Met and unmet needs for surgery in Sierra Leone: A comprehensive, retrospective, countrywide survey from all health care facilities performing operations in 2012

BACKGROUND

Understanding a country's baseline operative actors and capacity is critical to improving the quality of services and outcomes. The aim of this study was to describe all operative providers and national operative production, to evaluate district and nationwide population rates for operations, and to estimate unmet operative need in Sierra Leone.

METHODS

A nationwide, exhaustive, retrospective, facility-based study of operative actors and surgical procedures was performed in Sierra Leone. Between January and May 2013, 4 teams of 12 medical students collected data on the characteristics of the institutions and of the operations performed in 2012. Data were retrieved from the log books of operations, anesthesia, and delivery.

RESULTS

A total of 24,152 operative procedures were identified, equal to a national rate of 400 operative procedures per 100,000 inhabitants (district range 32-909/100,000, interquartile range 95-502/100,000). Hernia repair was the most common operative procedure at 86.1 per 100,000 inhabitants (22.4% of the total national volume) followed by cesarean delivery at 80.6 per 100,000 (21.0% of the total). Private, nonprofit facilities performed 54.0% of the operations, compared with 39.6% by governmental and 6.4% by private for-profit facilities. More than 90% of the estimated operative need in Sierra Leone was unmet in 2012.

CONCLUSION

The unmet operative need in Sierra Leone is very high. The 30-fold difference in operative output between districts also is very high. As the main training institution, operative services within the governmental sector need to be strengthened. An understanding of the existing operative platform is a good start for expanding operative services.

Rates of caesarean section and total volume of surgery in Sierra Leone: a retrospective survey

BACKGROUND

Surgical services are essential components of health-care systems. Monitoring of surgical activity is important, but resource demanding. Simpler tools to estimate surgical volume, particularly in low-income countries, are needed. Previous work hypothesises that the relative frequency of caesarean sections, expressed as a proportion of total operative procedures, could serve as a proxy measure of surgical capacity. We aimed to establish nationwide and district-wide rates of surgery and caesarean sections, and to explore correlations between districts rates for caesarean sections and corresponding rates for total volume of surgery in Sierra Leone in 2012.

METHODS

A nationwide, exhaustive, retrospective, facility-based study of all surgical providers and surgical procedures was performed in Sierra Leone. Between Jan 14, and May 20, 2013, four teams of 12 medical students collected data on the characteristics of the institutions and of the surgeries performed in 2012. Data were retrieved from operation, anaesthesia, and delivery logbooks.

FINDINGS

Of 60 facilities performing surgery, complete annual data for 2012 was collected from 58 (97%) institutions. 24 152 surgical procedures identified, gave a national rate of 400 surgeries per 100 000 inhabitants (district range 32-909 per 100 000 [IQR 95-502 per 100 000]). National caesarean section rate was 2·1% (district range 0·3-4·0% [IQR 0·8-2·1]). District caesarean sections rate significantly correlated with the rate of total surgical procedures per 100 000 population (p<0·01). With known caesarean section rate, total volume of surgeries per 100 000 can be calculated with the equation: -9·8 + 4·68 × caesarean sections per 100 000.

INTERPRETATION

The close correlation between rate of caesarean section and population rates of total volume of surgery at district level in Sierra Leone indicates that rate of caesarean section should be further explored as a proxy indicator for overall surgical volume in low performing settings. By collecting data from three sources, missing procedures was considered less likely.

FUNDING

Norwegian University of Science and Technology.