Does the use of antibiotic spacer disrupt induced membrane function?

Treatment of large segmental bone defects has been a challenging and long process for both physicians and patients. At present, the induced membrane technique is one of the reconstruction techniques commonly utilized in treating large segmental bone defects. It consists of a two-step procedure. In the first one, after bone debridement, the defect is filled with bone cement. The aim at this stage is to support and protect the defective area with cement. A membrane is formed around the area where cement was inserted 4-6 weeks after the first surgical stage. This membrane secretes vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), as shown in the earliest studies. In the second step, the bone cement is removed, and the defect is filled with cancellous bone autograft. In the first stage, antibiotics can be added to the applied bone cement, depending on the infection. Still, the histological and micromolecular effects of the added antibiotic on the membrane are unknown.This study investigates the molecular and histological effects of antibiotics addition into bone cement on the induced membrane.In this study, conducted on 27 male New Zealand rabbits, the 2 cm long defects of a bone were created in the rabbit femurs. Three groups were formed by placing antibiotic-free, gentamicin, and vancomycin-containing cement in the defect area.These groups were followed for six weeks, and the membrane formed at the end of 6 weeks was examined histologically. As a result of this study, it found that the membrane quality markers (Von Willebrand factor (vwf), Interleukin 6-8 (IL), Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were significantly higher in the antibiotic-free bone cement group. Our study has shown that antibiotics added to the cement have negative effects on the membrane. Based on the results we obtained, it would be a better choice to use antibiotic-free cement in aseptic nonunions. However, more data is needed to understand the effects of these changes on the cement on the membrane.

Perioperative alendronate, risedronate, calcitonin and indomethacin treatment alters femoral stem fixation and periprosthetic bone mineral density in ovariectomized rats

BACKGROUND

Many factors affect implant stability and periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) following total joint arthroplasty. We asked whether perioperative alendronate, risedronate, calcitonin and indomethacine administration altered (1) femoral stem shear strength and periprosthetic bone mineral density BMD in ovariectomized rats and (2) whether there were differences in the effect of these drugs.

METHODS

Thirty overiectomized rats were divided into five groups and implanted with intramedullary mini-cortical screws in the femur. Four groups were treated with alendronate, risedronate, salmon calcitonin and indomethacin for 4 weeks preoperatively and 8 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

Although alendronate and risedronate increased the periprosthetic BMD more than calcitonin, they did not alter implant fixation compared to calcitonin. Indomethacin significantly decreased the BMD around the stem and implant stability compared to all other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that perioperative treatment with bisphosphonates and calcitonin improved the BMD around the stems and implant stability. Although bisphosphonates increased the BMD more than calcitonin, there was no difference in implant stability. Indomethacin markedly decreased the periprosthetic BMD and implant stability. The main clinical significance of our study was the finding about the need to strictly avoid long-term use of high-dose nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs for patients who have major joint arthritis and a previous history of arthroplasty.