A micro-costing analysis of nutritional support for persons with TB and their families in India

Undernutrition is the leading risk factor for TB infection and death in India. We undertook a micro-costing analysis of a nutritional intervention for household contacts of people living with TB in Puducherry, India. We found that the total 6-month food cost for a family of four was USD4/day. We also identified several alternative regimens and cost-lowering strategies to encourage wider adoption of nutritional supplementation as a public health tool.

How much do Indians pay for tuberculosis treatment? A cost analysis

Setting

India's National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme (NTEP) covers diagnostic and therapeutic costs of TB treatment. However, persons living with TB (PLWTB) continue to experience financial distress due to direct costs (payment for testing, treatment, travel, hospitalization, and nutritional supplements) and indirect costs (lost wages, loan interest, and cost of domestic helpers).

Objective

To analyze the magnitude and pattern of TB-related costs from the perspective of Indian PLWTB.

Design

We identified relevant articles using key search terms ('tuberculosis,' 'India,' 'cost,' 'expenditures,' 'financing,' 'catastrophic' and 'out of pocket') and calculated variance-weighted mean costs.

Results

Indian patients incur substantial direct costs (mean: US$46.8). Mean indirect costs (US$666.6) constitute 93.4% of the net costs. Mean direct costs before diagnosis can be up to four-fold that of costs during treatment. Treatment in the private sector can result in costs up to six-fold higher than in government facilities. As many as one in three PLWTB in India experience catastrophic costs.

Conclusion

PLWTB in India face high direct and indirect costs. Priority interventions to realize India's goal of eliminating catastrophic costs from TB include decreasing diagnostic delays through active case finding, reducing the need for travel, improving awareness and perception of NTEP services, and ensuring sufficient reimbursement for inpatient TB care.

QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube reliability for immigrants with parasitic infections in Boston, USA

<sec id="st1"> <title>SETTING</title> Accurate testing and treatment for latent tuberculous infection is necessary for tuberculosis elimination. Certain parasite infections are associated with increased tuberculin skin test positivity; species-specific effects on QuantiFERON^®-TB Gold In-Tube (QGIT) have not been described. </sec> <sec id="st2"> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> To determine whether infection with helminths or protozoa affects QGIT results. </sec> <sec id="st3"> <title>DESIGN</title> We retrospectively analyzed QGIT and parasite testing results for immigrants screened in Boston, MA, USA, from 2012 to 2017. We also prospectively measured cytokines in QGIT supernatants for a subset (n = 68) with 1) helminths, 2) Blastocystis hominis, 3) other protozoa, and 4) no parasites. </sec> <sec id="st4"> <title>RESULTS</title> Of 527 immigrants screened, 141 (26.8%) were QGIT-positive and 229 (43.4%) had parasites detected: 27/527 (5.1%) had helminths and 202/527 (38.3%) protozoa. Cytokine analysis revealed increased interleukin-10 concentrations with protozoa (P = 0.04), and non-significantly higher T-helper 2 concentrations with helminths compared with no parasites. No significant differences emerged in QGIT positivity or interferon-gamma concentrations in any group. </sec> <sec id="st5"> <title>CONCLUSION</title> Study results support the use of QGIT in parasite-endemic settings. </sec>.

Low body mass index and latent tuberculous infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The well-documented association between underweight and increased incidence of active tuberculosis (TB) has not been extended to incidence or prevalence of latent tuberculous infection (LTBI).

DESIGN

After identifying studies that reported a categorical measure of body mass index (BMI) and used the tuberculin skin test (TST) or QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT) to measure LTBI, a maximum likelihood random-effects model was used to examine the pooled association between LTBI and low BMI (<18.5 kg/m2), compared with 1) normal BMI (18.5-25 kg/m2) and 2) a complementary group of all others, i.e., non-underweight subjects (BMI 18.5 kg/m2).

RESULTS

Among studies using TST, the odds ratios (ORs) showed a slight, non-statistically significant decrease in the odds of TST positivity in underweight persons compared with both groups (non-underweight, OR 0.88, 95%CI 0.73-1.05; normal weight, OR 0.96, 95%CI 0.77-1.20). Among studies using QFT, the OR suggested slightly decreased, yet non-significant, odds of QFT positivity in underweight compared with non-underweight subjects (OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.68-1.26), and significantly decreased odds of QFT positivity in underweight compared with normal weight subjects (OR 0.84, 95%CI 0.73-0.98).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that underweight persons are not at an increased risk of LTBI. Screening this population for LTBI would not increase the yield of identified LTBI.

Effectiveness of reporting on latent tuberculous infection in Massachusetts, 2006-2008

Massachusetts is one of five states that mandate the reporting of latent tuberculous infection (LTBI). We assessed 2006-2008 Massachusetts surveillance data for LTBI to describe the system and examine the characteristics of persons with LTBI. Over 3 years, 15 301 LTBI cases were reported (4742-5398/year). Among those with known country of birth (n = 11 655), 9983 (85.7%) were foreign-born. Substantial under-ascertainment and/or under-reporting appear likely; mandatory reporting does not appear sufficient for LTBI detection. Enhanced targeted testing, active LTBI surveillance, or laboratory-based surveillance may be needed to eliminate tuberculosis disease in the United States.