EASIX score predicts inferior survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

The Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) is a prognostic tool that uses common clinical laboratory values and has been shown to predict non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS) at the onset of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We hypothesized that EASIX calculated at different time points pre- and post- HCT may predict NRM and OS, and that EASIX calculated at onset of GVHD may predict response to steroids. We evaluated the EASIX score pre- and post-HCT in 152 patients with lymphoid malignancies undergoing unmodified reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) alloHCT with uniform GVHD prophylaxis. In multivariate analysis, EASIX calculated pre-HCT was significantly associated with higher NRM (HR = 1.64, p = 0.009) and lower OS (HR = 1.33, p = 0.046). Furthermore, EASIX calculated at day 30 and at day 100 was associated with increased NRM (HR = 1.65, p < 0.001; and HR = 1.65, p < 0.001) and decreased OS (HR = 1.27, p = 0.018; and HR = 1.49, p < 0.001), independent of HCT-CI, disease and conditioning regimen. Our study shows that high EASIX scores at various time points pre- and post-HCT are significantly associated with poorer overall outcomes. EASIX provides an independent and easily accessible tool to predict outcomes that can be complementary to other measures of risk stratification for patients undergoing HCT.

Dynamic EASIX scores closely predict nonrelapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) predicts nonrelapse mortality (NRM) when assessed before hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We sought to determine whether changes in EASIX after HCT may be an informative marker of NRM. We evaluated 509 adults who underwent reduced intensity, unmodified (N = 149, 29%), or myeloablative ex vivo CD34+-selected allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) (N = 306, 71%) between 2008 and 2016. Patients who underwent unmodified allo-HCT received tacrolimus-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, whereas CD34+-selected patients received no planned immunosuppression. EASIX (lactate dehydrogenase × creatinine/platelet count) was calculated continuously until 1-year after HCT. Log transformation using base 2 (log2) was applied to all EASIX variables to reduce skew. In total, 360 patients (71%) received CD34+-selected and 149 (29%) unmodified allo-HCT. Among all patients, EASIX scores increased rapidly, peaked at day +8, then declined rapidly until day +33. Thereafter, scores declined gradually but remained above the pre-HCT baseline. In unmodified HCT, scores appeared higher over time than in CD34+-selected patients. EASIX discrimination of NRM was highest around day +180 (concordance index = 0.85) in both platforms, but the prognostic impact of EASIX across time points differed between the 2 platforms. Mean EASIX scores were higher in men (mean log2 +0.52) and in patients who developed grade 2 to 4 GVHD (+0.81) and lower in patients who received matched vs mismatched donors (-0.81, all P < .01). EASIX scores are dynamic and variably concordant with NRM when analyzed longitudinally, and patterns differ between HCT platforms. Compared to pre-HCT evaluation, post-HCT EASIX scores may better predict risk of NRM as patients acquire additional endothelial injury and toxicities.

The post-transplant scoring system (PTSS) is associated with outcomes in patients with MDS after CD34+selected allogeneic stem cell transplant

The post-transplant scoring system (PTSS), developed by the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, is based on three independent post-transplant risk factors: grade of acute graft-versus-host disease, lack of platelet recovery before day 100, and relapse before day 100; discriminating low- (0), intermediate- (1–3), and high-risk (4–8) patients. We investigated the prognostic value of the PTSS in a cohort of patients with MDS who underwent myeloablative CD34-selected TCD transplants. From 2008 to 2018, 109 patients underwent a first TCD-HCT for MDS at our center. We used Cox proportional hazards models and different landmark analyses to evaluate the association of categorized PTSS score risk groups with overall survival (OS). Patients with an intermediate/ high risk PTSS score had decreased OS at day 180 (univariate HR 3.25 [95% CI 1.60, 6.60], p = 0.001) and at day 365 (univariate HR 5.42 [95% CI 2.21, 13.3], p < 0.001) compared to low risk PTSS scores. This association remained significant after adjusting for HCT-CI. PTSS score calculated at day 100 was not associated with OS, even after adjusting for HCT-CI subgroups. In summary, the PTSS predicted survival at day 180 and day 365 in recipients of T-cell-depleted allografts for myelodysplastic syndrome.

The Advent of CAR T-Cell Therapy for Lymphoproliferative Neoplasms: Integrating Research Into Clinical Practice

Research on CAR T cells has achieved enormous progress in recent years. After the impressive results obtained in relapsed and refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and aggressive B-cell lymphomas, two constructs, tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel, were approved by FDA. The role of CAR T cells in the treatment of B-cell disorders, however, is rapidly evolving. Ongoing clinical trials aim at comparing CAR T cells with standard treatment options and at evaluating their efficacy earlier in the disease course. The use of CAR T cells is still limited by the risk of relevant toxicities, most commonly cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity, whose management has nonetheless significantly improved. Some patients do not respond or relapse after treatment, either because of poor CAR T-cell expansion, lack of anti-tumor effects or after the loss of the target antigen on tumor cells. Investigators are trying to overcome these hurdles in many ways: by testing constructs which target different and/or multiple antigens or by improving CAR T-cell structure with additional functions and synergistic molecules. Alternative cell sources including allogeneic products (off-the-shelf CAR T cells), NK cells, and T cells obtained from induced pluripotent stem cells are also considered. Several trials are exploring the curative potential of CAR T cells in other malignancies, and recent data on multiple myeloma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia are encouraging. Given the likely expansion of CAR T-cell indications and their wider availability over time, more and more highly specialized clinical centers, with dedicated clinical units, will be required. Overall, the costs of these cell therapies will also play a role in the sustainability of many health care systems. This review will focus on the major clinical trials of CAR T cells in B-cell malignancies, including those leading to the first FDA approvals, and on the new settings in which these constructs are being tested. Besides, the most promising approaches to improve CAR T-cell efficacy and early data on alternative cell sources will be reviewed. Finally, we will discuss the challenges and the opportunities that are emerging with the advent of CAR T cells into clinical routine.

Impact of geriatric vulnerability on outcomes of older patients in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

7017

Background: Older patients are at increased risk for complications and death following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Traditional transplant-specific prognostic indices such as hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index (HCT-CI) may not capture all underlying geriatric vulnerabilities, and in-depth evaluation by a geriatrician prior to transplant may not always be available. We hypothesize that routine pre-transplant assessments by interdisciplinary clinical providers may help uncover additional geriatric deficits. Methods: Using an institutional database of 457 adults age 60 years and older (range 60-78.7) who underwent first allo-HCT for hematological malignancies from 2010 to 2017, we retrospectively examined the prevalence and the prognostic impact of pre-transplant geriatric deficits identified by interdisciplinary clinical providers including geriatric domains of functional activity, cognition, medication, nutrition, mobility, and routine laboratory tests. Results: With a median follow-up of 37 months for survivors, the 3-year probability of overall survival (OS) was 50% (95% CI 45-55). The 2-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 25% (95% CI 22-28). Among pre-transplant geriatric variables, we found that impairment in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) was associated with increased NRM and inferior PFS and OS. In multivariate analyses, mismatched donor, age-adjusted HCT-CI > 4 (aaHCTCI), and IADL impairment were associated with NRM, while high/very high disease risk index (DRI), IADL impairment, and positive CMV status were associated with OS. The combination of IADL impairment with either aaHCTCI or DRI readily stratifies NRM and OS, respectively. Conclusions: Our findings establish a simple assessment tool to risk stratify older patients prior to allo-HCT using IADL and aaHCTCI and DRI. These results may provide an entry point for prospective, interventional trials to reduce NRM and toxicities for older allo-HCT patients.