Federal food assistance accessibility and acceptability among Indigenous Peoples in the United States: A scoping review

The purpose of this scoping review was to determine the extent to which accessibility and acceptability of federal food assistance programs in the United States (U.S.) have been evaluated among Indigenous Peoples, and to summarize what is currently known. Twelve publications were found that examine aspects of accessibility or acceptability by indigenous peoples of one or more federal food assistance programs, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and/or the Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations (FDPIR) (n=8), the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) (n=3), and the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) (n=1). No publications were found to include the Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSFP) or the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP). Publications ranged in time from 1990 - 2023, and all reported on findings from rural populations, while three also included urban settings. Program accessibility varied by program type and geographic location. Road conditions, transportation access, telephone and internet connectivity, and overall number of food stores were identified as key access barriers to SNAP and WIC benefit redemption in rural areas. Program acceptability was attributed to factors such as being tribally administered, providing culturally sensitive services, and offering foods of cultural significance. For these reasons, FDPIR and WIC were more frequently described as acceptable compared to SNAP and NSLP. However, SNAP was occasionally described as more acceptable than other assistance programs because it allows participants autonomy to decide which foods to purchase and when. Overall, little attention has been paid to the accessibility and acceptability of federal food assistance programs among Indigenous Peoples in the U.S. More research is needed to understand and improve the participation experiences and health trajectories of these priority populations.

Shared Perceptions on Upstream Factors that Influence Water and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption Among Hispanic Families in the Greater Washington, DC, Metro Area: Qualitative Results From Focus Group Discussions

BACKGROUND

Hispanics in the United States are among those with highest consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and lowest consumption of water. These dietary disparities are rooted in systemic influences that must be identified and addressed.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to describe how Hispanic parents currently living in the greater Washington, DC, metro area and born outside of the United States, perceived upstream factors that influenced their current beverage choice.

DESIGN

Six qualitative focus groups were conducted in Spanish in 2021.

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING

Hispanic parents (n = 31) of children enrolled in Early Head Start in the greater Washington, DC, metro area were recruited (all women, born outside the United States, and spoke Spanish as a first language).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Verbatim transcripts were analyzed deductively using the Community Energy Balance Framework.

RESULTS

The five key findings were: Growing up (in their countries of origin in Central America and Mexico) participants were used to drinking water, often gathered it from the source, and liked its flavor. Relatives passed down their knowledge about potabilization of water, the health benefits of drinking water, and health consequences of drinking SSBs. Growing up, prepackaged SSBs were not as accessible compared with where they now live in the United States. Participants perceived that sociocultural hospitality norms dictated that guests should be served SSBs and not water. Participants noted that messages regarding juice and water across US public health programs and policies were not aligned.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest there are opportunities for public health messaging and procurement of safe, palatable drinking water in lieu of SSBs and juice.

Cardiometabolic risk among rural Native American adults in a large multilevel multicomponent intervention trial

This cross-sectional analysis of the baseline evaluation sample of the Obesity Prevention and Evaluation of InterVention Effectiveness in Native Americans 2 (OPREVENT2) study included 601 Native American adults ages 18-75 living in rural reservation communities in the Midwest and Southwest United States. Participants completed a self-report questionnaire for individual and family history of hypertension, heart disease, diabetes and obestiy. Body mass index (BMI), percent body fat, and blood pressure were measured by trained research staff. About 60% of respondents had a BMI >30 kg/m2. Approximately 80% had a waist-to-hip ratio and percent body fat classified as high risk, and nearly 64% had a high-risk blood pressure measurement. Although a large proportion of participants reported a family history of chronic disease and had measurements that indicated elevated risk, relatively few had a self-reported diagnosis of any chronic disease. Future studies should examine potential connections between healthcare access and discordance in self-reported versus measured disease risks and diagnoses.

Dietary Habits by Income Level during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: Results from the IndoNutriLifeCOVID-19 Online Survey

Background: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused many lifestyle changes, especially in the diet. Policies such as physical distancing and quarantine orders aimed to mitigate to spread of COVID-19 have affected the economy and, therefore, the dietary habits of the people.  Aim: The purpose of this study was to analyze the associations between income levels and dietary habits during the COVID-19 pandemic.  Methods: This cross-sectional study included 697 Indonesian adults from various regions in Indonesia. The study was conducted from June - August 2020. Data were obtained through a self-administered online questionnaire including dietary habits, lifestyles, and quality of life data adapted from MyNutriLifeCOVID-19 Online Survey. To analyze the associations between income levels and dietary habits during the COVID-19 pandemic, a chi square test was used. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.   Results: Respondents had mean age of 27.56 ± 8.58 years and the majority were women (83.6%). The percentage of people with large-scale social restrictions was 47.5%. Respondents reported that their dietary habits were healthier during the pandemic (46.2%), with the majority categorized as high and very high-income status (59.1%). From self-reported of the people in Indonesia, there was association between high-income level and self-perceived healthier dietary habits. Higher-income level was also associated with higher frequency of online food/drink delivery, consuming western diet foods, consuming dietary supplements, and probiotic consumption (p<0.05).  Conclusions: The self-reported that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the dietary habits of people with a higher income level had healthier compared to their dietary habits before the pandemic. However, it is also related to higher energy, cholesterol, and saturated fat intakes due to consuming high western diet foods.  Social inequalities in dietary intake should be considered through promoting a healthy balanced diet with affordable price and healthy food processing in the community. 

Individual- and household-level factors associated with fruit, vegetable, and dietary fiber adequacy among Native American adults in 6 reservation communities

This study utilized baseline data collected in 2017 from the OPREVENT2 trial, which included 540 Native Americans in six Midwest and Southwest reservation communities. The objective was to identify correlates of fruit, vegetable, and dietary fiber adequacy among participants 18–75 years old who self-identified as the main food purchaser or preparer in their household. Mean daily servings of fruits and vegetables and grams of dietary fiber were quantified based on a 30-day semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire.

Participants consumed an average of 0.5 (±0.4) cup-equivalent servings of fruit, 2.5 (±1.8) cup-equivalent servings of vegetables, and 15.5 (±8.9) grams of fiber per day. <2% of the study population met the 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommendations for fruit consumption, while 12 and 42% met recommendations for dietary fiber and vegetable consumption, respectively.

Females had a prevalence ratio 1.4 times greater than males for adequate intakes of vegetables (p = 0.008) and over 6 times greater for dietary fiber (p < 0.001). Participants over the age of 30 were about twice as likely to meet dietary fiber recommendations (p = 0.031) compared to those 30 years and younger. Participants receiving food assistance from the USDA’s Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations (FDPIR) were nearly twice as likely as non-FDPIR recipients to meet recommendations for dietary fiber (p = 0.008).

These findings can help guide the development of targeted interventions to improve diet quality; however, further work is needed to understand and address underlying reasons for low fruit consumption in these rural reservation communities.

Exposure to a Multilevel, Multicomponent Obesity Prevention Intervention (OPREVENT2) in Rural Native American Communities: Variability and Association with Change in Diet Quality

The OPREVENT2 obesity prevention trial was a multilevel multicomponent (MLMC) intervention implemented in rural Native American communities in the Midwest and Southwest U.S. Intervention components were delivered through local food stores, worksites, schools, community action coalitions, and by social and community media. Due to the complex nature of MLMC intervention trials, it is useful to assess participants’ exposure to each component of the intervention in order to assess impact. In this paper, we present a detailed methodology for evaluating participant exposure to MLMC intervention, and we explore how exposure to the OPREVENT2 trial impacted participant diet quality. There were no significant differences in total exposure score by age group, sex, or geographic region, but exposure to sub-components of the intervention differed significantly by age group, sex, and geographical region. Participants with the highest overall exposure scores showed significantly more improvement in diet quality from baseline to follow up compared to those who were least exposed to the intervention. Improved diet quality was also significantly positively associated with several exposure sub-components. While evaluating exposure to an entire MLMC intervention is complex and imperfect, it can provide useful insight into an intervention’s impact on key outcome measures, and it can help identify which components of the intervention were most effective.

Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Factors Associated With Diet Quality in 6 Rural Native American Communities

OBJECTIVE

To identify psychosocial and household environmental factors related to diet quality among Native Americans (NA).

DESIGN

Analysis of baseline data from a community-randomized obesity prevention trial.

SETTING

Six rural NA communities in the Midwest and the Southwestern US.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 580 tribal members, aged 18-75 years old (mean 45 years), 74% female, self-identified as the main household food purchaser.

VARIABLES MEASURED

Diet quality (Healthy Eating Index-2015 [HEI]) was derived from a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Sociodemographic, psychosocial, and home food environment factors were assessed via interviewer-administered questionnaires.

ANALYSIS

One-way ANOVA, linear regression models, and 2-tailed t tests compared HEI scores among sociodemographic categories. Multiple linear regression models assessed the relationship between psychosocial factors, home food environment, and HEI.

RESULTS

Prevalence of obesity was 59%. Mean HEI-2015 score was 49.3 (SD = 8.1). Average HEI scores were 3.0 points lower in smokers than nonsmokers (P < 0.001), and 2.2 points higher in females than males (P < 0.01). Higher self-efficacy (β = 0.97; P < 0.001) and healthier eating intentions (β = 0.78; P < 0.001) were positively associated with HEI. Healthier household food patterns score was associated with higher HEI (β = 0.48; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Psychosocial factors were associated with diet quality, a finding that supports the use of social-cognitive intervention approaches in rural NA communities in the Midwest and Southwest, and warrants evaluation in other locations. There remains a need to elucidate the association between the Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations and diet quality.

Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Factors Associated with Diet Quality Among Native American Adults: Baseline Data from the OPREVENT2 Study (P04-007-19)

Objectives

To identify sociodemographic and psychosocial factors associated with diet quality among Native American adults.

Methods

Cross-sectional data from the baseline assessment of a cluster-randomized obesity prevention trial (OPREVENT2) of 580 Native American adults from six tribal communities in the Midwest and Southwest. The Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2015) was used to define diet quality, calculated from a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (modified Block FFQ). Sociodemographic (age, sex, education, food assistance) and psychosocial factors (nutrition knowledge, self-efficacy, health eating intentions) were assessed via questionnaires administered by trained data collectors. One-way ANOVA, linear regression models, and two-tailed t-tests assessed compared mean total HEI scores among sociodemographic categories. Bivariate linear regression models assessed the relation between psychosocial factors and diet quality.

Results

Overall diet quality was low, with a mean HEI-2015 score of 49 (SD + 8), which is 10 points lower than in the general U.S. population. The HEI scores of smokers were an average of 3 points lower than those of non-smokers (P < 0.001), and females had better diet quality (2.2 points higher) than males (P < 0.01). Those receiving commodity food assistance had mean total HEI scores 2.7 points lower than those who did not receive commodities (P < 0.005), and no other source of food assistance was associated with HEI. Self-efficacy (b = 0.66; P < 0.001) and healthy eating intentions (b = 0.72; P < 0.001) were positively associated with mean HEI.

Conclusions

While nutrition knowledge has been a key focus of many dietary interventions, it does not appear to be associated with better diet quality among Native Americans. This finding suggests that it is necessary to focus interventions on factors other than nutrition knowledge that may impact food choice. Because higher self-efficacy and healthy eating intentions were associated with better diet quality, a social-cognitive approach to dietary interventions may be more effective in Native American populations.

Funding Sources

OPREVENT2 is funded by a grant from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.