1
|
Lei F, Lofwall MR, McAninch J, Adatorwovor R, Slade E, Freeman PR, Moga DC, Dasgupta N, Walsh SL, Vickers-Smith R, Slavova S. Higher First 30-Day Dose of Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Is Associated With Decreased Mortality. J Addict Med 2024:01271255-990000000-00306. [PMID: 38598300 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Buprenorphine is a medication for opioid use disorder that reduces mortality. This study aims to investigate the less well-understood relationship between the dose in the early stages of treatment and the subsequent risk of death. METHODS We used Kentucky prescription monitoring data to identify adult Kentucky residents initiating transmucosal buprenorphine medication for opioid use disorder (January 2017 to November 2019). Average daily buprenorphine dose for days covered in the first 30 days of treatment was categorized as ≤8 mg, >8 to ≤16 mg, and >16 mg. Patients were followed for 365 days after the first 30 days of buprenorphine treatment. Endpoints were opioid-involved overdose death and death from other causes. Causes and dates of death were obtained using Kentucky death certificate records. Associations were evaluated using multivariable Fine and Gray models adjusting for patient baseline characteristics. RESULTS In the cohort of 49,857 patients, there were 227 opioid-involved overdose deaths and 459 deaths from other causes. Compared with ≤8 mg, the adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (aSHR) of opioid-involved overdose death decreased by 55% (aSHR, 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34-0.60) and 64% (aSHR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25-0.52) for patients receiving doses of >8 to ≤16 mg and >16 mg, respectively. The incidence of death from other causes was lower in patients receiving >8 to ≤16 mg (aSHR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.98) and >16 mg (aSHR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47-0.80) versus ≤8 mg dose. CONCLUSIONS Higher first 30-day buprenorphine doses were associated with reduced opioid-involved overdose death and death from other causes, supporting benefit of higher dosing in reducing mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feitong Lei
- From the Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (FL, RA, ES, SS); Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (FL, PRF, DCM); Departments of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (MRL, SLW); Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (MRL, SLW, RV-S); Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration (JM); Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC (ND); Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (RV-S, DCM); and Kentucky Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (SS, DCM, PRF)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Glasgow L, Douglas C, Sprunger JG, Campbell ANC, Chandler R, Dasgupta A, Holloway J, Marks KR, Roberts SM, Martinez LS, Thompson K, Weiss RD, Aldridge A, Asman K, Barbosa C, Blevins D, Chassler D, Cogan L, Fanucchi L, Hall ME, Hunt T, Jadovich E, Levin FR, Lincourt P, Lofwall MR, Loukas V, McAlearney AS, Nunes E, Oga E, Oller D, Rudorf M, Sullivan AM, Talbert J, Taylor A, Teater J, Vandergrift N, Woodlock K, Zarkin GA, Freisthler B, Samet JH, Walsh SL, El-Bassel N. Effect of the Communities that HEAL intervention on receipt of behavioral therapies for opioid use disorder: A cluster randomized wait-list controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Depend 2024; 259:111286. [PMID: 38626553 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The U.S. opioid overdose crisis persists. Outpatient behavioral health services (BHS) are essential components of a comprehensive response to opioid use disorder and overdose fatalities. The Helping to End Addiction Long-Term® (HEALing) Communities Study developed the Communities That HEAL (CTH) intervention to reduce opioid overdose deaths in 67 communities in Kentucky, Ohio, New York, and Massachusetts through the implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs), including BHS. This paper compares the rate of individuals receiving outpatient BHS in Wave 1 intervention communities (n = 34) to waitlisted Wave 2 communities (n = 33). METHODS Medicaid data included individuals ≥18 years of age receiving any of five BHS categories: intensive outpatient, outpatient, case management, peer support, and case management or peer support. Negative binomial regression models estimated the rate of receiving each BHS for Wave 1 and Wave 2. Effect modification analyses evaluated changes in the effect of the CTH intervention between Wave 1 and Wave 2 by research site, rurality, age, sex, and race/ethnicity. RESULTS No significant differences were detected between intervention and waitlisted communities in the rate of individuals receiving any of the five BHS categories. None of the interaction effects used to test the effect modification were significant. CONCLUSIONS Several factors should be considered when interpreting results-no significant intervention effects were observed through Medicaid claims data, the best available data source but limited in terms of capturing individuals reached by the intervention. Also, the 12-month evaluation window may have been too brief to see improved outcomes considering the time required to stand-up BHS. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials.gov http://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov: Identifier: NCT04111939.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Joel G Sprunger
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati Center for Addiction Research, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Aimee N C Campbell
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, New York, NY, USA
| | - Redonna Chandler
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Anindita Dasgupta
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Katherine R Marks
- Kentucky Department for Behavioral Health, Developmental and Intellectual Disabilities, Frankfort, KY, USA
| | - Sara M Roberts
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Katherine Thompson
- University of Kentucky, Dr. Bing Zhang Department of Statistics, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Roger D Weiss
- McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA
| | | | - Kat Asman
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | | - Derek Blevins
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Lindsay Cogan
- New York State Department of Health, Office of Quality and Patient Safety, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laura Fanucchi
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Megan E Hall
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Timothy Hunt
- Columbia University School of Social Work, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Frances R Levin
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Patricia Lincourt
- New York State Office of Addiction Services and Supports, Albany, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Edward Nunes
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emmanuel Oga
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Devin Oller
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | | | | - Jeffery Talbert
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Angela Taylor
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Julie Teater
- Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Jeffrey H Samet
- Boston University and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sharon L Walsh
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peddireddy SR, Livingston MD, Young AM, Freeman PR, Ibragimov U, Komro KA, Lofwall MR, Oser CB, Staton M, Cooper HLF. Willingness to utilize a mobile treatment unit in five counties at the epicenter of the US rural opioid epidemic. J Subst Use Addict Treat 2024; 159:209262. [PMID: 38103835 PMCID: PMC10947911 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION US federal policies are evolving to expand the provision of mobile treatment units (MTUs) offering medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Mobile MOUD services are critical for rural areas with poor geographic access to fixed-site treatment providers. This study explored willingness to utilize an MTU among a sample of people who use opioids in rural Eastern Kentucky counties at the epicenter of the US opioid epidemic. METHODS The study analyzed Cross-sectional survey data from the Kentucky Communities and Researchers Engaging to Halt the Opioid Epidemic (CARE2HOPE) study covering five rural counties in the state. Logistic regression models investigated the association between willingness to utilize an MTU providing buprenorphine and naltrexone and potential correlates of willingness, identified using the Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations. RESULTS The analytic sample comprised 174 people who used opioids within the past six months. Willingness to utilize an MTU was high; 76.5 % of participants endorsed being willing. Those who had recently received MOUD treatment, compared to those who had not received any form of treatment or recovery support services, had six-fold higher odds of willingness to use an MTU. However, odds of being willing to utilize an MTU were 73 % lower among those who were under community supervision (e.g., parole, probation) and 81 % lower among participants who experienced an overdose within the past six months. CONCLUSIONS There was high acceptability of MTUs offering buprenorphine and naltrexone within this sample, highlighting the potential for MTUs to alleviate opioid-related harms in underserved rural areas. However, the finding that people who were recently under community supervision or had overdosed were significantly less willing to seek mobile MOUD treatment suggest barriers (e.g., stigma) to mobile MOUD at individual and systemic levels, which may prevent improving opioid-related outcomes in these rural communities given their high rates of criminal-legal involvement and overdose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Snigdha R Peddireddy
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, USA.
| | - Melvin D Livingston
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, USA
| | - April M Young
- Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Patricia R Freeman
- Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Umedjon Ibragimov
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, USA
| | - Kelli A Komro
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, USA
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Carrie B Oser
- Department of Sociology, University of Kentucky College of Arts & Sciences, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Michele Staton
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Hannah L F Cooper
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Havens JR, Lofwall MR, Young AM, Staton M, Schaninger T, Fraser H, Vickerman P, Walsh SL. Predictors of engagement in screening for a hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment trial in a rural Appalachian community. J Viral Hepat 2024. [PMID: 38436098 DOI: 10.1111/jvh.13933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
An HCV treatment trial was initiated in September 2019 to address the opioid/hepatitis C virus (HCV) syndemic in rural Kentucky. The focus of the current analysis is on participation in diagnostic screening for the trial. Initial eligibility (≥18 years of age, county resident) was established by phone followed by in-person HCV viremia testing. 900 rural residents met the inclusion criteria and comprised the analytic sample. Generalized linear models were specified to estimate the relative risk of non-attendance at the in-person visit determining HCV eligibility. Approximately one-quarter (22.1%) of scheduled participants were no-shows. People who inject drugs were no more likely than people not injecting drugs to be a no-show; however, participants ≤35 years of age were significantly less likely to attend. While the median time between phone screening and scheduled in-person screening was only 2 days, each additional day increased the odds of no-show by 3% (95% confidence interval: 2%-3%). Finally, unknown HCV status predicted no-show even after adjustment for age, gender, days between screenings and injection status. We found that drug injection did not predict no-show, further justifying expanded access to HCV treatment among people who inject drugs. Those 35 years and younger were more likely to no-show, suggesting that younger individuals may require targeted strategies for increasing testing and treatment uptake. Finally, streamlining the treatment cascade may also improve outcomes, as participants in the current study were more likely to attend if there were fewer days between phone screening and scheduled in-person screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer R Havens
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - April M Young
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Michele Staton
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Takako Schaninger
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Hannah Fraser
- Bristol Population Health Sciences Institute, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Peter Vickerman
- Bristol Population Health Sciences Institute, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Sharon L Walsh
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moffitt T, Fallin-Bennett A, Fanucchi L, Walsh SL, Cook C, Oller D, Ross A, Gallivan M, Lauckner J, Byard J, Wheeler-Crum P, Lofwall MR. The development of a recovery coaching training curriculum to facilitate linkage to and increase retention on medications for opioid use disorder. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1334850. [PMID: 38425462 PMCID: PMC10903364 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1334850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Medication treatment for opioid use disorder (MOUD) decreases opioid overdose risk and is the standard of care for persons with opioid use disorder (OUD). Recovery coach (RC)-led programs and associated training curriculums to improve outcomes around MOUD are limited. We describe our comprehensive training curriculum including instruction and pedagogy for novel RC-led MOUD linkage and retention programs and report on its feasibility. Methods–pedagogy and training development The Kentucky HEALing (Helping to End Addiction Long-termSM) Communities Study (HCS) created the Linkage and Retention RC Programs with a local recovery community organization, Voices of Hope-Lexington. RCs worked to reduce participant barriers to entering or continuing MOUD, destigmatize and educate on MOUD and harm reduction (e.g., safe injection practices), increase recovery capital, and provide opioid overdose education with naloxone distribution (OEND). An extensive hybrid (in-person and online, both synchronous and asynchronous), inclusive learning-focused curriculum to support the programs (e.g., motivational interviewing sessions, role plays, MOUD competency assessment, etc.,) was created to ensure RCs developed the necessary skills and could demonstrate competency before deployment in the field. The curriculum, pedagogy, learning environment, and numbers of RCs trained and community venues receiving a trained RC are reported, along with interviews from three RCs about the training program experience. Results The curriculum provides approximately 150 h of training to RCs. From December 2020 to February 2023, 93 RCs and 16 supervisors completed the training program; two were unable to pass a final competency check. RCs were deployed at 45 agencies in eight Kentucky HCS counties. Most agencies (72%) sustained RC services after the study period ended through other funding sources. RCs interviewed reported that the training helped them better explain and dispel myths around MOUD. Conclusion Our novel training and MOUD programs met a current unmet need for the RC workforce and for community agencies. We were able to train and deploy RCs successfully in these new programs aimed at saving lives through improving MOUD linkage and retention. This paper addresses a need to enhance the training requirements around MOUD for peer support specialists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor Moffitt
- University of Kentucky, Substance Use Priority Research Area, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Amanda Fallin-Bennett
- College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
- Voices of Hope, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Laura Fanucchi
- College of Medicine, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Sharon L. Walsh
- College of Medicine, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
- Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Christopher Cook
- University of Kentucky, Substance Use Priority Research Area, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Devin Oller
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Anna Ross
- Voices of Hope, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Molly Gallivan
- University of Kentucky, Substance Use Priority Research Area, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - John Lauckner
- University of Kentucky, Substance Use Priority Research Area, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Jeremy Byard
- Arthur Street Hotel, Louisville, KY, United States
| | | | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- College of Medicine, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
- Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stopka TJ, Babineau DC, Gibson EB, Knott CE, Cheng DM, Villani J, Wai JM, Blevins D, David JL, Goddard-Eckrich DA, Lofwall MR, Massatti R, DeFiore-Hyrmer J, Lyons MS, Fanucchi LC, Harris DR, Talbert J, Hammerslag L, Oller D, Balise RR, Feaster DJ, Soares W, Zarkin GA, Glasgow L, Oga E, McCarthy J, D’Costa L, Chahine R, Gomori S, Dalvi N, Shrestha S, Garner C, Shadwick A, Salsberry P, Konstan MW, Freisthler B, Winhusen J, El-Bassel N, Samet JH, Walsh SL. Impact of the Communities That HEAL Intervention on Buprenorphine-Waivered Practitioners and Buprenorphine Prescribing: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the HCS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e240132. [PMID: 38386322 PMCID: PMC10884876 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Buprenorphine significantly reduces opioid-related overdose mortality. From 2002 to 2022, the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 (DATA 2000) required qualified practitioners to receive a waiver from the Drug Enforcement Agency to prescribe buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder. During this period, waiver uptake among practitioners was modest; subsequent changes need to be examined. Objective To determine whether the Communities That HEAL (CTH) intervention increased the rate of practitioners with DATA 2000 waivers and buprenorphine prescribing. Design, Setting, and Participants This prespecified secondary analysis of the HEALing Communities Study, a multisite, 2-arm, parallel, community-level, cluster randomized, open, wait-list-controlled comparison clinical trial was designed to assess the effectiveness of the CTH intervention and was conducted between January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2023, in 67 communities in Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio, accounting for approximately 8.2 million adults. The participants in this trial were communities consisting of counties (n = 48) and municipalities (n = 19). Trial arm randomization was conducted using a covariate constrained randomization procedure stratified by state. Each state was balanced by community characteristics including urban/rural classification, fatal opioid overdose rate, and community population. Thirty-four communities were randomized to the intervention and 33 to wait-list control arms. Data analysis was conducted between March 20 and September 29, 2023, with a focus on the comparison period from July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022. Intervention Waiver trainings and other educational trainings were offered or supported by the HEALing Communities Study research sites in each state to help build practitioner capacity. Main Outcomes and Measures The rate of practitioners with a DATA 2000 waiver (overall, and stratified by 30-, 100-, and 275-patient limits) per 100 000 adult residents aged 18 years or older during July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022, were compared between the intervention and wait-list control communities. The rate of buprenorphine prescribing among those waivered practitioners was also compared between the intervention and wait-list control communities. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. Results A total of 8 166 963 individuals aged 18 years or older were residents of the 67 communities studied. There was no evidence of an effect of the CTH intervention on the adjusted rate of practitioners with a DATA 2000 waiver (adjusted relative rate [ARR], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.94-1.14) or the adjusted rate of practitioners with a DATA 2000 waiver who actively prescribed buprenorphine (ARR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.86-1.10). Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, the CTH intervention was not associated with increases in the rate of practitioners with a DATA 2000 waiver or buprenorphine prescribing among those waivered practitioners. Supporting practitioners to prescribe buprenorphine remains a critical yet challenging step in the continuum of care to treat opioid use disorder. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04111939.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J. Stopka
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Erin B. Gibson
- Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles E. Knott
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Debbie M. Cheng
- Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Villani
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jonathan M. Wai
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| | - Derek Blevins
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| | - James L. David
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| | - Dawn A. Goddard-Eckrich
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Lexington
| | - Richard Massatti
- Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Columbus
| | | | | | - Laura C. Fanucchi
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Lexington
| | | | | | - Lindsey Hammerslag
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Lexington
| | - Devin Oller
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Lexington
| | - Raymond R. Balise
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Daniel J. Feaster
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - William Soares
- UMass Chan Medical School–Baystate, Springfield, Massachusetts
| | - Gary A. Zarkin
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - LaShawn Glasgow
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Emmanuel Oga
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - John McCarthy
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Lauren D’Costa
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Rouba Chahine
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Steve Gomori
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Netrali Dalvi
- Office of Prescription Monitoring and Drug Control, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston
| | - Shikhar Shrestha
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Aimee Shadwick
- RecoveryOhio, Office of Ohio Governor Mike DeWine, Columbus
| | - Pamela Salsberry
- Health Behavior and Health Promotion, Ohio State University, Columbus
| | | | | | - John Winhusen
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Nabila El-Bassel
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| | - Jeffrey H. Samet
- Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sharon L. Walsh
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Lexington
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McGladrey M, Kelsch J, Lofwall MR, Fanucchi LC, Walsh SL, Oser CB. Get It in Writing: How to Make Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Available During Incarceration. J Correct Health Care 2024; 30:3-6. [PMID: 38150232 DOI: 10.1089/jchc.23.08.0065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
In a case example from the Kentucky HEALing Communities Study, extensive resources were deployed to address structural barriers and facilitate the provision of medication for opioid use disorder (OUD) in an urban county jail. However, implementation was unsuccessful, and this case example emphasizes the importance of including evidence-based medication for OUD (MOUD) treatment in the scope of work of jails' contracted medical providers. The privatization of correctional health care services allows local governments with opioid abatement funds to incorporate requirements into medical provider contracts to screen all people entering jails for OUD and to offer MOUD at intake, throughout incarceration, and upon release to everyone for whom it is clinically indicated. We provide sample contractual language that can be added to requests for medical provider proposals to help drive the private correctional health care market toward integrating MOUD treatment into their standard of care. This approach also could expedite efforts to scale up broad MOUD access across U.S. jails through sharing of workflows and best practices among the small group of national correctional health care companies contracted with jails in states with broad mandates, such as Massachusetts. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04111939.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret McGladrey
- Center for Innovation in Population Health, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Jordan Kelsch
- Substance Use Priority Research Area, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Laura C Fanucchi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Sharon L Walsh
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Carrie B Oser
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Center for Health Equity Transformation, Department of Sociology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hansen ER, South AM, Lofwall MR, Fanucchi LC. Extended-release Buprenorphine Administered at Discharge in Hospitalized Persons With Opioid Use Disorder: A Case Series. J Addict Med 2024; 18:65-67. [PMID: 37874645 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Monthly subcutaneous injectable buprenorphine (XR-Bup) is an option for treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) that addresses some sublingual buprenorphine adherence barriers and is infrequently offered to hospitalized patients with OUD. METHODS A retrospective case series was performed for patients receiving XR-Bup upon discharge from 1 academic medical center. Demographic information, diagnoses, follow-up, and documented factors informing the selection of XR-Bup were extracted from the electronic health record. RESULTS In 1 year, 37 hospitalized patients with OUD received XR-Bup at discharge. The average age was 37.6 years, and patients were primarily Medicaid insured with an injection-related infection. The most common documented factors informing the selection of XR-Bup were as follows: previous sublingual buprenorphine adherence barriers, concurrent stimulant use disorder, and patient preference. Sixty-four percent of patients scheduled for follow-up attended appointments, and 55% received a second dose of XR-Bup. CONCLUSIONS Subcutaneous injectable buprenorphine is an option for OUD treatment among hospitalized patients providing 30 or more days of buprenorphine coverage in the postdischarge period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Rose Hansen
- From the Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL (ERH); Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY (AMS, LCF); Departments of Behavioral Science and Psychiatry, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY (MRL); Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY (LCF, MRL); and UK Addiction Consult and Education Service (LCF)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lofwall MR, Young JL, Hansen Z, Wachman EM, Wilder C, Guille C, Charles JE, Leeman L, Gray JR, Winhusen TJ. What to Expect With Pregnant or Postpartum Prescribing of Extended-Release Buprenorphine (CAM2038). J Clin Gynecol Obstet 2023; 12:110-116. [PMID: 38435674 PMCID: PMC10906993 DOI: 10.14740/jcgo919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
Weekly and monthly CAM2038 (Brixadi®) extended-release subcutaneous buprenorphine (XR bup) has been available in Europe and Australia for several years and was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in May 2023. Little is known about the clinical experience of patients and providers using this new medication during prenatal care. Two cases of pregnant persons with opioid use disorder receiving weekly XR bup in an ongoing randomized multi-site outpatient clinical trial are presented along with a brief review of the pharmacology and literature on XR bup formulations. The cases in pregnancy illustrate how treatment with the weekly formulation is initiated including how to make dose adjustments, which may be necessary given the longer half-life; it takes 1 month to achieve steady state. Injection site pain with medication administration was time limited and managed readily. Other injection site reactions experienced included subcutaneous erythema and induration that was delayed in onset and typically mild, resolving with minimal intervention. Delivery management and breastfeeding recommendations while on weekly XR bup were not different compared to sublingual buprenorphine (SL bup). Weekly XR bup is a new treatment for opioid use disorder that may be used in the obstetric population. Obstetric and addiction medicine clinicians should be aware of this new formulation as its use is expected to increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R. Lofwall
- Departments of Behavioral Science and Psychiatry, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Jessica L. Young
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Zachary Hansen
- Department of Family Medicine, Division of Addiction Science, Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA
| | | | - Christine Wilder
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Center for Addiction Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Constance Guille
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Jasmin E. Charles
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge and Advocacy (PARCKA), Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Lawrence Leeman
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Jessica R. Gray
- Substance Use Disorder Initiative, Department of Psychiatry, and Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - T. John Winhusen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Center for Addiction Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
D’Onofrio G, Perrone J, Hawk KF, Cowan E, McCormack R, Coupet E, Owens PH, Martel SH, Huntley K, Walsh SL, Lofwall MR, Herring A. Early emergency department experience with 7-day extended-release injectable buprenorphine for opioid use disorder. Acad Emerg Med 2023; 30:1264-1271. [PMID: 37501652 PMCID: PMC10822018 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
As the opioid overdose epidemic escalates, there is an urgent need for treatment innovations to address both patient and clinician barriers when initiating buprenorphine in the emergency department (ED). These include insurance status, logistical challenges such as the ability to fill a prescription and transportation, concerns regarding diversion, and availability of urgent referral sites. Extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) preparations such as a new 7-day injectable could potentially solve some of these issues. We describe the pharmacokinetics of a new 7-day XR-BUP formulation and the feasibility of its use in the ED setting. We report our early experiences with this medication (investigational drug CAM2038), in the context of an ongoing clinical trial entitled Emergency Department-Initiated BUP VAlidaTION (ED INNOVATION), to inform emergency clinicians as they consider incorporating this medication into their practice. The medication was approved by the European Medicines Agency in 2018 and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2023 for those 18 years or older for the treatment of moderate to severe opioid use disorder (OUD). We report our experience with approximately 800 ED patients with OUD who received the 7-day XR-BUP preparation in the ED between June 2020 and July 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gail D’Onofrio
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine,
New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale School of Public Health New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jeanmarie Perrone
- Department of Emergency Medicine Perelman School of
Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kathryn F. Hawk
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine,
New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale School of Public Health New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Ethan Cowan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine,
New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Emergency Medicine Icahn School of Medicine
at Mount Sinai New York, New York
| | - Ryan McCormack
- Department of Emergency Medicine NYU Langone Medical Center
New York, New York
| | - Edouard Coupet
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine,
New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Patricia H. Owens
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine,
New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Shara H. Martel
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine,
New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Sharon L. Walsh
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine Center on Drug
and Alcohol Research, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine Center on Drug
and Alcohol Research, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Andrew Herring
- Department of Emergency Medicine Highland Hospital Oakland,
California
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Marks KR, Talbert J, Hammerslag LR, Lofwall MR, Fanucchi LC, Broce H, Walsh SL. Contributions of a central registry to monitor methadone -treatment through the HEALing Communities Study. J Opioid Manag 2023; 19:73-81. [PMID: 37879662 DOI: 10.5055/jom.2023.0801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the process of establishing a Methadone Central Registry (MCR) as part of the HEALing (Helping to End Addiction Long-termSM) Communities Study (HCS) and to support recommendations with evidence of its functionality relative to Medicaid claims data for monitoring utilization of methadone, an evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorder. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS The manuscript authors were active participants in establishing the MCR and include representation from state government, Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs), and HCS university partners. Secondary data were obtained from Kentucky's (KY's) MCR and Medicaid claims from July 2020 through June 2021. The functionality of data obtained from the MCR, as measured by data completeness and timeliness, is compared with Medicaid claims, the current standard. MAIN OUTCOMES Central registry and Medicaid data were each aggregated statewide and at the HCS-KY county level. Dual levels of analysis were selected to inform stakeholders at the study and state levels. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the number of patients in methadone treatment. RESULTS Statewide, the MCR provided a daily record of all individuals receiving methadone through an OTP within 72 hours. In contrast, Medicaid claims processing lagged 9 months and captured 57-62 percent of patients in the MCR. CONCLUSIONS Replacing a fax-based system, an MCR meets the converging need of providers, regulatory authorities, and researchers to monitor utilization, patient dual enrollment, and treatment outcomes. Implementation strategies included key stakeholder engagement, state partner leadership, training, and federal funding. Adoption of an MCR is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine R Marks
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington; Department for Behavioral Health, Developmental and Intellectual Disabilities, Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Frankfort, Kentucky. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5936-7497
| | - Jeffery Talbert
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4304-5167
| | - Lindsey R Hammerslag
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0750-6656
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Department of Behavioral Science; Department of Psychiatry; Center on Drug and Al-cohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5911-0752
| | - Laura C Fanucchi
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Ken-tucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0582-2399
| | - Holly Broce
- Kentucky Association for the Treatment of Opioid Dependence, Frankfort, Kentucky; Pinnacle Treatment Centers KY-I, Inc., Mt. Laurel, New Jersey
| | - Sharon L Walsh
- Department of Behavioral Science; Department of Psychiatry; Center on Drug and Alcohol Research; De-partment of Pharmacology; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Ken-tucky. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9722-5681
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hammerslag LR, Mack A, Chandler RK, Fanucchi LC, Feaster DJ, LaRochelle MR, Lofwall MR, Nau M, Villani J, Walsh SL, Westgate PM, Slavova S, Talbert JC. Telemedicine Buprenorphine Initiation and Retention in Opioid Use Disorder Treatment for Medicaid Enrollees. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2336914. [PMID: 37851446 PMCID: PMC10585416 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Early COVID-19 mitigation strategies placed an additional burden on individuals seeking care for opioid use disorder (OUD). Telemedicine provided a way to initiate and maintain transmucosal buprenorphine treatment of OUD. Objective To examine associations between transmucosal buprenorphine OUD treatment modality (telemedicine vs traditional) during the COVID-19 public health emergency and the health outcomes of treatment retention and opioid-related nonfatal overdose. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was conducted using Medicaid claims and enrollment data from November 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020, for individuals aged 18 to 64 years from Kentucky and Ohio. Data were collected and analyzed in June 2022, with data updated during revision in August 2023. Exposures The primary exposure of interest was the modality of the transmucosal buprenorphine OUD treatment initiation. Relevant patient demographic and comorbidity characteristics were included in regression models. Main Outcomes and Measures There were 2 main outcomes of interest: retention in treatment after initiation and opioid-related nonfatal overdose after initiation. For outcomes measured after initiation, a 90-day follow-up period was used. The main analysis used a new-user study design; transmucosal buprenorphine OUD treatment initiation was defined as initiation after more than a 60-day gap in buprenorphine treatment. In addition, uptake of telemedicine for buprenorphine was examined, overall and within patients initiating treatment, across quarters in 2020. Results This study included 41 266 individuals in Kentucky (21 269 women [51.5%]; mean [SD] age, 37.9 [9.0] years) and 50 648 individuals in Ohio (26 425 women [52.2%]; mean [SD] age, 37.1 [9.3] years) who received buprenorphine in 2020, with 18 250 and 24 741 people initiating buprenorphine in Kentucky and Ohio, respectively. Telemedicine buprenorphine initiations increased sharply at the beginning of 2020. Compared with nontelemedicine initiation, telemedicine initiation was associated with better odds of 90-day retention with buprenorphine in both states (Kentucky: adjusted odds ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.01-1.27]; Ohio: adjusted odds ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.06-1.32]) in a regression analysis adjusting for patient demographic and comorbidity characteristics. Telemedicine initiation was not associated with opioid-related nonfatal overdose (Kentucky: adjusted odds ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.56-1.40]; Ohio: adjusted odds ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.83-1.41]). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of Medicaid enrollees receiving buprenorphine for OUD, telemedicine buprenorphine initiation was associated with retention in treatment early during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings add to the literature demonstrating positive outcomes associated with the use of telemedicine for treatment of OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey R. Hammerslag
- Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington
| | - Aimee Mack
- Division of Health Sciences, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus
| | - Redonna K. Chandler
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Laura C. Fanucchi
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Daniel J. Feaster
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Marc R. LaRochelle
- Clinical Addiction Research & Education Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Michael Nau
- Division of Health Sciences, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus
| | - Jennifer Villani
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sharon L. Walsh
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Philip M. Westgate
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Svetla Slavova
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Jeffery C. Talbert
- Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Silwal A, Talbert J, Bohler RM, Kelsch J, Cook C, Blevins D, Gallivan M, Hunt T, Hatcher SM, Thomas CP, Williams S, Fanucchi L, Lofwall MR. State alignment with federal regulations in 2022 to relax buprenorphine 30-patient waiver requirements. Drug Alcohol Depend Rep 2023; 7:100164. [PMID: 37234704 PMCID: PMC10206439 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2023.100164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Background In 2021, the Department of Health and Human Services released guidelines allowing waiver-eligible providers seeking to treat up to 30 patients to be exempt from waiver training (WT) and the counseling and other ancillary services (CAS) attestation. This study evaluates if states and the District of Columbia had more restrictive policies preventing adoption of the 2021 federal guidelines. Methods First, the Westlaw database was searched for buprenorphine regulations. Second, state medical, osteopathic, physician assistant, nursing boards, and single state agencies (SSA) were surveyed to assess for the WT and CAS requirements and if they were discussing the 2021 guidelines. Results were recorded and compared by state and waiver-eligible provider types. Results The Westlaw search revealed seven states with regulations requiring the WT and ten states requiring CAS. Survey results showed ten state boards/SSAs required WT for at least one waiver-eligible practitioner type and eleven state boards/SSAs required CAS. In some states, the WT and CAS requirements only applied in special circumstances. Eleven states had discrepancies between the Westlaw and survey results among three waiver-eligible provider types. Conclusions Despite the 2021 federal change intended to increase access to buprenorphine, several states had regulations and/or provider boards and SSAs that were not supportive. Now, the Mainstreaming Addiction Treatment (MAT) Act of 2022 eliminated the federal x-waiver requirement to prescribe buprenorphine. However, these states may continue to have barriers to treatment access despite the MAT Act. Strategies to engage states with these restrictive policies are needed to improve buprenorphine treatment capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Silwal
- Substance Use Priority Research Area (SUPRA), University of Kentucky, Lexington KY, USA
- Department of Communication, College of Communication and Information, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Jeffery Talbert
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Robert M. Bohler
- Heller School for Social Policy and Management at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Jordan Kelsch
- Substance Use Priority Research Area (SUPRA), University of Kentucky, Lexington KY, USA
| | - Christopher Cook
- Substance Use Priority Research Area (SUPRA), University of Kentucky, Lexington KY, USA
| | - Derek Blevins
- Division of Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute / Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Molly Gallivan
- Substance Use Priority Research Area (SUPRA), University of Kentucky, Lexington KY, USA
| | - Timothy Hunt
- Social Intervention Group, School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Cindy Parks Thomas
- Heller School for Social Policy and Management at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Soncere Williams
- Social Intervention Group, School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laura Fanucchi
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Avenue, Lexington, KY 40508, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Avenue, Lexington, KY 40508, USA
- Departments of Behavioral Science and Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kropp FB, Smid MC, Lofwall MR, Wachman EM, Martin PR, Murphy SM, Wilder CM, Winhusen TJ. Collaborative care programs for pregnant and postpartum individuals with opioid use disorder: Organizational characteristics of sites participating in the NIDA CTN0080 MOMs study. Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment 2023; 149:209030. [PMID: 37023858 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pregnant individuals with substance use disorders face complex issues that may serve as barriers to treatment entry and retention. Several professional organizations have established recommendations on comprehensive, collaborative approaches to treatment to meet the needs of this population, but information on real-world application is lacking. Sites participating in the NIDA CTN0080 "Medication treatment for Opioid use disorder in expectant Mothers (MOMs)"-a randomized clinical trial of extended release compared to sublingual buprenorphine among pregnant and postpartum individuals (PPI)-were selected, in part, because they have a collaborative approach to treating PPI with opioid use disorder (OUD). However, organizational differences among sites and how they implement expert recommendations for collaborative care could impact study outcomes. METHODS Prior to study launch at each of the 13 MOMs sites, investigators used the Pregnancy and Addiction Services Assessment (PAASA) to collect information about organizational factors. Input from a team of addiction, perinatal, and economic evaluation experts guided the development of the PAASA. Investigators programmed the PAASA into a web-based data system and summarized the resultant site data using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Study sites represented four US census regions. Most sites were specialty obstetrics & gynecology (OB/GYN) programs providing OUD services (n = 9, 69.2 %), were affiliated with an academic institution (n = 11, 84.6 %), and prescribed buprenorphine in an ambulatory/outpatient setting (n = 11, 84.6 %); all sites offered access to naloxone. Sites reported that their population was primarily White, utilized public insurance, and faced numerous psychosocial barriers to treatment. Although all sites offered many services recommended by expert consensus groups, they varied in how they coordinated these services. CONCLUSIONS By providing the organizational characteristics of sites participating in the MOMs study, this report assists in filling the current gap in knowledge regarding similar programs providing services to PPI with OUD. Collaborative care programs such as those participating in MOMs are uniquely positioned to participate in research to determine the most effective models of care and to determine how research can be integrated into those clinical care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frankie B Kropp
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3131 Harvey Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
| | - Marcela C Smid
- University of Utah, 50 N. Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Departments of Behavioral Science and Psychiatry, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 845 Angliana Avenue, Lexington, KY 40508, USA.
| | - Elisha M Wachman
- Boston Medical Center, 801 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02119, USA.
| | - Peter R Martin
- Vanderbilt Psychiatric Hospital, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1601 23rd Avenue South, Suite 3035, Nashville, TN 372124, USA.
| | - Sean M Murphy
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | - Christine M Wilder
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3131 Harvey Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA; Center for Addiction Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3230 Eden Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.
| | - T John Winhusen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3131 Harvey Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA; Center for Addiction Research, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3230 Eden Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Staton M, Pike E, Tillson M, Lofwall MR. Facilitating factors and barriers for use of medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD) among justice-involved individuals in rural Appalachia. J Community Psychol 2023:10.1002/jcop.23029. [PMID: 36930568 PMCID: PMC10505241 DOI: 10.1002/jcop.23029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this qualitative study is to assess facilitating factors and barriers for medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD) initiation among justice-involved individuals in one rural Appalachian community, as well as how those factors may differ across the three types of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved medications. Qualitative interviews were conducted with rural justice-involved individuals (N = 10) with a history of opioid use in the target community. Overall, participants demonstrated knowledge of the different types of MOUD and their pharmacological properties, but limited overall health literacy around opioid use disorder and MOUD treatment. Treatment access was hampered by transportation, time burdens, and costs. Findings call for research into improving health literacy education, training, and resources to decrease stigma and increase access to MOUD, particularly in light of the ongoing opioid crisis. State policies also need to increase access to all FDA medications among justice-involved individuals, as well as supporting a care continuum from facility entry, release, and community re-entry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Staton
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Ave, Lexington, KY 40508, USA
| | - Erika Pike
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA
| | - Martha Tillson
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Ave, Lexington, KY 40508, USA
- Department of Sociology, University of Kentucky College of Arts and Sciences, Lexington, KY 40506-0027, USA
| | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Ave, Lexington, KY 40508, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bohler RM, Freeman PR, Villani J, Hunt T, Linas BS, Walley AY, Green TC, Lofwall MR, Bridden C, Frazier LA, Fanucchi LC, Talbert JC, Chandler R. The policy landscape for naloxone distribution in four states highly impacted by fatal opioid overdoses. Drug Alcohol Depend Rep 2023; 6:100126. [PMID: 36643788 PMCID: PMC9838196 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background Expanding access to naloxone is one of the most impactful interventions in decreasing opioid-related mortality. However, state distribution rates of naloxone are insufficient to meet community need. The current study sought to better understand this gap by focusing on state policies that may facilitate or impede naloxone distribution in four states highly impacted by fatal opioid overdoses - Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio. Methods We provide a descriptive analysis of the policy landscape impacting naloxone distribution through pharmacy and community channels in the four states participating in the HEALing Communities Study (HCS). Publicly available data and the expertise of the research team were used to describe each state's naloxone access laws (NALs), Medicaid coverage of naloxone, and community overdose education and naloxone distribution infrastructure. Data presented in this study represent the most current policy landscape through September 2022. Results Variation exists between specific components of the NALs of each state, the structure of Medicaid coverage of naloxone, and the community distribution infrastructure networks. Massachusetts and New York have a statewide standing order, but other states use different strategies short of a statewide standing order to expand access to naloxone. Quantity limits specific to naloxone may limit access to Medicaid beneficiaries in some states. Conclusion States participating in the HCS have developed innovative but different mechanisms to ensure naloxone access. Policies were dynamic and moved towards greater access. Research should consider the policy landscape in the implementation and sustainability of interventions as well as the analysis of outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M. Bohler
- Institute for Behavioral Health, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA 02453, United States,Corresponding author. (R.M. Bohler)
| | - Patricia R. Freeman
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Jennifer Villani
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Tim Hunt
- School of Social Work, Social Intervention Group (SIG), Center for Healing of Opioid and Other Substance Use Disorders (CHOSEN), Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Beth S. Linas
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | - Alexander Y. Walley
- Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Traci C. Green
- Institute for Behavioral Health, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA 02453, United States
| | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- Departments of Behavioral Science and Psychiatry, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Carly Bridden
- Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Lisa A. Frazier
- Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Evaluation Studies, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Laura C. Fanucchi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Jeffery C. Talbert
- Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Redonna Chandler
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
D'Onofrio G, Hawk KF, Perrone J, Walsh SL, Lofwall MR, Fiellin DA, Herring A. Incidence of Precipitated Withdrawal During a Multisite Emergency Department-Initiated Buprenorphine Clinical Trial in the Era of Fentanyl. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e236108. [PMID: 36995717 PMCID: PMC10064247 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.6108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gail D'Onofrio
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- School of Public Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Kathryn F Hawk
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- School of Public Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jeanmarie Perrone
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Sharon L Walsh
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington
| | - David A Fiellin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- School of Public Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Andrew Herring
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital Oakland, Oakland, California
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cuperfain AB, Katznelson G, Costa T, Wong P, Beyraghi N, George TP, Lofwall MR, Chopra N. Factors to guide the use of extended-release buprenorphine formulations for specific patient populations. Journal of Substance Use 2023. [DOI: 10.1080/14659891.2023.2174908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ari B. Cuperfain
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gali Katznelson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tianna Costa
- Addictions Division and Centre for Complex Interventions, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patrick Wong
- Addictions Division and Centre for Complex Interventions, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Narges Beyraghi
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Addictions Division and Centre for Complex Interventions, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tony P. George
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Addictions Division and Centre for Complex Interventions, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- Departments of Behavioral Science and Psychiatry, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Nitin Chopra
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Addictions Division and Centre for Complex Interventions, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fanucchi LC, Murphy SM, Surratt H, Kapadia SN, Walsh SL, Grubbs JA, Thornton AC, Nuzzo P, Lofwall MR. Design and protocol of the Buprenorphine plus Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (B-OPAT) study: a randomized clinical trial of integrated outpatient treatment of opioid use disorder and severe, injection-related infections. Ther Adv Infect Dis 2022; 9:20499361221108005. [PMID: 35847566 PMCID: PMC9277431 DOI: 10.1177/20499361221108005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction A marked increase in hospitalizations for severe, injection-related infections (SIRI) has been associated with the opioid epidemic. Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) is typically not offered to persons with opioid use disorder (OUD) and SIRI, though increasing evidence suggests it may be feasible and safe. This study evaluates the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an integrated care model combining Buprenorphine treatment of OUD with OPAT for SIRI (B-OPAT) compared with treatment as usual on key OUD, infectious disease, and health economic outcomes. B-OPAT expands and incorporates key elements of established clinical models, including inpatient initiation of buprenorphine for OUD, inpatient infectious disease consultation for SIRI, office-based treatment of OUD, and OPAT, and includes more frequent clinical outpatient visits than standard OPAT. A qualitative evaluation is included to contextualize effectiveness outcomes and identify barriers and facilitators to intervention adoption and implementation. Methods B-OPAT is a single-site, randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial recruiting 90 adult inpatients hospitalized with OUD and SIRI who require at least 2 weeks of intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy. After screening, eligible participants are randomized 1:1 to either discharge once medically stable to an integrated outpatient treatment care model combining Buprenorphine and OPAT (B-OPAT) or to Treatment As Usual (TAU). The primary outcome measure is the proportion of urine samples negative for illicit opioids in the 12 weeks after discharge from the hospital. Key secondary OUD outcomes include self-reported number of days of illicit opioid abstinence and 12-week retention in buprenorphine treatment. The infection outcomes are completion of recommended IV antibiotic therapy, peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) complications, and readmission related to primary SIRI. Conclusions The B-OPAT study will help address the important question of whether it is clinically effective and cost-effective to discharge persons with OUD and SIRI to an integrated outpatient care model combining OUD treatment with OPAT relative to TAU (Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04677114).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sean M. Murphy
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill
Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hilary Surratt
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, College of
Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA,Department of Behavioral Science, College of
Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Shashi N. Kapadia
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill
Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA,Division of Infectious Diseases, Weill Cornell
Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sharon L. Walsh
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, College of
Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA,Departments of Behavioral Science and
Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY,
USA,Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College
of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - James A. Grubbs
- Division of Infectious Diseases, College of
Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Alice C. Thornton
- Division of Infectious Diseases, College of
Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Paul Nuzzo
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, College
of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, College
of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA,Departments of Behavioral Science and
Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY,
USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lei F, Lofwall MR, Freeman PR, Slade E, Vickers‐Smith R, Slavova S. Changes in transmucosal buprenorphine utilization for opioid use disorder treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kentucky. J Rural Health 2022; 39:186-196. [PMID: 35610181 PMCID: PMC9348381 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE With surging opioid-involved overdoses, maintaining access to opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment is critical during the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined changes in transmucosal buprenorphine prescribing for OUD treatment in Kentucky after the national COVID-19 emergency declaration, with a focus on rural-urban differences. METHODS Using 2019-2020 prescription monitoring data, we performed segmented regression analysis for an interrupted time series design to evaluate changes in weekly rates (per 100,000 residents) of dispensed prescriptions, unique individuals with dispensed prescriptions, and average days' supply for dispensed prescriptions of transmucosal buprenorphine. FINDINGS The weekly rates of dispensed prescriptions and unique individuals with dispensed prescriptions were higher for rural residents than urban residents. After the national COVID-19 emergency declaration, rural and urban residents experienced similar immediate drops in the rate of dispensed prescriptions (rural -33.4; urban -24.3) and unique patients with dispensed prescriptions (rural -25.0; urban -17.1), followed by similar sustained increases. Both measures surpassed the prepandemic levels in mid-June 2020. Patients residing in urban areas received averagely longer prescriptions at baseline (urban: 11.0 days; rural: 10.5 days). The average weekly days' supply increased in the week after the national emergency declaration, but the estimated increase was higher (P = .004) for urban (0.8 days) versus rural (0.5 days) residents. CONCLUSIONS Transmucosal buprenorphine utilization increased during the COVID-19 pandemic after experiencing interruption during the initial weeks of the pandemic. Future studies should evaluate the contribution of the relaxed telemedicine buprenorphine prescribing regulations during the COVID-19 national emergency on initiation and maintenance of buprenorphine treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feitong Lei
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public HealthUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKentuckyUSA
| | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- Department of Behavioral Science and PsychiatryUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKentuckyUSA,Center on Drug and Alcohol ResearchUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKentuckyUSA
| | - Patricia R. Freeman
- Center on Drug and Alcohol ResearchUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKentuckyUSA,Department of Pharmacy Practice and ScienceUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKentuckyUSA
| | - Emily Slade
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public HealthUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKentuckyUSA
| | - Rachel Vickers‐Smith
- Department of EpidemiologyCollege of Public HealthUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKentuckyUSA
| | - Svetla Slavova
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public HealthUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKentuckyUSA,Kentucky Injury Prevention and Research CenterUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonKentuckyUSA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lofwall MR, Fanucchi LC. Long-acting buprenorphine injectables: Opportunity to improve opioid use disorder treatment among rural populations. Prev Med 2021; 152:106756. [PMID: 34352306 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The opioid epidemic continues with escalating overdose deaths further exacerbated by the coronavirus pandemic, despite having efficacious medication treatments for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Most persons with OUD remain undiagnosed, without ever receiving MOUD, and even among those who initiate MOUD, retention is infrequently longer than 6 months (Williams et al., 2019). Treatment access remains particularly problematic in rural areas that often have few providers and limited resources (Ghertner, 2019). There are two new injectable long-acting buprenorphine (LAB) formulations recently approved in the United States and abroad (Lofwall et al., 2018; Walsh et al., 2017; Haight et al., 2019). They hold promise to improve treatment access and retention by decreasing risks of nonadherence, diversion and misuse and may be particularly attractive during a pandemic in order to minimize provider and pharmacy contacts (Roberts et al., 2020) and help improve access to care in rural areas. There are several ongoing evaluations of LAB injectables in large multi-site randomized clinical trials sponsored by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and Veterans Administration Office of Research and Development in settings with special populations that exist in both urban and rural settings. Understanding the potential clinical benefits of LAB injectables along the care continuum, particularly for rural areas is essential to successful implementation in the complex healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R Lofwall
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Departments of Behavioral Science and Psychiatry, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, 845 Angliana Avenue, Lexington, KY 40508, United States of America.
| | - Laura C Fanucchi
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, 845 Angliana Avenue, Lexington, KY 40508, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
D'Onofrio G, Hawk KF, Herring AA, Perrone J, Cowan E, McCormack RP, Dziura J, Taylor RA, Coupet E, Edelman EJ, Pantalon MV, Owens PH, Martel SH, O'Connor PG, Van Veldhuisen P, DeVogel N, Huntley K, Murphy SM, Lofwall MR, Walsh SL, Fiellin DA. The design and conduct of a randomized clinical trial comparing emergency department initiation of sublingual versus a 7-day extended-release injection formulation of buprenorphine for opioid use disorder: Project ED Innovation. Contemp Clin Trials 2021; 104:106359. [PMID: 33737199 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
ED-INNOVATION (Emergency Department-INitiated bupreNOrphine VAlidaTION) is a Hybrid Type-1 Implementation-Effectiveness multisite emergency department (ED) study funded through The Helping to End Addiction Long-termSM Initiative, or NIH HEAL InitiativeSM efforts to increase access to medications for opioid use disorder (OUD). We use components of Implementation Facilitation to enhance adoption of ED-initiated buprenorphine (BUP) at approximately 30 sites. Subsequently we compare the effectiveness of two BUP formulations, sublingual (SL-BUP) and 7-day extended-release injectable (CAM2038, XR-BUP) in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) of approximately 2000 patients with OUD on the primary outcome of engagement in formal addiction treatment at 7 days. Secondary outcomes assessed at 7 and 30 days include self-reported opioid use, craving and satisfaction, health service utilization, overdose events, and engagement in formal addiction treatment (30 days) and receipt of medications for OUD (at 7 and 30 days). A sample size of 1000 per group provides 90% power at the 2-sided significance level to detect a difference in the primary outcome of 8% and accommodates a 15% dropout rate. We will compare the cost effectiveness of the two treatments on the primary outcome using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. We will also conduct an ancillary study in approximately 75 patients experiencing minimal to no opioid withdrawal who will undergo XR-BUP initiation. If the ancillary study demonstrates safety, we will expand the eligibility criteria for the RCT to include individuals with minimal to no opioid withdrawal. The results of these studies will inform implementation of ED-initiated BUP in diverse EDs which has the potential to improve treatment access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gail D'Onofrio
- Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States.
| | - Kathryn F Hawk
- Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Andrew A Herring
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Highland Hospital, Oakland, CA, United States
| | - Jeanmarie Perrone
- Department of Emergency Medicine Perelman, School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, PA, United States
| | - Ethan Cowan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Ryan P McCormack
- Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - James Dziura
- Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - R Andrew Taylor
- Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Edouard Coupet
- Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - E Jennifer Edelman
- Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States; Internal Medicine Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Michael V Pantalon
- Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Patricia H Owens
- Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Shara H Martel
- Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Patrick G O'Connor
- Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States; Internal Medicine Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | | | | | - Kristen Huntley
- The National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD, United States
| | - Sean M Murphy
- Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, New York, United States
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- University of Kentucky, College of Medicine Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Sharon L Walsh
- University of Kentucky, College of Medicine Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - David A Fiellin
- Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States; Internal Medicine Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Babalonis S, Coe MA, Nuzzo PA, Lofwall MR, Ali N, Sloan PA, Fanucchi LC, Walsh SL. Acute administration of oxycodone, alcohol, and their combination on simulated driving-preliminary outcomes in healthy adults. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2021; 238:539-549. [PMID: 33169203 PMCID: PMC7855562 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-020-05702-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE Epidemiological data indicate that drivers testing positive for an opioid drug are twice as likely to cause a fatal car crash; however, there are limited controlled data available. OBJECTIVES The primary aim of this study was to assess the effects of a therapeutic dose range of oxycodone alone and in combination with alcohol on simulated driving performance. METHODS Healthy participants (n = 10) completed this within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized outpatient study. Six 7-h sessions were completed during which oxycodone (0, 5, 10 mg, p.o.) was administered 30 min before alcohol (0, 0.8 g/kg (15% less for women), p.o.) for a total of 6 test conditions. Driving assessments and participant-, observer-rated, psychomotor and physiological measures were collected in regular intervals before and after drug administration. RESULTS Oxycodone alone (5, 10 mg) did not produce any changes in driving outcomes or psychomotor task performance, relative to placebo (p > 0.05); however, 10 mg oxycodone produced increases in an array of subjective ratings, including sedation and impairment (p < 0.05). Alcohol alone produced driving impairment (e.g., decreased lateral control) (p < 0.05); however, oxycodone did not potentiate alcohol-related driving or subjective effects. CONCLUSIONS These preliminary data suggest that acute doses of oxycodone (5, 10 mg) do not significantly impair acuity on laboratory-based simulated driving models; however, 10 mg oxycodone produced increases in self-reported outcomes that are not compatible with safe driving behavior (e.g., sedation, impairment). Additional controlled research is needed to determine how opioid misuse (higher doses; parenteral routes of administration) impacts driving risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanna Babalonis
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA. .,Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, 845 Angliana Avenue, Lexington, 40508, KY, USA.
| | - Marion A. Coe
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY,Department of Pharmacology, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY
| | - Paul A. Nuzzo
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY
| | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY,Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY,Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY
| | - Nur Ali
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY
| | - Paul A. Sloan
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY
| | - Laura C. Fanucchi
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY
| | - Sharon L. Walsh
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY,Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY,Department of Pharmacology, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY,Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Fanucchi LC, Walsh SL, Thornton AC, Nuzzo PA, Lofwall MR. Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Plus Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder and Severe Injection-related Infections. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 70:1226-1229. [PMID: 31342057 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
In a pilot randomized trial in persons with opioid use disorder hospitalized with injection-related infections, an innovative care model combining outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy with buprenorphine treatment had similar clinical and drug use outcomes to usual care (inpatient intravenous antibiotic completion) and shortened hospital length of stay by 23.5 days. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NCT03048643.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura C Fanucchi
- Division of Infectious Disease, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Sharon L Walsh
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Alice C Thornton
- Division of Infectious Disease, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Paul A Nuzzo
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Havens JR, Knudsen HK, Strickland JC, Young AM, Babalonis S, Lofwall MR, Walsh SL. Recent Increase in Methamphetamine Use in a Cohort of Rural People Who Use Drugs: Further Evidence for the Emergence of Twin Epidemics. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:805002. [PMID: 35069295 PMCID: PMC8777215 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.805002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Appalachian Kentucky was at the epicenter of the prescription opioid epidemic in the early 2000's. As we enter the third decade of the epidemic, patterns have begun to emerge as people who use drugs (PWUD) transition from use of opioids to other drugs. The purpose of this analysis was to examine longitudinal changes in methamphetamine use in an ongoing cohort of rural people who use drugs (PWUD) in Appalachian Kentucky. All but five of the cohort participants (N = 503) reported nonmedical prescription opioid use (NMPOU) at baseline and those 498 are included in this longitudinal analysis encompassing eight waves of data (2008-2020). Past 6-month use of methamphetamine was the dependent variable. Given the correlated nature of the data, mixed effects logistic regression was utilized to examine changes in methamphetamine use over time. Significant increases in methamphetamine use were observed over the past decade in this cohort of PWUD, especially in recent years (2017-2020). Prevalence of recent use at baseline and each of the follow-up visits was as follows: 9.4, 5.6, 5.0, 5.4, 8.1, 6.8, 6.9, and 33.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). On the contrary, significant reductions in NMPO and heroin use were observed in the same time period. The odds of methamphetamine use at the most recent visit were 25.8 times greater than at baseline (95% CI: 14.9, 44.6) and 52.6% of those reporting methamphetamine use reported injecting the drug. These results provide further evidence of "twin epidemics" of methamphetamine use among NMPOU. While problematic on several fronts, of particular concern is the lack of effective treatment options for methamphetamine use disorder. As policies around the opioid epidemic continue to evolve, particular attention should be paid to the surge in stimulant use in opioid-endemic areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer R Havens
- Department of Behavioral Science, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Hannah K Knudsen
- Department of Behavioral Science, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Justin C Strickland
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - April M Young
- Department of Behavioral Science, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States.,Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Shanna Babalonis
- Department of Behavioral Science, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Department of Behavioral Science, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Sharon L Walsh
- Department of Behavioral Science, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Walsh SL, El-Bassel N, Jackson RD, Samet JH, Aggarwal M, Aldridge AP, Baker T, Barbosa C, Barocas JA, Battaglia TA, Beers D, Bernson D, Bowers-Sword R, Bridden C, Brown JL, Bush HM, Bush JL, Button A, Campbell AN, Cerda M, Cheng DM, Chhatwal J, Clarke T, Conway KP, Crable EL, Czajkowski A, David JL, Drainoni ML, Fanucchi LC, Feaster DJ, Fernandez S, Freedman D, Freisthler B, Gilbert L, Glasgow LM, Goddard-Eckrich D, Gutnick D, Harlow K, Helme DW, Huang T, Huerta TR, Hunt T, Hyder A, Kerner R, Keyes K, Knott CE, Knudsen HK, Konstan M, Larochelle MR, Craig Lefebvre R, Levin F, Lewis N, Linas BP, Lofwall MR, Lounsbury D, Lyons MS, Mann S, Marks KR, McAlearney A, McCollister KE, McCrimmon T, Miles J, Miller CC, Nash D, Nunes E, Oga EA, Oser CB, Plouck T, Rapkin B, Freeman PR, Rodriguez S, Root E, Rosen-Metsch L, Sabounchi N, Saitz R, Salsberry P, Savitsky C, Schackman BR, Seiber EE, Slater MD, Slavova S, Speer D, Martinez LS, Stambaugh LF, Staton M, Stein MD, Stevens-Watkins DJ, Surratt HL, Talbert JC, Thompson KL, Toussant K, Vandergrift NA, Villani J, Walker DM, Walley AY, Walters ST, Westgate PM, Winhusen T, Wu E, Young AM, Young G, Zarkin GA, Chandler RK. The HEALing (Helping to End Addiction Long-term SM) Communities Study: Protocol for a cluster randomized trial at the community level to reduce opioid overdose deaths through implementation of an integrated set of evidence-based practices. Drug Alcohol Depend 2020; 217:108335. [PMID: 33248391 PMCID: PMC7568493 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid overdose deaths remain high in the U.S. Despite having effective interventions to prevent overdose deaths, there are numerous barriers that impede their adoption. The primary aim of the HEALing Communities Study (HCS) is to determine the impact of an intervention consisting of community-engaged, data-driven selection, and implementation of an integrated set of evidence-based practices (EBPs) on reducing opioid overdose deaths. METHODS The HCS is a four year multi-site, parallel-group, cluster randomized wait-list controlled trial. Communities (n = 67) in Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York and Ohio are randomized to active intervention (Wave 1), which starts the intervention in Year 1 or the wait-list control (Wave 2), which starts the intervention in Year 3. The HCS will test a conceptually driven framework to assist communities in selecting and adopting EBPs with three components: 1) a community engagement strategy with local coalitions to guide and implement the intervention; 2) a compendium of EBPs coupled with technical assistance; and 3) a series of communication campaigns to increase awareness and demand for EBPs and reduce stigma. An implementation science framework guides the intervention and allows for examination of the multilevel contexts that promote or impede adoption and expansion of EBPs. The primary outcome, number of opioid overdose deaths, will be compared between Wave 1 and Wave 2 communities during Year 2 of the intervention for Wave 1. Numerous secondary outcomes will be examined. DISCUSSION The HCS is the largest community-based implementation study in the field of addiction with an ambitious goal of significantly reducing fatal opioid overdoses.
Collapse
|
27
|
Havens JR, Knudsen HK, Young AM, Lofwall MR, Walsh SL. Longitudinal trends in nonmedical prescription opioid use in a cohort of rural Appalachian people who use drugs. Prev Med 2020; 140:106194. [PMID: 32652132 PMCID: PMC7680378 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Revised: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Rural Appalachia remains an epicenter of the prescription opioid epidemic. In 2008, a cohort study was undertaken to examine longitudinal trends in nonmedical prescription opioid use (NMPOU). Eight waves of data (2008-2020) from the Social Networks among Appalachian People (SNAP) cohort were utilized for the current analysis. Only those who reported recent (past 6-month) NMPOU at baseline are included (n = 498, 99%). Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to model factors associated with NMPOU over time. Recent NMPOU declined significantly over the past decade (p < .001). However, 54.1% of participants still engaged in NMPOU at their most recent follow-up. Receipt of benefits for a physical or mental disability (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.11, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.98, 4.90) and self-described poor health status (aOR: 3.67, 95% CI: 1.61, 8.37) were both associated with NMPOU. All treatment modalities (methadone maintenance, residential, outpatient counseling) tested in the model, with the notable exception of detoxification, were associated with significantly lower odds of NMPOU. Although significant declines in prescription opioid misuse were observed in the cohort, more than half of all participants were engaged in NMPOU more than a decade after entering the study. Substance use disorder (SUD) treatment (excluding detoxification) was shown associated with reduced odds of continued NMPOU; therefore, increasing access to evidence-based treatments should be a priority in rural areas affected by the ongoing opioid epidemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer R Havens
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Use, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, United States of America; Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, United States of America.
| | - Hannah K Knudsen
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Use, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, United States of America; Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, United States of America
| | - April M Young
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Use, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, United States of America; Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, United States of America
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Use, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, United States of America; Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, United States of America
| | - Sharon L Walsh
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Use, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, United States of America; Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jones JD, Babalonis S, Marcus R, Vince B, Kelsh D, Lofwall MR, Fraser H, Paterson B, Martinez S, Martinez DM, Nunes EV, Walsh SL, Comer SD. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the kappa opioid receptor antagonist, CERC-501, in a human laboratory model of smoking behavior. Addict Biol 2020; 25:e12799. [PMID: 31240842 DOI: 10.1111/adb.12799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Revised: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Preclinical data indicate that selective kappa opioid receptor antagonists reduce nicotine self-administration and withdrawal symptoms. The aim of the current study was to determine whether treatment with CERC-501, an orally available, potent, and selective kappa opioid receptor antagonist, could alleviate nicotine withdrawal and craving and mitigate mood alterations associated with nicotine withdrawal in humans. Healthy, adult cigarette smokers were enrolled into this randomized, multisite, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Participants completed two 8-day treatment phases during which they received either CERC-501 (15 mg, p.o., once daily) or placebo. On the seventh day of each dosing phase, participants were admitted as inpatients for an 18-hour cigarette abstinence period followed by experimental testing. The primary outcome measures were (a) performance on the McKee Smoking Lapse test (ie, latency to smoke in exchange for money) and (b) number of cigarettes self-administered during a 60-minute ad lib smoking period. Other outcomes included measures of craving, mood, anxiety, nicotine withdrawal, and subjective effects of cigarette smoking. A total of 71 participants who smoked an average of approximately 23 cigarettes per day were enrolled, and 56 subjects completed the study. CERC-501 was well tolerated, but it did not significantly alter the latency to start smoking (CERC-501: 16.5 min vs placebo: 17.7 min) or the number of cigarettes smoked (CERC-501: 3.3 cigarettes vs placebo: 3.1 cigarettes). Compared with placebo, CERC-501 also did not affect cigarette craving, mood, anxiety, nicotine withdrawal, or subjective effects of smoking. These findings do not support a role for CERC-501 in the treatment of nicotine use disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jermaine D. Jones
- Division on Substance Use Disorders New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York City New York USA
| | - Shanna Babalonis
- Department of Behavioral Science, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USA
| | | | | | - Debra Kelsh
- Vince and Associates Overland Park Kansas USA
| | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- Department of Behavioral Science, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USA
| | | | | | - Suky Martinez
- Division on Substance Use Disorders New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York City New York USA
- Translational Research Training Program in Addiction City College of New York New York City New York USA
| | - Diana M. Martinez
- Division on Substance Use Disorders New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York City New York USA
| | - Edward V. Nunes
- Division on Substance Use Disorders New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York City New York USA
| | - Sharon L. Walsh
- Department of Behavioral Science, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky USA
| | - Sandra D. Comer
- Division on Substance Use Disorders New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York City New York USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sohn M, Talbert JC, Delcher C, Hankosky ER, Lofwall MR, Freeman PR. Association between state Medicaid expansion status and naloxone prescription dispensing. Health Serv Res 2020; 55:239-248. [PMID: 32030751 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test whether Medicaid expansion is associated with (a) a greater number of naloxone prescriptions dispensed and (b) a higher proportion of naloxone prescriptions paid by Medicaid. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING We used the IQVIA National Prescription Audit to obtain data on per state per quarter naloxone prescription dispensing for the period 2011-16. STUDY DESIGN In this quasi-experimental design study, the impact of Medicaid expansion on naloxone prescription dispensing was examined using difference-in-difference estimation models. State-level covariates including pharmacy-based naloxone laws (standing/protocol orders and direct authority to dispense naloxone), third-party prescribing laws, opioid analgesic prescribing rates, opioid-involved overdose death rates, and population size were controlled for in the analysis. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Medicaid expansion was associated with 38 additional naloxone prescriptions dispensed per state per quarter compared to nonexpansion controls, on average (P = .030). Also, Medicaid expansion resulted in an average increase of 9.86 percent in the share of naloxone prescriptions paid by Medicaid per state per quarter (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Our study found that Medicaid expansion increased naloxone availability. This finding suggests that it will be important to consider naloxone access when making federal- and state-level decisions affecting Medicaid coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minji Sohn
- College of Pharmacy, Ferris State University, Big Rapids, Michigan
| | - Jeffery C Talbert
- Institute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Chris Delcher
- Institute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Emily R Hankosky
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Patricia R Freeman
- Institute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sweeney MM, Antoine DG, Nanda L, Géniaux H, Lofwall MR, Bigelow GE, Umbricht A. Increases in body mass index and cardiovascular risk factors during methadone maintenance treatment. J Opioid Manag 2020. [PMID: 31849028 DOI: 10.5055/jom.2019.0526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study describes changes in weight and cardiovascular risk factors over time among individuals enrolled in methadone maintenance treatment for opioid use disorder. Demographic and clinical predictors of weight gain were also evaluated. DESIGN This study was a retrospective chart review evaluating data over a period of 3 years. SETTING Medical records of individuals enrolled in an academic research outpatient methadone maintenance treatment program were reviewed. PATIENTS Seventy-four individuals who were admitted and retained in methadone maintenance treatment for at least 3 consecutive years were included. OUTCOME MEASURES Annual weight was assessed by calculating body mass index (BMI). Changes over time in cardiovascular risk factors of hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia were also assessed. RESULTS The percentage of patients categorized as overweight, obese, or morbidly obese BMI increased from 42 percent (n = 31) at admission to 76 percent (n = 56), 82 percent (n = 61), and 88 percent (n = 65) at 1, 2, and 3 years post-admission, respectively. Hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia also tended to increase following admission. BMI increases tended to be greater for those with a higher dose of methadone, as well as for females and Black/African American individuals. No other predictors of weight gain were identified. CONCLUSIONS These data indicate that methadone maintenance treatment is associated with clinically meaningful weight gain and increases in cardiovascular risk factors. Given the importance of methadone maintenance for treatment of opioid use disorder, future research should examine additional predictors and potential mechanisms of weight gain among methadone patients and develop tailored interventions including nutritional knowledge and lifestyle recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary M Sweeney
- Instructor, Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Denis G Antoine
- Assistant Professor, Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Leticia Nanda
- Adult Nurse Practitioner, Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hélène Géniaux
- Pharmacist, Department of Toxicology and Pharmacovigilance, University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Associate Professor, Department of Behavioral Science, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky; Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - George E Bigelow
- Professor, Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Annie Umbricht
- Assistant Professor, Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Vickers-Smith R, Sun J, Charnigo RJ, Lofwall MR, Walsh SL, Havens JR. Gabapentin drug misuse signals: A pharmacovigilance assessment using the FDA adverse event reporting system. Drug Alcohol Depend 2020; 206:107709. [PMID: 31732295 PMCID: PMC7762328 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Revised: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 10/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although there have been increasing reports of intentional gabapentin misuse, epidemiological evidence for the phenomenon is limited. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are pharmacovigilance abuse signals for gabapentin. METHODS Using FDA Adverse Events Reporting System reports from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2015, we calculated pharmacovigilance signal measures (i.e., reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, information component, and empirical Bayes geometric mean) for abuse-related adverse event (AR-AE)-gabapentin pairs. Loglinear modeling assessed the frequency of concurrent reporting of abuse-related and abuse-specific AEs (AS-AEs) associated with gabapentin. Findings were compared to a positive (pregabalin) and negative (duloxetine) control. RESULTS From 2005-2015 there were 5,951,229 unique AE reports submitted to the FDA including 99,977 for gabapentin, 73,977 for duloxetine, and 97,813 for pregabalin. Significant drug-AR-AE pair signals involving gabapentin included: drug abuser, multiple drug overdose, and substance-induced psychotic disorder. Significant drug AR-AE signals involving gabapentin and pregabalin, but not duloxetine, were: ataxia, dependence, drug abuse, increased drug tolerance, and overdose. Compared to duloxetine, gabapentin had significantly greater odds of a co-report for an AS-AE with drug withdrawal syndrome (OR: 6.55), auditory hallucinations (OR: 4.57), delusions (OR: 2.36), euphoric mood (OR: 5.45), ataxia (OR: 2.85), drug abuser (OR: 3.01), aggression (OR: 1.98), psychotic disorder (OR: 1.96), and feeling abnormal (OR: 1.31). CONCLUSIONS We identified abuse-related signals for gabapentin and highlighted several CNS effects that may be associated with its abuse. Gabapentin prescribers should be aware of the drug's abuse liability and effects that may accompany its use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Vickers-Smith
- University of Louisville School of Nursing, Louisville, KY 40202, USA; Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, 111 Washington Avenue, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, 111 Washington Avenue, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 845 Angliana Avenue, Lexington, KY 40508, USA.
| | - Jiangwen Sun
- Department of Computer Science, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA
| | - Richard J. Charnigo
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, 111 Washington Avenue, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 845 Angliana Avenue, Lexington, KY 40508, USA
| | - Sharon L. Walsh
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 845 Angliana Avenue, Lexington, KY 40508, USA,Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, 789 South Limestone, Lexington, KY 40508, USA
| | - Jennifer R.. Havens
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, 111 Washington Avenue, Lexington, KY 40536, USA,Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 845 Angliana Avenue, Lexington, KY 40508, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sweeney MM, Antoine DG, Nanda L, Géniaux H, Lofwall MR, Bigelow GE, Umbricht A. Increases in body mass index and cardiovascular risk factors during methadone maintenance treatment. J Opioid Manag 2019; 15:367-374. [PMID: 31849028 DOI: 10.5055/jom.2018.0526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study describes changes in weight and cardiovascular risk factors over time among individuals enrolled in methadone maintenance treatment for opioid use disorder. Demographic and clinical predictors of weight gain were also evaluated. DESIGN This study was a retrospective chart review evaluating data over a period of 3 years. SETTING Medical records of individuals enrolled in an academic research outpatient methadone maintenance treatment program were reviewed. PATIENTS Seventy-four individuals who were admitted and retained in methadone maintenance treatment for at least 3 consecutive years were included. OUTCOME MEASURES Annual weight was assessed by calculating body mass index (BMI). Changes over time in cardiovascular risk factors of hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia were also assessed. RESULTS The percentage of patients categorized as overweight, obese, or morbidly obese BMI increased from 42 percent (n = 31) at admission to 76 percent (n = 56), 82 percent (n = 61), and 88 percent (n = 65) at 1, 2, and 3 years post-admission, respectively. Hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia also tended to increase following admission. BMI increases tended to be greater for those with a higher dose of methadone, as well as for females and Black/African American individuals. No other predictors of weight gain were identified. CONCLUSIONS These data indicate that methadone maintenance treatment is associated with clinically meaningful weight gain and increases in cardiovascular risk factors. Given the importance of methadone maintenance for treatment of opioid use disorder, future research should examine additional predictors and potential mechanisms of weight gain among methadone patients and develop tailored interventions including nutritional knowledge and lifestyle recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary M Sweeney
- Instructor, Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Denis G Antoine
- Assistant Professor, Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Leticia Nanda
- Adult Nurse Practitioner, Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hélène Géniaux
- Pharmacist, Department of Toxicology and Pharmacovigilance, University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Associate Professor, Department of Behavioral Science, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky; Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - George E Bigelow
- Professor, Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Annie Umbricht
- Assistant Professor, Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Babalonis S, Lofwall MR, Sloan PA, Nuzzo PA, Fanucchi LC, Walsh SL. Cannabinoid modulation of opioid analgesia and subjective drug effects in healthy humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2019; 236:3341-3352. [PMID: 31201479 PMCID: PMC6832798 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-019-05293-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE Dozens of preclinical studies have reported cannabinoid agonist potentiation of the analgesic effects of μ-opioid agonists. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine if a cannabinoid agonist could potentiate opioid analgesia in humans using several laboratory pain models. METHODS Healthy participants (n = 10) with/out current drug use/pain conditions completed this within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized outpatient study. Nine 8-h sessions were completed during which dronabinol (0, 2.5, 5 mg, p.o.) was administered 1 h before oxycodone (0, 5, 10 mg, p.o.) for a total of 9 test conditions. Outcomes included sensory threshold and tolerance from four experimental pain models (cold pressor, pressure algometer, hot thermode, cold hyperalgesia), along with participant- and observer-rated, performance and physiological effects. RESULTS Oxycodone produced miosis (p < 0.05) and analgesic responses (e.g., pressure algometer [p < 0.05]), while dronabinol did not (p > 0.05). Depending on the dose combination, dronabinol attenuated or did not alter oxycodone analgesia; for example, dronabinol (2.5 mg) decreased the analgesic effects of oxycodone (10 mg) on pressure tolerance. Conversely, dronabinol increased oxycodone subjective effects (e.g., drug liking) (p < 0.05); oxycodone (5 mg) ratings of "high" were potentiated by 5 mg dronabinol (p < 0.05; placebo = 1.1 [± 0.7]; 5 mg oxycodone = 4.7 [± 2.2]; 5 mg dronabinol = 9.9 [± 8.4]; 5 mg oxycodone + 5 mg dronabinol = 37.4 [± 11.3]). CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that dronabinol did not enhance the analgesic effects of oxycodone and increased abuse- and impairment-related subjective effects. These data suggest that dronabinol may not be an effective or appropriate opioid adjuvant; it could potentially increase opioid dose requirements, while increasing psychoactive opioid effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanna Babalonis
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA. .,Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 845 Angliana Avenue, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA.
| | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY,Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY,Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY
| | - Paul A. Sloan
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY
| | - Paul A. Nuzzo
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY
| | - Laura C. Fanucchi
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY
| | - Sharon L. Walsh
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY,Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY,Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fanucchi LC, Walsh SL, Thornton AC, Lofwall MR. Integrated outpatient treatment of opioid use disorder and injection-related infections: A description of a new care model. Prev Med 2019; 128:105760. [PMID: 31251946 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Revised: 06/15/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Persons with opioid use disorder (OUD) hospitalized with severe, injection-related infections (SIRI) are frequently hospitalized for the duration of IV antibiotic treatment due to concerns regarding their eligibility for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), which is the standard of care for prolonged IV antibiotic courses for patients without drug use. As part of a pilot study, a novel, integrated care model was developed where patients with OUD and SIRI receive addiction consultation and buprenorphine induction while hospitalized, followed by ongoing management in an outpatient clinic that combines office-based opioid treatment with buprenorphine pharmacotherapy and counseling services with OPAT. Through three illustrative case vignettes the outpatient model is described along with challenges, lessons learned and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura C Fanucchi
- Division of Infectious Disease, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Ave., Lexington, KY 40508, United States of America.
| | - Sharon L Walsh
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, United States of America
| | - Alice C Thornton
- Division of Infectious Disease, University of Kentucky, United States of America
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Knudsen HK, Lofwall MR, Lin LA, Walsh SL, Studts JL. US physicians' decision-making during buprenorphine-naloxone treatment: Conjoint analyses of dose and office visit adjustments based on patient progress. Drug Alcohol Depend 2019; 204:107490. [PMID: 31518885 PMCID: PMC6910718 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Revised: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research on how US physicians individualize buprenorphine-naloxone treatment is limited. The current study uses conjoint analysis to examine the importance of current dose, visit frequency, clinical indicators, and payment type on office visit and dose adjustments during buprenorphine-naloxone treatment. METHODS A national random sample of 776 US buprenorphine-prescribing physicians participated in a mailed survey between October 2015 and July 2018. The survey contained 16 patient vignettes describing: (1) current dose, (2) urine drug test (UDT) results and opioid blockade, (3) recent intravenous use, (4) visit attendance, (5) counseling adherence, (6) payment, and (7) visit schedule. Physicians rated how they would adjust office visits (0=definitely decrease to 5=no change to 10=definitely increase) and the dose (0=definitely decrease to 5=no change to 10=definitely increase). Descriptive statistics were calculated for the vignette responses. Conjoint analysis was used to estimate relative importance scores and part-worth utilities. RESULTS Across the vignettes, the mean response for adjusting office visits was 7.43 (SD = 1.69), indicating a tendency to increase the frequency of visits. UDT results/opioid blockade, intravenous use, and current visit schedule had the greatest importance scores for office visit adjustments. The mean response for adjusting the dose was 5.48 (SD = 1.69), corresponding with a tendency toward not changing dose. Current dose, UDT results/opioid blockade, and intravenous use had the largest importance scores for dose adjustment. CONCLUSIONS Physicians individualized buprenorphine-naloxone treatment in response to hypothetical patient attributes by changing visit frequency and, to a lesser extent, modifying maintenance dose, in a manner generally consistent with current practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah K Knudsen
- Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Ave, Room 204, Lexington, KY, 40508, United States.
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Ave, Room 203, Lexington, KY, 40508, United States.
| | - Lewei Allison Lin
- University of Michigan, Department of Psychiatry and Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor MI, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States.
| | - Sharon L Walsh
- Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Ave, Room 202, Lexington, KY, 40508, United States.
| | - Jamie L Studts
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, 127 Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY, 40536-0086, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Background: Increasing access to buprenorphine treatment is a critical tool for addressing the opioid epidemic in the United States. In 2016, a federal policy change allowed physicians who meet specific requirements to treat up to 275 concurrent buprenorphine patients. This study examines state-level measures of buprenorphine treatment supply over 21 months since this policy change and estimates associations between the supply of 275-patient waivers and state characteristics. Methods: Monthly state-level measures of the number of physicians holding the 275-patient waiver per 100,000 residents were constructed from September 2016 to May 2018 using the Drug Enforcement Agency's Controlled Substance Act database. State characteristics were obtained from publicly available sources. Mixed-effects regression models were estimated to examine change over time. Results: During the 21-month period, the number of physicians waivered to treat 275 patients increased from 153 to 4009 physicians. The mean supply of 275-patient physicians per 100,000 state residents significantly increased from 0.07 (SD = 0.21) in September 2016 to 1.43 (SD = 1.08) in May 2018 (t = -9.84, df = 50, P < .001). The final mixed-effects regression model indicated that Census division and the preexisting supply of 100-patient waivered physicians were correlated with the rate of growth in 275-patient waivers over the study period. Conclusions: Although uptake of the 275-patient waiver has exceeded initial projections, growth is uneven across the United States. Unequal patterns of growth pose a challenge to efforts to increase treatment availability as a means of addressing the opioid epidemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah K. Knudsen
- Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | - Lewei (Allison) Lin
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan and Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
IMPORTANCE To mitigate the opioid overdose crisis, states have implemented a variety of legal interventions aimed at increasing access to the opioid antagonist naloxone. Recently, Virginia and Vermont mandated the coprescription of naloxone for potentially at-risk patients. OBJECTIVE To assess the association between naloxone coprescription legal mandates and naloxone dispensing in retail pharmacies. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a population-based, state-level cohort study. The sample included all prescriptions dispensed for naloxone in the retail pharmacy setting contained in IQVIA's national prescription audit, which represents 90% of all retail pharmacies in the United States. The unit of observation was state-month and the study period was January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2017. EXPOSURES State legal intervention mandating naloxone coprescription. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Number of naloxone prescriptions dispensed. State rates of naloxone prescriptions dispensed per month per 100 000 standard population were calculated. RESULTS The rate of naloxone dispensing increased after implementation of legal mandates for naloxone coprescription. An estimated 88 naloxone prescriptions per 100 000 were dispensed in Virginia and 111 prescriptions per 100 000 were dispensed in Vermont during the first full month the legal requirement was effective. In comparison, 16 naloxone prescriptions per 100 000 were dispensed in the 10 states (including the District of Columbia) with the highest opioid overdose death rates and 6 prescriptions per 100 000 were dispensed in the 39 remaining states. The number of naloxone prescriptions dispensed was associated with the legal mandate for naloxone coprescription (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 7.75; 95% CI, 1.22-49.35). Implementation of the naloxone coprescription mandate was associated with an estimated 214 additional naloxone prescriptions dispensed per month in the period following the mandates, holding all other variables constant. Among covariates, naloxone access laws (IRR, 1.37; 1.05-1.78), opioid overdose death rates (IRR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.08), the percentage of naloxone prescriptions paid by third-party payers (IRR 1.009; 1.008-1.010), and time (IRR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.05-1.07) were significantly associated with naloxone prescription dispensing. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These study findings suggest that legally mandated naloxone prescription for those at risk for opioid overdose may be associated with substantial increases in naloxone dispensing and further reduction in opioid-related harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minji Sohn
- College of Pharmacy, Ferris State University, Big Rapids, Michigan
| | - Jeffery C. Talbert
- Institute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Zhengyan Huang
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | | | - Patricia R. Freeman
- Institute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lin L(A, Lofwall MR, Walsh SL, Knudsen HK. Perceived need and availability of psychosocial interventions across buprenorphine prescriber specialties. Addict Behav 2019; 93:72-77. [PMID: 30690416 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Revised: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Psychosocial interventions are often recommended as part of buprenorphine treatment for patients with opioid use disorder, but little is known about prescriber perspectives on their use and how this varies across buprenorphine prescriber specialties. METHODS A large US sample of physicians actively prescribing buprenorphine (n = 1174) was surveyed from July 2014 to January 2017. Analyses examined prescriber characteristics and their perceptions and use of psychosocial interventions across three groups of physicians: primary care providers (PCPs), addiction physicians/psychiatrists, and other physicians. RESULTS Across all prescribers, 93.3% (n = 1061) report most patients would benefit from formal counseling during buprenorphine treatment while only 36.4% (n = 414) believe there are adequate number of counselors in their communities. Among addiction physicians/psychiatrists, 75.9% (n = 416) report their treatment settings have the resources to provide psychiatric services to patients with complex psychiatric problems compared to 29.1% (n = 130) of PCPs and 29.6% (n = 39, p < .001) of other physicians. Addiction physicians/psychiatrists report a higher percentage of patients receive counseling from clinicians in their practice while PCPs report a higher percentage of patients receive counseling from external providers. CONCLUSIONS The majority of prescribers believe patients receiving buprenorphine would benefit from psychosocial interventions and there is variation in how these services are delivered. However, many prescribers, especially those without addiction or psychiatry backgrounds, report their settings do not have adequate psychosocial treatment resources for patients with complex psychosocial needs. Future work developing novel models of psychosocial interventions may be helpful to support prescribers to effectively treat complex patients with opioid use disorders.
Collapse
|
39
|
Knudsen HK, Lofwall MR, Walsh SL, Havens JR. Impact of health reform on health insurance status among persons who use opioids in eastern Kentucky: A prospective cohort analysis. Int J Drug Policy 2019; 70:8-14. [PMID: 31054372 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Revised: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health insurance improves health and reduces mortality. Expanding insurance is a central feature of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Persons who use drugs (PWUDs) have historically been at high risk of being uninsured. It is unknown if Appalachian PWUDs, who live in an extremely economically distressed region, are more likely to be insured since implementation of the ACA. METHODS Data from a cohort of 503 PWUDs from eastern Appalachian Kentucky, who were interviewed at seven time-points between 2008 and 2017, were analysed using mixed effects regression models. RESULTS At baseline, only 33.8% of participants were insured, which increased to 87.3% of the cohort at the last follow-up interview. The final multivariate model, which included baseline characteristics and interactions by time, indicated there were significant baseline differences in insurance status by gender, age, education, income, and history of injection. Differences in the predictive margin probabilities of being insured across these groups had dissipated by the final follow-up interview. CONCLUSIONS After Kentucky's implementation of the ACA, this cohort of Appalachian PWUDs made substantial gains in obtaining insurance that far exceeded the increases reported in national studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah K Knudsen
- Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Avenue, Room 204, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA.
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Avenue, Room 203, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA.
| | - Sharon L Walsh
- Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Avenue, Room 202, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA.
| | - Jennifer R Havens
- Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Avenue, Room 201, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Freeman PR, Hankosky ER, Lofwall MR, Talbert JC. The changing landscape of naloxone availability in the United States, 2011 - 2017. Drug Alcohol Depend 2018; 191:361-364. [PMID: 30195192 PMCID: PMC6167017 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Revised: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 07/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Opioid overdose deaths have been on the rise in the United States since 1999. Naloxone is a competitive opioid antagonist that rapidly reverses opioid overdose. The implementation of naloxone access laws and development of naloxone formulations that can be administered by laypersons have coincided with changes in the landscape of naloxone availability in the United States. Using data from IQVIA's National Prescription Audit® we present the number of naloxone prescriptions dispensed quarterly from 2011 through the second quarter of 2017. The data demonstrate that nationwide naloxone dispensing increased nearly eight-fold from the fourth quarter of 2015 to the second quarter of 2017. Narcan® was the most commonly prescribed naloxone formulation as of the second quarter of 2017, accounting for 68% of prescriptions during that quarter followed by Evzio® (20%). There was considerable variability in the extent to which states experienced increases in naloxone dispensing, which may represent a general state-specific response to the opioid crisis, rather than direct association with opioid overdose death rates in a particular state. Although naloxone access laws continue to increase the amount of naloxone dispensed, cost remains a concern in terms of wide distribution of the life-saving medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia R Freeman
- College of Pharmacy, Institute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
| | - Emily R Hankosky
- College of Pharmacy, Institute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- College of Medicine, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Jeffery C Talbert
- College of Pharmacy, Institute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Fanucchi LC, Lofwall MR, Nuzzo PA, Walsh SL. In-hospital illicit drug use, substance use disorders, and acceptance of residential treatment in a prospective pilot needs assessment of hospitalized adults with severe infections from injecting drugs. J Subst Abuse Treat 2018; 92:64-69. [PMID: 30032946 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Revised: 06/10/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To conduct a pilot needs assessment of underlying substance use disorders (SUD), motivation for SUD treatment, and willingness to enter residential SUD treatment in hospitalized adults who inject drugs with complex infections requiring intravenous (IV) antibiotics, and to assess the presence of in-hospital illicit substance use. PATIENTS AND METHODS From March 8, 2016 through August 25, 2016 hospitalized, English-speaking, adult patients not currently in SUD treatment with a history of injection drug use and a current infection requiring treatment with IV antibiotics, were prospectively enrolled. Participants were followed weekly during the hospitalization and for 60 days after discharge via interview and medical record review. RESULTS Of the 42 participants, 8 (19.0%) accepted discharge to residential SUD treatment, 16 (38.0%) completed at least one follow-up research visit after hospital discharge, and 3 (7.1%) died during the 5-month study period. The majority (33; 78%) were hospitalized with endocarditis, and 37 (88.0%) had an opioid use disorder (DSM-5). Mean days of self-reported IV opioid use in the 30 days before hospitalization compared to 30 days after discharge decreased significantly (16.5 to 1.5, P = .001) despite not receiving SUD treatment. Illicit in-hospital drug use was identified in 17 (40.5%) participants, with opioids most commonly detected. CONCLUSION Hospitalization is a 'reachable moment' and critical opportunity to initiate evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorder. The ongoing in-hospital illicit drug use and high short-term mortality observed in this study contribute to the mandate to expand access to effective pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorder and integrate it into health care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura C Fanucchi
- Division of Infectious Disease, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, United States of America.
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, United States of America
| | - Paul A Nuzzo
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, United States of America
| | - Sharon L Walsh
- Behavioral Science, Psychiatry, Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lofwall MR, Walsh SL, Nunes EV, Bailey GL, Sigmon SC, Kampman KM, Frost M, Tiberg F, Linden M, Sheldon B, Oosman S, Peterson S, Chen M, Kim S. Weekly and Monthly Subcutaneous Buprenorphine Depot Formulations vs Daily Sublingual Buprenorphine With Naloxone for Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2018; 178:764-773. [PMID: 29799968 PMCID: PMC6145749 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.1052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Accepted: 02/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Importance Buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder may be improved by sustained-release formulations. Objective To determine whether treatment involving novel weekly and monthly subcutaneous (SC) buprenorphine depot formulations is noninferior to a daily sublingual (SL) combination of buprenorphine hydrochloride and naloxone hydrochloride in the treatment of opioid use disorder. Design, Setting, and Participants This outpatient, double-blind, double-dummy randomized clinical trial was conducted at 35 sites in the United States from December 29, 2015, through October 19, 2016. Participants were treatment-seeking adults with moderate-to-severe opioid use disorder. Interventions Randomization to daily SL placebo and weekly (first 12 weeks; phase 1) and monthly (last 12 weeks; phase 2) SC buprenorphine (SC-BPN group) or to daily SL buprenorphine with naloxone (24 weeks) with matched weekly and monthly SC placebo injections (SL-BPN/NX group). Main Outcomes and Measures Primary end points tested for noninferiority were response rate (10% margin) and the mean proportion of opioid-negative urine samples for 24 weeks (11% margin). Responder status was defined as having no evidence of illicit opioid use for at least 8 of 10 prespecified points during weeks 9 to 24, with 2 of these at week 12 and during month 6 (weeks 21-24). The mean proportion of samples with no evidence of illicit opioid use (weeks 4-24) evaluated by a cumulative distribution function (CDF) was an a priori secondary outcome with planned superiority testing if the response rate demonstrated noninferiority. Results A total of 428 participants (263 men [61.4%] and 165 women [38.6%]; mean [SD] age, 38.4 [11.0] years) were randomized to the SL-BPN/NX group (n = 215) or the SC-BPN group (n = 213). The response rates were 31 of 215 (14.4%) for the SL-BPN/NX group and 37 of 213 (17.4%) for the SC-BPN group, a 3.0% difference (95% CI, -4.0% to 9.9%; P < .001). The proportion of opioid-negative urine samples was 1099 of 3870 (28.4%) for the SL-BPN/NX group and 1347 of 3834 (35.1%) for the SC-BPN group, a 6.7% difference (95% CI, -0.1% to 13.6%; P < .001). The CDF for the SC-BPN group (26.7%) was statistically superior to the CDF for the SL-BPN/NX group (0; P = .004). Injection site adverse events (none severe) occurred in 48 participants (22.3%) in the SL-BPN/NX group and 40 (18.8%) in the SC-BPN group. Conclusions and Relevance Compared with SL buprenorphine, depot buprenorphine did not result in an inferior likelihood of being a responder or having urine test results negative for opioids and produced superior results on the CDF of no illicit opioid use. These data suggest that depot buprenorphine is efficacious and may have advantages. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02651584.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sharon L. Walsh
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Edward V. Nunes
- Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Department of Psychiatry, New York
| | - Genie L. Bailey
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | | - Kyle M. Kampman
- Department of Psychiatry, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Michael Frost
- The Frost Medical Group, LLC, Conshocken, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Behshad Sheldon
- Braeburn Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Princeton, New Jersey
- Now affiliated with FORCE Alliance, Princeton, New Jersey
| | - Sonia Oosman
- Braeburn Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Princeton, New Jersey
| | | | | | - Sonnie Kim
- Braeburn Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Princeton, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lin LA, Lofwall MR, Walsh SL, Gordon AJ, Knudsen HK. Perceptions and practices addressing diversion among US buprenorphine prescribers. Drug Alcohol Depend 2018; 186:147-153. [PMID: 29573649 PMCID: PMC5911230 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Revised: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 01/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While there has been a dramatic increase in prescribing of buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder in the US, little is known about prescribers' attitudes and practices regarding buprenorphine diversion and how they relate to prescriber characteristics. METHODS A national random sample of buprenorphine prescribers (N = 1174) completed surveys from July 2014 to January 2017. Analyses examined relationships between prescriber and practice characteristics and prescriber perceptions and approaches regarding diversion. RESULTS Among this sample of buprenorphine prescribers, 79.0% (N = 898) reported assessing all patients for risk of buprenorphine diversion and misuse. A third of prescribers described diversion as a significant or very significant concern in their community. The majority of prescribers reported seeing patients on average at least every other week during the first 60 days of treatment, and the majority reported testing urine for buprenorphine to assess for diversion. Perceptions of diversion being a greater problem in their community (AOR 1.212, 95% CI 1.073-1.369) and use of medication counts (AOR 1.006, 95% CI 1.003-1.009) were associated with increased likelihood of terminating patients when diversion was suspected, while having expertise in addiction (AOR 0.526, 95% CI 0.406-0.682) or psychiatry (AOR 0.714, 95% CI 0.558-0.914) were associated with decreased odds of terminating treatment for suspected diversion. CONCLUSIONS Buprenorphine prescribers report diversion is an important issue, and most prescribers report that they assess patients for diversion, though specific practices differ based on prescriber and practice characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lewei Allison Lin
- University of Michigan, Department of Psychiatry, 2800 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; VA Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, 2800 Plymouth Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- University of Kentucky, Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, 845 Angliana Avenue, Lexington, KY 40508, USA
| | - Sharon L Walsh
- University of Kentucky, Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, 845 Angliana Avenue, Lexington, KY 40508, USA
| | - Adam J Gordon
- University of Utah, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City UT 84132, USA; VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences Center (IDEAS 2.0) and Section of Addiction Medicine, 500 Foothill Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84148, USA
| | - Hannah K Knudsen
- University of Kentucky, Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, 845 Angliana Avenue, Lexington, KY 40508, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Vickers Smith R, Boland EM, Young AM, Lofwall MR, Quiroz A, Staton M, Havens JR. A qualitative analysis of gabapentin misuse and diversion among people who use drugs in Appalachian Kentucky. Psychol Addict Behav 2017; 32:115-121. [PMID: 29239621 DOI: 10.1037/adb0000337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Gabapentin, an anticonvulsant and analgesic for postherpetic neuralgia, has been thought to have no abuse potential despite numerous published reports to the contrary. Gabapentin has been linked with impaired driving and opioid use, highlighting the need to more fully understand its risk profile. Thirty-three individuals reporting recent nonmedical use of gabapentin were recruited from two ongoing longitudinal studies of drug users in Appalachian Kentucky to participate in focus groups. Four sessions were held (two in the community and two in jail settings), during which participants responded to questions regarding their personal experiences with gabapentin misuse. Focus group participants were similar to other gabapentin users in the larger cohort studies with respect to demographics and drug use behaviors. Overall, the sample reported having initiated gabapentin more than 10 years earlier after having it prescribed for a legitimate, though generally off-label, medical indication (e.g., pain, anxiety, opioid detoxification). Participants reported use of gabapentin in combination with buprenorphine, other opioids, cocaine, and caffeine to produce sought-after central nervous system effects (e.g., muscle relaxation, pain reduction, sleep induction, feeling drunk, and feeling "high"). Focus group responses highlighted the low cost of gabapentin for the purpose of getting high and noted increasing popularity in the community, particularly over the last 2 years. Gabapentin was a prominent drug of abuse in two cohorts of the primarily opioid-using individuals. Providers should be aware of gabapentin's abuse potential, and a reexamination of the need for scheduling is warranted. (PsycINFO Database Record
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Vickers Smith
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine
| | - Elaine M Boland
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine
| | - April M Young
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine
| | - Alexa Quiroz
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine
| | - Michele Staton
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine
| | - Jennifer R Havens
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Chavan NR, Ashford KB, Wiggins AT, Lofwall MR, Critchfield AS. Buprenorphine for Medication-Assisted Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder in Pregnancy: Relationship to Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome. AJP Rep 2017; 7:e215-e222. [PMID: 29226017 PMCID: PMC5720890 DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1608783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2017] [Accepted: 10/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To examine the relationship between antepartum buprenorphine dose for medication-assisted treatment (MAT) of opioid use disorder (OUD) and incident neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). Study Design We performed a prospective cohort study of pregnant women with a singleton gestation diagnosed with OUD and receiving buprenorphine for MAT at a tertiary care academic institution from July 2015 to January 2017. We divided the study cohort into two groups-pregnancies with versus without NOWS. Substance abuse patterns in pregnancy, maternal, and neonatal clinical outcomes were compared. Results The incidence of NOWS was 31.11% ( n = 28/90) in our study cohort. Pregnancies with NOWS had a significantly higher rate of benzodiazepine positive urine tests and number of positive urine drug screen (UDS) results for illicit opioids. The group without NOWS had significantly higher number of patients with an appropriate UDS result at delivery through postpartum. Rates of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, length of NICU stay, and maximum Finnegan score were significantly higher in the group with NOWS. Neither the initial (10.6 ± 5.2 versus 10.3 ± 4.8 mg, p = 0.80) nor the final buprenorphine doses (13.3 ± 5.1 versus 13.0 ± 4.6 mg, p = 0.81) were significantly different between study groups. Conclusion The occurrence of NOWS was not related to buprenorphine dose used for MAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niraj R Chavan
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
| | | | | | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Department of Behavioral Science and Psychiatry, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Agatha S Critchfield
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Walsh SL, Comer SD, Lofwall MR, Vince B, Levy-Cooperman N, Kelsh D, Coe MA, Jones JD, Nuzzo PA, Tiberg F, Sheldon B, Kim S. Effect of Buprenorphine Weekly Depot (CAM2038) and Hydromorphone Blockade in Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2017; 74:894-902. [PMID: 28655025 PMCID: PMC5710238 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Buprenorphine is an efficacious, widely used treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Daily oral transmucosal formulations can be associated with misuse, diversion, and nonadherence; these limitations may be obviated by a sustained release formulation. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the ability of a novel, weekly, subcutaneous buprenorphine depot formulation, CAM2038, to block euphorigenic opioid effects and suppress opioid withdrawal in non-treatment-seeking individuals with OUD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This multisite, double-blind, randomized within-patient study was conducted at 3 controlled inpatient research facilities. It involved 47 adults with DSM-V moderate-to-severe OUD. The study was conducted from October 12, 2015 (first patient enrolled), to April 21, 2016 (last patient visit). INTERVENTIONS A total of five 3-day test sessions evaluated the response to hydromorphone (0, 6, and 18 mg intramuscular in random order; 1 dose/session/day). After the first 3-day session (ie, qualification phase), participants were randomized to either CAM2038 weekly at 24 mg (n = 22) or 32 mg (n = 25); the assigned CAM2038 dose was given twice, 1 week apart (day 0 and 7). Four sets of sessions were conducted after randomization (days 1-3, 4-6, 8-10, and 11-13). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was maximum rating on the visual analog scale for drug liking. Secondary end points included other visual analog scale (eg, high and desire to use), opioid withdrawal scales, and physiological and pharmacokinetic outcomes. RESULTS A total of 46 of 47 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 35.5 [9] years; 76% male [n = 35]) completed the study. Both weekly CAM2038 doses produced immediate and sustained blockade of hydromorphone effects (liking maximum effect, CAM2038, 24 mg: effect size, 0.813; P < .001, and CAM2038, 32 mg: effect size, 0.753; P < .001) and suppression of withdrawal (Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale, CAM2038, 24 mg: effect size, 0.617; P < .001, and CAM2038, 32 mg: effect size, 0.751; P < .001). CAM2038 produces a rapid initial rise of buprenorphine in plasma with maximum concentration around 24 hours, with an apparent half-life of 4 to 5 days and approximately 50% accumulation of trough concentration from first to second dose (trough concentration = 0.822 and 1.23 ng/mL for weeks 1 and 2, respectively, with 24 mg; trough concentration = 0.993 and 1.47 ng/mL for weeks 1 and 2, respectively, with 32 mg). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE CAM2038 weekly, 24 and 32 mg, was safely tolerated and produced immediate and sustained opioid blockade and withdrawal suppression. The results support the use of this depot formulation for treatment initiation and stabilization of patients with OUD, with the further benefit of obviating the risk for misuse and diversion of daily buprenorphine while retaining its therapeutic benefits. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02611752.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon L. Walsh
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Sandra D. Comer
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | | | - Bradley Vince
- Vince and Associates Clinical Research, Overland Park, Kansas
| | | | - Debra Kelsh
- Vince and Associates Clinical Research, Overland Park, Kansas
| | - Marion A. Coe
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | | | - Paul A. Nuzzo
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | | | | | - Sonnie Kim
- Braeburn Pharmaceuticals, Princeton, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Knudsen HK, Cook J, Lofwall MR, Walsh SL, Studts JL, Havens JR. A mixed methods study of HIV-related services in buprenorphine treatment. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2017; 12:37. [PMID: 28814313 PMCID: PMC5559779 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-017-0122-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2017] [Accepted: 08/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a major risk factor in the acquisition and transmission of HIV. Clinical practice guidelines call for the integration of HIV services in OUD treatment. This mixed methods study describes the integration of HIV services in buprenorphine treatment and examines whether HIV services vary by prescribers' medical specialty and across practice settings. METHODS Data were obtained via qualitative interviews with buprenorphine experts (n = 21) and mailed surveys from US buprenorphine prescribers (n = 1174). Survey measures asked about screening for HIV risk behaviors at intake, offering HIV education, recommending all new patients receive HIV testing, and availability of on-site HIV testing. Prescribers' medical specialty, practice settings, caseload demographics, and physician demographics were measured. Multivariate models of HIV services were estimated, while accounting for the nesting of physicians within states. RESULTS Qualitative interviews revealed that physicians often use injection behaviors as the primary indicator for whether a patient should be tested for HIV. Interviews revealed that HIV-related services were often viewed as beyond the scope of practice among general psychiatrists. Surveys indicated that prescribers screened for an average of 3.2 of 5 HIV risk behaviors (SD = 1.6) at intake. About 62.0% of prescribers delivered HIV education to patients and 53.2% recommended HIV testing to all new patients, but only 32.3% offered on-site HIV testing. Addiction specialists and psychiatrists screened for significantly more HIV risk behaviors than physicians in other specialties. Addiction specialists and psychiatrists were significantly less likely than other physicians to offer on-site testing. Physicians in individual medical practice were significantly less likely to recommend HIV testing and to offer onsite testing than physicians in other settings. CONCLUSIONS Buprenorphine treatment providers have not uniformly integrated HIV-related screening, education, and testing services for patients. Differences by medical specialty and practice setting suggest an opportunity for targeting efforts to increase implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah K Knudsen
- Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Ave, Room 204, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA.
| | - Jennifer Cook
- Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Ave, Room 214, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Ave, Room 203, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA
| | - Sharon L Walsh
- Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Ave, Room 202, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA
| | - Jamie L Studts
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, 1100 Veterans Drive, Medical Behavioral Science Building, Room 127, Lexington, KY, 40536-0086, USA
| | - Jennifer R Havens
- Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Ave, Room 201, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Gray KM, Sonne SC, McClure EA, Ghitza UE, Matthews AG, McRae-Clark AL, Carroll KM, Potter JS, Wiest K, Mooney LJ, Hasson A, Walsh SL, Lofwall MR, Babalonis S, Lindblad RW, Sparenborg S, Wahle A, King JS, Baker NL, Tomko RL, Haynes LF, Vandrey RG, Levin FR. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of N-acetylcysteine for cannabis use disorder in adults. Drug Alcohol Depend 2017; 177. [PMID: 28623823 PMCID: PMC5535813 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is a prevalent and impairing condition, and established psychosocial treatments convey limited efficacy. In light of recent findings supporting the efficacy of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) for CUD in adolescents, the objective of this trial was to evaluate its efficacy in adults. METHODS In a 12-week double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, treatment-seeking adults ages 18-50 with CUD (N=302), enrolled across six National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network-affiliated clinical sites, were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to a 12-week course of NAC 1200mg (n=153) or placebo (n=149) twice daily. All participants received contingency management (CM) and medical management. The primary efficacy measure was the odds of negative urine cannabinoid tests during treatment, compared between NAC and placebo participants. RESULTS There was not statistically significant evidence that the NAC and placebo groups differed in cannabis abstinence (odds ratio=1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.63-1.59, p=0.984). Overall, 22.3% of urine cannabinoid tests in the NAC group were negative, compared with 22.4% in the placebo group. Many participants were medication non-adherent; exploratory analysis within medication-adherent subgroups revealed no significant differential abstinence outcomes by treatment group. CONCLUSIONS In contrast with prior findings in adolescents, there is no evidence that NAC 1200mg twice daily plus CM is differentially efficacious for CUD in adults when compared to placebo plus CM. This discrepant finding between adolescents and adults with CUD may have been influenced by differences in development, cannabis use profiles, responses to embedded behavioral treatment, medication adherence, and other factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Udi E. Ghitza
- National Institute on Drug Abuse Center for the Clinical Trials Network, Rockville MD
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Albert Hasson
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | | | | | | | | | - Steven Sparenborg
- National Institute on Drug Abuse Center for the Clinical Trials Network, Rockville, MD, United States.
| | - Aimee Wahle
- The Emmes Corporation, Rockville, MD, United States.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Frances R. Levin
- Columbia University / New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York NY
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Knudsen HK, Havens JR, Lofwall MR, Studts JL, Walsh SL. Buprenorphine physician supply: Relationship with state-level prescription opioid mortality. Drug Alcohol Depend 2017; 173 Suppl 1:S55-S64. [PMID: 28363321 PMCID: PMC5584581 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.08.642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2016] [Revised: 08/15/2016] [Accepted: 08/16/2016] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Buprenorphine is an effective treatment for opioid use disorder but the supply of buprenorphine physicians is currently inadequate to address the nation's prescription opioid crisis. Perception of need due to rising opioid overdose rates is one possible reason for physicians to adopt buprenorphine. This study examined associations between rates of growth in buprenorphine physicians and prescription opioid overdose mortality rates in US states. METHODS The total buprenorphine physician supply and number of physicians approved to treat 100 patients (per 100,000 population) were measured from June 2013 to January 2016. States were divided into two groups: those with rates of prescription opioid overdose mortality in 2013 at or above the median (>5.5 deaths per 100,000 population) and those with rates below the median. State-level growth curves were estimated using mixed-effects regression to compare rates of growth between high and low overdose states. RESULTS The total supply and the supply of 100-patient buprenorphine physicians grew significantly (total supply from 7.7 to 9.9 per 100,000 population, p<0.001; 100-patient supply from 2.2 to 3.4 per 100,000 population, p<0.001). Rates of growth were significantly greater in high overdose states when compared to low overdose states (total supply b=0.033, p<0.01; 100-patient b=0.022, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS The magnitude of the US prescription opioid crisis, as measured by the rate of prescription opioid overdose mortality, is associated with growth in the number of buprenorphine physicians. Because this observational design cannot establish causality, further research is needed to elucidate the factors influencing physicians' decisions to begin prescribing buprenorphine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah K. Knudsen
- Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Avenue, Room 204, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA
| | - Jennifer R. Havens
- Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Avenue, Room 201, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA
| | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Avenue, Room 203 Lexington, KY, 40508, USA
| | - Jamie L. Studts
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 127 Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA
| | - Sharon L. Walsh
- Department of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Avenue, Room 202, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Coe MA, Nuzzo PA, Lofwall MR, Walsh SL. Effects of Short-Term Oxycodone Maintenance on Experimental Pain Responses in Physically Dependent Opioid Abusers. J Pain 2017; 18:825-834. [PMID: 28274698 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.02.433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2016] [Revised: 01/26/2017] [Accepted: 02/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
A common clinical problem with opioid analgesics is the loss of analgesic efficacy after repeated dosing; when this occurs, it is not clear what principles should guide providing effective analgesia among opioid-dependent individuals. This within-subject inpatient study aimed to determine if physically dependent opioid abusers (n = 11) experience changes in oxycodone-induced analgesia during 2 oxycodone maintenance (30 mg orally 4 times per day) phases: initial stabilization (days 1-3) and after 6 weeks of chronic dosing. Six sessions (3 each phase), measured threshold, tolerance, and pain ratings for a Pressure Pain Test and Cold Pressor Test after a single double-blind dose of oxycodone 30 mg (initial stabilization) and 0, 30, and 60 mg (chronic dosing) given in place of a scheduled maintenance dose. Physiologic and opioid agonist effects were assessed during chronic dosing sessions. There was no analgesic response to oxycodone 30 mg. Oxycodone (60 mg) produced a 25% increase in peak Cold Pressor Test threshold compared with placebo, and significantly increased expired breath CO2, miosis, and ratings of abuse liability measures. These data suggest that more than twice the acute oxycodone maintenance dose is needed to produce robust acute analgesia, although adverse effects (eg, respiratory depression and abuse signals) may occur with lower doses. PERSPECTIVE To understand sensitivity to opioid analgesia in opioid-dependent individuals, this article describes experimental pain, subjective and physiological responses during stabilization and after 6 weeks of oxycodone maintenance. Oxycodone produced euphoric effects and miosis with limited evidence of analgesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion A Coe
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
| | - Paul A Nuzzo
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Michelle R Lofwall
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Sharon L Walsh
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| |
Collapse
|