Impact of enhanced recovery program implementation on postoperative outcomes after liver surgery: a monocentric retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

It is still unclear whether enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) reduce postoperative morbidity after liver surgery. This study investigated the effect on liver surgery outcomes of labeling as a reference center for ERP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Perioperative data from 75 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy in our institution after implementation and labeling of our ERP were retrospectively compared to 75 patients managed before ERP. Length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and adherence to protocol were examined.

RESULTS

Patient demographics, comorbidities, and intraoperative data were similar in the two groups. Our ERP resulted in shorter length of stay (3 days [1-6] vs. 4 days [2-7.5], p = 0.03) and fewer postoperative complications (24% vs. 45.3%, p = 0.0067). This reduction in postoperative morbidity can be attributed exclusively to a lower rate of minor complications (Clavien-dindo grade < IIIa), and in particular to a lower rate of postoperative ileus, after labeling. (5.3% vs. 25.3%, p = 0.0019). Other medical and surgical complications were not significantly reduced. Adherence to protocol improved after labeling (17 [16-18] vs. 14 [13-16] items, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The application of a labeled enhanced recovery program for liver surgery was associated with a significant shortening of hospital stay and a halving of postoperative morbidity, mainly ileus.

Untargeted NMR-based metabolomics analysis of kidney allograft perfusates identifies a signature of delayed graft function

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplantation (KTx) necessarily conveys an ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) process, which impacts on allograft outcomes. Delayed graft function (DGF) is defined as a non-decrease of serum creatinine by at least 10% daily on 3 consecutive days during the first 7 days post-KTx. DGF significantly conditions both short- and long-term graft outcomes. Still there is a lack of DGF predictive biomarkers.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore the potential of kidney graft perfusate metabolomics to predict DGF occurrence.

METHODS

49 human perfusates from grafts categorized upon donor type [donation after brain death (DBD)/donation after circulatory death (DCD)] and DGF occurrence and 19 perfusates from a murine model classified upon death type (DBD/DCD) were collected and analyzed by NMR-based metabolomics.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis of the murine data highlighted significant differences between perfusate metabolomes of DBD versus DCD. These differences were similarly observed in the human perfusates. After correcting for the type of donor, multivariate analysis of human data demonstrated a metabolomics signature that could be correlated with DGF occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The metabolome of kidney grafts is influenced by the donor's type in both human and pre-clinical studies and could be correlated with DGF in the human DBD cohort. Thus, metabolomic analysis of perfusate applied prior to KTx may represent a new predictive tool for clinicians in a more personalized management of DGF. Moreover, our data paves the way to better understand the impact of donor's types on the biochemical events occurring between death and the hypothermic storage.

[Delayed graft function : an ongoing clinical challenge]

Delayed Graft Function (DGF) is defined as the need for dialysis during the first week after transplantation. DGF is frequent and mostly derived from the ischemia/reperfusion cascade to which the graft is subjected throughout the transplantation process. A graft biopsy is recommended after 7 days of DGF to exclude an episode of acute rejection. Note that DGF per se is associated with an increased risk of acute graft rejection, as well as with a shorter long-term graft survival. Several strategies are being studied to mitigate the ischaemic damage, thereby improving graft quality. Among these, cellular therapy using mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) is promising, in particular via the administration of MSC in the machine perfusion during the preservation of the graft. We will discuss here the different definitions of DGF and the main predictive factors of DGF, as well as the impact on the graft outcomes. The current strategies to prevent DGF will be briefly reviewed.

Effect of the Combination of Everolimus and Mesenchymal Stromal Cells on Regulatory T Cells Levels and in a Liver Transplant Rejection Model in Rats

Introduction

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have particular properties that are of interest in organ transplantation, including the expansion of regulatory T cells (Tregs), a key factor in transplant tolerance induction. However, the most effective immunosuppressive drug to associate with MSCs has yet to be defined. Additionally, the impact of the association of everolimus with MSCs on Treg expansion, and on the induction of liver graft tolerance, has never been studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of MSCs in combination, or not, with everolimus on Treg expansion and in a model of rejection after liver transplantation (LT) in the rat.

Methods

Firstly, 24 Lewis rats were assigned to 4 groups (n=6 in each group) receiving intravenous MSCs or saline injection at day (D)9 with/without subcutaneous everolimus from D0 to D14. Analysis of circulating Tregs was performed at D0, D14 and D28. In a second set of experiment, 30 Lewis rats were randomized in 3 groups 48hours after LT with a Dark Agouti rat liver: everolimus (subcutaneous for 14 days), MSCs (intravenous injection at post-operative day 2 and 9), or both everolimus and MSCs. Rejection of the liver graft was assessed by liver tests, histology and survival.

Results

Individually, MSC infusion and everolimus promoted Treg expansion in rats, and everolimus had no negative impact on Treg expansion in combination with MSCs. However, in the LT model, injections of MSCs two and nine days following LT were not effective at preventing acute rejection, and the combination of MSCs with everolimus failed to show any synergistic effect when compared to everolimus alone.

Conclusion

Everolimus may be used in association with MSCs. However, in our model of LT in the rat, post-transplant MSC injections did not prevent acute rejection, and the association of MSCs with everolimus did not show any synergistic effect.

Infusion of Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stromal Cells After Liver Transplantation: A 5-Year Follow-Up

Various properties of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) might be particularly of interest after liver transplantation (LT). In this article, we report the long-term results of a prospective, controlled, and first-in-human phase 1 study evaluating the safety of a single MSC infusion after LT. A total of 10 LT recipients treated with standard immunosuppression received 1.5 to 3 × 10⁶ /kg third-party unrelated MSCs on postoperative day 3 and were prospectively compared with a control group of 10 LT recipients. Primary endpoints were set to prospectively detect potentially delayed adverse effects of MSC infusion, particularly the occurrence of infections and cancers. Secondary endpoints of liver graft and patient survival, graft rejection and function, occurrence of bile duct complications, and development of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA) against liver or MSC donors were studied. The median follow-up was 85 months. There was no difference in overall rates of infection or cancer at 5 years of follow-up between the 2 groups. There was also no difference in secondary endpoints. The prevalence of de novo liver DSAs related to HLA mismatches was twice as high in the MSC group compared with the control group. All of the de novo class II HLA antibodies against MSCs were linked to a shared HLA mismatch between the liver and MSCs. This study confirms the safety of a single MSC infusion after LT. The potential benefits of MSC injections in the context of organ transplantation have yet to be demonstrated by larger prospective studies. The development of anti-HLA antibodies against an MSC donor should be further evaluated, especially in cases of shared HLA mismatches between graft and MSC donors, despite the fact that no deleterious effect has been detected.

Aorto-duodenal fistula secondary to aortic graft replacement

Secondary aorto-duodenal fistula (SADF) is a rare and serious event occurring in up to 45% of aortic prosthesis infections. The clinical manifestations are variable ranging from isolated signs of graft infection such as fever to massive gastrointestinal bleeding. The diagnosis is based on CT scan and is generally oriented by an inconstant association of indirect signs. Despite a high early severe postoperative morbidity and mortality, especially in presence of a preoperative shock, emergency surgery allows for the diagnosis and treatment of SADF with multidisciplinary management allowing favorable midterm outcomes among surviving patients. The images that we present in this manuscript highlight some indirect signs of SADF on CT scan that should alert clinicians to warrant on time surgical management with an illustration of per operative diagnosis of the fistula.

Standardized Technique of Selective Left Liver Vascular Exclusion During Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Benign and Malignant Tumors

BACKGROUND

Tumors located close to major hepatic veins pose a technical challenge to standard laparoscopic liver resection. Hepatic outflow occlusion may reduce the risks of bleeding from hepatic vein and gas embolism. The aim of this study was to detail our standardized laparoscopic approach for a safe extrahepatic control of the common trunk of middle and left hepatic veins during laparoscopic liver resection and to assess its feasibility in patients with tumors located in both right and left lobes of the liver.

METHODS

Data of 25 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection with extrahepatic control of the common trunk of middle and left hepatic veins were reviewed.

RESULTS

All patients underwent primary hepatectomy. The vast majority (84%) of patients had malignant tumors. The control of the common trunk of middle and left hepatic veins was achieved in 96% of patients. There were 14 (56%) major hepatectomies and 11 (44%) minor hepatectomies. Some form of vascular clamping was performed in 23 (62%) patients: Pringle maneuver in 17 (median time = 45 min; range, 10-109) and selective vascular exclusion of the liver in 6 patients (median time = 30 min; range, 15-94). The median duration of operation was 254 min (range, 70-441). There was one case (4%) of gas embolism but without any complications during the postoperative course. Conversion to open surgery was performed in 2 (7.7%) patients: 1 for oncologic reason and 1 for non-progression during the transection plane. Perioperative blood transfusion rate was nil. The overall morbidity rate was 24%.

CONCLUSIONS

The laparoscopic approach for an extrahepatic control of the common trunk of middle and left hepatic veins is reproducible, safe, and effective, and can be applied during laparoscopic liver resection for tumors close to major hepatic veins.

Image in transplantation surgery: median arcuate ligament in liver transplantation

Low inserted median arcuate ligament (MAL) may cause extrinsic coeliac trunk compression and MAL syndrome (association of post-prandial epigastric pain, weight loss and nausea or vomiting). In liver transplantation (LT), liver graft arterial supply depends on the recipient's hepatic artery, as the gastro-duodenal artery has generally been ligated. A decreased graft arterial flow caused by coeliac trunk stenosis might induce hepatic artery thrombosis leading to graft loss. In this short report, the authors describe LT procedure during which recipient's hepatic artery pressure was dramatically decreased after ligature of the gastro-duodenal artery. Dissection and division of the MAL allowed to restore an excellent blood flow through the hepatic artery. This report reminds how important it is to be able to recognize and how to manage a stenosing MAL in LT.

Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in liver transplantation for hepatocarcinoma

AIM: To evaluate the prognostic value of pretreatment FDG positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) in patients with hepatocarcinoma treated by liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed the data of 27 patients (mean age 58 ± 9 years) who underwent FDG PET-CT before LT for hepatocarcinoma. Mean follow-up was 26 ± 18 mo. The FDG PET/CT was performed according to a standard clinical protocol: 4 MBqFDG/kg body weight, uptake 60 min, low-dose non-enhanced CT. The authors measured the SUVmax and SUVmean of the tumor and the normal liver. The tumor/liver activity ratios (RSUVmax and RSUVmean) were tested as prognostic factors and compared to the following conventional prognostic factors: MILAN, CLIP, OKUDA, TNM stage, alphafoetoprotein level, portal thrombosis, size of the largest nodule, tumor differentiation, microvascular invasion, underlying cirrhosis and liver function.

RESULTS: Overall and recurrence free survivals were 80.7% and 67.4% at 3 years, and 70.6% and 67.4% at 5 years, respectively. According to a multivariate Cox model, only FDG PET/CT RSUVmax predicted recurrence free survival. Even though the MILAN criteria alone were not predictive, it is worth noting that none of the patients outside the MILAN criteria and with RSUVmax < 1.15 relapsed.

CONCLUSION: FDG PET/CT with an RSUVmax cut-off value of 1.15 is a strong prognostic factor for recurrence and death in patients with HCC treated by LT in this retrospective series. Further prospective studies should test whether this metabolic index should be systematically included in the preoperative assessment.

Rationale for the potential use of mesenchymal stromal cells in liver transplantation

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are multipotent and self-renewing cells that reside essentially in the bone marrow as a non-hematopoietic cell population, but may also be isolated from the connective tissues of most organs. MSCs represent a heterogeneous population of adult, fibroblast-like cells characterized by their ability to differentiate into tissues of mesodermal lineages including adipocytes, chondrocytes and osteocytes. For several years now, MSCs have been evaluated for their in vivo and in vitro immunomodulatory and ‘tissue reconstruction’ properties, which could make them interesting in various clinical settings, and particularly in organ transplantation. This paper aims to review current knowledge on the properties of MSCs and their use in pre-clinical and clinical studies in solid organ transplantation, and particularly in the field of liver transplantation. The first available clinical data seem to show that MSCs are safe to use, at least in the medium-term, but more time is needed to evaluate the potential adverse effects of long-term use. Many issues must be resolved on the correct use of MSCs. Intensive in vitro and pre-clinical research are the keys to a better understanding of the way that MSCs act, and to eventually lead to clinical success.

[Mesenchymal stromal cells and organ transplantation]

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) are multipotent and self-renewing cells. MSC are studied for their in vivo and in vitro immunomodulatory effects, in the prevention or the treatment of isehemic injury, and for their potential properties of tissue or organ reconstruction. Over the last few years, the potential role of MSC in organ transplantation has been studied both in vitro and in vivo, and their properties make them an ideal potential cell therapy after solid organ transplantation. A prospective, controlled, phase 1-2 study has been initiated at the CHU of Liege, Belgium. This study assesses the potential risks and benefits of MSC infusion after liver or kidney transplantation. Even if the preliminary results of this study look promising, solely a prospective, randomized, large scale, phase 3 study will allow the clinical confirmation of the theoretical benefits of MSC in solid organ transplantation.