1
|
Covington S, Strand N, Pew S, Dawodu A, Dunn T, Johnson B, Hand B, Abd-Elsayed A. Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Neck Surgery Syndrome. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2024:10.1007/s11916-024-01214-w. [PMID: 38308745 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01214-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Cervical spine pain with or without radicular symptoms is a common condition leading to high utilization of the healthcare system with over 10 million medical visits per year. Many patients undergo surgical interventions and unfortunately are still left with neck and upper extremity pain, sometimes referred to as "Failed Neck Surgery Syndrome." When these options fail, cervical spinal cord stimulation can be a useful tool to decrease pain and suffering as well as reduce prescription medication use. RECENT FINDINGS Spinal cord stimulation is a well-established therapy for chronic back and leg pain and is becoming more popular for neck and upper extremity pain. Recent studies have explored cervical spinal cord stimulation with successful outcomes regarding improved pain scores, functional outcomes, and reduction of prescription medication use. Continued research into cervical spinal cord stimulation is essential for maximizing its therapeutic potential for patients with chronic neck and upper extremity pain. This review highlights the importance of cervical spinal cord stimulation as an option for patients with failed neck surgery syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Covington
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| | - N Strand
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - S Pew
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - A Dawodu
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - T Dunn
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - B Johnson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - B Hand
- Mayo Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - A Abd-Elsayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maloney J, Strand N, Wie C, Pew S, Dawodu A, Dunn T, Johnson B, Eells A, Viswanath O, Freeman J, Covington S. Current Review of Regenerative Medicine Therapies for Spine-Related Pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2023:10.1007/s11916-023-01194-3. [PMID: 38112985 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01194-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Persistent spinal pain syndromes are pervasive and lead to functional impairment, increased healthcare utilization, potential disability, and high societal costs. Spinal (cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacroiliac joint) pain includes mechanical, degenerative, inflammatory, oncologic, and infectious etiologies. Regenerative medicine is a novel biotechnology targeting mechanical, degenerative, and inflammatory conditions believed to cause pain. Preparations including platelet-rich plasma, mesenchymal stem cells (adipose tissue and bone marrow aspirate concentrates), and growth factors are derived from an autologous donor. The goal of intervention through guided injection of the regenerative media is to reduce inflammation and reverse the degenerative cascade in hopes of restoring normal cellular composition (physiologic homeostasis) and anatomical function to improve pain and function. The authors review limited research supporting the use of platelet-rich plasma injections for facet joint arthropathy and sacroiliac joint pain compared to traditional steroid treatments, as well as the use of platelet rich plasma or mesenchymal stem cells for lumbar discogenic and radicular pain. RECENT FINDINGS Current evidence to support regenerative medicine for spine-related pain is limited. Although several studies demonstrated a reduction in pain, many of these studies had a small number of participants and were case series or prospective trials. Regenerative medicine treatments lack evidence for the treatment of spine-related pain. Large randomized controlled trials are needed with consistent study protocols to make further recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jillian Maloney
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| | - N Strand
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - C Wie
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - S Pew
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - A Dawodu
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - T Dunn
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - B Johnson
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - A Eells
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - O Viswanath
- Innovative Pain and Wellness, LSU Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - J Freeman
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - S Covington
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Strand N, Wie C, Peck J, Maita M, Singh N, Dumbroff J, Tieppo Francio V, Murphy M, Chang K, Dickerson DM, Maloney J. Correction to: Small Fiber Neuropathy. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:439. [PMID: 35460493 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01050-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- N Strand
- Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| | - C Wie
- Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - J Peck
- Performing Arts Medicine Department, Shenandoah University, Winchester, USA
| | - M Maita
- Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - N Singh
- OrthoAlabama Spine and Sports, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - J Dumbroff
- Mount Sinai Morningside and West Department of Anesthiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - V Tieppo Francio
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - M Murphy
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - K Chang
- Department of Anesthiology and Critical Care, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - D M Dickerson
- NorthShore University Healthsystem, Evanston, IL, USA
- University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - J Maloney
- Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Strand N, Wie C, Peck J, Maita M, Singh N, Dumbroff J, Tieppo Francio V, Murphy M, Chang K, Dickerson DM, Maloney J. Small Fiber Neuropathy. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:429-438. [PMID: 35384587 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01044-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This narrative review aims to summarize advances in the field of small fiber neuropathy made over the last decade, with emphasis on novel research highlighting the distinctive features of SFN. RECENT FINDINGS While the management of SFNs is ideally aimed at treating the underlying cause, most patients will require pain control via multiple, concurrent therapies. Herein, we highlight the most up-to-date information for diagnosis, medication management, interventional management, and novel therapies on the horizon. Despite the prevalence of small fiber neuropathies, there is no clear consensus on guidelines specific for the treatment of SFN. Despite the lack of specific guidelines for SFN treatment, the most recent general neuropathic pain guidelines are based on Cochrane studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which have individually examined therapies used for the more commonly studied SFNs, such as painful diabetic neuropathy and HIV neuropathy. The recommendations from current guidelines are based on variables such as number needed to treat (NNT), safety, ease of use, and effect on quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Strand
- Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| | - C Wie
- Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - J Peck
- Performing Arts Medicine Department, Shenandoah University, Winchester, USA
| | - M Maita
- Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - N Singh
- OrthoAlabama Spine and Sports, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - J Dumbroff
- Mount Sinai Morningside and West Department of Anesthesiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - V Tieppo Francio
- Department of Rehabilitation on Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - M Murphy
- Department of Rehabilitation on Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - K Chang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - D M Dickerson
- NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
- University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago,, IL, USA
| | - J Maloney
- Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Selander H, Strand N, Almberg M, Lidestam B. Ready for a Learner's Permit? Clinical Neuropsychological Off-road Tests and Driving Behaviors in a Simulator among Adolescents with ADHD and ASD. Dev Neurorehabil 2021; 24:256-265. [PMID: 33459571 DOI: 10.1080/17518423.2020.1869339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
A simulator driving test (SDT) and two neuropsychological tests, the Useful Field of View (UFOV) test and the Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) were evaluated with regard to validity for fitness to drive on 51 young clients diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), 33 of whom also had autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and 38 adolescents without a neurodevelopmental diagnosis. The results show generally much greater variability and significantly poorer performance in the SDT and the TOVA for clients with ADHD/ASD compared with the control group. The SDT results were strongly intratest correlated, but had no interest correlation with either the UFOV test or the TOVA. The greater variability among clients with ADHD/ASD suggests greater effort and susceptibility to motivational issues and decline in sustained attention over several tests. In conclusion, the SDT is sensitive and has good face validity, and the TOVA is sensitive to neuropsychological aspects of safe driving. The SDT and the TOVA thus complement each other, and discrepancy between test scores calls for special consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Selander
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Driver and vehicle, Gothenburg, Swedish National Transport Research Institute, Sweden
| | - N Strand
- Division Digital Systems, Department Mobility and Systems, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - M Almberg
- Mobilitetscenter, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - B Lidestam
- Driver and vehicle, Gothenburg, Swedish National Transport Research Institute, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Strand N, Burkhardi C, Collins J, Mosca L. 214 CORRELATES OF SUCCESSFUL LIFESTYLE MODIFICATION FOLLOWING A CARDIAC REHABILITATION PROGRAM. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993. [DOI: 10.1249/00005768-199305001-00216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
7
|
Strand N. [Discussion from the book "Patient, nurse, physician... whose need?" Whose interest do we have in mind with the performance of patient care?]. Sygeplejersken 1978; 78:18-20. [PMID: 249085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
8
|
Trussell PM, Strand N. A comparison of concurrent and retrospective audits on the same patients. J Nurs Adm 1978; 8:33-8. [PMID: 246914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|