundreds of relevant articles were evaluated by the group in 2014, of which 114 were summarized and disseminated to CCPLU group members. From among those 114 publications, 10 deemed to be of particularly high utility to the critical care practitioner were selected for inclusion in this review for their potential to change practice or reinforce current evidence-based practice. One of the selected articles presents updated recommendations on the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); the other 9 address topics such as albumin replacement in patients with severe sepsis, use of enteral statins for acute respiratory distress syndrome, fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism, the use of unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin for primary percutaneous coronary intervention, and early protocol-based care for septic shock.

CONCLUSION

There were many important additions to the critical care pharmacotherapy literature in 2014, including a joint guideline for the management of AF and reports of clinical trials.

Major publications in the critical care pharmacotherapy literature: January-December 2013

PURPOSE

Ten recently published articles with important implications for critical care pharmacotherapy are summarized.

SUMMARY

The Critical Care Pharmacotherapy Literature Update (CCPLU) group is a national assembly of experienced intensive care unit (ICU) pharmacists across the United States. Group members monitor 25 peer-reviewed journals on an ongoing basis to identify literature relevant to pharmacy practice in the critical care setting. After evaluation by CCPLU group members, selected articles are chosen for summarization and distribution to group members nationwide based on (1) applicability to critical care practice, (2) relevance to pharmacy practitioners, and (3) quality of evidence or research methodology. Hundreds of relevant articles were evaluated by the group during the period January-December 2013, of which 98 were summarized and disseminated nationally to CCPLU group members. Among those 98 publications, 10 deemed to be of particularly high utility to critical care practitioners were included in this review. The 10 articles address topics such as rapid lowering of blood pressure in patients with intracranial hemorrhage, adjunctive therapy to prevent renal injury due to acute heart failure, triple-drug therapy to improve neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest, and continuous versus intermittent infusion of β-lactam antibiotics in severe sepsis.

CONCLUSION

There were many important additions to the critical care pharmacotherapy literature in 2013, including an updated guideline on the management of myocardial infarction and reports on advances in research focused on improving outcomes in patients with stroke or cardiac arrest and preventing the spread of drug-resistant pathogens in the ICU.

Celecoxib-Induced Nephrotoxicity in a Renal Transplant Recipient

A 47-year-old renal transplant recipient came to the transplant clinic with a serum creatinine level that was elevated above her baseline value. She had been taking celecoxib for arthritic pain. She was told to discontinue the drug, and shortly after, her serum creatinine level returned to baseline. Several case reports describe nephrotoxicity with cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors. However, only two of these reports involved renal transplant recipients, and in both, rofecoxib was the COX-2 inhibitor of concern. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of a renal transplant recipient who developed nephrotoxicity while taking celecoxib. The potential renal effects of COX-2 inhibitors have received little attention, even though nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are considered to carry the risk of nephrotoxicity in patients with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Further studies are necessary to determine the safety of COX-2 inhibitors in transplant recipients and other patient groups that may be at heightened risk of nephrotoxicity.

Recombinant Factor VIIa for Refractory Bleeding Following Orthotopic Heart Transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of successful use of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) for the treatment of refractory bleeding in a patient undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation.

Case Summary

A 57-year-old white male with idiopathic cardiomyopathy was taken to the operating room for explantation of his left-ventricular assist device and orthotopic heart transplantation. He experienced excessive generalized oozing that required transfusions of multiple units of blood products and significant amounts of Cellsaver (washed red blood cells via autotransfusion) without achieving adequate hemostasis. After ruling out any obvious surgical sources of bleeding and attempting to correct all coagulation deficiencies, the clinicians administered rFVIIa 90 μg/kg. The oozing rapidly declined to a negligible level, chest tubes and sternal wires were placed, and the chest was closed. The patient was on minimal inotropic support and was transferred to the intensive care unit in stable condition.

DISCUSSION

Cardiac surgery is often associated with significant disruption of the coagulation system, particularly in high-risk patients, such as those undergoing removal of a ventricular assist device and subsequent orthotopic heart transplantation. This can lead to life-threatening bleeding that can require multiple hemostatic agents and significant transfusions to restore hemostasis. Recently, rFVIIa has been utilized as an alternative to massive transfusion for treatment of refractory bleeding in several patient populations, including some cardiac surgery patients.

CONCLUSIONS

rFVIIa appears to be a viable option as rescue therapy for treatment of refractory bleeding following orthotopic heart transplantation. Despite the anecdotal success of rFVIIa in this setting, further clinical research is needed.

Use of Epoetin Alfa in Critically III Patients

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the controversies regarding the use of epoetin alfa (EPO) for reducing red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in critically ill patients with anemia.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (1966–July 2003) was conducted using the search terms anemia; critical illness; erythropoietin; epoetin alfa; and erythropoietin, recombinant. References of selected articles were reviewed for studies that may have been missed by the computerized search.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Studies pertaining to the use of EPO for anemia of critical illness with an emphasis on data obtained from controlled trials.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Anemia is a common complication in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Two prospective, randomized studies have demonstrated decreased transfusion requirements associated with EPO administration in medical/surgical patients who were in the ICU for at least 3 days and had hematocrit concentrations <38%. No differences were found in length of stay or mortality. A multicenter trial found that a restrictive strategy of RBC transfusion (hemoglobin goal 7–9 g/dL) was associated with in-hospital mortality lower than that with a more liberal approach, which calls into question the 38% hematocrit goal in the EPO trials. Furthermore, preliminary results from an economic analysis of EPO use in the ICU setting have demonstrated that EPO is not cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the controversies surrounding EPO administration in critically ill patients, institutions are encouraged to develop EPO guidelines to help ensure the most appropriate use of this expensive product. Additional studies regarding patients most likely to benefit from EPO therapy, the most effective dosing regimen, and use of adjunctive therapies are needed.