French National Diagnostic and Care Protocol for antiphospholipid syndrome in adults and children

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a chronic autoimmune disease involving vascular thrombosis and/or obstetric morbidity and persistent antibodies to phospholipids or certain phospholipid-associated proteins. It is a rare condition in adults and even rarer in children. The diagnosis of APS can be facilitated by the use of classification criteria based on a combination of clinical and biological features. APS may be rapidly progressive with multiple, often synchronous thromboses, resulting in life-threatening multiple organ failure. This form is known as "catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome" (CAPS). It may be primary or associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (associated APS) and in very rare cases with other systemic autoimmune diseases. General practitioners and paediatricians may encounter APS in patients with one or more vascular thromboses. Because APS is so rare and difficult to diagnosis (risk of overdiagnosis) any suspected case should be confirmed rapidly and sometimes urgently by an APS specialist. First-line treatment of thrombotic events in APS includes heparin followed by long-term anticoagulation with a VKA, usually warfarin. Except in the specific case of stroke, anticoagulants should be started as early as possible. Any temporary discontinuation of anticoagulants is associated with a high risk of thrombosis in APS. A reference/competence centre specialised in autoimmune diseases must be urgently consulted for the therapeutic management of CAPS.

French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of relapsing polychondritis

Relapsing polychondritis is a rare systemic disease. It usually begins in middle-aged individuals. This diagnosis is mainly suggested in the presence of chondritis, i.e. inflammatory flares on the cartilage, in particular of the ears, nose or respiratory tract, and more rarely in the presence of other manifestations. The formal diagnosis of relapsing polychondritis cannot be established with certainty before the onset of chondritis, which can sometimes occur several years after the first signs. No laboratory test is specific of relapsing polychondritis, the diagnosis is usually based on clinical evidence and the elimination of differential diagnoses. Relapsing polychondritis is a long-lasting and often unpredictable disease, evolving in the form of relapses interspersed with periods of remission that can be very prolonged. Its management is not codified and depends on the nature of the patient's symptoms and association or not with myelodysplasia/vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS). Some minor forms can be treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or a short course of corticosteroids with possibly a background treatment of colchicine. However, the treatment strategy is often based on the lowest possible dosage of corticosteroids combined with background treatment with conventional immunosuppressants (e.g. methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, rarely cyclophosphamide) or targeted therapies. Specific strategies are required if relapsing polychondritis is associated with myelodysplasia/VEXAS. Forms limited to the cartilage of the nose or ears have a good prognosis. Involvement of the cartilage of the respiratory tract, cardiovascular involvement, and association with myelodysplasia/VEXAS (more frequent in men over 50years of age) are detrimental to the prognosis of the disease.

[Artificial intelligence and internal medicine: The example of hydroxychloroquine according to ChatGPT]

Artificial intelligence (AI) using deep learning is revolutionizing several fields, including medicine, with a wide range of applications. Available since the end of 2022, ChatGPT is a conversational AI or "chatbot", using artificial intelligence to dialogue with its users in all fields. Through the example of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), we discuss its use for patients, clinicians, or researchers, and discuss its performance and limitations, particularly in relation to algorithmic bias. If AI tools using deep learning do not dispense with the expertise and experience of a clinician (at least, for the moment), they have a potential to improve or simplify our daily practice.

[Heart involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome]

Cardiac involvement in systemic lupus (SL) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) can be due to variables and involve different presentations. Pericarditis is the most common lupus manifestation and occurs in 16% to 25% of patients. While corticosteroids are usually very effective, colchicine may avoid steroids and prevent relapse. Myocarditis during SL is rare and often inaugural. They may manifest as chest pain, acute heart failure, arrhythmias or conduction disturbances, and may progress to dilated cardiomyopathy and/or permanent heart failure. Their prognosis is however generally good, even in the absence of treatment with cyclophosphamide for the less serious forms. Finally, coronary involvement in SL is most often due to atherosclerotic, thrombotic origin (generally in the context of associated APS), and exceptionally explained by coronary vasculitis. During APS, valve disease is frequent and usually asymptomatic. Thrombotic damage can be (1) coronary, typically manifesting as a myocardial infarction in a young subject with healthy coronary arteries, (2) much more rarely intracardiac, or (3) microcirculatory, generally as part of a catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) leading to a multiorgan failure. Finally, iatrogenic cardiac manifestations can exceptionally be seen during treatment with cyclophosphamide or antimalarials characterized by conduction disorders and/or heart failure.

OP0280 WEANING OF MAINTENANCE IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPY IN LUPUS NEPHRITIS (WIN-Lupus): A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Background

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a frequent complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Severe (proliferative) forms of LN are treated with an induction immunosuppressive therapy (IST), followed by a maintenance IST, to target remission and avoid relapses. The optimal duration of maintenance IST for proliferative LN is unknown.

Objectives

The WIN-Lupus trial tested whether IST discontinuation after 2-3 years in proliferative LN was non-inferior to IST continuation for 2 more years.

Methods

WIN-Lupus is an investigator-initiated academic randomized controlled trial, conducted in 28 French centers. Patients on maintenance IST with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil for a minimum of 2 years and a maximum of 3 years, and who were taking Hydroxychloroquine, were randomized (1:1) between 2 groups: IST continuation and IST discontinuation. The primary endpoint was the relapse rate of proliferative LN at 24 months. Secondary endpoints were the rate of severe SLE flares, survival without renal relapse or severe flare, adverse events, kidney function, disease activity, corticosteroid exposure, patient-reported outcome and medico-economic impact.

Results

Between 2011 and 2016, 125 patients were screened and 96 were randomized in the trial: 48 in the IST continuation group, 48 in the IST discontinuation group. In the per-protocol population, a relapse of proliferative LN occurred in 5/40 (10.4%) patients with IST continuation, and in 12/44 (25%) patients with IST discontinuation (difference 14.8%, 95%CI [-1.9; 31.5]). Non-inferiority was not demonstrated for relapse rate. Time to renal relapse did not differ between groups (p=0.092). Severe SLE flares (renal or extra-renal) were less frequent in patients with IST continuation compared to IST discontinuation (5/40 vs 14/44 patients, p=0.035). IST discontinuation was associated with lower health-related costs. Adverse events did not differ between groups.

Conclusion

Non-inferiority of maintenance IST discontinuation after 2 to 3 years was not demonstrated for renal relapse. IST discontinuation was associated with a higher risk of severe SLE flare.

References

[1]Moroni G et al. When and how is it possible to stop therapy in patients with lupus nephritis? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021. CJN.04830421. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04830421.

[2]Fanouriakis A et al. 2019 Update of the Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(6):713-723.

[3]Jourde-Chiche N et al. Proliferative lupus nephritis treatment: practice survey in nephrology and internal medicine in France. Nephrol Ther. 2014;10(3):170-6.

[4]Zen M et al. Immunosuppressive therapy withdrawal after remission achievement in patients with lupus nephritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;keab373. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab373.

[5]Malvar A et al. Kidney biopsy-based management of maintenance immunosuppression is safe and may ameliorate flare rate in lupus nephritis. Kidney Int. 2020;97(1):156-162.

Acknowledgements

Groupe Coopératif sur le Lupus Rénal (GCLR)

Disclosure of Interests

Noemie JOURDE-CHICHE Speakers bureau: Vifor Pharma, Grant/research support from: Fresenius Medical Care: grant paid to my institution (AP-HM) for the CINEVAS study in ANCA-associated vasculitis, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau Grant/research support from: AP-HP received a research support from ROCHE for the OBILUP trial, Karine Baumstarck: None declared, LAURENCE BOUILLET Speakers bureau: GSK, novartis, biocryst, takeda, behring, Paid instructor for: takeda, novartis, Consultant of: GSK, novartis, biocryst, takeda, behring, blueprint, Grant/research support from: takeda, gsk, sanofi, biocryst, novartis, Stéphane Burtey: None declared, Valerie Caudwell: None declared, Laurent Chiche Speakers bureau: BMS, Paid instructor for: BMS, Lionel Couzi Speakers bureau: Astellas, Chiesi, Novartis, Sandoz, Ostuka, GSK, Biotest, Consultant of: Biotest, Hansa, Novartis, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Astellas, Christophe DELIGNY: None declared, Bertrand Dussol Speakers bureau: Genzyme, Novonordisk, Grant/research support from: Shire, Stanislas Faguer Speakers bureau: Asahi, Vifor Pharma, Sanofi, Consultant of: Abyonyx Pharma, Pierre Gobert: None declared, Guillaume Gondran Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Consultant of: Genzyme, Antoine Huart Speakers bureau: Janssen, Paid instructor for: Pfizer, Aurélie Hummel: None declared, Emilie Kalbacher: None declared, Alexandre Karras Speakers bureau: Vifor, GSK, Astra-Zeneca, Roche, Paid instructor for: Vifor, Sanofi, Alexion, Consultant of: Novartis, GSK, Bohringer-Ingelheim, Marc Lambert Speakers bureau: CHUGAI-ROCHE, BAYER, PFIZER, LEOPHARMA, Paid instructor for: CHUGAI-ROCHE, Consultant of: CHUGAI-ROCHE, BAYER, PFIZER, LEOPHARMA, Grant/research support from: CHUGAI-ROCHE, Véronique LE GUERN: None declared, Sandrine Loubiere: None declared, Helene Maillard: None declared, Francois Maurier: None declared, Micheline Pha: None declared, Viviane Queyrel Paid instructor for: GSK, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Francoise Sarrot-Reynauld: None declared, David Verhelst: None declared, Eric Hachulla Speakers bureau: Johnson & Johnson, GSK, Roche-Chugai, Consultant of: Johnson & Johnson, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, GSK, Roche-Chugai, Sanofi-Genzyme, Grant/research support from: CSL Behring, GSK, Roche-Chugai and Johnson & Johnson, Zahir Amoura Speakers bureau: GSK, CSL Behring, Consultant of: GSK, Grant/research support from: GSK, Eric Daugas Speakers bureau: GSK, Amgen, Paid instructor for: GSK, Astra Zeneca, Consultant of: GSK, Astra Zeneca, Amgen, Grant/research support from: ROCHE for the OBILUP trial (AP-HP)

AB1120 PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC RHEUMATIC, SYSTEMIC AUTOIMMUNE, OR AUTOINFLAMMATORY DISEASES PRESENTED WITH COVID-19: THE MentCOVRMD STUDY

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns about its psychological effects. Sleep disturbances, anxiety and/or depressive symptoms, post-traumatic stress symptoms have been reported in general population. Patients with chronic rheumatism, systemic autoimmune disease or auto-inflammatory disease, due to immunosuppression, are at risk of severe forms of infection. Currently, there is little information on psychological impact of the pandemic on the mental health of these more vulnerable patients.

Objectives

To compare psychological assessment between patients with chronic rheumatic, autoimmune and/or autoinflammatory diseases who presented with COVID-19 infection between March and September 2020, first wave of French pandemic, and patients with same diseases who did not presented with infection to date.

Methods

The MentCOVRMD study was a multicenter descriptive study. Cases were patients with chronic rheumatic, autoimmune and/or autoinflammatory diseases from the French RMD cohort who presented COVID-19 infection between March and September 2020. Controls were patients with same diseases who did not develop infection. The study is registered in Clinical Trials under number 2020-A02058-31.

For participants, following criteria were collected: demographics (age, gender, smoking status); psychological assessment questionnaires: Insomnia Severity Index (ISI); Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) checklist; Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) Depression; Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD7) Anxiety; Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15) and Somatic Symptom Disorder (SSD)-12.

Results

Between February and December 2021, 60 cases (46 (76.7%) women), median age 52.0 (39.0; 63.0) were included, of which 15 (25%) had been hospitalized during infection, and 169 controls (148 (87.6%) women), median age of 52.0 (38.0; 63.0). There were more smokers in the group of cases 12 (20%) than controls 14 (9.1%) (p=0.028) as well as more cases on ARA2 treatment (8 (13.3%)) than controls (7 (4.5%)) (p=0.035) with no statistically significant difference in others comorbidities or treatments.

There was no statistically difference concerning the ISI scores between cases (11.83 ± 7.31) of which 60% had sleep disorders and controls (11.64 ± 6.82) of which 70.4% had sleep disorders. There was no statistically significant difference in PTSD scores of 15.5 (5.0 to 28.0) for cases and 18.0 (8.0 to 35.0) for controls, of which respectively 12 (20%) had values indicating possible PTSD for cases and 50 (29.6%) for controls. There was no statistically significant difference in PHQ-9 scores (5.5 (1.5 to 11.0)) of which 50% had depressive symptoms and controls (6.0 (2.0 to 11.0)) of which 54.5% had symptoms. There was no statistically significant difference in GAD-7 scores (3.5 (0.0 to 8.0)) of which 40% had anxiety symptoms and controls (4.0 (0.0 to 8.0)) of which 43.2% had symptoms. There was no statistically significant difference in PHQ-15 scores (11.4 ± 6.7), 85% of whom reported presence of symptoms, and controls (10.9 ± 6.2), 82.3% of whom reported symptoms. There was no statistically significant difference in SSD scores between cases (17.7 ± 10.9) and controls (18.4 ± 10.9).

There was a statistically significant difference in reported VAS scores of pain related to inflammatory rheumatism in cases with a median of 4.5 (3.0 to 6. 0) compared to controls with a median of 4.0 (1.0 to 6.0) (p=0.011).

There was no statistically significant difference in any of the psychological assessment scores between the inpatient and outpatient COVID cases.

Conclusion

There was no statistically significant difference between COVID cases and controls in the evaluation of these psychological parameters. Prevalence of all these variables were high in the whole study population, testifying to the need to manage these psychological aspects for patients with chronic rheumatisms, autoimmune and/or autoinflammatory diseases.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0789 What drives the BASDAI in pregnant patients with axial spondyloarthritis? A pooled analysis of four European pregnancy registries

Background

The patient reported Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) includes the six components fatigue, neck, back or hip pain, pain or swelling in other joints, tenderness, morning stiffness severity and duration on a 0-10 scale.

Objectives

To explore the driving factors for the BASDAI in pregnant patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

Methods

Anonymized pooled data of the European Network of Pregnancy Registries in Rheumatology (EuNeP) were used. The four participating registries are located in France, Germany, Norway and Switzerland, and collect data of women with child wish, during and after pregnancy prospectively and nationwide on regular time points. For the analysis, women who fulfilled ASAS classification criteria for axSpA and for whom a pregnancy outcome was reported until 12/2019 or 07/2020, depending on the registry, were selected. Mean BASDAI and its components were analysed descriptively.

Results

A total of 332 pregnancies from 304 women with axSpA were eligible. The Norwegian registry contributed half of the pregnancies (50.3%), followed by Germany (26.2%), France (15.4%) and Switzerland (8.1%). Mean maternal age was 31 years, the average disease duration 5 years.

Mean BASDAI was 3.0 before conception, 3.4, 3.4 and 3.5 in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimester, and 3.4 within 6 months postpartum. The figure shows mean values of the BASDAI and its individual components in the different time periods. Fatigue was higher than the mean score during all phases, and especially elevated in the 1st and 3rd trimester. Furthermore, values for neck, back or hip pain were higher than the mean score, especially from 2nd trimester on. All other components were lower than the mean score.

Data were not reported for all pregnancies and all time periods. Availability was highest in the 2nd and 3rd trimester with reported BASDAI in 60% and 62% of the pregnancies, respectively. Lowest reporting was 24% in the preconception period because only a part of the women was also observed before pregnancy.

Conclusion

The BASDAI is a validated instrument for assessing disease activity in patients with axSpA. Since the calculation of the score also includes factors that can be influenced by pregnancy, it may only be of limited value for measuring disease activity in pregnancy. This analysis shows that mainly fatigue and back pain in particular have an impact on the mean BASDAI. A limitation of this analysis is that data were not available for all measured time points of the individual pregnancies. Therefore, the results should be confirmed by other studies.

Figure 1.

Means of BASDAI components before, during and after pregnancy (the table presents means ± standard deviation).

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a research grant from FOREUM Foundation for Research in Rheumatology.

Disclosure of Interests

Yvette Meissner Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Anna Moltó Consultant of: UCB and BioGen, Grant/research support from: UCB, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau Grant/research support from: to my institution (UCB), Rebecca Fischer-Betz: None declared, Frauke Förger Speakers bureau: UCB pharma, GSK, Consultant of: UCB pharma, GSK, Roche, Grant/research support from: UCB pharma, GSK, Marianne Wallenius: None declared, Anja Strangfeld Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB.

POS1000 MORE THAN 30 % OF WOMEN WITH SPONDYLOARTHRITIS HAVE AN UNFAVORABLE PREGNANCY OUTCOME MOST FREQUENTLY DUE TO SMALL FOR GESTATIONAL AGE: ANALYSIS OF THE PROSPECTIVE GR2 COHORT

Background

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is one of the most common chronic inflammatory diseases and regularly affects women of childbearing age1. However, there is limited knowledge about the impact of the disease and its treatment on pregnancy.

Objectives

The aim of the study was to determine the factors associated with adverse pregnancy outcome in women with SpA.

Methods

All SpA patients (diagnosis according to the Rheumatologist) included in the national multicenter GR2 cohort from 2015 to June 2021 were included in the analysis. Patients could be included either with a pregnancy wish (i.e., preconceptional period) or because of a clinical pregnancy (<12 weeks of gestation). The main endpoint was favorable pregnancy outcome, a composite outcome defined as a live birth at term ≥ 37 gestation weeks of a healthy newborn with a weight greater than the 10th percentile. We performed a multilevel logistic regression model, in which we considered patient and center random effects (patient random effect for some women included in the cohort two times). Disease activity was defined by a BASDAI score ≥ 4 at least once during pregnancy. We used a multiple imputation to address missing data among the explanatory variables. Results are presented as an odds ratio (OR) with confidence interval (CI).

Results

Among the 207 pregnancies in women with SpA included in the GR2 cohort, 126 were retained for analysis of obstetrical outcome. Of these, 29 (23.0%), 14 (11.1%), 69 (54.8%) were exposed to corticosteroid, NSAID and biologics at least once during pregnancy, respectively. An active disease at least once during pregnancy was found in 47 (37.3%) pregnancies. A live birth was found in 116 (92.1%) women, including 110 (87.3%) full-term births. Early miscarriages and stillbirths were observed in 7 (0.06%) and 3 (0.02%) women, respectively. A caesarean section was performed in 20 (17.2%) cases.

A favorable pregnancy outcome was found in 80 (63.5%) of the women. Unfavorable pregnancy outcome was most frequently due to small for gestational age, observed in 22 (19%) pregnancies. The multivariate model adjusted for age, BMI, nulliparity, active disease during pregnancy, smoking, and exposure to NSAIDs and corticosteroids during pregnancy found an association between unfavorable pregnancy outcome with nulliparity (OR 2.63 95% CI [1.01-6.81] p = 0.05).

Conclusion

This study provides original results on pregnancy in women with SpA. It found a favorable pregnancy outcome in 63.5% of women. Unfavorable pregnancy outcome was most frequently due to small for gestational age, which should lead to a coordinated management with obstetricians for the follow-up of pregnancy in women with SpA.

References

[1]Van den Brandt S. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19(1):64.

Table 1.

Multilevel logistic regression model: factors associated with unfavorable pregnancy outcome in women with SpA.

Univariate analysesMultivariate analysesCrude OR 95% CIpAdjusted OR 95% CIpAge1.01 [0.92-1.10]0.8591.05 [0.95-1.17]0.297BMI0.99 [0.91-1.07]0.7960.99 [0.90-1.08]0.747Nulliparity2.16 [0.94-4.94]0.0712.63 [1.01-6.81]0.049Smoking0.84 [0.23-3.03]0.8050.84 [0.22-3.21]0.805Disease activity*0.98 [0.40-2.43]0.9641.15 [0.43-3.07]0.778Corticosteroids**1.09 [0.45-2.65]0.8761.15 [0.51-2.71]0.902NSAIDs**0.65 [0.18-2.33]0.1960.67 [0.18-2.56]0.565

* BASDAI score ≥ 4 at least once during pregnancy.

** Use at least once during pregnancy

Acknowledgements

The GR2 Cohort is supported by the French Society of Rheumatology, the French Internal Medicine Society, and unrestricted grants from UCB.

Disclosure of Interests

SABRINA HAMROUN: None declared, Marion Couderc: None declared, Rene-Marc Flipo: None declared, Jérémie SELLAM: None declared, Christophe Richez Speakers bureau: CR has received consulting/speaker’s fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, GSK, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer, all unrelated to this manuscript., Rakiba Belkhir: None declared, Laure Gossec: None declared, Hubert MAROTTE: None declared, Emmanuelle Dernis: None declared, Aline Frazier-Mironer: None declared, Elisabeth Gervais: None declared, Cédric Lukas: None declared, Valerie Devauchelle-Pensec: None declared, Laëtitia Dunogeant: None declared, Alban Deroux: None declared, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau: None declared, Anna Moltó: None declared

AB1131 IDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE OCCURRENCE OF SEVERE FORMS OF COVID-19 INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH AUTOIMMUNE/INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES

Background

Patients with autoimmune/inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIRD) were suspected to be an at-risk population of severe COVID-19. However, whether this higher risk is linked to the disease or to its treatment is difficult to determine.

Objectives

To identify, among AIRD patients, factors associated with occurrence of moderate-to-severe COVID19 infection and to evaluate if having an AIRD was associated with an increased risk of severe form of COVID19 infection (defined by hospitalization in ICU or death), compared to general population.

Methods

Data source: The “Entrepôt des Données de Santé (EDS)” collect data from electronic health records of all patients hospitalized or followed in the AP-HP (39 hospitals in Paris area, France). The French RMD COVID19 cohort is a national multi-center cohort that included patients with confirmed AIRD and diagnosed with COVID-19. All AIRD patients diagnosed with COVID-19 before September 2020 from both cohorts were included.

-We Identified factors associated with severe COVID-19 was made in a combined analysis of the 2 cohorts.

-Then, we compared COVID-19 infection severity in the EDS-COVID database in AIRD patients and controls, by a propensity score (PS)-matched case-control (1:4) study

Results

Among 1213 patients (334 in EDS and 879 in RMD cohort), 195 (16.1%) experienced a severe COVID19. In multivariate analysis, greater age, history of interstitial lung disease, arterial hypertension, obesity, sarcoidosis, vasculitis, auto-inflammatory disease and treatment with corticosteroids or rituximab were associated with severe COVID-19 (Table 1).

Table 1.

AIRD patient’s characteristics associated with severity of COVID-19

Patients with mild or moderate infectionPatients with severe infectionOR ajustés 95%CIp-value(N = 1018)(N = 195)Patients characteristics Age55.9 (16.7%)70.3 (14.3%)1.05 [1.03;1.07]<0.001 Gender: Female695 (68.3%)105 (54.1%)0.59 [0.38;0.94]0.025 Interstitial pneumonia38 (3.7%)20 (10.3%)2.94 [1.34;6.34]0.008 Obesity143 (17.8%)38 (27.7%)2.09 [1.26;3.43]0.004 Hypertension268 (26.3%)114 (58.5%)1.81 [1.13;2.89]0.013Underlying Disease: Chronic inflammatory arthritis618 (60.8%)72 (36.9%)Ref. Auto-inflammatory disease29 (2.9%)5 (2.6%)3.91 [1.2;11.32]0.025 Other29 (2.9%)4 (2.1%)0.35 [0.06;1.41]0.15 Connectivitis190 (18.7%)34 (17.4%)1.13 [0.62;2.01]0.69 Sarcoidosis40 (3.9%)24 (12.3%)5.19 [2.15;12.3]<0.001 Vasculitis111 (10.9%)56 (28.7%)1.8 [1.02;3.16]0.044Treatments Corticosteroid318 (31.2%)117 (60.0%)2.47 [1.58;3.87]<0.001 Leflunomide44 (4.3%)2 (1.0%)0.13 [0;0.97]0.045 Rituximab37 (3.7%)22 (11.5%)4.05 [1.96;8.27]<0.001Not significant in multivariate analysisCOPD, Asthma, Coronary heart diseases, stroke, diabetes, smoking, cancer, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, colchicine, hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate, salazopyrine, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, intravenous immunoglobulins, anti-TNFα, anti-IL1, -IL6, -IL17, Abatacept, JAK inhibitor

Among 35741 COVID-19 patients in EDS, 316 with AIRD were compared to 1264 PS-matched controls. Severe form occurred in 118 (37,3%) AIRD cases and 384 (30.4%) controls (Adjusted OR (aOR) for severe form= 1.43 [1.1;1.9], p=0,01). In analysis restricted to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondylarthritis (SpA), no increased risk of severe form (aOR=1.11 [0.68;1.81]) form or death (aOR=1.00 [0.55;1.81]) was observed.

Conclusion

In this multicenter study we confirmed that AIRD patients treated with rituximab or corticosteroids were at increased risk of severe COVID-19, as were those with vasculitis, auto-inflammatory disease, and sarcoidosis. Also, when compared to controls from the same cohort of hospitalized patients, AIRD patients had, overall, an increased risk of severe COVID-19, increased risk not observed in an analysis restricted to patients with RA or SpA.

Acknowledgements

FAI2R /SFR/SNFMI/SOFREMIP/CRI/IMIDIATE consortium and contributors

Patricia Martel

All clinicians/physicians implicated in COVID-19 patient care in APHP hospital and generated EDS patient data

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS1405 LESS THAN 50% FEMALES WITH CHRONIC RHEUMATIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASES CONTINUE A DMARD DURING PREGNANCY: A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE NATIONAL FRENCH SOCIAL SECURITY DATABASE

Background

Treatment of patients with chronic rheumatic inflammatory diseases (CRID) during pregnancy has changed in the last decade, namely due to the availability of new DMARDs labelled to be used during pregnancy.

Objectives

To describe the anti-rheumatic drug use during pregnancy in women with CRID (i.e. rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or spondyloarthritis (SpA)) in France over the past decade.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study within the French Healthcare database (SNDS), which covers 98% of the French population. Adult women were included if they had RA or SpA according to CIM-10 codes, had started a singleton pregnancy between 2008 and 2017 (index date), and were continuously covered by this health insurance from 1-year before pregnancy onset to 1-year after end of the pregnancy or death (whichever comes first). The treatment exposures of interest were: NSAIDs, oral corticosteroids, csDMARD (methotrexate, leflunomide, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, hydroxychloroquine), biologics (anti-TNF, rituximab, abatacept, tocilizumab, ustekinumab, anakinra). Exposure during pregnancy was defined as at least one drug reimbursement from the 6 months before the last menstrual period (LMP) to the end of pregnancy period.

Results

Among the 35,737 adult women with a CIRD (40.7% with RA and 59.3% with SpA) who had a past history of DMARD reimbursement, 11,274 (41.7%) started a singleton pregnancy during the study period. In total, during preconception and pregnancy, 4,773 (42.3%) women were not delivered any DMARD nor corticosteroids, 769 (6.8%) were delivered corticosteroids alone, 3,639 (32.2%) a csDMARD alone and 2,862 (25.4%) a biologic (among whom 33.1% associated a csDMARD). Biologics delivered during pregnancy were mainly anti-TNFs (92.1%).

Exposure to NSAIDs was more frequent during the first trimester (30% patients) of pregnancy but occurred all along the pregnancy (6% and 2% in the second and third trimesters, respectively). Conversely, exposure to oral corticosteroids was stable during the pregnancy (33% to 27%); however, more than half of the prescriptions corresponded to doses higher than 10mg. Exposure to DMARDs including bDMARDs during pregnancy was more frequent during the first trimester, compared to the rest of the pregnancy (see graph).

Conclusion

Overall, less than 50% of women with a CRID who received a DMARD prior to the pregnancy continued to retrieve such treatment during pregnancy, and overall less than 20% were delivered biologics during pregnancy. Whether the withdrawal of DMARDs led to unfavorable maternal and pregnancy outcomes needs to be evaluated.

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted thanks to a grant from the French Ministry of Health - Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique

Disclosure of Interests

Anna Moltó Consultant of: UCB, Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Biogen, Janssen, Grant/research support from: UCB, Aya Ajrouche: None declared, Diep Tran: None declared, Barbara Roux: None declared, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau Grant/research support from: UCB, Elisabeth Elefant: None declared, Vassilis Tsatsaris: None declared, Jeanne Fresson: None declared, Brigitte Bader-Meunier: None declared, Bruno Fautrel: None declared, Florence Tubach: None declared

AB1391 19% PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC RHEUMATIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASES PRESENT AN UNFAVORABLE PREGNANCY OUTCOME: A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE NATIONAL FRENCH SOCIAL SECURITY DATABASE

Background

patients with chronic rheumatic inflammatory diseases (CRID, i.e. rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or spondyloarthritis (SpA)) have been reported to have poorer pregnancy outcomes than the general population.

Objectives

to describe the pregnancy outcomes of singleton in patients with CRID in France in the past decade.

Methods

this is an analysis of the French Health Insurance claims database (SNDS), which represents 87% of the French population) from 2008 to 2016. To be included in the analysis patients had to be identified as RA or SpA according to existing diagnostic algorithms, to have at least one pregnancy declaration in the database, and to have continuous health insurance from 1-year before pregnancy onset to 1-year after end of the pregnancy or until death (if death occured before the 1-year-period after the end of pregnancy) to be included. Only the first singleton pregnancy occurring during the study period was included in this analysis. Both maternal and pregnancy outcomes were considered. Outcomes were identified either by ICM-10 codes or hospital discharge summaries discharge between 2008-2016.

Results

Among the 35 737 identified adult females with a CRID diagnosis (40.7% with RA and 59.3% with SpA), 27 722 (78%) had a pregnancy during the study period. 11 274 (42%) had received at least one DMARD prior to the pregnancy and were included in the analysis. Among them, only 4025 (36%) were exposed to DMARDs during pregnancy.

Mean (SD) age of females at the start of the pregnancy was 32 (5) years, and mean (SD) disease duration was 4 (4) years. Pregnancy ended before 13 WG in 21% and after 37 WG in 70% cases. Live-birth represented the most frequent pregnancy outcome (76.9%), and overall 34.7% patients presented at least one unfavorable outcome (see Table 1).

Table 1.Unfavourable outcomeN(%)Pregnancy outcomesMiscarriage (<22WG)579 (5.3%)Abortion91 (0.8%)Stillbirth48 (0.4%)Preterm delivery (>= 22WG and <37 WG)779 (7.1%)Low weight at birth (<3th percentile)287 (2.6%)Perinatal mortality (22WG to 6 days of life)2 (0%)Maternal outcomesSevere maternal infection*211 (1.9%)Newborn outcomesHospitalisation in neonatal intensive care > 48h in full-term newborns (after 37 WG)95 (0.8%)Neonatal mortality (27 first days of life)2 (0%)Severe infection * during first year603 (5.3%)

Conclusion

More than 75% pregnancies in patients with CRID resulted in a live-birth. Prevalence of miscarriage was surprisingly low, probably related to under-coding. Maternal and infant outcomes seemed comparable to general population. Whether medications had an impact on such outcomes is currently under evaluation.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0722 CLONAL HEMATOPOIESIS OF INDETERMINATE POTENTIAL AND ACCELERATED ATHEROSCLEROSIS IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (HEMATOPLUS STUDY)

Background

The detection of somatic mutations in genes of myeloid cells in asymptomatic patients - defining clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) - predisposes to cardiovascular events (CVE) in the general population.

Objectives

We aimed to determine whether CHIP was associated with CVE in SLE patients.

Methods

The study is an ancillary study of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial PLUS study conducted from June 2007 through August 2010 at 37 centers in France involving 573 SLE patients. The search for somatic mutations by high-throughput sequencing of 53 genes involved in clonal hematopoiesis was performed on genomic DNA collected at PLUS inclusion. The CHIP prevalence was assessed in SLE and in a retrospective cohort of 479 patients free of hematological malignancy. The primary outcome was the incident CVE in SLE.

Results

Screening for CHIP was performed in 438 SLE patients (38 [29-47] years, 91·8% female). Overall, 63 somatic mutations were identified in 47 patients defining a CHIP prevalence of 10·7% in SLE. Most SLE patients (78·7%) carried a single mutation. Most variants (62·5%) were located in the DNMT3A gene. CHIP was associated with age, age at SLE diagnosis and a lower frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies. CHIP occurred more than 20-years earlier (p<0·00001) in SLE than in controls. The detection of CHIP at inclusion was not associated with the occurrence of CVE during follow up (HR= 0·42 (0·06 – 3·21), p=0·406).

Conclusion

The prevalence of CHIP is high in SLE with respect to age but was not associated with incident CVE.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0621 MORE THAN 40% OF WOMEN WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS HAVE A TIME-TO-CONCEPTION LONGER THAN 1 YEAR: ANALYSIS OF THE PROSPECTIVE GR2 COHORT

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the most common chronic inflammatory diseases and regularly affects women of childbearing age1. However, there is limited knowledge about the impact of the disease and its treatment on fertility.

Objectives

The aim of the study was to determine factors associated with time-to-conception in women with RA.

Methods

All RA patients (diagnosis according to the Rheumatologist) included in the national multicenter GR2 cohort from 2015 to June 2021 were included in the analysis. Patients could be included either with a pregnancy wish (i.e., preconceptional period) or because of a clinical pregnancy (<12 weeks of gestation): for this analysis, only patients included preconceptionally were included. The main endpoint was time-to-conception, and the secondary endpoints were the number of subfertile patients (i.e., time-to-conception >12 months or non-achievement of pregnancy), as well as the number exposed to csDMARDs and biologics in the preconception period. We performed survival analyses, using a Cox model including a random effect for the center to account for heterogeneity of practices among participating centers. We used a multiple imputation to address missing data among the explanatory variables. Results are presented as a hazard ratio (HR) with confidence interval (CI) to assess associations between the factors studied and time-to-conception.

Results

Among the 167 patients with RA included in the GR2 cohort, 78 were selected for the main analysis of time-to-conception. Of these, 40 (51.3%) had a clinical pregnancy during follow-up. Subfertility was observed in 33 (42.3%) women and median time-to-conception was 19.1 months; mean preconception DAS28-CRP score was 2.3 (+/- 1.2).

Patients were treated during the preconceptional period with NSAIDs, corticosteroids, csDMARDs and biotherapy in 10 (12.8%), 35 (44.9%), 24 (30.8%), and 32 (41.0%) cases, respectively. The multivariate model adjusted for age, BMI, DAS28-CRP, disease duration, ACPA positivity, and exposure to corticosteroids and biologics in the preconception period found an association between increased preconception delay and age (HR (per year) 1. 12 95% CI [1.04-1.16] p = 0.01) as well as disease duration (HR (per year) 1.06 95% CI [1.02-1.15] p = 0.03).

Conclusion

This study provides original results on fertility in women with RA. It found a median time-to-conception of 19.1 months, with a subfertility rate of 42.3%, which is significantly higher than the general population2. In this context, it seems essential to discuss this topic from the beginning of the disease in women of childbearing age.

References

[1]Van den Brandt S. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19(1):64.

[2]Junul S. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(5):1250-4.

Table 1.

Survival analyses (Cox model): factors associated with time-to-conception in women with RA.

Univariate analysesMultivariate analysesCrude HR 95% CIpAdjusted HR 95% CIpAge1.11 [1.04-1.18]0.0021.12 [1.04-1.16]0.015BMI1.06 [0.99-1.16]0.1031.08 [0.99-1.16]0.062ACPA positivity1.75 [0.90-3.39]0.1071.44 [0.65-2.86]0.310Disease duration1.03 [0.98-1.08]0.2671.06 [1.02-1.15]0.032DAS28-CRP score1.08 [0.81-1.45]0.5921.08 [0.92-1.32]0.170Corticosteroids0.91 [0.51-1.65]0.7690.86 [0.42-1.68]0.620Biologics1.52 [0.82-2.81]0.1891.30 [0.62-2.78]0.630Figure 1.

Cumulative incidence curves for pregnancies in women with RA.

Acknowledgements

The GR2 Cohort is supported by the French Society of Rheumatology, the French Internal Medicine Society, and unrestricted grants from UCB.

Disclosure of Interests

SABRINA HAMROUN: None declared, Marion Couderc: None declared, Laure Gossec: None declared, Rene-Marc Flipo: None declared, Hubert MAROTTE: None declared, Christophe Richez Speakers bureau: CR has received consulting/speaker’s fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, GSK, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer, all unrelated to this manuscript., Aline Frazier-Mironer: None declared, Jérémie SELLAM: None declared, Elisabeth Gervais: None declared, Valerie Devauchelle-Pensec: None declared, Alban Deroux: None declared, Rakiba Belkhir: None declared, AZEDDINE DELLAL: None declared, Laëtitia Dunogeant: None declared, Cédric Lukas: None declared, Emmanuel Chatelus: None declared, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau: None declared, Anna Moltó: None declared

AB0450 SOLUBLE CD163 IS A BIOMARKER FOR CARDIOVASCULAR EVENT IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

Background

Prediction models based on traditional cardiovascular risk factors underestimate the risk of cardiovascular events (CVE) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Objectives

We aimed to determine whether sCD163, a biomarker for SLE-associated atherosclerosis, may predict CVE in SLE.

Methods

All SLE patients included between 2007 and 2010 in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter PLUS trial were screened. Patients with no past history of CVE at inclusion and a follow-up period of >20 months were analyzed. sCD163 level was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on serum collected at PLUS inclusion. The primary outcome was the incident CVE. Factors associated with incident CVE and sCD163 level were analyzed.

Results

Overall, 442 SLE patients (of the 573 included in the PLUS study) were analyzed for the primary outcome with a median follow up of 110 (interquartile range: 99–120) months. Among them, 29 (6.6%) experienced at least one CVE that occurred at a median of 67 (interquartile range: 31–91) months after inclusion. In the multivariate analysis, dyslipidaemia, age and increased sCD163 were associated with CVE onset. Multivariate Cox models analysis showed that a concentration of sCD163> 263 ng/mL at inclusion increased by 2.7 [hazard ratio 2.7 (95% CI: 1.0, 7.0)] the risk of CVE in SLE. Increased sCD163 was also associated with immunosuppressive treatment, higher body mass index (BMI) and SLEDAI score.

Conclusion

Macrophage-specific sCD163 serum level reflects lupus disease activity and predicts CVE in SLE.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

OP0127 UNFAVORABLE PREGNANCY OUTCOME IS SIGNIFICANTLY ASSOCIATED WITH CORTICOSTEROID EXPOSURE DURING PREGNANCY IN WOMEN WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: ANALYSIS OF THE PROSPECTIVE GR2 COHORT

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the most common chronic inflammatory diseases and regularly affects women of childbearing age1. However, there is limited knowledge about the impact of the disease and its treatment on pregnancy.

Objectives

The aim of the study was to determine the factors associated with adverse pregnancy outcome in women with RA.

Methods

All RA patients (diagnosis according to the Rheumatologist) included in the national multicenter GR2 cohort from 2015 to June 2021 were included in the analysis. Patients could be included either with a pregnancy wish (i.e., preconceptional period) or because of a clinical pregnancy (<12 weeks of gestation). The main endpoint was favorable pregnancy outcome, a composite outcome defined as a live birth at term ≥ 37 gestation weeks of a healthy newborn with a weight greater than the 10th percentile. Disease activity was defined by a DAS28-CRP score > 3.2 at least once during pregnancy. We performed a multilevel logistic regression model, in which we considered patient and center random effects (patient random effect for some women included in the cohort two times). We used a multiple imputation procedure to address missing data among the explanatory variables. Results are presented as an odds ratio (OR) with confidence interval (CI).

Results

Among the 167 pregnancies in women with RA included in the GR2 cohort, 92 were retained for analysis of obstetrical outcome. Of these, 43 (46.2%), 8 (7.9%), 40 (43.5%) were exposed to corticosteroid, NSAID and biologics at least once during pregnancy, respectively. A moderate or severe disease activity at least once during pregnancy was found in 20 (21.8%) pregnancies. A live birth was found in 83 (90.2%) women, including 69 (83.1%) full-term births. Early miscarriages were observed in 9 (0.1%) women. A caesarean section was performed in 22 (23.9%) cases.

A favorable pregnancy outcome was found in 52 (56.5%) of the women. Unfavorable pregnancy outcome was mainly due to prematurity and small for gestational age, observed in 14 (16.9%) and 17 (20.5%), respectively. The multivariate model adjusted for age, BMI, nulliparity, active disease during pregnancy, smoking, and exposure to biologics and corticosteroids during pregnancy found an association between an unfavorable pregnancy outcome and nulliparity (OR 6.2 95% CI [2.1-17.8] p = 0.002), age (OR (per year) 1.1 95% CI [1.0-1.3] p = 0.02) and exposition to corticosteroids during pregnancy (OR 3.2 95% CI [1.1-9.6] p = 0.04).

Conclusion

This study provides original results on pregnancy in women with RA. It found a favorable pregnancy outcome in 56.5% of women. Unfavorable pregnancy outcome was associated with age, nulliparity and corticosteroids use during pregnancy, which argues for their careful use during pregnancy.

References

[1]Van den Brandt S. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19(1):64.

Table 1.

Multilevel logistic regression model: factors associated with unfavorable pregnancy outcome in women with RA.

Univariate analysesMultivariate analysesCrude OR 95% CIpAdjusted OR 95% CIpAge1.09 [1.01-1.19]0.0361.14 [1.02-1.28]0.019BMI0.93 [0.83-1.04]0.1960.91 [0.77-1.08]0.204Nulliparity4.18 [1.66-10.53]0.0036.16 [2.13-17.76]0.002Smoking1.08 [0.29-3.36]0.9961.65 [0.37-7.22]0.141Disease activity*1.06 [0.40-2.81]0.9110.98 [0.21-2.28]0.753Corticosteroids**2.45 [1.05-5.68]0.0393.22 [1.09-9.57]0.038Biologics**1.05 [0.11-3.54]0.5892.02 [0.70-4.12]0.194

* Moderate or severe disease activity at least once during pregnancy.

** Use at least once during pregnancy

Acknowledgements

The GR2 Cohort is supported by the French Society of Rheumatology, the French Internal Medicine Society, and unrestricted grants from UCB.

Disclosure of Interests

SABRINA HAMROUN: None declared, Marion Couderc: None declared, Rene-Marc Flipo: None declared, Laure Gossec: None declared, Christophe Richez Speakers bureau: CR has received consulting/speaker’s fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, GSK, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer, all unrelated to this manuscript., Rakiba Belkhir: None declared, Aline Frazier-Mironer: None declared, Valerie Devauchelle-Pensec: None declared, Hubert MAROTTE: None declared, Jérémie SELLAM: None declared, Elisabeth Gervais: None declared, Alban Deroux: None declared, Cédric Lukas: None declared, Emmanuelle Dernis: None declared, Emmanuel Chatelus: None declared, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau: None declared, Anna Moltó: None declared

OP0066 IMPACT OF DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF TROPHERYMA WHIPPLEI INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH PRE-EXISTING CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES: DATA FROM THE NATIONAL Tw-IRD REGISTRY

Background

Tropheryma whipplei (Tw) infection is a rare condition, characterized by inflammatory joint symptoms in more than 75% of the cases, which can lead the physician to diagnose chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) and to initiate DMARDs. DMARDs are often ineffective and may reveal digestive signs, systemic manifestations or involvement of other organs. We hypothesized that treatment of Tw infection has a favorable impact on rheumatologic and extra-rheumatologic manifestations attributed to IRD.

Objectives

To validate this hypothesis, we initiated a registry with the objectives to describe the characteristics of IRD and their treatments, the diagnostic and therapeutic modalities of Tw infections and the impact of the treatment of Tw infection on the evolution of IRD and associated DMARDs.

Methods

We initiated a French National register including adult patients with pre-existing IRD, treated with DMARDs, later diagnosed with Tw infection. Cases were identified through a call for observation via the “Club Rhumatismes et inflammations” website. We collected clinical and biological data about the characteristics of IRD and their treatments, the diagnostic and therapeutic modalities of Tw infections, and the impact of the treatment of Tw infection on the evolution of IRD and associated DMARDs.

Results

Seventy-three IRD patients were included. Mean age at diagnosis was 49 years (SD +/- 10.9), with 78% of men, median IRD duration was 79 months (IQR 36; 140), including rheumatoid arthritis (31 cases), spondyloarthritis (14 cases), psoriatic arthritis (6 cases) and other IRDs (22 cases). All IRD patients were treated with DMARDs, with no therapeutic response in 51% of the cases, worsening of rheumatologic symptoms in 34% of the cases, and occurrence of extra-articular manifestations in 27% of the cases. Screening for Tw infection mainly involved saliva and stool PCR, while diagnostic modalities involved organ specific PCR and biopsies, in particular duodenal biopsies (PCR positive in 87% of cases and histology in only 38% of cases). At the time of Tw infection diagnosis, mean age was 58 years (SD +/- 10.1), all patients had joint involvement, 33% axial involvement, 11% entheseal involvement, 84% extra-articular manifestations, 93% elevated CRP, 86% hypoalbuminemia and 67% anemia. Tw infection treatment modalities (median follow-up of 22 months) mainly involved a combination of doxycycline (95%) and hydroxychloroquine (96%), with complete recovery in 79% of the cases and Tw-related deaths in 2 cases. At the same time, Tw infection treatment was associated with IRD remission in 93% of cases, with a median time to remission of 2 months (IQR 1; 4.25), leading to DMARD withdrawal in 94% of cases and corticosteroid therapy withdrawal in 65% of cases.

Conclusion

A Tw infection should be considered in IRD patients with peripheral joint involvement and inadequate response to DMARDs, particularly in the presence of extra-articular manifestations, elevated CRP and hypoalbuminemia. In such patients, positive results of screening and diagnostic tests for Tw infection may lead to the initiation of Tw infection treatment which is associated with complete recovery of Tw infection and rapid remission of the IRD, allowing DMARD and corticosteroid therapy withdrawal in most the cases.

References

[1]Marth T. Tropheryma whipplei infection and Whipple’s disease. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2016;16(3):e13–22.

[2]Puéchal X. Whipple’s arthritis. Joint Bone Spine 2016;83(6):631–5.

Acknowledgements

Club Rhumatismes et Inflammations.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared.

POS1373 DEFINING EAR CHONDRITIS: DATA FROM 685 PATIENTS WITH RELAPSING POLYCHONDRITIS

Background:

Ear chondritis is often considered the pathognomonic feature of relapsing polychondritis (RP). Although painful redness and swelling of the pinna and a resultant cauliflower ear are universally recognized as chondritis, the complete spectrum of symptoms associated with ear chondritis have not been well described.

Objectives:

The study objective was to seek patient input to help characterize ear chondritis An online survey was administered in English or Spanish to participants with self-reported RP.

Methods:

Participants were asked questions about their ear pain, including quality, location, duration, aggravating/alleviating factors, timing of onset and duration. Participants were included who reported age ≥ 18 years, a diagnosis of RP confirmed by a physician, and sufficient symptoms to meet McAdams or Damiani’s diagnostic criteria. Participants were categorized as having “typical ear chondritis” if they reported ear pain localized to the pinna with associated redness and swelling. Atypical presentations of ear chondritis were also considered.

Results:

A total of 685 participants from five continents completed the survey. Among them, 659 met inclusion criteria for subsequent analysis. Most participants were female (n=574; 87%), white (n=548; 83%) and from the United States (n=484;74%). The median age was 50 years (interquartile range = 41-58). In total, 593 (90%) patients reported ear pain, 227 (38%) had “typical ear chondritis”, and 98 (16%) had cauliflower ear.

Ear pain was most commonly described as burning (n=334, 56%) or throbbing (n=295, 50%). The most common location of pain was the pinna (n=373, 63%). Participants reported ear redness (n=454, 60%) and swelling (n=405, 62%). Some patients experienced only ear redness without swelling (n=286, 48%) or only ear swelling without redness (n=71, 12%). The most common aggravating factors were minor trauma (n=371, 62%) and stress (n=358, 60%). The most common alleviating factor was avoidance of touching the ear (n=374, 63%). Pain was most frequently reported during the daytime (n=355, 60%) and most likely to occur in either ear at different times (n=310, 52%). Onset could be gradual (n=198, 33%) or sudden (n=155, 26%). Pain typically lasted a few hours (n=175, 30%) or 2-3 days (n=130, 22%). The majority of patients who had pinna pain also had pain in other parts of the ear (e.g. mastoid process, inner ear, whole ear) at some point (n=394, 67%). In patients with cauliflower ear, the most common location of pain was the pinna (n=57, 58%) followed by pain inside the ear (n=53, 54%). Most participants reported at least two different types of pain (n=420, 64%).

Conclusion:

Ear chondritis in patients with RP has a wide range of clinical presentations and characteristics beyond the typical triad of redness, swelling, and pain localized to the pinna. The description of pain often significantly varies within the same patient. Knowledge of the various distinct characteristics of ear involvement in RP may help physicians recognize and monitor the disease more effectively.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS0724 GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THROMBOTIC PRIMARY ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME IN A LARGE COHORT OF PATIENTS FROM FOUR EUROPEAN CENTERS

Background:

Autoimmune diseases occur more frequently in females and their course and severity can be affected by gender. Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder in which antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) exert a pathogenic role resulting in vascular thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidities. Data about gender differences in thrombotic APS (t-APS) are still scarce1,2.

Objectives:

To evaluate the differences in frequency, disease expression and severity between females and males affected by primary t-APS.

Methods:

Retrospective study enrolling subjects with a formal diagnosis of primary APS (Miyakis 2006) with vascular thrombosis at onset. Women who presented with obstetric events as first aPL-related manifestation were excluded. All the patients were followed from 1967 to 2019 in four European centers: three French centers and one Italian center.

Results:

The study included 433 patients (68% females, 32% males). Median age at t-APS onset [31 (24-46) vs 41 (29-53) years, p<0.001] and at diagnosis [34 (27-50) vs 46 (34-57) years, p<0.001] was significantly lower in females.

The most common presenting manifestations were venous thrombosis (60%) followed by arterial events (37%) and catastrophic APS (3%). Venous events were more frequent in women as compared to men (64% vs 51% p:0.012 OR:1.7 [1.1-2.5]). Sites of venous thrombosis included: limbs (35%), pulmonary (17%), cerebral (3%), portal and inferior cava (2%) and retinal (1%) veins, without gender differences. The arterial events were more frequent among men (43% vs 34% p:0.053). Strokes (27%) and myocardial infarctions (4%) were the most frequent manifestations, followed by thrombosis of limbs (2%), retina (2%) and abdominal organs (1%). Noteworthy, only men presented with visceral ischemia.

During the follow-up, new thrombosis occurred in 41% of patients (179/433). 33% out of them had at least two episodes and these occurred especially among males (22% vs 10% p:0.001 OR:2.5 [1.3-4.8]). New events were mostly of the same type, but ⅓ of patients presented a switch from venous to arterial side and viceversa, with no gender differences.

Complete aPL profile was available in 357 subjects: 33% had single aPL positivity, 24% double positivity and 43% triple positivity, with no differences between women and men. About 80% of the patients had a concomitant risk factor (RF) for thrombosis. Established cardiovascular RFs were more represented among men as shown in table 1. In women, estrogenic exposure was the main RFs, present in almost 40% of them.

Table 1.MALESn= 137FEMALESn= 296POR [IC 95%]Traditional cardiovascular RFs, n (%)Smoke66 (48)81 (27)<0.0012.5 [1.6-3.8]Arterial hypertension59 (43)75 (25)<0.0012.2 [1.5-3.4]Dyslipidemia52 (38)72 (24)0.0041.9 [1.2-2.9]Diabetes16 (12)15 (5)0.0142.5 [1.8-5.1]Obesity13 (10)38 (13)nsOther thrombophilic factors, n (%)Estrogenic stimuli*0116 (39)-Trauma / surgery / immobilization21 (15)32 (11)nsCongenital thrombophilia9/94 (10)33/204 (16)ns

Data were compared using contingency tables, p value was calculated with Chi-Squared or Fisher exact test. *= hormonal therapy, pregnancy, post-partum

Conclusion:

This gender-oriented analysis of patients with primary t-APS showed that women had the first vascular event at a younger age and mostly on the venous side, while men presented mainly with arterial events, later in life and suffered from more recurrent events. No differences were observed in the distribution of the aPL profile. The different frequency of arterial and venous events in the two groups could be attributed mainly to the presence of additional RFs rather than to biological gender-specific issues. However, it should be underlined that some RFs, such as the use of estrogens or classic cardiovascular RFs, are exclusive or more represented in one gender rather than the other, making it difficult to assess the link of causality between gender and manifestations of t-APS.

References:

[1]JF de Carvalho. Rheumatol Int. 2011.

[2]LJ Jara. Lupus. 2005.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

OP0296 THE 2021 DORIS DEFINITION OF REMISSION IN SLE – FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS FROM AN INTERNATIONAL TASK FORCE

Background:

Remission is the stated goal for both patient and care-giver (1), but consensus on a definition of remission has been lacking. Previously, an international task force consisting of patient representatives and medical specialists published a frame-work for such a definition (2), but without making a final recommendation.

Objectives:

To achieve consensus around a definition of remission in SLE (DORIS).

Methods:

The DORIS task force met annually from 2015 to 2020 and consisted of patient representatives and specialists in rheumatology, nephrology, dermatology, and clinical immunology. Systemic literature reviews of several key topics were done and specific research questions were examined in suitably chosen datasets. The findings were discussed, reformulated as recommendations, and voted upon. Level of evidence (LoE), strength of recommendation (SoR), and agreement were determined in standard fashion. The final recommendation for the DORIS definition of remission was established by electronic vote after finalization of the minutes of the most recent task force meeting.

Results:

Based on data from the literature and from several SLE-specific data sets, five key recommendations were endorsed (Table 1) that should be seen as additions to those published previously (2). Literature reviews identified strong support for the face-, content-, construct- and criterion validity of the definition based on the clinical SLEDAI (not including anti-DNA and complement) equal to zero plus low physician global assessment and allowing stable medical treatment. Thus, the DORIS Task Force recommended a single definition of remission in SLE, based on clinical SLEDAI = 0, evaluator’s global assessment <0.5 (0-3), prednisone 5 mg/day or less, and stable antimalarials, immunosuppressives and biologics.

Table 1.Vote in favorLoESoRAgreement1.Inclusion of serology [anti-DNA, complement] in the DORIS definition of remission-on-treatment does not meaningfully alter the construct validity and therefore it is not recommended to include it90%2aB8.382.While the goal of treatment is sustained remission, a definition of remission should be able to be met at any point in time; therefore, duration should not be included in the definition100%5C9.023.To date, the SLEDAI-based definitions of remission have formally been investigated more extensively than BILAG-or ECLAM-based definitions. The SLEDAI-based definitions can therefore more confidently be recommended91%2aB9.254.Remission off treatment, while the ultimate goal for many patients and providers, is achieved very rarely. In clinical research and as an outcome in clinical trials, the definition for remission-on-treatment is recommended92%2aB9.525.In clinical trials, the LLDAS definition for low disease activity and the DORIS definition of remission are both recommended as outcomes100%5C9.25

The 2021 DORIS definition of remission in SLE:

Conclusion:

The 2021 DORIS definition of remission in SLE was established. It is recommended for use as an aspirational treatment target in clinical care, a clear concept in education, and a key outcome in research including clinical trials and observational studies.

References:

[1]van Vollenhoven RF, Mosca M, Bertsias G, et al. Treat-to-target in systemic lupus erythematosus: recommendations from an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:958-67.

[2]van Vollenhoven R, Voskuyl A, Bertsias G, et al. A framework for remission in SLE: consensus findings from a large international task force on definitions of remission in SLE (DORIS). Ann Rheum Dis 2016.

Disclosure of Interests:

Ronald van Vollenhoven Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Biotest, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Servier, UCB, Vielabo, Grant/research support from: BMS, GSK, Lilly, UCB, George Bertsias: None declared, Andrea Doria: None declared, David Isenberg: None declared, Eric F. Morand: None declared, Michelle A Petri: None declared, Bernardo Pons-Estel Consultant of: GSK, Janssen, Anisur Rahman: None declared, Manuel Ugarte-Gil Grant/research support from: Janssen, Pfizer, Alexandre Voskuyl: None declared, Laurent Arnaud Consultant of: Alexion, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, LFB, Lilly, Menarini France, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugaï, UCB., Ian N. Bruce: None declared, Ricard Cervera Consultant of: GSK, Alexion, Eli Lilly, Astra Zeneca, Termo-Fisher, Rubió, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau: None declared, Caroline Gordon Speakers bureau: UCB, Consultant of: Center for Disease Control, Astra-Zeneca, MGP, Sanofi, UCB, Frederic Houssiau: None declared, Marta Mosca: None declared, Matthias Schneider: None declared, Michael Ward: None declared, Cynthia Aranow: None declared.

OP0295 GR2 MULTICENTRIC PROSPECTIVE FRENCH STUDY’S RESULTS: DAMAGE BUT NOT REMISSION AT FIRST TRIMESTER PREDICTS ADVERSE PREGNANCY OUTCOME IN LUPUS PREGNANCIES

Background:

Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) during pregnancy is associated with poor obstetrical outcome but it is still not clear if remission, lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) is the best target to achieve at conception. Besides, the effect of damage on pregnancy outcome has not been studied.

Objectives:

Our aim was to determine the 1st trimester risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcome (APO).

Methods:

Inclusion criteria were: 1) women≥18 years enrolled in the prospective GR2 study; 2) with SLE (SLICC criteria); 3) and an ongoing singleton pregnancy at 12 weeks (only 1 pregnancy per patient). We used the following definitions: DORIS1, DORIA2, clinical SLEDAI-2K=0, LLDAS3 (for SLE activity), SFI4 (for flares), and SLICC-damage index5 (for damage). APO included: foetal death, neonatal death, placental insufficiency with premature delivery<37 weeks, and small for gestational age (SGA:≤3rd percentile).

Results:

238 patients were included. 234 (98.3%) women were on hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and 206 (86.5%) had a clinical SLEDAI-2K=0. Regarding pregnancy outcome, 230 (96.6%) patients had a live birth (mean term 37.7 weeks). Thirty-four (14.3%) patients developed at least 1 APO: placental insufficiency (n=22), foetal death (n=7), neonatal death (n=1), and SGA (n=5). Two different regression logistic models were assessed, one for DORIA and one for LLDAS. We found that only SLICC-Damage index and lupus anticoagulant (LAC) were associated with APO (p=0.02, OR 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1-2.9; p=0.001, OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.8-9.7 respectively for DORIA model; p=0.03, OR 1.7, 95% CI:1.1-2.8; p=0.002, OR 3.7, 95% CI: 1.6-8.7 respectively for LLDAS model).

Conclusion:

We confirmed that LAC predicts APO. We found for the first time that chronic damage at 1st trimester also predicted APO. No effect of remission/LLDAS was observed in this cohort of patients on HCQ with a stable and well-controlled SLE.

References:

[1]van Vollenhoven R, et al. ARD 2017.

[2]Zen M, et al. ARD. 2015.

[3]Franklyn, K. et al. ARD 2016.

[4]Petri M, et al. NEJM 2005.

[5]Gladman DD, et al. Arthritis Rheum, 1997.

Table 1.Univariate analysis for APOMaternal featuresTotal (N=238)APO (N=34)Non-APO (N=204)P valueAge, mean (SD)31.6(4.5)30.7(4.8)31.7(4.4)0.22Secondary APS34(14.3)10(29.4)24(11.8)0.01Previous renal phenotype67(28.2)13(38.2)54(26.5)0.16At least 1 flare during pregnancy37(15.5)6(17.4)31(15.2)0.80Positive anti-DNA (N=222)104(46.8)21(67.7)83(43.5)0.01Hypocomplementemia (N=216)57(26.4)13(40.6)44(23.9)0.05LAC (N=232)41(17.7)15(44.1)26(13.1)<0.001Triple aPL (N=232)17(7.3)5(14.7)12(6.1)0.0824h-proteinuria>0.5g/day9(3.8)3(8.8)6(2.9)0.12Activity/DamageSLEDAI-2K, median (IQR) (N=212)2(0-3)2(2-4)2(0-2)0.01SLICC-DI, median (IQR) (N=236)0(0-0)0(0-0)0(0-0)0.007PGA, median (IQR)(N=235)0.1(0-0.2)0.1(0-0.41)0.1(0-0.2)0.06DORIA remission*154(64.7)17(50.0)137(67.2)0.05DORIS remission**147(61.8)17(50.0)130(63.4)0.13LLDAS (N=219)157(71.7)19(57.6)138(74.2)0.05Clinical SLEDAI-2K=0206(86.5)28(82.4)178(87.3)0.44TreatmentPrednisone (PDN)119(50.0)23(67.7)96(47.1)0.03PDN (mg/day) median (IQR)7(5-10)0(0-6)5(0-10)0.007Immunosuppressants57(24.0)13(38.2)44(21.6)0.04Hydroxychloroquine234(98.3)34(100.0)200(98.0)1.00Low dose aspirin165(69.3)29(85.3)136(66.7)0.03Low molecular weight heparin61(25.6)15(44.1)46(22.6)0.01

Legend: APS: antiphospholipid syndrome; aPL: antiphospholipid; PGA: Physician global assessment. *: DORIA definition of remission = clinical SLEDAI=0 and prednisone ≤5 mg/day; **: DORIS definition of remission = clinical SLEDAI=0, prednisone ≤5 mg/day, and PGA<0.5.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

OP0297 THE SLE-DAS ENABLES ACCURATE AND USER-FRIENDLY DEFINITIONS OF REMISSION AND CATEGORIES OF LUPUS DISEASE ACTIVITY: DERIVATION AND VALIDATION STUDY IN 1190 SLE PATIENTS

Background:

Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is tailored according to the intensity of SLE disease activity and aims to achieve remission. Current definitions of remission and disease activity categories are mostly based on the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), which has important limitations. The SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) is a validated continuous disease activity score with higher accuracy in measuring SLE activity and higher sensitivity-to-change as compared to SLEDAI1. SLE-DAS is user-friendly with its online calculator.

Objectives:

To derive and validate the SLE-DAS cut-off values for defining SLE disease activity categories and SLE clinical remission state.

Methods:

Derivation study was conducted at the Padova Lupus Clinic. Validation was performed prospectively in patients from the Cochin Lupus Clinic and by post-hoc analysis of BLISS-76 (NCT00410384) trial. Gold-standard for clinical remission state was fulfillment of Definition Of Remission In SLE (DORIS). In Padova and Cochin Clinics, at time of inclusion, a senior clinician classified each patient as presenting: (i) remission, (ii) mild, or (iii) moderate/severe disease activity. Derivation of the SLE-DAS cut-offs for disease activity categories was performed using ROC curve analysis against this expert clinical classification. Performance of these SLE-DAS categories of disease activity was assessed as compared with: (i) expert classification (in Cochin cohort); (ii) British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index (in BLISS-76). An index-based and a Boolean definition of remission were tested applying decision trees, using CHAID (chi-square automatic interaction detection) algorithm and their performance estimated.

Results:

We included 1190 SLE patients (221 in Padova, 150 in Cochin and 819 from BLISS-76 cohorts). In the derivation cohort, best SLE-DAS cut-off values for disease activity categories were: (i) remission, SLE-DAS≤2.08; (ii) mild activity, 2.08<SLE-DAS≤7.10; (iii) moderate/severe activity, SLE-DAS>7.10. Table 1 shows the performance of these SLE-DAS cut-offs. The SLE-DAS Boolean-based definition of remission (all SLE-DAS clinical items scores = 0 and prednisone ≤5mg/day) showed sensitivity and specificity of 100% in the derivation (Padova) and validation (Cochin) clinical cohorts. The SLE-DAS index-based definition of remission (SLE-DAS ≤2.08 and prednisone ≤5mg/day) presented sensitivity =100% and specificity =97.4% in the derivation and validation clinical cohorts. The SLE-DAS definitions of remission were fully substantiated by CHAID.

Table 1.

Performance of SLE-DAS cut-offs for remission and disease activity categories compared to physician’s classification and BILAG (n =1190).

Disease activity categorySensitivity (%)Specificity (%)Accuracy (%)DerivationPadova CohortRemission(SLE-DAS≤2.08)99.397.198.6Mild Disease Activity(2.08<SLE-DAS≤7.10)74.298.995.5Moderate and Severe Disease Activity(SLE-DAS>7.10)97.496.796.8ValidationCochin CohortRemission(SLE-DAS≤2.08)99.193.998.0Mild Disease Activity(2.08<SLE-DAS≤7.10)82.699.296.7Moderate and Severe Disease Activity(SLE-DAS>7.10)100.098.698.7ValidationBLISS-76Remission and Mild Disease Activity§vs. Moderate and Severe Disease Activity§§ (SLE-DAS≤7.10 vs. >7.10)91.484.190.8

§ Remission/Mild: No BILAG B or A scores

§§ Moderate/severe: ≥1 BILAG B or A scores

Conclusion:

The SLE-DAS is an accurate and easy to use tool for defining clinical remission state and SLE disease activity categories, validated with both the expert assessment and BILAG.

References:

[1]Jesus D, et al. Derivation and validation of the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS): a new SLE continuous measure with high sensitivity for changes in disease activity. Ann Rheum Dis 2019;78:365-71.

Acknowledgements:

The authors would like to thank GlaxoSmithKline (Uxbridge, UK) for granting access to the data from the BLISS-76 trial through the Clinical Study Data Request consortium.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

Progressive clinical case-based multiple-choice questions: An innovative way to evaluate and rank undergraduate medical students

INTRODUCTION

In France, at the end of the sixth year of medical studies, students take a national ranking examination including progressive clinical case-based multiple-choice questions (MCQs). We aimed to evaluate the ability of these MCQs for testing higher-order thinking more than knowledge recall, and to identify their characteristics associated with success and discrimination.

METHODS

We analysed the 72 progressive clinical cases taken by the students in the years 2016-2019, through an online platform.

RESULTS

A total of 72 progressive clinical cases (18 for each of the 4 studied years), corresponding to 1059 questions, were analysed. Most of the clinical cases (n=43, 60%) had 15 questions. Clinical questions represented 89% of all questions, whereas basic sciences questions accounted for 9%. The most frequent medical subspecialties were internal medicine (n=90, 8%) and infectious diseases (n=88, 8%). The most frequent question types concerned therapeutics (26%), exams (19%), diagnosis (14%), and semiology (13%). Level 2 questions ("understand and apply") accounted for 59% of all questions according to the Bloom's taxonomy. The level of Bloom's taxonomy significantly changed over time with a decreasing number of level 1 questions ("remember") (P=0.04). We also analysed the results of the students among 853 questions of training ECNi. Success and discrimination significantly decreased when the number of correct answers increased (P<0.0001 both). The success, discrimination, mean score, and mean number of discrepancies did not differ according to the diagnosis, exam, imaging, semiology, or therapeutic type of questions.

CONCLUSION

Progressive clinical case-based MCQs represent an innovative way to evaluate undergraduate students.

[Sickle cell trait complications: A case series of 6 patients]

INTRODUCTION

Patients with sickle cell trait (SCT) are commonly considered as asymptomatic carriers. However, some clinical manifestations may occur.

METHODS

Here we present a retrospective descriptive study about SCT subjects with at least one complication diagnosed in a sickle cell disease referral center, in Paris, between 2008 and 2019. We also performed a literature review on the complications of SCT subjects.

RESULTS

Six patients (between 19 and 65 years old) were included. SCT was already known only for 4 of them at the time of the complication. Four patients presented with a splenic infarct after a stay in high altitude or a plane trip, one of them was associated with papillary necrosis; one patient had isolated papillary necrosis, and the last one had splenic sequestration. These complications happened for most of them after exposure to an unusual situation of hypoxia or deshydratation. Five out of 6 patients had a marked elevated C reactive protein.

CONCLUSION

SCT may cause acute ischemic complications in a context of prolonged hypoxia or dehydration. The most commonly reported are the splenic infarct and the renal papillary necrosis. A study of hemoglobin should be considered in these clinical situations in patients with compatible ethnic origin.

THU0271 PERFORMANCE OF THE EULAR/ACR 2019 CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA FOR SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS IN EARLY DISEASE, ACROSS SEXES AND ETHNICITIES

Background:

EULAR/ACR 2019 SLE Classification Criteria were validated in an international cohort.

Objectives:

To evaluate performance characteristics of SLE classification systems in sex, race/ethnicity, and disease duration subsets.

Methods:

Sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR 2019, SLICC 2012 and ACR 1982/1997 criteria were evaluated in the validation cohort.

Results:

The cohort consisted of female (n=1098), male (n=172), Asian (n=118), Black (n=68), Hispanic (n=124) and White (n=941) patients; and patients with an SLE duration of 1-3 years (n=196), 3-5 years (n=157), and ≥5 years (n=879). Among patients with 1-3 years disease duration, the EULAR/ACR criteria had better sensitivity than the ACR criteria (97% (95%CI 92-99%) vs 81% (95%CI 72-88%). The new criteria performed well in men (sensitivity 93%, specificity 96%) and women (sensitivity 97%, specificity 94%). The new criteria had better sensitivity than the ACR criteria in White (95% vs 83%), Hispanic (100% vs 86%) and Asian patients (97% vs 77%).

Conclusion:

The EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria perform well in patients with early disease, and across sexes and ethnicities.

Disclosure of Interests:

Sindhu Johnson Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Merck, Bayer, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Ikaria, Ralph Brinks: None declared, Karen Costenbader Grant/research support from: Merck, Consultant of: Astra-Zeneca, David Daikh: None declared, Marta Mosca: None declared, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman: None declared, Josef S. Smolen Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche – grant/research support, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Astro, Celgene Corporation, Celtrion, Eli Lilly, Glaxo, ILTOO, Janssen, Medimmune, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, UCB – consultant, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Astro, Celgene Corporation, Celtrion, Eli Lilly, Glaxo, ILTOO, Janssen, Medimmune, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi, UCB – speaker, David Wofsy: None declared, Dimitrios Boumpas Grant/research support from: Unrestricted grant support from various pharmaceutical companies, Diane L Kamen Consultant of: Consulted on SLE survey development for Lilly and consulted on SLE trial protocol development for EMD Serono in 2019, David Jayne Grant/research support from: ChemoCentryx, GSK, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi-Genzyme, Consultant of: Astra-Zeneca, ChemoCentryx, GSK, InflaRx, Takeda, Insmed, Chugai, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Ricard Cervera: None declared, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau Grant/research support from: UCB to my institution, Betty Diamond: None declared, Dafna D Gladman Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., BMS, Celgene Corporation, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB – grant/research support, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen Inc., BMS, Celgene Corporation, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB – consultant, Bevra H. Hahn Grant/research support from: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Falk Hiepe: None declared, Soren Jacobsen: None declared, Dinesh Khanna Shareholder of: Eicos Sciences, Inc./Civi Biopharma, Inc., Grant/research support from: Dr Khanna was supported by NIH/NIAMS K24AR063120, Consultant of: Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Horizon Therapeutic, Galapagos, Roche/Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, UCB, Kirsten Lerstrom: None declared, Elena Massarotti: None declared, William Joseph McCune: None declared, Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza: None declared, Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero: None declared, Matthias Schneider: None declared, Murray B Urowitz: None declared, George Bertsias Grant/research support from: GSK, Consultant of: Novartis, Bimba F. Hoyer: None declared, Nicolai Leuchten: None declared, Chiara Tani: None declared, Sara Tedeschi: None declared, Zahi Touma: None declared, Gabriela Schmajuk Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Branimir Anic: None declared, Florence Assan: None declared, Tak Chan: None declared, Ann E Clarke: None declared, Mary K. Crow: None declared, László Czirják Consultant of: Actelion, BI, Roche-Genentech, Lilly, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, Bayer AG, Andrea Doria Consultant of: GSK, Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, Ely Lilly, Speakers bureau: UCB pharma, GSK, Pfizer, Janssen, Abbvie, Novartis, Ely Lilly, BMS, Winfried Graninger: None declared, Bernadett Halda-Kiss: None declared, Sarfaraz Hasni: None declared, Peter Izmirly: None declared, Michelle Jung: None declared, Gabor Kumanovics Consultant of: Boehringer, Teva, Speakers bureau: Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Xavier Mariette: None declared, Ivan Padjen: None declared, Jose M Pego-Reigosa: None declared, Juanita Romero-Diaz Consultant of: Biogen, Iñigo Rua-Figueroa: None declared, Raphaèle Seror Consultant of: BMS, Medimmune, Novartis, Pfizer, GSK, Lilly, Georg Stummvoll: None declared, Yoshiya Tanaka Grant/research support from: Asahi-kasei, Astellas, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, Takeda, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers, UCB, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Pfizer, and Ono, Consultant of: Abbvie, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, AbbVie, YL Biologics, Bristol-Myers, Takeda, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Eisai, Janssen, Sanofi, UCB, and Teijin, Maria Tektonidou Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, Novartis and Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, MSD, Novartis and Pfizer, Carlos Vasconcelos: None declared, Edward Vital Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, and Sandoz, Consultant of: AstraZeneca, GSK, Roche/Genentech, and Sandoz, Speakers bureau: Becton Dickinson and GSK, Daniel J Wallace: None declared, Sule Yavuz: None declared, Pier Luigi Meroni: None declared, Marvin Fritzler: None declared, Raymond Naden: None declared, Thomas Dörner Grant/research support from: Janssen, Novartis, Roche, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Roche, Janssen, EMD, Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Roche, Samsung, Janssen, Martin Aringer Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche

FRI0558 PREGNANCY OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS – A FIRST JOINT ANALYSIS OF A EUROPEAN COLLABORATION OF PREGNANCY REGISTERS

Background:

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) can affect women in their childbearing age. But data on pregnancy in axSpA patients are mainly retrospective and highly heterogeneous [1].

Objectives:

The aim of this analysis was to investigate pregnancy outcomes and health of live born children in women with axSpA in four prospective cohort studies.

Methods:

Data of European pregnancy registries that collaborate in the European Network of Pregnancy Registries in Rheumatology (EuNeP) were analysed: EGR2 (France), RePreg (Switzerland), RevNatus (Norway) and Rhekiss (Germany). Eligible women had a diagnosis of axSpA and a pregnancy outcome reported until June-September 2019. Data were analysed descriptively by every registry and provided to the coordinating centre.

Results:

A total of 328 pregnancies in 288 women were investigated. Mean age of patients ranged from 31 to 33 years. Disease duration (3-8 years) and proportion of patients with a positive HLA-B27 (64-74%) varied (Table 1). The axSpA diagnosis was either classified by ASAS criteria (fulfilment in EGR2: 93%, RePreg: 65%, RevNatus: 86%) or by ASAS criteria for axial/ peripheral SpA (Rhekiss: 81/ 34%). Rates for preterm birth were ≤5%, and congenital malformations were reported in 4 out of 287 neonates (Table 2).

Table 1.

Maternal and disease characteristics

EGR2 (FR)RePreg (CH)RevNatus (NO)Rhekiss (DE)# Pregnancies453116092# Patients443112588Age in years32.0 ± 4.231.4 ± 4.030.5 ± 4.533.2 ± 4.4Disease duration in years6.0 ± 5.67.7 ± 4.63.2 ± 3.36.2 ± 5.3HLA-B27 positive26 (66.7)23 (74.2)79 (71.2)54 (73.0)Pre-gestational diabetes001 (0.6)1 (1.4)IBD004 (2.6)5 (7.2)Uveitis003 (1.9)3 (4.3)BMI26.5 ± 4.822.6 ± 2.524.4 ± 4.323.4 ± 4.3

Results as mean ± SD or number (percentage)

Table 2.

Pregnancy characteristics, obstetric and neonatal outcomes

EGR2 (FR)RePreg (CH)RevNatus (NO)Rhekiss (DE)WGA at 1stvisit in pregnancy11.9 ± 8.219.7 ± 9.412.9 ± 5.713.4 ± 5.4Patients with 1 pregnancy43 (95.5)31 (100.0)101 (80.8)84 (95.5)Primigravidae18 (40.0)15 (48.4)47 (29.4)37 (45.1)Adverse events of interestPreeclampsia1 (4.4)04 (2.6)0Gestational diabetes4 (8.9)2 (6.5)n.a.5 (6.2)Pregnancy outcomes(5 Outcomes missing)(1 Outcome missing)Elective termination1 (2.2)02 (1.3)0Miscarriage (< WGA 20)2 (4.4)013 (8.4)4 (4.4)Pregnancy loss >WGA 202 (4.4)000Live birth40 (88.9)31 (100.0)140 (90.3)87 (95.6)Outcomes of live births# Neonates, singleton pregn.403013978$# Neonates, multiple pregn.0224Neonatal outcomes, only singleton pregnanciesWGA at delivery39.1 ± 1.239.5 ± 1.538.9 ± 2.339.4 ± 2.0Preterm birth006 (4.3)4 (5.4)Birth weight in g3253 ± 3953314 ± 5193446 ± 5263377 ± 522Congenital malformation00n.a.#4 (5.1)

Results as mean ± SD or number (percentage). WGA: gestational age in weeks

#Malformations can be retrieved by national birth registry with a lag time of 2 years.

$Missing information for 7 infants.

Conclusion:

Differences in study design and classification criteria result in slightly different patient populations in each registry. The outcome of pregnancies was favourable. Preterm birth rates are within rates reported by the WHO for the EU general population. However, a selection bias of rather planned and well-controlled pregnancies cannot be ruled out. This is the first collaborative analysis of the EuNeP registries. Descriptive data were combined, and will be – as a next step – pooled together.

Funding: This work was supported by a research grant from FOREUM Foundation for Research in Rheumatology.

References:

[1] Giovannopoulou E et al. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2017;13(3):162-9.

Disclosure of Interests:

Yvette Meißner Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau Grant/research support from: UCB to my institution, Frauke Förger Grant/research support from: Unrestricted grant from UCB, Consultant of: UCB, GSK, Roche, Speakers bureau: UCB, GSK, Doreen Goll: None declared, Anna Moltó Grant/research support from: Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Rebecca Özdemir: None declared, Marianne Wallenius: None declared, Anja Strangfeld Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Rebecca Fischer-Betz Consultant of: UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Novartis, Roche, UCB, Pfizer.

SAT0201 ASSOCIATION OF CARDIAC TROPONIN T MEASURED WITH A HIGHLY SENSITIVE ASSAY WITH CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (TROPOPLUS STUDY)

Background:

Mortality is still 2 to 5 times superior in SLE patients as compared to general population and is mainly due to cardiovascular event (CVE). Although cardiovascular traditional risk factors contribute to early-onset atherosclerosis in SLE, the phenomenon is not fully explained by a higher frequency of smoking habits, hypertension, or dyslipidemia and the Framingham risk equation usually underestimates the 10-year cardiovascular risk in this population. Thus, identification of biological markers able to better stratify cardiovascular risks in SLE patients is needed.

Objectives:

Our study aimed to determine whether serum cardiac troponin T measured with a highly sensitive assay (HS-cTnT) was associated with CVE in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients.

Methods:

All SLE patients included between 2007 and 2010 in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter PLUS trial were retrospectively screened. Patients with no past history of CVE and a follow-up period of > 20 months were analyzed. HS-cTnT concentration was measured using the electrochemiluminescence method on serum collected at PLUS inclusion. The primary outcome was the incident CVE. Factors associated with the primary outcome were identified and multivariate analysis was performed.

Results:

Overall, 442 SLE patients (of the 573 included in the PLUS study) were analyzed for the primary outcome with a median follow up of 110 (IQR: 99-120) months. Among them 29 (6.6%) experienced at least one CVE that occurred at a median of 67 (IQR: 31-91) months after inclusion. Six out of 29 patients had more than one CVE. In the multivariate analysis, dyslipidemia, duration of SLE disease and HS-cTnT were associated with the occurrence of CVE. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that a concentration of HS-cTnT>4.27 ng/L at inclusion increased by 2.7 (HR 2.7 [1.3-5.6], p=0.0083) the risk of CVE in SLE.

Conclusion:

HS-cTnT measured in serum is the first identified biomarker independently associated with incident CVE in SLE patients

Disclosure of Interests:

Julie Chezel: None declared, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau Grant/research support from: UCB to my institution, Diane Rouzaud: None declared, Véronique LE GUERN Grant/research support from: UCB for GR2 study (to our institution), Camille Gobeaux: None declared, Nathalie Morel: None declared, Micheline Pha: None declared, Zahir Amoura: None declared, Thomas Papo: None declared, karim sacre: None declared

THU0275 SEVERE PREECLAMPSIA RELATED TO ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME: AN EUROPEAN STUDY OF 40 WOMEN

Background:

One of the 3 features of obstetrical antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is severe preeclampsia (PE). Its time of occurrence, the associated risk of thromboses and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have not been reported yet.

Objectives:

We analyzed severe PE in a series of women with APS.

Methods:

We retrospectively collected data of female patients from 5 French internal medicine and 1 Italian rheumatology units. Inclusion criteria were: a severe PE/eclampsia(1), that occurred before 34 weeks of gestation (WG) in patients who met the APS classification criteria(2).

Results:

40 patients were enrolled (Table 1). Because of known APS/positive aPL/previous obstetrical complications, 23(57.5%) patients were treated during the index PE: 4 with low dose aspirin (LDA), 4 with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), and 15 with a combination of both. 7 patients were also treated with hydroxychloroquine, 8 with corticosteroids and 3 with immunosuppressants. 17(42.5%) patients received no treatment. 24(60%) live births were observed. During a follow-up period of 3 years, 26(65%) patients had at least 1 new pregnancy, with a total of 38 pregnancies which resulted in 33(86.8%) live births. 57.5% pregnancies who resulted in live births occurred without any maternal or fetal complications. All 26 patients who had at least 1 pregnancy after index PE were treated with LDA; LMWH was given at prophylactic and therapeutic dosage in 13(50%) patients, respectively. No patient experienced 3 consecutive miscarriages.

Table 1.

40 APS patients with severe PE

Overall features (n, %)Patients40 (100)Age at PE, (median, IQR)30.5 (27-33)PE term, WG (median, IQR)25.5 (23-29) Live births24 (60) Birth term, WG (median, IQR)25.5 (23.7-30.3) Associated SLE12 (30)Maternal complications (n, %)25 (62.5) HELLP18 (45) E6 (15) CAPS3 (7.5) Placental abruptions3 (7.5)Fetal complications (n, %)31 (77.5) IUGR18 (45) IUFD11 (2.5) Preterm delivery22 (55)Obstetrical history (n, %) Primiparous21 (52.5) Index PE before APS12 (30)Thrombosis (n, %) Thrombosis before PE index14 (35.0) Thrombosis after PE index2 (5.0)Abs at APS diagnosis (n, %) aPL triple positivity21 (52.5) IgG/IgM anti-cardiolipin34 (85.0) IgG/IgM anti-β2GPI25 (62.5) LAC33 (82.5)

Legend to Table 1:PE: preeclampsia; APS: antiphospholipid syndrome; IQR: interquartile range; WG: weeks of gestation; SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus; HELLP: Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet; E: eclampsia; CAPS: catastrophic APS; IUGR: intrauterine growth restriction; IUFD: intrauterine fetal death; CHB: congenital atrioventricular block; aPL: antiphospholipid antibodies; LAC: lupus anticoagulant.

Conclusion:

Among the APS criteria, “3 consecutive miscarriages criterion” was not found. The majority of patients also experienced thrombosis and SLE before the index PE.

References:

[1]Diagnosis and Management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. International Journal of Gynecology &Obestetrics 2002;77:67-75.

[2]Miyakis S, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost 2006;4:295e 306.

Disclosure of Interests:

Maddalena Larosa: None declared, Nathalie Morel: None declared, Meriem BELHOCINE: None declared, Amelia Ruffatti: None declared, Nicolas Martin Silva: None declared, Romain Paul: None declared, Luc Mouthon: None declared, Michel DREYFUS: None declared, Jean-Charles PIETTE: None declared, Odile Souchaud-Debouverie: None declared, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux: None declared, Vassilis Tsatsaris: None declared, Emmanuelle Pannier: None declared, Gaêlle Guettrot Imbert: None declared, Véronique LE GUERN Grant/research support from: UCB for GR2 study (to our institution), Andrea Doria Consultant of: GSK, Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, Ely Lilly, Speakers bureau: UCB pharma, GSK, Pfizer, Janssen, Abbvie, Novartis, Ely Lilly, BMS, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau Grant/research support from: UCB to my institution

[A rare cause of impaired general condition: Muscular and cardiac toxicity of antimalarials]

INTRODUCTION

This case report signifies the need to systemically assess antimalarial toxicity in those undergoing long-term treatment.

CASE REPORT

A 59-year-old man with a history of ischemic-labeled heart disease revealed by conduction disorders and cutaneous lupus treated initially with hydroxychloroquine followed by chloroquine consulted for asthenia and weight loss. Clinically, he had a muscular atrophy, a motor deficit, and an abolition of the osteo-tendinous reflexes in the lower limbs. Adverse drug effects of the antimalarial therapy were suspected-specifically, muscular and cardiac toxicity. The diagnosis was confirmed with a muscle biopsy, which showed typical and florid vacuolar myopathy. Cessation of the drug resulted in a slow regression of symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac and muscular toxicity related to antimalarials are rare and sometimes fatal; thus, they must be systematically assessed in a patient with several years of exposure. A muscle biopsy could be sufficient to allow for the diagnosis.