Phase 3 RCT comparing docetaxel-platinum with docetaxel-platinum-5FU as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in borderline resectable oral cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5FU) is one of the treatment options in very locally advanced oral cancer with a survival advantage over PF (cisplatin and 5FU). TP (docetaxel and cisplatin) has shown promising results with a lower rate of adverse events but has never been compared to TPF.

METHODS

In this phase 3 randomized superiority study, adult patients with borderline resectable locally advanced oral cancers were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either TP or TPF. After the administration of 2 cycles, patients were evaluated in a multidisciplinary clinic and further treatment was planned. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events.

RESULTS

495 patients were randomized in this study, 248 patients in TP arm and 247 in TPF arm. The 5-year OS was 18.5% (95% CI 13.8-23.7) and 23.9% (95% CI 18.1-30.1) in TP and TPF arms, respectively (Hazard ratio 0.778; 95% CI 0.637-0.952; P = 0.015). Following NACT, 43.8% were deemed resectable, but 34.5% underwent surgery. The 5-year OS was 50.7% (95% CI 41.5-59.1) and 5% (95%CI 2.9-8.1), respectively, in the surgically resected versus unresected cohort post NACT (P < 0.0001). Grade 3 or above adverse events were seen in 97 (39.1%) and 179 (72.5%) patients in the TP and TPF arms, respectively (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

NACT with TPF has a survival benefit over TP in borderline resectable oral cancers, with an increase in toxicity which is manageable. Patients who undergo surgery achieve a relatively good, sustained survival.

Results of Phase III Randomized Trial for Use of Docetaxel as a Radiosensitizer in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer, Unsuitable for Cisplatin-Based Chemoradiation

PURPOSE

There is a lack of published literature on systemic therapeutic options in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC) undergoing chemoradiation. Docetaxel was assessed as a radiosensitizer in this situation.

METHODS

This was a randomized phase II/III study. Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with LAHNSCC planned for chemoradiation and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and who were cisplatin-ineligible were randomly assigned in 1:1 to either radiation alone or radiation with concurrent docetaxel 15 mg/m² once weekly for a maximum of seven cycles. The primary end point was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

The study recruited 356 patients between July 2017 and May 2021. The 2-year DFS was 30.3% (95% CI, 23.6 to 37.4) versus 42% (95% CI, 34.6 to 49.2) in the RT and Docetaxel-RT arms, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.673; 95% CI, 0.521 to 0.868; P value = .002). The corresponding median overall survival (OS) was 15.3 months (95% CI, 13.1 to 22.0) and 25.5 months (95% CI, 17.6 to 32.5), respectively (log-rank P value = .035). The 2-year OS was 41.7% (95% CI, 34.1 to 49.1) versus 50.8% (95% CI, 43.1 to 58.1) in the RT and Docetaxel-RT arms, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.747; 95% CI, 0.569 to 0.980; P value = .035). There was a higher incidence of grade 3 or above mucositis (22.2% v 49.7%; P < .001), odynophagia (33.5% v 52.5%; P < .001), and dysphagia (33% v 49.7%; P = .002) with the addition of docetaxel.

CONCLUSION

The addition of docetaxel to radiation improved DFS and OS in cisplatin-ineligible patients with LAHNSCC.[Media: see text].

Low-Dose Immunotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer: A Randomized Study

PURPOSE

The regimens approved for the treatment of advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are accessible to only 1%-3% of patients in low- and middle-income countries because of their cost. In our previous study, metronomic chemotherapy improved survival in this setting. Retrospective data suggest that a low dose of nivolumab may be efficacious. Hence, we aimed to assess whether the addition of low-dose nivolumab to triple metronomic chemotherapy (TMC) improved overall survival (OS).

METHODS

This was a randomized phase III superiority study. Adult patients with recurrent or newly diagnosed advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma being treated with palliative intent with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to TMC consisting of oral methotrexate 9 mg/m² once a week, celecoxib 200 mg twice daily, and erlotinib 150 mg once daily, or TMC with intravenous nivolumab (TMC-I) 20 mg flat dose once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was 1-year OS.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-one patients were randomly assigned, 75 in TMC and 76 in the TMC-I arm. The addition of low-dose nivolumab led to an improvement in the 1-year OS from 16.3% (95% CI, 8.0 to 27.4) to 43.4% (95% CI, 30.8 to 55.3; hazard ratio, 0.545; 95% CI, 0.362 to 0.820; P = .0036). The median OS in TMC and TMC-I arms was 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.8 to 8.1) and 10.1 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 12.6), respectively (P = .0052). The rate of grade 3 and above adverse events was 50% and 46.1% in TMC and TMC-I arms, respectively (P = .744).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first-ever randomized study to demonstrate that the addition of low-dose nivolumab to metronomic chemotherapy improved OS and is an alternative standard of care for those who cannot access full-dose checkpoint inhibitors.

Phase 3 randomised study evaluating the addition of low-dose nivolumab to palliative chemotherapy in head and neck cancer

LBA6016

Background: The regimens approved for the treatment of advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are accessible to only 1-3% of patients in low and middle-income countries due to cost. In our previous study, metronomic chemotherapy (MC) improved survival in this setting. Retrospective data suggest that a low dose of nivolumab may be efficacious. Hence, we aimed to assess whether the addition of low dose nivolumab to MC improved the overall survival. Methods: This was a randomised phase 3 superiority open-label study. Adult patients with relapsed -recurrent or newly diagnosed advanced HNSCC being treated with palliative intent with ECOG PS 0-1 were eligible. Patients were randomised 1:1 to MC consisting of methotrexate 15 mg/m2 PO weekly, celecoxib 200 mg PO daily and erlotinib 150 mg PO daily, or MC with intravenous nivolumab 20 mg flat dose once-every-3-weeks. Therapy was continued until disease progression or intolerable adverse events. Response assessment (RECIST version 1.1) was performed every 2 months. The primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival (OS) and this was a pre-specified interim analysis with the nominal p-value for efficacy being 0.006. Results: 151 patients were randomised, 75 in MC and 76 in the MC-I arm respectively. The addition of low dose nivolumab led to an improvement in the 1-year overall survival from 16.3% (95%CI 7.95-27.4) to 43.4% (95% CI 30.8-52.3) [Hazard ratio-0.545; 95%CI 0.362-0.82; P=0.00358]. The median overall survival in MC and MC-I arms was 6.7 months (95%CI 5.83 -8.07) and 10.1 months (95%CI 7.37-12.63) respectively (P=0.0052). The median progression-free survival in MC and MC-I arms was 4.57 months (95%CI 4.2 -5.3) and 6.57 months (95%CI 4.43-8.9) respectively (P=0.0021). Response rate in MC and MC-I arm were 49.3% (95% CI 37.8-60.8) and 65.2% (95%CI 53.4-75.4) respectively (P=0.085). The rate of grade 3 and above adverse events was 50% and 46.1% in MC and MC-I arm respectively (P=0.744). Conclusions: In this first-ever randomised study, the addition of low dose nivolumab led to improved overall survival and is an alternative standard of care for those who cannot access full dose nivolumab. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2020/11/028953.

Real world evidence for use of NACT in locally advanced external auditory canal cancer

e18000

Background: The management of very locally advanced external auditory canal cancers (LAEACC) is complicated, has a dismal prognosis and there is limited literature available for guidance. At our institute, we have offered neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) to such patients. The objective of the current analysis was to study the outcomes and adverse events with this approach. Methods: We identified 16 patients with LAEACC over a period of 10 years (2010-2020) from the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) database of the Head and Neck department at our hospital. All patients were seen in a multidisciplinary clinic before and after NACT. Further local therapy was planned as per the response and ECOG PS of the patient. SPSS version 20 was used for analysis. Descriptive statistics were performed and Kaplan-Meier analysis was done to evaluate overall survival and progression-free survival. Results: Out of 16 patients enrolled in the study, 14 patients eventually received NACT. The median age was 59.5 years (27 - 83), the male to female ratio was 7:1 and the ECOG PS was 0-1 in 14 (87.5%) and PS 2 in rest. The regimen offered was a 2 drug regimen of taxane and platinum in 11 patients and a 3 drug regimen of TPF in (7.14%) patients. The median cycle received was 2. Post NACT 6 (42.85%) patients underwent surgery, 5 (35.71%) received radical CTRT and 3 (21.42%) patients received palliative treatment. The median progression-free survival was 1.67 years [95% CI (0.364 - 6.175)] while the median overall survival was 2.0 years [95% CI (0.455 - 6.175)]. Conclusions: Locally advanced EACC where upfront surgery is not feasible, NACT can be considered an option as patients receiving NACT have a 44.44% response rate and surgical resection rate of 42.8%.

Late Toxicity After Adjuvant Conventional Radiation Versus Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer (PARCER): A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation in Cervical Cancer (PARCER), a phase III randomized trial, compared late toxicity after image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in women with cervical cancer undergoing postoperative radiation.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive either IG-IMRT or 3D-CRT after stratification for the type of hysterectomy and use of concurrent chemotherapy. The primary end point was 3-year grade ≥ 2 late GI toxicity assessed using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v 3.0 and estimated using time-to-event, intention-to-treat analysis, with a study level type I error of 0.05 and a nominal α of .047 after accounting for one interim analysis. Secondary end points included acute toxicity, health-related quality of life, and pelvic relapse-free, disease-free, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2019, 300 patients were randomly assigned (IG-IMRT 151 and 3D-CRT 149). At a median follow-up of 46 (interquartile range 20-72) months, the 3-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 late GI toxicity in the IG-IMRT and 3D-CRT arms were 21.1% versus 42.4% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.73; P < .001). The cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 any late toxicity was 28.1% versus 48.9% (HR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.76; P < .001), respectively. Patients reported reduced diarrhea (P = .04), improved appetite (P = .008), and lesser bowel symptoms (P = .002) with IG-IMRT. However, no difference was observed in the time by treatment interaction. The 3-year pelvic relapse-free survival and disease-free survival in the IG-IMRT versus the 3D-CRT arm were 81.8% versus 84% (HR 1.17; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.99; P = .55) and 76.9% versus 81.2% (HR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.71; P = .89), respectively.

CONCLUSION

IG-IMRT results in reduced toxicity with no difference in disease outcomes.