1
|
Bushra A, Sulieman A, Edam A, Tamam N, Babikir E, Alrihaima N, Alfaki E, Babikir S, Almujally A, Otayni A, Alkhorayef M, Abdelradi A, Bradley DA. Patient's effective dose and performance assessment of computed radiography systems. Appl Radiat Isot 2023; 193:110627. [PMID: 36584412 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Computed tomography is widely used for planar imaging. Previous studies showed that CR systems involve higher patient radiation doses compared to digital systems. Therefore, assessing the patient's dose and CR system performance is necessary to ensure that patients received minimal dose with the highest possible image quality. The study was performed at three medical diagnostic centers in Sudan: Medical Corps Hospital (MCH), Advance Diagnostic Center (ADC), and Advance Medical Center (AMC). The following tools were used in this study: Tape measure, Adhesive tape, 1.5 mm copper filtration (>10 × 10 cm), TO 20 threshold contrast test object, Resolution test object (e.g., Huttner 18), MI geometry test object or lead ruler, Contact mish, Piranha (semiconductor detector), Small lead or copper block (∼5 × 5 cm), and Steel ruler, to do a different type of tests (Dark Noise, Erasure cycle efficiency, Sensitivity Index calibration, Sensitivity Index consistency, Uniformity, Scaling errors, Blurring, Limiting spatial Resolution, Threshold, and Laser beam Function. Entrance surface air kerma (ESAK (mGy) was calculated from patient exposure parameters using DosCal software for three imaging modalities. A total of 199 patients were examined (112 chest X rays, 77 lumbar spine). The mean and standard deviation (sd) for patients ESAK (mGy) were 2.56 ± 0.1 mGy and 1.6 mGy for the Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral projections for the lumbar spine, respectively. The mean and sd for the patient's chest doses were 0.1 ± 0.01 for the chest X-ray procedures. The three medical diagnostic centers' CR system performance was evaluated and found that all of the three centers have good CR system functions. All the centers satisfy all the criteria of acceptable visual tests. CR's image quality and sensitivity were evaluated, and the CR image is good because it has good contrast and resolution. All the CR system available in the medical centers and upgraded from old X-ray systems to new systems, has been found to work well. The patient's doses were comparable for the chest X-ray procedures, while patients' doses from the lumbar spine showed variation up to 2 folds due to the variation in patients' weight and X-ray machine setting. Patients dose optimization is recommended to ensure the patients received a minimal dose while obtaining the diagnostic findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bushra
- Radiation Safety Institute, Sudan Atomic Energy Commission, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - A Sulieman
- Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Radiology and Medical Imaging Department, P.O.Box 422, Alkharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
| | - A Edam
- Radiation Safety Institute, Sudan Atomic Energy Commission, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - N Tamam
- Physics Department, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia
| | - E Babikir
- Radiologic Technology Program, Allied Health Department, College of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Bahrain, Bahrain
| | - N Alrihaima
- Radiation Safety Institute, Sudan Atomic Energy Commission, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - E Alfaki
- Radiation Safety Institute, Sudan Atomic Energy Commission, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - S Babikir
- Radiation Safety Institute, Sudan Atomic Energy Commission, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - A Almujally
- Department of Biomedical Physics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Otayni
- Radiology Department, King Khaled Hospital and Prince Sultan Center for Health Care, Ministry of Health, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - M Alkhorayef
- Department of Radiological Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, P.O Box 10219, Riyadh, 11433, Saudi Arabia
| | - A Abdelradi
- Radiation Safety Institute, Sudan Atomic Energy Commission, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - D A Bradley
- Centre for Nuclear and Radiation Physics, Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK; Centre for Applied Physics and Radiation Technologies, School of Engineering and Technology, Sunway University, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Johary YH, Albarakati S, AlSohaim A, Aamry A, Aamri H, Tamam N, Salah H, Tahir D, Alkhorayef M, Sulieman A, Bradley D. Evaluation occupationally radiation exposure during diagnostic imaging examinations. Appl Radiat Isot 2023; 193:110648. [PMID: 36669265 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.110648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Occupational radiation exposure can occur due to various human activities, including the use of radiation in medicine. Occupationally exposed personnel surpassing 7.4 millions, and respresent the biggest single group of employees who are exposed to artificial radiation sources at work. This study compares the occupational radiation dose levels for 145 workers in four different hospitals located in the Aseer region in Saudi Arabia. The occupational exposure was quantified using thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLD-100). The levels of annual occupational exposures in targeted hospitals were calculated and compared with the levels of the international atomic energy agency (IAEA) Safety Standards. An average yearly cumulative dose for the two consecutive years. The average, highest and lowest resulted occupational doses under examination in this work is 1.42, 3.9 mSv and 0.72 for workers in various diagnostic radiology procedures. The resulted annual effective dose were within the IAEA approved yearly dose limit for occupational exposure of workers over 18, which is 20 mSv. Staff should be monitored on a regular basis, according to current practice, because their annual exposure may surpass 15% of the annual effective doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yehia H Johary
- Radiation Protection Department, General Directorate of Health Affairs in Aseer Region, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sultan Albarakati
- Radiation Protection Department, General Directorate of Health Affairs in Aseer Region, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah AlSohaim
- Radiation Protection Department, General Directorate of Health Affairs in Aseer Region, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ali Aamry
- Medical Imaging Administration, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Hussin Aamri
- Medical Physics Department, King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - N Tamam
- Department of Physics, College of Science, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hassan Salah
- INAYA Medical Collage, Nuclear Medicine Department, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dahlang Tahir
- Department of Physics, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, 90245, Indonesia
| | - Mohammed Alkhorayef
- Department of Radiological Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, P.O Box 10219, Riyadh, 11433, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdelmoneim Sulieman
- Radiology and Medical Imaging Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, P.O.Box 422, Alkharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia
| | - David Bradley
- Centre for Nuclear and Radiation Physics, Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK; Centre for Applied Physics and Radiation Technologies, School of Engineering and Technology, Sunway University, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Salah H, Rabbaa M, Abuljoud M, Babikir E, Alkhorayef M, Tamam N, Tahir D, Sulieman A, Bradley DA. Paediatric effective radiation doses during brain computed tomography angiography procedure. Appl Radiat Isot 2023; 192:110610. [PMID: 36525913 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
In comparison to adults and paediatric are more sensitive to ionizing radiation exposure. Computed tomography (CT) is now the dominant source of medical radiologic tests for patients, accounting for more than 70% of total doses to the general public. Paediatric CT brain scans (with and without contrast) are routinely performed for a variety of clinical reasons. As a result, this parameter must be calculated in order to determine relative radiation risk. The goal of this study is to assess the radiation risk to children during CT brain diagnostic procedures. Three hundred fifty three child patients' radiation risk doses were assessed over the course of a year. The mean and ranged of the children's radiation doses were 40.6 ± 8.8 (27.8-45.8) CTDIvol (mGy) and 850 ± 230 (568.1-1126.4) DLP (mGy.cm) for the brain with contrast medium. For CT brain without contrast, the patients' doses were 40.9 ± 9.4 (14.27-64.07) CTDIvol (mGy), and 866.1 ± 289.3 (203.6-2484.9) DLP (mGy.cm). The characteristics related to the radiation dose were retrieved from the scan protocol generated by the CT system by the participating physicians after each procedure. Furthermore, optimizing the CT acquisition parameter is critical for increasing the benefit while lowering the procedure's radiogenic risk. The patients' radiation dose is comparable with the most previously published studies and international diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). Radiation dose optimization is recommended due to high sensitivity of the paediatric patients to ionizing radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Salah
- INAYA Medical Collage, Nuclear Medicine Department, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; College of Medical Radiologic Science, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Khartoum, Sudan.
| | - Mohammad Rabbaa
- Radiology Department, Riyadh Care Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - E Babikir
- Radiologic Technology Program, College of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Bahrain, Sakhir Campus, Zallaq, P.O. Box 32038, Bahrain
| | - M Alkhorayef
- Department of Radiological Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, P.O Box 10219, Riyadh, 11433, Saudi Arabia
| | - N Tamam
- Department of Physics, College of Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dahlang Tahir
- Department of Physics, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, 90245, Indonesia
| | - A Sulieman
- Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Radiology and Medical Imaging Department, P.O. Box 422, Alkharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia
| | - D A Bradley
- Centre for Nuclear and Radiation Physics, Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom; Centre for Applied Physics and Radiation Technologies, School of Engineering and Technology, Sunway University, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ahmed A, Ali M, Salah H, Eisa RE, Mohieldin H, Omer H, Sulieman A, Tamam N, Bradley D. Evaluation of uptake values of FDG: Body surface area Vs. body weight correction. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
5
|
Sulieman A, Tamam N, Elnour A, Alkhorayef M, Babikir E, Al-Mohammed H, Abuhadi N, Khandaker MU, A.Bradley D. Effective radiation dose and radiogenic cancer risk during contrast enhanced abdominal computed tomography examinations. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
6
|
Almujally A, Tamam N, Sulieman A, Doung TT, Omer H, Abuhadi N, Salah H, Mattar E, Khandaker MU, Bradley D. Evaluation of paediatric computed tomography imaging for brain, abdomen procedures. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
7
|
Osman E, Sulieman A, Alzimami K, Tamam N, Jambi LK, Babikir E, Abd-Elghany AA, Abuzaid M, Omer H, Bradley D. Radiation exposure during therapeutic cardiac interventional procedures. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
8
|
Edam A, Sulieman A, Tamam N, Abuelhaia E, Salih I, Sam A, Yousef M, Alkhorayef M, Bradley D. Current Sudan protective practice in diagnostic nuclear medicine and patient dose. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
9
|
Sulieman A, Adam H, Elnour A, Tamam N, Alhaili A, Alkhorayef M, Alghamdi S, Khandaker MU, Bradley D. Patient radiation dose reduction using a commercial iterative reconstruction technique package. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|