Histomorphometric and microarchitectural analysis of bone in metastatic breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Despite widespread use of repeated doses of potent bone-targeting agents (BTA) in oncology patients, relatively little is known about their in vivo effects on bone homeostasis, bone quality, and bone architecture. Traditionally bone quality has been assessed using a trans-iliac bone biopsy with a 7 mm "Bordier" core needle. We examined the feasibility of using a 2 mm "Jamshidi™" core needle as a more practical and less invasive technique.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic breast cancer on BTAs were divided according to the extent of bone metastases. They were given 2 courses of tetracycline labeling and then underwent a posterior trans-iliac trephine biopsy and bone marrow aspirate. Samples were analyzed for the extent of tumor invasion and parameters of bone turnover and bone formation by histomorphometry.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were accrued, 1 had no bone metastases, 3 had limited bone metastases (LSM) (<3 lesions) and 7 had extensive bone metastases (ESM) (>3 lesions). Most of the primary tumors were estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) positive. The procedure was well tolerated. The sample quality was sufficient to analyze bone trabecular structure and bone turnover by histomorphometry in 11 out of 12 patients. There was a good correlation between imaging data and morphometric analysis of tumor invasion. Patients with no evidence or minimal bone metastases had no evidence of tumor invasion. Most had suppressed bone turnover and no detectable bone formation when treated with BTA. In contrast, 6 out of 7 patients with extensive bone invasion by imaging and evidence of tumor cells in the marrow had intense osteoclastic activity as measured by the number of osteoclasts. Of these 7 patients with ESM, 6 were treated with BTA with 5 showing resistance to BTA as demonstrated by the high number of osteoclasts present. 3 of these 6 patients had active bone formation. Based on osteoblast activity and bone formation, 3 out of 6 patients with ESM responded to BTA compared to all 3 with LSM. Compared to untreated patients, all patients treated with BTA showed a trend towards suppression of bone formation, as measured by tetracycline labelling. There was also a trend towards a significant difference between ESM and LSM treated with BTA, highly suggestive of resistance although limited by the small sample size.

DISCUSSION

Our results indicate that trans-iliac bone biopsy using a 2 mm trephine shows excellent correlation between imaging assessment of tumor invasion and tumor burden by morphometric analysis of bone tissues. In addition, our approach provides additional mechanistic information on therapeutic response to BTA supporting the current clinical understanding that the majority of patients with extensive bone involvement eventually fail to suppress bone turnover (Petrut B, et al. 2008). This suggests that antiresorptive therapies become less effective as disease progresses.

Association of clinical factors and recent anticancer therapy with COVID-19 severity among patients with cancer: a report from the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer may be at high risk of adverse outcomes from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We analyzed a cohort of patients with cancer and coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) to identify prognostic clinical factors, including laboratory measurements and anticancer therapies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with active or historical cancer and a laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis recorded between 17 March and 18 November 2020 were included. The primary outcome was COVID-19 severity measured on an ordinal scale (uncomplicated, hospitalized, admitted to intensive care unit, mechanically ventilated, died within 30 days). Multivariable regression models included demographics, cancer status, anticancer therapy and timing, COVID-19-directed therapies, and laboratory measurements (among hospitalized patients).

RESULTS

A total of 4966 patients were included (median age 66 years, 51% female, 50% non-Hispanic white); 2872 (58%) were hospitalized and 695 (14%) died; 61% had cancer that was present, diagnosed, or treated within the year prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. Older age, male sex, obesity, cardiovascular and pulmonary comorbidities, renal disease, diabetes mellitus, non-Hispanic black race, Hispanic ethnicity, worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, recent cytotoxic chemotherapy, and hematologic malignancy were associated with higher COVID-19 severity. Among hospitalized patients, low or high absolute lymphocyte count; high absolute neutrophil count; low platelet count; abnormal creatinine; troponin; lactate dehydrogenase; and C-reactive protein were associated with higher COVID-19 severity. Patients diagnosed early in the COVID-19 pandemic (January-April 2020) had worse outcomes than those diagnosed later. Specific anticancer therapies (e.g. R-CHOP, platinum combined with etoposide, and DNA methyltransferase inhibitors) were associated with high 30-day all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical factors (e.g. older age, hematological malignancy, recent chemotherapy) and laboratory measurements were associated with poor outcomes among patients with cancer and COVID-19. Although further studies are needed, caution may be required in utilizing particular anticancer therapies.

CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER

NCT04354701.

Economic evaluation of adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer and residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant taxane and trastuzumab-based treatment in Canada

Background

In the katherine trial, adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine [T-DM1, Kadcyla (Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, U.S.A.)], compared with trastuzumab, significantly reduced the risk of recurrence or death by 50% (unstratified hazard ratio: 0.50; 95% confidence interval: 0.39 to 0.64; p < 0.0001) in patients with her2-positive early breast cancer (ebc) and residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant systemic treatment. A cost-utility evaluation, with probabilistic analyses, was conducted to examine the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (qaly) gained associated with T-DM1 relative to trastuzumab, given the higher per-cycle cost of T-DM1.

Methods

A Markov model comprising a number of health states was used to examine clinical and economic outcomes over a lifetime horizon from the Canadian public payer perspective. Patients entered the model in the invasive disease-free survival (idfs) state, where they received either T-DM1 or trastuzumab. Transition probabilities between the health states were derived from the katherine trial, Canadian life tables, and published literature from other relevant clinical trials (emilia, cleopatra, and M77001). Resource use, costs, and utilities were derived from katherine, other clinical trials, published literature, provincial fee schedules, and clinical expert opinion. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for key assumptions and model parameters.

Results

Compared with trastuzumab, adjuvant T-DM1 was associated with a cost savings of $8,300 per patient and a 2.16 incremental qaly gain; thus T-DM1 dominated trastuzumab. Scenario analyses yielded similar results, with T-DM1 dominating trastuzumab or producing highly favourable incremental cost-utility ratios of less than $10,000 per qaly.

Conclusions

Adjuvant T-DM1 monotherapy is a cost-effective strategy compared with trastuzumab alone in the treatment of patients with her2-positive ebc and residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant systemic treatment.

Incretin-based drugs and risk of lung cancer among individuals with type 2 diabetes

AIM

To assess whether dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are associated with an increased lung cancer risk among individuals with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. We identified 130 340 individuals newly treated with antidiabetes drugs between January 2007 and March 2017, with follow-up until March 2018. We used a time-varying approach to model use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists compared with use of other second- or third-line antidiabetes drugs. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios, with 95% CIs, of incident lung cancer associated with use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, separately, by cumulative duration of use, and by time since initiation.

RESULTS

A total of 790 individuals were newly diagnosed with lung cancer (median follow-up 4.6 years, incidence rate 1.5/1000 person-years, 95% CI 1.4-1.6). Compared with use of second-/third-line drugs, use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists was not associated with an increased lung cancer risk (hazard ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.87-1.32, and hazard ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.68-1.54, respectively). There was no evidence of duration-response relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

In individuals with type 2 diabetes, use of incretin-based drugs was not associated with increased lung cancer risk.

A survey of health care professionals and oncology patients at the McGill University Health Centre reveals enthusiasm for establishing a postmortem rapid tissue donation program

Background

In the early developmental phase of a postmortem rapid tissue donation (rtd) program for patients with metastatic cancer, we surveyed health care professionals (hcps) and oncology patients at the McGill University Health Centre (muhc) to assess their knowledge and attitudes pertaining to rtd from metastatic cancer patients for research purposes.

Methods

A 23-item survey was developed and distributed to hcps at tumour board meetings, and a related 26-item survey was developed and distributed to oncology patients at the muhc Cedars Cancer Centre.

Results

The survey attracted participation from 73 hcps, including 37 attending physicians, and 102 oncology patients. Despite the fact that 88% of hcps rated their knowledge of rtd as none or limited, 42% indicated that they would feel comfortable discussing rtd with their cancer patients. Of the responding hcps, 67% indicated that their current knowledge of rtd would affect their decision to discuss such a program with patients, which implies the importance of education for hcps to facilitate enrolment of patients into a rtd program. Of responding patients, 78% indicated that they would not be uncomfortable if their doctor discussed rtd with them, and 61% indicated that they would like it if their doctor were to discuss rtd with them. The hcps and patients felt that the best time for patients to be approached about consenting to a rtd program would be at the transition to palliative care when no treatment options remain.

Conclusions

At the muhc, hcps and patients are generally enthusiastic about adopting a rtd program for patients with metastatic cancer. Education of hcps and patients will be an important determinant of the program's success.

Aromatase inhibitors and the risk of colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women with breast cancer

Background

A large trial of postmenopausal women with breast cancer reported an imbalance in colorectal cancer events with aromatase inhibitors (AIs), compared with tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting. This unexpected signal was observed within 3 years of randomization. To date, no observational studies have examined this important safety question in the natural setting of clinical practice. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine whether AIs, when compared with tamoxifen, are associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Patients and methods

Using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we identified women, at least 55 years of age, with breast cancer newly treated with either AIs or tamoxifen between 1 January 1996 and 30 September 2015, with follow-up until 30 September 2016. High-dimensional propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of incident colorectal cancer associated with AIs when compared with tamoxifen overall, by cumulative duration of use, and time since initiation. All exposures were lagged by 1 year for latency considerations.

Results

A total of 9701 and 8893 patients initiated AIs and tamoxifen as first-line hormonal therapy (median follow-up of 2.4 and 2.9 years, respectively). Compared with tamoxifen, AIs were not associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (incidence rates of 150 per 100 000 person-years in both groups; adjusted HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.53-1.52). Similarly, there was no evidence of an association with cumulative duration of use (P-heterogeneity = 0.54), and time since initiation (P-heterogeneity = 0.66).

Conclusions

In this first population-based study, the use of AIs was not associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. These findings should provide reassurance to the concerned stakeholders.

Cardiotoxicity of aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been associated with cardiovascular disease in adjuvant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing these drugs to tamoxifen. However, it is unclear whether this risk is real or due to cardioprotective effects of tamoxifen. To address this question, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all RCTs of AIs and tamoxifen in adjuvant and extended adjuvant setting.

Patients and methods

We searched PubMed, Embase (OVID), Cochrane CENTRAL, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to June 2016 for all RCTs comparing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular safety of AIs to tamoxifen, AIs to placebo or no-treatment, or tamoxifen to placebo or no-treatment in the adjuvant or extended adjuvant setting. Relative risks (RRs) were pooled using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models with analyses stratified by RCT design.

Results

A total of 19 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis (n  =  62 345). In the adjuvant setting, AIs were associated with a 19% (RR: 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.34) increased risk of cardiovascular events compared with tamoxifen. AIs were not associated with an increased risk compared with placebo in the extended-adjuvant setting (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.85-1.20). In the adjuvant setting, tamoxifen was associated with a 33% (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.45-0.98) decreased risk compared with placebo or no-treatment. The results from extended adjuvant RCTs comparing tamoxifen to placebo were inconclusive but suggestive of a small protective effect (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.77-1.07).

Conclusions

The increased risk of cardiovascular events with AIs relative to tamoxifen is likely the result of cardioprotective effects of the latter. This new evidence should be considered when assessing the benefits and risks of AIs in the treatment of breast cancer.

Can the referring surgeon enhance accrual of breast cancer patients to medical and radiation oncology trials? The ENHANCE study

INTRODUCTION

The accrual rate to clinical trials in oncology remains low. In this exploratory pilot study, we prospectively assessed the role that engaging a referring surgeon plays in enhancing nonsurgical oncologic clinical trial accrual.

METHODS

Newly diagnosed breast cancer patients were seen by a surgeon who actively introduced specific patient-and physician-centred strategies to increase clinical trial accrual. Patient-centred strategies included providing patients, before their oncology appointment, with information about specific clinical trials for which they might be eligible, as evaluated by the surgeon. The attitudes of the patients about clinical trials and the interventions used to improve accrual were assessed at the end of the study. The primary outcome was the clinical trial accrual rate during the study period.

RESULTS

Overall clinical trial enrolment during the study period among the 34 participating patients was 15% (5 of 34), which is greater than the institution's historical average of 7%. All patients found the information delivered by the surgeon before the oncology appointment to be very helpful. Almost three quarters of the patients (73%) were informed about clinical trials by their oncologist. The top reasons for nonparticipation reported by the patients who did not participate in clinical trials included lack of interest (35%), failure of the oncologist to mention clinical trials (33%), and inconvenience (19%).

CONCLUSIONS

Accrual of patients to clinical trials is a complex multistep process with multiple potential barriers. The findings of this exploratory pilot study demonstrate a potential role for the referring surgeon in enhancing nonsurgical clinical trial accrual.

A randomized, double-blind, phase II, exploratory trial evaluating the palliative benefit of either continuing pamidronate or switching to zoledronic acid in patients with high-risk bone metastases from breast cancer

Previous studies suggest switching from pamidronate to a more potent bone-targeted agent is associated with biomarker and palliative response in breast cancer patients with bone metastases. Until now, this has not been addressed in a double-blind, randomized trial. Breast cancer patients with high-risk bone metastases, despite >3 months of pamidronate, were randomized to either continue pamidronate or switch to zoledronic acid every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a fall in serum C-telopeptide (sCTx) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included difference in mean sCTx, pain scores, quality of life, toxicity, and skeletal-related events (SREs). Seventy-three patients entered the study; median age 61 years (range 37-87). Proportion of patients achieving a fall in sCTx over the 12-week evaluation period was 26/32 (81 %) with zoledronic acid and 18/29 (62 %) with pamidronate (p = 0.095). Mean decrease in sCTx (mean difference between groups = 50 ng/L, 95 % CI 18-84; p = 0.003) was significantly greater in patients who received zoledronic acid. Quality of life, pain scores, toxicity, and frequency of new SREs were comparable between the two arms. While a switch from pamidronate to zoledronic acid resulted in reduction in mean sCTx, there were no significant differences between the arms for proportion of patients achieving a reduction in sCTx, quality of life, pain scores, toxicity or SREs. Given the lack of palliative improvement, the current data do not support a switching strategy.

Establishing a clinic-based pancreatic cancer and periampullary tumour research registry in Quebec

BACKGROUND

Enrolling patients in studies of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (pdac) is challenging because of the high fatality of the disease. We hypothesized that a prospective clinic-based study with rapid ascertainment would result in high participation rates. Using that strategy, we established the Quebec Pancreas Cancer Study (qpcs) to investigate the genetics and causes of pdac and other periampullary tumours (pats) that are also rare and underrepresented in research studies.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with pdac or pat were introduced to the study at their initial clinical encounter, with a strategy to enrol participants within 2 weeks of diagnosis. Patient self-referrals and referrals of unaffected individuals with an increased risk of pdac were also accepted. Family histories, epidemiologic and clinical data, and biospecimens were collected. Additional relatives were enrolled in families at increased genetic risk.

RESULTS

The first 346 completed referrals led to 306 probands being enrolled, including 190 probands affected with pdac, who represent the population focus of the qpcs. Participation rates were 88.4% for all referrals and 89.2% for pdac referrals. Family history, epidemiologic and clinical data, and biospecimens were ascertained from 91.9%, 54.6%, and 97.5% respectively of patients with pdac. Although demographics and trends in risk factors in our patients were consistent with published statistics for patients with pdac, the qpcs is enriched for families with French-Canadian ancestry (37.4%), a population with recurrent germ-line mutations in hereditary diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Using rapid ascertainment, a pdac and pat research registry with high participation rates can be established. The qpcs is a valuable research resource and its enrichment with patients of French-Canadian ancestry provides a unique opportunity for studies of heredity in these diseases.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer-time for a new paradigm?

BACKGROUND

In cases of locally advanced breast cancer (labc), preoperative ("neoadjuvant") therapy was traditionally reserved to render the patient operable. More recently, neoadjuvant therapy, particularly chemotherapy, is being used in patients with operable disease to increase the opportunity for breast conservation. Despite the increasing use of preoperative chemotherapy, rates of pathologic complete response, a surrogate marker for disease-free survival, remain modest in patients with locally advanced disease and particularly so when the tumour is estrogen or progesterone receptor-positive and her2-negative. A new paradigm for labc patients is needed. In other solid tumours (for example, rectal, esophageal, and lung cancers), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (ccrt) is routinely used in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment protocols alike.

RESULTS

The literature suggests that ccrt in labc patients with inoperable disease is associated with response rates higher than would be anticipated with systemic therapy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Ongoing trials in this field are eagerly awaited to determine if ccrt should become the new paradigm.

Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment for breast cancer: from bedside to bench and back again?

In recent years, considerable attention has been paid to the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a pluripotential test bed for the treatment of breast cancer. Although traditionally reserved to render inoperable disease operable, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly being used to improve the chance for breast-conserving surgery, to gain information on pathologic response rates for a more rapid assessment of new chemotherapy-biologic regimens, and also to study in vivo tumour sensitivity or resistance to the agent being used. Similarly, use of neoadjuvant endocrine treatment was also traditionally restricted to elderly or frail patients who were felt to be unsuitable for chemotherapy. It is therefore not surprising that, given the increasing realization of the pivotal role of endocrine therapy in patient care, there is enhanced interest in neoadjuvant endocrine therapy not only as a less-toxic alternative to chemotherapy, but also to assess tumour sensitivity or resistance to endocrine agents. The availability of newer endocrine manipulations and increasing evidence that the benefits of chemotherapy are frequently marginal in many hormone-positive patients is making endocrine therapy increasingly important in the clinical setting. The hope is that, one day, instead of preoperative endocrine therapy being restricted to the infirm and the elderly, it will be used in the time between biopsy diagnosis and surgery to predict which patients will or will not benefit from chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting.

Bevacizumab-based therapy for colorectal cancer: experience from a large Canadian cohort at the Jewish General Hospital between 2004 and 2009

BACKGROUND

Before its regulatory approval in Canada, bevacizumab to treat patients with colorectal cancer (crc) was accessed through the Bevacizumab Expanded Access Trial and a special-access program at the Jewish General Hospital. We retrospectively evaluated patient outcomes in that large cohort.

METHODS

All patients (n = 196) had metastatic crc, were bevacizumab-naïve, and received bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy at the Jewish General Hospital between 2004 and 2009. We collected patient demographics and clinical characteristics; relevant medical history, disease stage and tumour pathology at diagnosis; type, duration, and line of therapy; grades 3 and 4 adverse events (aes), time to disease progression (ttp), and overall survival (os) from diagnosis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 36.0 months. Median ttp was 8.0 months [95% confidence interval (ci): 7.0 to 9.0 months). Median os was 41.0 months (95% ci: 36.0 to 47.0 months). Of the 40 grades 3 and 4 bevacizumab-related aes experienced by 38 patients (19.4%), the most common were thrombocytopenia (n = 17), deep-vein thrombosis (n = 6), pulmonary embolism (n = 4), and hypertension (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

In an expanded access setting, our data reflect the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab-based therapy in the controlled post-registration clinical trial setting.

Do alternative methods of measuring tumor size, including consideration of multicentric/multifocal disease, enhance prognostic information beyond TNM staging in women with early stage breast cancer: an analysis of the NCIC CTG MA.5 and MA.12 clinical trials

The AJCC staging criteria consider tumor size to be the largest dimension of largest tumor. Some case series suggest using summation of all tumor dimensions in patients with multicentric/multifocal (MC/MF) disease. We used data from NCIC CTG MA.5 and MA.12 clinical trials to examine alternative methods of assessing tumor size on breast-cancer-free-interval (BCFI). The 710 MA.5 pre-/peri-menopausal node positive and 672 MA.12 pre-menopausal node-negative/-positive patients have 10-year median follow-up. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Tumors were centrally reviewed for grade, hormone receptor, and HER2 status. Continuous pathologic tumor size was: (1) largest dimension of largest tumor (cm); (2) tumor area (cm(2)); (3) volume of tumor (cm(3)); (4) with MC/MF disease, summation of (1)-(3) for up to 3 foci. We examined univariate and multivariate effects of tumor size on BCFI utilizing (un)stratified Cox regression and the Wald test statistic. In univariate analysis, larger tumor dimension was significantly associated with worse BFCI in node positive patients: p < 0.0001 for MA.5; p = 0.01 for MA.12. In MA.5 multivariate analysis, larger summation of largest tumor dimensions was associated with worse BCFI (p = 0.0003), while larger single dimension was associated with worse BCFI (p = 0.02) for MA.12. Presence of MC/MF and other tumor size measurements were not associated (p > 0.05) with BFCI. While physicians could consider the largest diameter of the largest focus of disease or the sum of the largest diameters of all foci in their T-stage determination, it appears that the current method of T-staging offers equivalent determinations of prognosis.

Prospective validation of risk prediction indexes for acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

BACKGROUND

Despite the use of standardized anti-emetic guidelines, up to 20% of cancer patients suffer from moderate-to-severe chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (cinv)-that is, grade 2 or greater according to the U.S. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. We previously developed cycle-based prediction models and associated scoring systems for acute and delayed cinv. As part of the validation process, we prospectively evaluated the ability of the scoring systems to accurately identify patients deemed to be high risk for grade 2 or greater cinv.

METHODS

Patients who were receiving any chemotherapy for solid tumours and who consented to participate were provided with symptom diaries. Compliance to the diaries was enhanced by 24-hour and 5-day telephone callbacks after chemotherapy in every cycle. All patients received anti-emetic prophylaxis as prescribed by the treating physician. Before each cycle of chemotherapy, the acute and delayed cinv scoring systems were used to stratify patients into low- and high-risk groups. Logistic regression modelling was then applied to compare the risk for grade 2 or greater cinv between patients considered to be at high and at low risk. The external validity of each system was also assessed using an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (auroc) analysis.

RESULTS

We collected cinv outcomes data from 95 patients during 181 cycles of chemotherapy. The incidence of grade 2 or greater acute and delayed cinv was 17.7% and 18.2% respectively. As previously identified, major predictors for grade 2 or greater cinv included younger patient age, platinum- or anthracycline-based chemotherapy, low alcohol consumption, earlier cycles of chemotherapy, previous history of morning sickness, and prior emetic episodes after chemotherapy. The acute and delayed scoring systems both had good predictive accuracy when applied to the external validation sample (acute-auroc: 0.69; 95% confidence interval: 0.59 to 0.79; delayed-auroc: 0.70; 95% confidence interval: 0.60 to 0.80). Patients identified by the scoring systems to be at high risk were 2.8 (p = 0.025) and 3.1 (p = 0.001) times more likely to develop grade 2 or greater acute and delayed cinv.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that our scoring systems are able to accurately identify patients at high risk for acute and delayed cinv. Application and planned continued refinement of the scoring systems will be an important means of patient-specific risk assessment that will allow for optimization of anti-emetic therapy.

Abstract P2-05-13: Correlation of conventional versus experimental biomarkers of bone turnover and metastasis behaviour with skeletal related events – A biomarker analysis in conjunction with the TRIUMPH study

BACKGROUND: Despite considerable variability in patient (pt) risk of skeletal related events (SREs) from bone metastases (BM), all pts are treated using a one size fits all approach, namely the same dose and dosing schedule (q3-4 wk) of IV bisphosphonate (BP). Identification of novel markers of individual SRE risk are thus required to better tailor treatment. TRIUMPH is an ongoing clinical trial evaluating q12 wk IV BP therapy for 1 year, following &gt;3 months of standard q3-4 wk BP, in women with low risk bone metastases [defined by the bone resorption marker C-telopeptide (CTx) levels &lt;600 ng/L]. This sub-study evaluated the utility of novel biomarkers in better predicting SRE risk in this low-risk cohort.

METHODS: Seventy-one pts enrolled in TRIUMPH. Pt serum at baseline (69), 6 (67) and 12 (59) wks post-entry were analyzed for CTx and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) as per study protocol. Urine N-telopeptide (NTx) levels and serum levels of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), activinA, procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP), and bone sialoprotein (BSP) levels were also assessed by ELISA (for n=63, 63 and 57 patients at baseline, wk 6 and wk 12 respectively). Biomarker levels were correlated with pt parameters including; time to development of BM, previous SREs, and SREs post-study entry using linear regression analysis. Changes in levels of biomarkers from baseline to 6 or 12 weeks were used to calculate odds ratios of coming off study as per protocol (due to either CTx&gt;600 ng/ml or SRE) or of SRE alone using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS: Although baseline CTx and NTx were elevated in pts who went on to develop SREs, this did not reach statistical significance. Baseline activinA trended towards total number of prior SREs (p = 0.07). Baseline TGF-β correlated with duration of BM (p = 0.004). Change in activinA (baseline to week 6) was the only biomarker that trended to predict coming off study early (p = 0.043). Results of other baseline biomarkers and changes in biomarkers from baseline to wk 12 will also be presented.

CONCLUSIONS: This study further questions the role of CTx and NTx for driving treatment decisions around de-intensification of BP therapy (Coleman et al. J Clin Oncol 2012, suppl; abstr 511), and highlights the need for novel markers of SRE risk. Baseline levels of activinA was associated with the incidence of SREs in patients with BM and changes in levels from baseline to 6 weeks correlated with coming off study early. These findings warrant future studies in breast cancer pts assessing activinA as a predictor of SRE risk associated with breast cancer bone metastases.

This study was supported by grants from the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research with funding from the Government of Ontario, and from the Ontario Chapter of the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-05-13.

Abstract P5-13-01: Does empowering patients improve accrual to breast cancer trials?

BACKGROUND Many international oncology professional and patient advocacy groups recommend that a minimum of 5% of eligible new patients should be entered into a clinical trial. Unfortunately, physician and patient related barriers translates to a much lower accrual rate in reality. We performed a prospective single arm pilot study evaluating the efficacy of implementing various physician and patient related strategies in enhancing clinical trial accrual.

METHODS All patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer seen at the breast surgery clinic were eligible for the study. Patients were offered information packages by their surgeons on non-surgical clinical trials that they might be eligible for, prior to their initial oncologist visit. Oncologists were informed of the information given to the prospective patient consultation via email and chart flagging. Patient were then given a questionnaire assessing the feedback on this method of introducing clinical trials. The primary outcome was the number of patients consenting to clinical trials. Secondary outcomes included the number of patients actually enrolling in clinical trials, screen failure rate, and overall patient satisfaction with this method of potentially enhancing accrual to clinical trials.

RESULTS 36 patients consented to this pilot study. 51% of oncologists mentioned the clinical trials to the patients. For those patients with which clinical trials were discussed, 72% went on to consent for a trial of which 31% were ultimately found to be ineligible (screen failure rate). The overall 14% clinical trial enrolment was significantly higher than our historical average of 7%. 100% of the patients found that the information package very helpful and was noted to reduce anxiety (39%) and empower (31%) the patients. 19% of the patients felt that this information should have been offered by the oncologist during the initial consultation as opposed to the surgeon prior to the oncology visit.

CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study could have a major impact on the way that cancer centres across the world approach patients for clinical trial options. Physicians remain an important barrier to trial accrual. The results of this study demonstrate that combined patient and physician centered approach to clinical trial enrolment may be the most effective.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-01.

Abstract P3-13-05: Evaluating efficacy of de-escalated bisphosphonate therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients at low-risk of skeletal related events. TRIUMPH: A pragmatic multicentre trial

Background: Optimal bisphosphonate (BP) dosing intervals for breast cancer patients (pts) with bone metastases (BM) remain unknown. BP are usually prescribed q3-4 wk regardless of individual pt risk for skeletal related events (SREs). Recent evidence (Amadori J Clin Oncol, 2012 suppl; abstr 9005) shows that q12 wk BP is as effective as q4 wk in pts previously treated with &gt;9 cycles of q4 wk therapy. Hence, further evaluation of modified BP dosing strategies is warranted. The objective of the current study was to show in women with biochemically defined low-risk bone disease that IV BP use every q12 wk for 1 year is sufficient to maintain stability of the bone turnover [measured by serum c-telopeptide (CTx) or bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP)].

Methods: Eligible pts with BM, who had received &gt;3 months of q3-4 wk IV BP and no systemic treatment change within 4 wks of study entry were enrolled. Low risk was defined as serum CTx &lt;600 ng/L. Biochemical failure was defined as CTx levels &gt;600 ng/L at baseline, weeks 6, 12, 24, 36 or 48. Evaluation of palliative benefit of 12-wk IV BP therapy was measured by SREs, analgesic use, and self-reported pain (BPI and FACT-BP).

Results: Between Oct. 2010-Sept. 2011, 85 pts consented to screening, with 13 found ineligible. In the 71 accrued pts baseline characteristics were: mean age 60 (SD 13), median time from breast cancer diagnosis to development of bone metastases 4 months (IQR 82), median duration of prior BP therapy 14 months (IQR 19), and mean number of SREs/yr prior to entering study 0.35 (SD 0.76). Baseline median CTx was 120 ng/L (IQR 240) and BSAP 9.2 IU/L (IQR 3). To date: 26/71 pts (36%) remain on study. Reasons for coming off study include; study completion (18), elevation of CTx &gt;600ng/L (10), or on study SRE (3). An elevation of CTx between baseline and wk 6 was significantly associated with coming off study early (p = 0.008). For pts who had had an SRE before study entry the odds ratios for coming off study early due to an on study SRE or elevated CTx was 1.005 (CI 1.002–1.009; p = 0.007) and for coming off early for an SRE was 0.0245 (CI 0.061–0.094; p = 0.046) respectively. Of the 8/13 pts who were ineligible due to baseline CTx &gt;600ng/L, 6 had an SRE within 1 year of screening.

Conclusion: De-escalating BP therapy to 12 weekly in low risk pts has advantages for both the pt and the health care system. Individual risk of SREs is highly variable, however baseline serum CTx levels &lt;600 ng/L is associated with a low risk of subsequent SREs. While larger trials are required to assess whether increasing CTx with de-escalated therapy will lead to higher rates of SREs or not (Coleman et al. J Clin Oncol 2012 suppl; abstr 511). However, the results of this study and Amadori et al. would suggest that de-escalated BP treatment will likely become a new standard of care after a limited period of q 4wk treatment.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-13-05.

Histomorphometric and microarchitectural analyses using the 2 mm bone marrow trephine in metastatic breast cancer patients-preliminary results

BACKGROUND

Bone-targeted agents are widely used for the treatment of osteoporosis, the prevention of cancer-therapy induced bone loss, and for reducing the risk of skeletal related events in patients with metastatic disease. Despite widespread use, relatively little is known about the in vivo effect of these agents on bone homeostasis, bone quality, and bone architecture in humans. Traditionally bone quality has been assessed using a transiliac bone biopsy with a 7 mm "Bordier" core needle. We examined the possibility of using a 2 mm "Jamshidi" core needle as a more practical and less invasive method to assess bone turnover and potentially other tumor effects.

METHODS

A pilot study on the feasibility of assessing bone quality and microarchitecture and tumor invasion using a 2 mm bone marrow trephine was conducted. Patients underwent a posterior trans-iliac trephine biopsy and bone marrow aspirate. Samples were analyzed for bone microarchitecture, bone density, and histomorphometry. The study plan was to accrue three patients with advanced breast cancer to assess the feasibility of the study before enrolling more patients.

RESULTS

The procedure was well tolerated. The sample quality was excellent to analyze bone trabecular microarchitecture using both microCT and histomorphometry. Intense osteoclastic activity was observed in a patient with extensive tumor burden in bone despite intravenous bisphosphonate therapy.

DISCUSSION

Given the success of this study for assessing bone microarchitecture, bone density, and histomorphometry assessment using a 2 mm needle the study will be expanded beyond these initial three patients for longitudinal assessment of bone-targeted therapy.

Treatment Recommendations for the Use of Bone-Targeted Agents in 2011—Report from the 6th Annual Bone and the Oncologist New Updates Meeting

The 6th annual Bone and the Oncologist New Updates conference was held in Ottawa, Ontario, April 14–15, 2011. This meeting traditionally focuses on innovative research into the mechanisms and consequences of treatment-induced and metastatic bone disease. This year, the multidisciplinary audience was polled to produce “treatment recommendations for the use of bone-targeted agents.” In addition, the meeting report itself outlines some of the key topics presented on adjuvant bisphosphonate use and the role of bone-targeted agents in the settings of meta-static and cancer-therapy-induced bone loss.

Excision of the primary tumour in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a clinical dilemma

BACKGROUND

Approximately 10% of new breast cancer patients will present with overt synchronous metastatic disease. The optimal local management of those patients is controversial. Several series suggest that removal of the primary tumour is associated with a survival benefit, but the retrospective nature of those studies raises considerable methodologic challenges. We evaluated our clinical experience with the management of such patients and, more specifically, the impact of surgery in patients with synchronous metastasis.

METHODS

We reviewed patients with primary breast cancer and concurrent distant metastases seen at our centre between 2005 and 2007. Demographic and treatment data were collected. Study endpoints included overall survival and symptomatic local progression rates.

RESULTS

The 111 patients identified had a median follow-up of 40 months (range: 0.6-71 months). We allocated the patients to one ot two groups: a nonsurgical group (those who did not have breast surgery, n = 63) and a surgical group (those who did have surgery, n = 48, 29 of whom had surgery before the metastatic diagnosis). When compared with patients in the nonsurgical group, patients in the surgical group were less likely to present with T4 tumours (23% vs. 35%), N3 nodal disease (8% vs. 19%), and visceral metastasis (67% vs. 73%). Patients in the surgical group experienced longer overall survival (49 months vs. 33 months, p = 0.01) and lower rates of symptomatic local progression (14% vs. 44%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, improved overall survival and symptomatic local control were demonstrated in the surgically treated patients; however, this group had less aggressive disease at presentation. The optimal local management of patients with metastatic breast cancer remains unknown. An ongoing phase iii trial, E2108, has been designed to assess the effect of breast surgery in metastatic patients responding to first-line systemic therapy. If excision of the primary tumour is associated with a survival benefit, then the preselected subgroup of patients who have responded to initial systemic therapy is the desired population in which to put this hypothesis to the test.

Use and delivery of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy-single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (g-csf) as primary prophylaxis against chemotherapy-induced neutropenia has significant cost implications. We examined use of g-csf for early-stage breast cancer patients at our centre. The study also examined the pattern of nurse-led patient teaching with respect to drug self-administration.

METHODS

Patients who received g-csf between November 2009 and October 2010 were identified from pharmacy records. After consent had been obtained, electronic charts were examined to extract data on chemotherapy and use of g-csf. Patients were contacted by telephone to obtain information on the utilization of home-care nursing visits for g-csf administration.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 36 patients. Median age was 58 years (range: 31-78 years). Of the 36 patients, 30 (83%) had received adjuvant treatment, and 6 (17%), neoadjuvant treatment. Most patients (71%) received 10 days (range: 7-10 days) of filgrastim. Of the 36 patients, 29 (81%) received g-csf as primary prophylaxis. In 90% of those patients, primary prophylaxis commenced with the taxane component of treatment. Of the 36 patients, 7 (19%) received g-csf after neutropenia, including 2 who had febrile neutropenia. In 96% of the patients, injections were received at home with the help of a nurse; those patients were subsequently taught self-injection techniques. The median number of nursing visits was 2 (range: 1-3 visits). Most patients were satisfied with the home care and g-csf teaching they received.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the g-csf used in breast cancer treatment during the study period was given for primary prophylaxis. A major reason for the decision to use g-csf appears to have been physician-perceived risk of febrile neutropenia. Delivery of g-csf by home-care nurses was well received by patients.

P2-12-27: Simply Adding Together the Diameters of Tumor Foci in Patients with Multicentric or Multifocal Disease Does Not Add Any Additional Prognostic Information: An Analysis from NCIC CTG MA.12 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Tamoxifen after Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Pre-Menopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer

Background: A common clinical conundrum in breast cancer management is whether pathologic T stage in women with multicentric or multifocal disease should be taken as the diameter of the largest focus or as the sum of all foci in the breast. Most staging systems, such as the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), simply use the largest tumor focus for staging. We examine here the impact of alternate methods of estimating tumour size including measures of total tumor size, volume and surface area.

Materials & Methods: NCIC CTG MA.12 is a randomized placebo-controlled trial of tamoxifen after adjuvant chemotherapy for pre-menopausal women with early breast cancer. Median follow up is 9.7 years. Pathologically reported patient tumor dimensions for up to 3 foci were utilized to examine the effects of tumor size on Breast-Cancer-Free-Interval (BCFI), defined as the time from randomization until recurrence (defined as first local, regional, distant, or contralateral invasive tumor or DCIS). Tumor size was estimated as 1) pathologic T stage as per AJCC criteria; 2) largest dimension of largest tumor focus (cm); 3) sum of largest dimension(s) of tumor foci (cm); 4) sum of surface area(s) of tumor foci (cm2), and 5) sum of volume of tumor foci (cm3). Step-wise forward unstratified Cox regression was used to assess the different effects of tumor size. Results: This study accrued 672 patients, 43% with T1 tumors, 51% with T2 tumors, and 6% with T3/T4 tumors; 25% were node negative and 56% had 1–3 positive lymph nodes. 75% were locally determined to have hormone receptor positive tumors. A higher number of involved lymph nodes was associated with significantly shorter BCFI (p&lt;0.0001). None of pathologic T stage (p=0.14), largest dimension of largest tumor size (p=0.14), sum of largest dimensions of tumor foci (p=0.24), sum of surface area (p=0.38), and sum of volume of foci (p=0.51) were significantly associated with BCFI. Likewise, lymphovascular invasion (p=0.08), grade (p=0.14), nor administration of anthracycline therapy (p=0.08) were associated with BCFI.

Discussion: In the MA.12 population of pre-menopausal women randomized to either tamoxifen or placebo, the sole factor significantly associated with BCFI was nodal status. No measure of tumor size in unifocal or multicentric/multifocal tumors impacted BCFI. The findings of this mature data set suggest that simply adding together the diameters of tumors in patients with multicentric or multifocal disease did not add any additional prognostic information.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-27.

P5-19-14: Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Background: There is increasing evidence that DNA repair defects characteristic of BRCA1-related cancers and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) confer sensitivity to certain chemotherapeutic agents, such as platinums. However, prospective and retrospective studies comparing the efficacy of these agents versus conventional treatment in TNBC are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) in metastatic TNBC in terms of median duration of treatment and overall-survival (OS) and compare it to patients treated with conventional chemotherapy. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with metastatic TNBC who received PBC from January 2007 to June 2010 treated at the Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center and the Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre. This cohort was compared to a control group that included metastatic TNBC treated with conventional agents that included anthracyclines, taxanes, capecitabine, and vinorelbine.

Results: A total of 166 metastatic TNBC patients were analyzed: 60 treated with PBC and 106 managed with conventional treatment. Median age at diagnosis was 48 years and distant disease-free interval was 26 months (m) for both groups. Patients on both groups had multiple sites of metastases at diagnosis of recurrence than a single site of metastasis (69% for both groups). Of the 60 patients treated with PBC, 90% received a combination regimen, most commonly weekly cisplatin plus gemcitabine in 37% of patients and cisplatin plus vinorelbine in 17% of patients. The median number of cycles delivered was 4 (1-24). 33% received the PBC as first-line treatment, 38% as second-line, 18% as third-line, 7% as fourth line, and 3% as fifth-line. Only 8 patients (5%) discontinued PBC secondary to toxicity. The median time on treatment in first, second and third-line therapy was longer for the PBC group compared to the conventional group (5 vs. 2 m, p=0.108; 5 vs. 2 m, p=0.01; and 4 vs. 1 m, p=0.026). Patients treated with PBC had a longer OS compared to those managed conventionally (16 vs. 10 m, p=0.039).

Conclusions: PBC appears to improve clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic TNBC compared to those treated with conventional chemotherapy regimens. Although this is a retrospective study with its obvious limitations, it adds to the growing body of literature, suggesting the benefit of PBC in TNBC. Prospective trials are needed to confirm its benefit in order to integrate it as part of the routine management of these patients.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-19-14.

P2-15-05: Excision of the Primary Tumour in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer – Will E2108 Provide the Definitive Answer?

Background: Approximately 10% of new breast cancer patients will present with overt synchronous metastatic disease. Controversy exists about the optimal local management of these patients. While several series suggest that removal of primary tumour is associated with a survival benefit, the retrospective nature of these studies raises considerable methodological challenges. We decided to evaluate the experience at our centre around the impact of surgery in patients with synchronous metastasis.

Method: Case records of all patients seen with primary breast cancer and concurrent distant metastases between 2005 to 2007 were reviewed. Demographic and treatment data was collected. The study endpoints compared both overall survival and symptomatic local progression rates between patients who had breast surgery and those who did not.

RESULTS: 111 patients were identified. Median follow-up 40 months (0.6-71 months). Patients were divided into two groups: those patients who underwent breast surgery (n=48; 29/48 had surgery immediate prior to metastatic diagnosis) and those that did not have surgery(n = 63). The surgical group were less likely to present with T4 tumours (20% vs 36%), N3 nodal disease (8% vs 19%) and visceral metastasis (67% vs 73%)when compared with non-surgical group. Improved overall survival (49 months vs 33 months; p=0.01) and less symptomatic local progression rates ( 15% vs 43%, p &lt; 0.001 ) were seen in the surgical group compared to the non-surgical group.

CONCLUSIONS: The optimal local management of patients with metastatic breast cancer is unknown. Despite the surgery group demonstrating an improved overall survival and symptomatic local control, this group had less aggressive disease at presentation. These results confirm the need for prospective randomized studies. E2108, an ongoing Phase III Trial, was designed to assess the effect of breast surgery in metastatic patients responding to first line systemic therapy. If excision of the primary tumour is associated with a survival benefit, then the pre-selected subgroup of patients that have responded to initial systemic therapy is the desired population to put this hypothesis to test.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-15-05.

P2-12-23: How Should We Assess Tumour Size (T Stage) in Patients with Multicentric/Multifocal Breast Cancer? Results from the NCIC CTG MA.5 Randomized Trial of CEF vs. CMF in Pre-Menopausal Women with Node Positive Breast Cancer

Background

A common clinical conundrum in breast cancer management is whether pathologic T stage in women with multicentric or multifocal disease should be taken as the diameter of the largest focus or as the sum of all foci in the breast. Most staging systems, such as the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), simply use the largest tumour focus for staging. We examine here the impact of alternate methods of estimating tumour size including measures of total tumour size, volume and surface area.

Methods: NCIC CTG MA.5 is a randomized trial of CEF versus CMF in pre-menopausal women with node positive breast cancer.

Median follow up is 10 years. Pathologically reported patient tumour dimensions for up to 3 foci were utilized to examine the effects of tumour size on Breast-Cancer-Free-Interval (BCFI). BCFI is defined as the time from randomization until recurrence: first local invasive or DCIS, regional, distant, contralateral invasive or DCIS. Tumour size was estimated as 1) pathologic T stage as per AJCC criteria; 2) largest dimension of largest tumour focus (cm); 3) sum of largest dimension(s) of tumour foci (cm); 4) sum of surface area(s) of tumour foci (cm2), and 5) sum of volume of tumour foci (cm3). Step-wise forward unstratified Cox regression was used to assess the different effects of tumour size.

Results: This study accrued 710 patients, 37% with T1 tumours, 52% with T2 tumours and 9% with T3 tumours; 61% had 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes. 59% hormone receptor positive. Higher pathologic T stage (p=0.001) and greater surface area (p=0.02) were associated with shorter BCFI, as was lymphovascular invasion (p=0.03), and # of lymph nodes involved (p&lt;0.0001). Administration of anthracycline therapy led to significantly longer BCFI (0.003). The sum of largest tumour sizes (p=0.33) and sum of tumour volume (p=0.34) were not significantly associated with BCFI. Additionally, when the less complete locally reported tumour grade data were included, higher tumour grade was associated with shorter BCFI (p&lt;0.0001).

Conclusions: Consideration of multicentric and multifocal disease was an important adjunct to standard pathologic tumour size as was estimation of tumour surface area in this chemotherapy trial of node positive premenopausal women. However, simply adding together the diameters of tumours in patients with multicentric or multifocal disease did not add any additional prognostic information in this high risk patient population.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-23.

OT1-01-02: A Multicentre Study Assessing 12-Weekly Intravenous Bisphosphonate Therapy in Women with Low Risk Bone Metastases from Breast Cancer – The TRIUMPH Trial

Background: Metastatic bone disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality for breast cancer patients. Bisphosphonates (BP) have been shown to significantly delay the onset and frequency of skeletal related events (SREs), improve pain control and overall quality of life. Most patients receive intravenous BP every 3–4 weeks regardless of their individual risk for a SRE. This “one size fits all” strategy could expose those patients at a relatively low risk of SREs to an increased chance of adverse drug effects, as well as to the financial and quality of life burden of multiple visits to the cancer centre for treatments. This study aimed to assess whether IV BP can be safely given at reduced frequency.

Methods: The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate in women with biochemically defined low-risk bone metastases that the administration of IV BP every 12 weeks is sufficient to maintain biochemical stability for one year. Eligibility criteria include; bone metastases from breast cancer, have received at least three months of regular 3–4 weekly IV BP, satisfactory renal function, adequate dental health, no systemic treatment change or recent SRE within 4 weeks of study entry. Low risk disease will be defined as serum CTx levels &lt;600 ng/L Biochemical failure is defined as CTx levels &gt;600 ng/L measured at predefined time points (6, 12, 24, 36 and 48th). Secondary objectives are to evaluate the palliative benefit of 12-weekly IV BP therapy as reflected by occurrence of SREs, analgesic use, self-reported pain using the validated BP and FACT-BP questionnaires. Sample size was calculated at 68 patients. Given the small sample size, nonparametric Bootstrapping will be employed to calculate point estimates, standard deviations and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). An exploratory multivariable analysis will also be undertaken to determine baseline factors that were associated with patient's maintaining their telopeptide levels in the low risk range. Conclusion: TRIUMPH opened in October 2010 and as of June 2011, has quickly accrued 54/68 patients (79%). This trial has the potential to allow lower risk women to receive less frequent dosing of bisphosphonates, thus improving their quality of life with less cancer center visits and reducing their chance of drug induced adverse events.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-01-02.

P4-11-08: Changes in the Distribution of Loco-Regional and Distant Breast Cancer Recurrences over the Last 20 Years: Implications for Patient Care and Future Research

Introduction: Improvements in adjuvant therapy have led to a sustained fall in recurrences after early breast cancer. The differential reduction of both local-regional and systemic recurrences is poorly understood. This study aimed to explore changes in the distribution of loco-regional and distant recurrences in clinical trials reported over the last 20 years. We also aimed to determine the relative impact of adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy.

Methods: A MEDLINE search for adjuvant, Phase III randomized breast cancer clinical studies between January 1990 and March 2011 was performed. Neo-adjuvant, single agent biologics and studies that did not report the proportion of loco-regional and distant recurrences were excluded. Change in the frequency of recurrences was assessed as the non-parametric correlation between the number of loco-regional recurrences (as a proportion of all recurrences) and time. Studies were weighted by sample size. Pre-specified subgroup analyses were assessed using the interaction test and included type of surgery performed, radiotherapy use, menopausal status and type of systemic therapy delivered. Definition of local and distant recurrences differed between studies. For consistency, loco-regional recurrences were classified as recurrences limited to the ipsilateral breast, chest wall, axillary, supraclavicular and internal mammary lymph nodes. Any other recurrence was defined as distant, with the exception of contralateral breast cancer; that was excluded from this analysis.

Results: Fifty-three randomized clinical trials with a total of 86,598 patients were included in the analysis. Between 1990 and 2011, the proportion of loco-regional recurrences has decreased from approximately 50% to 10% (Spearman's rho = −0.40, p&lt;.001). There was no interaction between type of surgery (mastectomy vs. lumpectomy, p=0.40), adjuvant radiotherapy use (p=0.63) and menopausal status (p=0.95) and the correlation of loco-regional recurrences and time. Chemotherapy use showed a larger negative correlation compared with endocrine therapy (rho = 0.49 vs rho = 0.24, p=0.008).

Conclusion: Advances in treatment of early breast cancer have differentially reduced the proportion of loco-regional recurrences compared with distant recurrences. In recent trials, loco-regional recurrences account for less than 10–15% of all recurrences. These falling event rates may affect patient care, especially when deciding on treatments influencing loco-regional control. This change may also impact on the design of clinical trials assessing loco-regional therapy such as surgery and/or local radiation therapy.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-08.

Trastuzumab and vinorelbine in early stages of HER2-positive breast cancer

The combination of vinorelbine and trastuzumab (VH) is highly active and well tolerated in patients with metastatic HER2+ breast cancer. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of VH as an alternative adjuvant treatment for patients with localized breast cancer refusing or ineligible for standard adjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. Twenty-eight patients with stage I-III breast cancer were treated only with VH as preoperative or postoperative chemotherapy. Fourteen patients received VH as adjuvant treatment for pT1a-b pN0 or eR+ pT1c pN0 cancers. VH was well tolerated, the only grade 3-4 toxicity being neutropenia with 2 cases of febrile neutropenia. At a median follow-up of 39 months, no breast cancer relapses were documented; moreover, overall and disease-free survival was 96.4%. In summary, our results indicate that VH is effective and well tolerated. VH should be prospectively tested as adjuvant treatment for pN0 pT1a-b breast cancer patients for which no standard treatment is well defined.

Immune therapy for breast cancer in 2010-hype or hope?

The identification of numerous breast cancer antigens has generated increasing enthusiasm for the application of immune-based therapies in breast malignancies. Although the use of monoclonal antibodies has revolutionized the "targeted therapy" of breast cancer, and the immunomodulatory effects of bisphosphonates continue to be evaluated, few studies to date have demonstrated widespread utility for other forms of immunotherapy. The present review assesses modern research and explores whether the hopes for immunotherapy can overcome the hype.

BONUS 5: 5th Annual Bone and The Oncologist New Updates

The 5th annual Bone and The Oncologist New Updates (BONUS 5) conference, held at the National Arts Center, Ottawa, April 8–9, 2010, focused on innovative research into the mechanisms and consequences of increased bone turnover in the benign and metastatic settings alike. This year there was also a debate over the controversial use of bisphosphonates as an adjuvant treatment in patients with early-stage breast cancer. This meeting report highlights a few of the topics presented.

Safety of bevacizumab when given perioperatively for colorectal cancer with liver metastases: McGill University pilot study

e15083

Background: Bevacizumab (BV) increases responses and survival rates when used with chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Current practice is to give peri-operative chemotherapy for resectable CRC liver metasases (LM). The safety and efficacy of chemo-BV in this setting is unknown. Post-operative complications have been reported in patients (pts) who underwent surgery while receiving BV. The goals were to determine safety of perioperative BV. Methods: In a prospective pilot study, patients with resectable LM from October 2005 to 2008 that received BV perioperatively along with chemotherapy. Of a total of 60 pts, 34 had oxaliplatin-based CTX, 22 CPT-11 (FOLFIRI) and 4 IROX. All but seven pts received BV pre and postoperatively. The average age was 55 years. All patients underwent liver surgery 6–8weeks post last dose of BV. Univariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate the association of patient and tumour characteristics, therapy and postoperative complications. Results: Postoperative complications developed in a total of 24 pts (40%). 12 pts (35%) who received Oxaliplatin CTX + BV, 9 pts (40%) with CPT 11 CTX + BV and 3 pts (75%) with Oxaliplatin + CPT-11 CTX +BV. The average time from BV discontinuation to surgery was 49 days. No significant associations were identified between BV and CTX regimen or timing and postoperative complications. Wound healing complication were most frequent with 8 pts (13%), DVT diagnosed in 6 pts (10%), protracted pancytopenia 4 pts (7%), sepsis 1pt, infections 2pts, MI 1pt, acute cardiomyopathy 1pt, and billiary leak 1pt. No bowel perforations or sudden deaths were reported. These side effects apart from thromboembolic events are comparable to previously reported post-operative complications. Conclusions: Neither the use of BV with CTX nor timing of BV administration were associated with a non acceptable increase in complication rates as compared to previously published by EORTC intergroup. Our data confirm that the combination of BV with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is feasible and safe in patients CRC LM. A higher incidence of thromboembolic events was seen. To determine the optimal timing and drug combination prospective randomized trials are urgently required.

[Table: see text]

Perioperative chemotherapy with bevacizumab (BV) for liver metastases (LM) in colorectal cancer (CRC): McGill University pilot study

e15027

Background: Colorectal liver metastases treated with perioperative chemotherapy were previously shown to increase progression free survival. Given the survival benefit of bevacizumab in metastatic CRC, the aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab based chemotherapy in the perioperative setting. Methods: In this single arm prospective pilot study, patients with resectable LM eligible to receive perioperative BV and chemotherapy were included. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was used to calculate overall survival and progression free survival. Results: A total of 60 patients were recruited, 41 male, with an average age of 55. Forty-three patients had synchronous LM. All but seven patients received pre and post-operative BV-based chemotherapy (34/60 oxaliplatin based, 22/60 CPT-11 based and 4/60 CPT-11 and oxaliplatin based). All patients underwent hepatectomy 6–8 weeks post last dose of BV. Overall response rate was 80% (48/60), 4pt with stable diseaase; 10% had a complete pathological response and 27% had no evidence of disease post hepatectomy with a median follow up of 33 months.8 patients progressed prior to surgery. Overall survival (OS) rates at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months were: 100%, 86%, 74% and 66% respectively and 5 year median survival of 55%. Progression free survival (PFS) was 14 months. Subgroup analysis of the data according to the chemotherapy pts received showed that PFS in the CPT-11 and the oxaliplatin arm were 13 and 15 months respectively. Most of the adverse events recorded were associated with the post-operative period and included wound healing (8pts), infections (2pts) and thromboemblic (6pts) disease. No sudden deaths or bowel perforations were reported. Conclusions: Bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy regimens in the peri-operative setting is effective in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Our 80% response rate and 10% complete pathological response is one of the highest reported and warrants further investigation in phase III trials.

[Table: see text]

Trastuzumab and vinorelbine (TV) in early stages of breast cancer

e11556

Background: HER-2+ breast cancers (BCs) have a higher relapse rate, even for early stages of disease. The combination of trastuzumab and vinorelbine (TV) displays a high degree of synergism both preclinically and in metastatic BC patients that typically tolerate TV remarkably well. Occasionally, patients refuse standard treatment with chemotherapy and trastuzumab because of toxic side effects. In our institution, some of these patients accepted to receive treatment with TV. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on patients with stage I-III BCs, treated with TV as the only chemotherapy regimen. Most patients received TV on a weekly basis (one week off for V every 3–4 weeks) for ∼6 months, followed by 6 more months of T only. Results: Between May 2003 and June 2008, 23 patients were started on weekly TV. Median age was 66. Five patients received TV as preoperative treatment for BCs with the following clinical stages: IIB (1); IIIA (1); IIIB (3). The other 18 patients were pathologically staged as: stage I (11); IIA (5); IIIB (2). All cancers were HER2+; 65% of patients also received hormonal treatment for ER/PR+ disease. 3 patients had been previously treated for BC, and received TV as “adjuvant” treatment after a local relapse. Only one of these patients had previously received chemotherapy, while none had received prior T. No pathological complete response was found at surgery after preoperative TV. TV was very well tolerated, with one patient developing febrile neutropenia, 4 patients grade 3–4 uncomplicated neutropenia, and no other grade 3–4 events. During therapy, 5 patients had an asymptomatic 10–20% drop in the LVEF (Grade 1). Follow-up MUGA scans at 1 year after TV so far failed to show any significant abnormality. At an average follow-up of 26 months, one patient died for non-BC related causes, and all the other 22 patients are disease-free. Conclusions: TV is safe and very well tolerated, with no significant cardiac toxicity in our patient population. Preliminary follow-up data suggest that TV may be an acceptable alternative (neo-)adjuvant therapy for patients refusing “toxic” chemotherapy. Further studies prospectively testing TV as adjuvant treatment should be considered for patients with stage 1A BC, for which no standard treatment is clearly defined.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.