1
|
Harvey JJ, Chester S, Burke SA, Ansbro M, Aden T, Gose R, Sciulli R, Bai J, DesJardin L, Benfer JL, Hall J, Smole S, Doan K, Popowich MD, St George K, Quinlan T, Halse TA, Li Z, Pérez-Osorio AC, Glover WA, Russell D, Reisdorf E, Whyte T, Whitaker B, Hatcher C, Srinivasan V, Tatti K, Tondella ML, Wang X, Winchell JM, Mayer LW, Jernigan D, Mawle AC. Comparative analytical evaluation of the respiratory TaqMan Array Card with real-time PCR and commercial multi-pathogen assays. J Virol Methods 2015; 228:151-7. [PMID: 26640122 PMCID: PMC7113746 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2015] [Revised: 11/19/2015] [Accepted: 11/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Viral and bacterial real-time PCR oligonucleotides were spotted on TaqMan Array Cards. Analytical sensitivity was compared with standalone laboratory PCR assays. TaqMan Array Card sensitivity was generally one log lower. Reproducibility across six independent testing sites was within one log.
In this study, a multicenter evaluation of the Life Technologies TaqMan® Array Card (TAC) with 21 custom viral and bacterial respiratory assays was performed on the Applied Biosystems ViiA™ 7 Real-Time PCR System. The goal of the study was to demonstrate the analytical performance of this platform when compared to identical individual pathogen specific laboratory developed tests (LDTs) designed at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), equivalent LDTs provided by state public health laboratories, or to three different commercial multi-respiratory panels. CDC and Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL) LDTs had similar analytical sensitivities for viral pathogens, while several of the bacterial pathogen APHL LDTs demonstrated sensitivities one log higher than the corresponding CDC LDT. When compared to CDC LDTs, TAC assays were generally one to two logs less sensitive depending on the site performing the analysis. Finally, TAC assays were generally more sensitive than their counterparts in three different commercial multi-respiratory panels. TAC technology allows users to spot customized assays and design TAC layout, simplify assay setup, conserve specimen, dramatically reduce contamination potential, and as demonstrated in this study, analyze multiple samples in parallel with good reproducibility between instruments and operators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J Harvey
- Battelle Technical On-Site Professional Services, Atlanta, GA, 30329 USA; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027 USA.
| | - Stephanie Chester
- Association of Public Health Laboratories, Silver Spring, MD, 20904 USA
| | - Stephen A Burke
- Battelle Technical On-Site Professional Services, Atlanta, GA, 30329 USA; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027 USA
| | - Marisela Ansbro
- Battelle Technical On-Site Professional Services, Atlanta, GA, 30329 USA; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027 USA
| | - Tricia Aden
- Battelle Technical On-Site Professional Services, Atlanta, GA, 30329 USA; Association of Public Health Laboratories, Silver Spring, MD, 20904 USA
| | - Remedios Gose
- Hawaii Department of Health State Laboratories, Pearl City, HI, 96782 USA
| | - Rebecca Sciulli
- Hawaii Department of Health State Laboratories, Pearl City, HI, 96782 USA
| | - Jing Bai
- Iowa State Hygienic Laboratory, Coralville, IA, 52241 USA
| | - Lucy DesJardin
- Iowa State Hygienic Laboratory, Coralville, IA, 52241 USA
| | | | - Joshua Hall
- William A. Hinton State Laboratory Institute, Jamaica Plain, MA, 02130 USA
| | - Sandra Smole
- William A. Hinton State Laboratory Institute, Jamaica Plain, MA, 02130 USA
| | - Kimberly Doan
- William A. Hinton State Laboratory Institute, Jamaica Plain, MA, 02130 USA
| | - Michael D Popowich
- Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, 12201-0509 USA
| | - Kirsten St George
- Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, 12201-0509 USA
| | - Tammy Quinlan
- Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, 12201-0509 USA
| | - Tanya A Halse
- Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, 12201-0509 USA
| | - Zhen Li
- Washington State Public Health Laboratories, Shoreline, WA, 98155-7224 USA
| | | | - William A Glover
- Washington State Public Health Laboratories, Shoreline, WA, 98155-7224 USA
| | - Denny Russell
- Washington State Public Health Laboratories, Shoreline, WA, 98155-7224 USA
| | - Erik Reisdorf
- Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Thomas Whyte
- Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Brett Whitaker
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027 USA
| | - Cynthia Hatcher
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027 USA
| | - Velusamy Srinivasan
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027 USA
| | - Kathleen Tatti
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027 USA
| | - Maria Lucia Tondella
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027 USA
| | - Xin Wang
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027 USA
| | - Jonas M Winchell
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027 USA
| | - Leonard W Mayer
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027 USA
| | - Daniel Jernigan
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027 USA
| | - Alison C Mawle
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4027 USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Popowich MD, Brunt SJ, Bennett RT, St George K. Development of a proficiency testing program for molecular diagnosis of influenza viruses. J Clin Virol 2012; 54:245-50. [PMID: 22538096 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2012.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2012] [Revised: 03/30/2012] [Accepted: 04/03/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Molecular Virology Proficiency Testing Program at the Wadsworth Center began the assembly and distribution of influenza virus panels to US public health labs (PHLs) in 2008. The program was created to assist PHLs in assessing their performance and in meeting CLIA regulations for mandated proficiency testing (PT). OBJECTIVES To design and distribute proficiency testing panels containing influenza A virus subtypes H1N1 and H3N2, and influenza B; when H1N1pdm09 emerged it also was incorporated into the panels. A secondary objective was to determine the best matrix for long term storage of the molecular PT samples. STUDY DESIGN Viruses were quantitated using TCID(50) and quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Reference laboratories were enlisted to verify viral identity in the panels and to help determine viral titers to be used in the PT panels sent to PHLs. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Of the 29 laboratories that participated the first year, 27 were able to correctly identify all of the virus types in the panel. Fifty-one PHLs participated in the program the second year when pandemic H1N1 was added, and 45 were able to correctly detect, type and subtype all of the viruses in the panel. In the program's third year, 60 laboratories participated; 58 correctly detected and subtyped all of the viruses in the panel. Annual surveys of assay techniques showed that the PHLs had shifted their extraction methods and PCR-thermocycler instrumentation to meet FDA-approved methods. The degradation study revealed that frozen viral stocks were stable for at least 30months, thus allowing ample time to prepare and pre-test panels.
Collapse
|