Chen JC, Bigelow N, Davis BH. Proposed flow cytometric reference method for the determination of erythroid F-cell counts.
Cytometry 2000;
42:239-46. [PMID:
10934343]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Quantitation of adult erythrocytes (RBC) containing fetal hemoglobin (F cells) is of potential clinical utility in evaluating erythropoietic disorders, such as myelodysplasia and hemoglobinopathies, and in monitoring F-cell augmenting therapy. F-cell counting methodologies include fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Previous flow cytometric methods have employed an isotype antibody control to distinguish F cells from non-F cells. We investigated the feasibility of using the orange autofluorescence signal (FL2) in glutaraldehyde-fixed RBC to substitute for fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled isotype control antibody use in F-cell quantitation.
METHODS
Our previously published method for fetal red cell detection in fetomaternal hemorrhage was used, employing a FITC-labeled anti-hemoglobin F (HbF) monoclonal antibody reagent. Blood samples with varying F-cell counts were quantitated for F cells using both immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry comparing FITC-labeled isotype to FL1 thresholding defined by FL2 autofluorescence.
RESULTS
F cell percentages obtained by using an FL2 defined threshold for FL1 gating correlated well with expected values in diluted blood samples (r(2) = 0.994, slope = 1. 019, intercept = 0.24), values obtained using an isotype control (r(2) = 0.996, slope = 1.012, intercept = -0.17), and microscopic immunofluorescence counts (r(2) = 0.989, slope = 0.999, intercept = -0.72). F-cell quantitation by the isotype control and FL2 autofluorescence methods was also comparable in 40 blood samples (r(2) = 0.994, slope = 1.014, intercept = 0.03). Intra-assay, interobserver, and interinstrument precision with this autofluorescence gating method exhibited low imprecision (coefficient of variation <14%).
CONCLUSION
This novel method is a more objective and less laborious alternative for F-cell quantitation by flow cytometry compared to using an isotype control or microscopy, thereby providing a more robust methodology for clinical studies and consideration as a laboratory reference method for F-cell counting.
Collapse