The importance of combined HPV and CINtec® PLUS genotyping testing for p16 in women with cervical squamous cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for p16INK4A (p16) is a reliable surrogate test for the presence of a high-risk, potentially transformative human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in precursor and malignant lesions of the cervix. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in cervical cells caused by persistent HPV infection, by IHC (p16 protein) by comparison with HPV genotyping.

PATIENTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included female patients aged between 26 and 57 years who presented to a public hospital, with complaints related to the genital area, namely vaginal bleeding and dyspareunia. After selecting the patients, samples were subjected to cytological testing and IHC for p16 and for the determination of HPV types.

RESULTS

The relationship between HPV status and p16 status was statistically significant (p=0.0001), of the 41 patients, 53.7% were HPV positive, respectively 56.1% were p16 positive, the agreement relationship between the two indicators was very high (weighted kappa: 0.951). The clinical performance of CINtec® PLUS triage for p16 shows a high positive predictive value (PPV) and a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.7% and 100%, respectively, as regards HPV.

CONCLUSIONS

The p16 marker (CINtec® PLUS) can be used as a prognostic biomarker and provides clinical usefulness through increased sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) in the triage of women at risk of developing precancerous lesions, compared to cytology that is based on morphology, but has a rather low Se and high Sp, while HPV testing is very sensitive but slightly more specific.

Assessing the Level of Knowledge, Beliefs and Acceptance of HPV Vaccine: A Cross-Sectional Study in Romania

(1) Background: The infection with Human papilloma virus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection and it has been associated with cervical cancer (CC) in 99.7% of the cases. In Romania, CC is the second most common, with incidence (22.6%₀₀₀) and mortality rates (9.6%₀₀₀) three times higher than any other European country. Our aim was to assess the level of knowledge regarding HPV infection among parents, highschool students, medical students and doctors, with an emphasis on their main source of information—the Internet. (2) Methods: We applied five questionnaires to six categories of respondents: parents of pupils in the 6th–8th grades, medical students, doctors, boys in the 11th–12th grades, girls in the 11th–12th grades and their mothers. (3) Results: We included a total of 3108 respondents. 83.83% of all respondents had known about HPV infection. The level of information about HPV infection and vaccination was either satisfactory, poor or very poor. Their main source of information varied depending on the respondent profile and professional activity. Medical students were informed by doctors and healthcare professionals (53.0%), doctors gathered their information from books, journals and specialized brochures (61.6%). For the other categories of respondents, the Internet was the main source of information. Most respondents answered that doctors and healthcare professionals should provide information on HPV infection and vaccination, but very few of them actually seeked information from their general practitioner. (4) Conclusions: Population adherence to the appropriate preventative programs, as well as relevant information disseminated by the medical staff are key elements towards reducing the risk of HPV-associated cancers. An important role could also be played by schools, where teachers and school doctors could provide relevant information on the general aspects of HPV infection. Additionally, sex education classes and parent-teacher meetings should cover the main characteristics of HPV infection and what preventative measures can be employed against it.