1
|
Ferko N, Priest S, Almuallem L, Walczyk Mooradally A, Wang D, Oliva Ramirez A, Szabo E, Cabra A. Economic and healthcare resource utilization assessments of pet imaging in coronary artery disease diagnosis: a systematic review and discussion of opportunities for future economic evaluations. J Med Econ 2024:1-26. [PMID: 38650543 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2345507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Aims: This systematic literature review (SLR) consolidated economic and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) evidence for positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) to inform future economic evaluations.Materials and Methods: An electronic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases from 2012-2022. Economic and HCRU studies in adults who underwent PET- or SPECT-MPI for coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosis were eligible. A qualitative methodological assessment of existing economic evaluations, HCRU, and downstream cardiac outcomes was completed. Exploratory meta-analyses of clinical outcomes were performed.Results: The search yielded 13,439 results, with 71 records included. Economic evaluations and comparative clinical trials were limited in number and outcome types (HCRU, downstream cardiac outcomes, and diagnostic performance) assessed. No studies included all outcome types and only one economic evaluation linked diagnostic performance to HCRU. The meta-analyses of comparative studies demonstrated significantly higher rates of early- and late-invasive coronary angiography and revascularization for PET- compared to SPECT-MPI; however, the rate of repeat testing was lower with PET-MPI. The rate of acute myocardial infarction was lower, albeit non-significant with PET- vs. SPECT-MPI.Limitations and Conclusions: This SLR identified economic and HCRU evaluations following PET- and SPECT-MPI for CAD diagnosis and determined that existing studies do not capture all pertinent outcome parameters or link diagnostic performance to downstream HCRU and cardiac outcomes, thus, resulting in simplified assessments of CAD burden. A limitation of this work relates to heterogeneity in study designs, patient populations, and follow-up times of existing studies. Resultingly, it was challenging to pool data in meta-analyses. Overall, this work provides a foundation for the development of comprehensive economic models for PET- and SPECT-MPI in CAD diagnosis, which should link diagnostic outcomes to HCRU and downstream cardiac events to capture the full CAD scope.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Di Wang
- EVERSANA, Burlington, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fu R, Ng V, Liu M, Wells D, Yurga E, Nauenberg E. Considering patient perspectives in economic evaluations of health interventions. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1212583. [PMID: 37876714 PMCID: PMC10593459 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1212583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Current guidelines for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of health interventions commonly recommend the use of a payer and/or a societal perspective. This raises the concern that the resulting reimbursement decision may overlook the full spectrum of impacts and equity considerations. In this paper, we argue that a potential solution is to supplement a societal- or payer-perspective economic evaluation with an additional evaluation accounting for exclusively the patient perspective. We present five categories of health interventions for which a patient-perspective analysis may be informative including those (1) that cross the definitional boundary between drugs and non-drug technologies; (2) affect patient adherence to protocol; (3) represent revolutionary treatments for genetic disorders; (4) with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio involving slightly less effective, but substantially less costly, than the current standard; and (5) have been previously approved for funding but now being targeted for potential delisting or disinvestment. Real-world examples are discussed in detail. Lived experience individuals were invited to provide vignettes. Discussions are provided regarding how to incorporate patient inputs to improve patient-centered decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Fu
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vivian Ng
- Roche Diagnostics, Laval, QC, Canada
| | - Michael Liu
- Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - David Wells
- The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), Nanaimo, BC, Canada
| | - Emre Yurga
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eric Nauenberg
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ontario Ministry of Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Federici C, Callea G, Testoni PA, Costamagna G, Trentino P, Repici A. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Barrett Esophagus and High-Grade Dysplasia or Low-Grade Dysplasia. Clin Ther 2023:S0149-2918(23)00136-4. [PMID: 37137786 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical guidelines recommend radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for eradication of Barrett esophagus in patients with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD), but evidence on whether RFA provides good value for money is still sparse. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of RFA in Italy. METHODS A Markov model was used to estimate lifelong costs and consequences of disease progression with different treatments. RFA was compared with esophagectomy in the HGD group or endoscopic surveillance in the LGD group. Clinical and quality-of-life parameters were derived from a review of the literature and expert opinions, whereas Italian national tariffs were used as a proxy for costs. FINDINGS RFA dominated esophagectomy in patients with HGD with a probability of 83%. For patients with LGD, RFA was more effective and more costly than active surveillance (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, €6276 per quality-adjusted life-year). At a cost-effectiveness threshold of €15,272, the probability of RFA being the optimal strategy in this population was close to 100%. Model results were sensitive to the cost of the interventions and utility weights used in the different disease states. IMPLICATIONS RFA is likely to be the optimal choice for patients with LGD and HGD in Italy. Italy is discussing the implementation of a national program for the health technology assessment of medical devices, requiring more studies to prove value for money of emerging technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Federici
- SDA Bocconi School of Management, Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Milan, Italy.
| | - Giuditta Callea
- SDA Bocconi School of Management, Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Milan, Italy
| | - Pier Alberto Testoni
- Division of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Costamagna
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training (CERTT), Università Cattolica, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Repici
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Raman S, Shafie AA, Tan BY, Abraham MT, Chen Kiong S, Cheong SC. Economic Evaluation of Oral Cancer Screening Programs: Review of Outcomes and Study Designs. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11081198. [PMID: 37108032 PMCID: PMC10138408 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11081198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
A lack of guidance on economic evaluations for oral cancer screening programs forms a challenge for policymakers and researchers to fill the knowledge gap on their cost-effectiveness. This systematic review thus aims to compare the outcomes and design of such evaluations. A search for economic evaluations of oral cancer screening was performed on Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, PubMed, health technology assessment databases, and EBSCO Open Dissertations. The quality of studies was appraised using QHES and the Philips Checklist. Data abstraction was based on reported outcomes and study design characteristics. Of the 362 studies identified, 28 were evaluated for eligibility. The final six studies reviewed consisted of modeling approaches (n = 4), a randomized controlled trial (n = 1), and a retrospective observational study (n = 1). Screening initiatives were mostly shown to be cost-effective compared to non-screening. However, inter-study comparisons remained ambiguous due to large variations. The observational and randomized controlled trials provided considerably accurate evidence of implementation costs and outcomes. Modeling approaches, conversely, appeared more feasible for the estimation of long-term consequences and the exploration of strategy options. The current evidence of the cost-effectiveness of oral cancer screening remains heterogeneous and inadequate to support its institutionalization. Nevertheless, evaluations incorporating modeling methods may provide a practical and robust solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivaraj Raman
- Centre for Health Economics Research, Institute for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health, Shah Alam 40170, Malaysia
| | - Asrul Akmal Shafie
- Institutional Planning and Strategic Center, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia
- Discipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia
| | - Bee Ying Tan
- Discipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia
| | - Mannil Thomas Abraham
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital Tengku Ampuan Rahimah, Ministry of Health, Klang 41200, Malaysia
| | - Shim Chen Kiong
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital Umum Sarawak, Ministry of Health, Kuching 93586, Malaysia
| | - Sok Ching Cheong
- Digital Health Research Unit, Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya 47500, Malaysia
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim DD, Do LA, Synnott PG, Lavelle TA, Prosser LA, Wong JB, Neumann PJ. Developing Criteria for Health Economic Quality Evaluation Tool. Value Health 2023:S1098-3015(23)02561-5. [PMID: 37068557 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Because existing publication guidelines and checklists have limitations when used to assess the quality of cost-effectiveness analysis, we developed a novel quality assessment tool for cost-effectiveness analyses, differentiating methods and reporting quality and incorporating the relative importance of different quality attributes. METHODS We defined 15 quality domains from a scoping review and identified 72 methods and reporting quality attributes (36 each). After designing a best-worst scaling survey, we fielded an online survey to researchers and practitioners to estimate the relative importance of the attributes in February 2021. We analyzed the survey data using a sequential conditional logit model. The final tool included 48 quality attributes deemed most important for assessing methods and reporting quality (24 each), accompanied by a free and web-based scoring system. RESULTS A total of 524 participants completed the methodology section, and 372 completed both methodology and reporting sections. Quality attributes pertaining to the "modeling" and "data inputs and evidence synthesis" domains were deemed most important for methods quality, including "structure of the model reflects the underlying condition and intervention's impact" and "model validation is conducted." Quality attributes pertaining to "modeling" and "Intervention/comparator(s)" domains were considered most important for reporting quality, including "model descriptions are detailed enough for replication." Despite its growing prominence, "equity considerations" were not deemed as important as other quality attributes. CONCLUSIONS The Criteria for Health Economic Quality Evaluation tool allows users to differentiate methods and reporting as well as quantifies the relative importance of quality attributes. Alongside other considerations, it could help assess and improve the quality of cost-effectiveness evidence to inform value-based decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D Kim
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Lauren A Do
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patricia G Synnott
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tara A Lavelle
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- The Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - John B Wong
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Clinical Decision Making, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health (CEVR), Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Benedetto V, Filipe L, Harris C, Tahir N, Doherty A, Clegg A. Outcome measures for economic evaluations and cost-effectiveness analyses of interventions for people with intellectual disabilities: A methodological systematic review. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2023; 36:230-240. [PMID: 36448370 PMCID: PMC10099878 DOI: 10.1111/jar.13056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mainstream economic evaluations methods may not be appropriate to capture the range of effects triggered by interventions for people with intellectual disabilities. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify, assess and synthesise the arguments in the literature on how the effects of interventions for people with intellectual disabilities could be measured in economic evaluations. METHOD We searched for studies providing relevant arguments by running multi-database, backward, forward citation and grey literature searches. Following title/abstract and full-text screening, the arguments extracted from the included studies were summarised and qualitatively assessed in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS Our final analysis included three studies, with their arguments summarised in different methodological areas. CONCLUSIONS Based on the evidence, we suggest the use of techniques more attuned to the population with intellectual disabilities, such sensitive preference-based instruments to collect health states data, and mapping algorithms to obtain utility values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Benedetto
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.,Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK
| | - Luís Filipe
- Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK.,Department of Health Research, Faculty of Health & Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Catherine Harris
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.,Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK
| | - Naheed Tahir
- Public Advisers' Forum, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK
| | - Alison Doherty
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.,Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.,Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bashir NS, Hughes A, Ungar WJ. Infliximab Pricing in International Economic Evaluations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease to Inform Biologic and Biosimilar Access Policies: A Systematic Review. MDM Policy Pract 2023; 8:23814683231156433. [PMID: 36860664 PMCID: PMC9969457 DOI: 10.1177/23814683231156433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. Policies mandating the use of lower cost biosimilars in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have created concerns for patients who prefer their original biologic. Purpose. To inform the cost-effectiveness of biosimilar infliximab treatment in IBD by systematically reviewing the effect of infliximab price variation on cost-effectiveness for jurisdictional decision making. Data Sources. MEDLINE, Embase, Healthstar, Allied and Complementary Medicine, Joanna Briggs Institute EBP Database, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Health and Psychosocial Instruments, Mental Measurements Yearbook citation databases, PEDE, CEA registry, HTA agencies. Study Selection. Economic evaluations of infliximab for adult or pediatric Crohn's disease and/or ulcerative colitis published from 1998 through 2019 in which drug price was varied in sensitivity analysis were included. Data Extraction. Study characteristics, main findings, and results of drug price sensitivity analyses were extracted. Studies were critically appraised. The cost-effective price of infliximab was determined based on the stated willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds for each jurisdiction. Data Synthesis. Infliximab price was examined in sensitivity analysis in 31 studies. Infliximab showed favorable cost-effectiveness at a price ranging from CAD $66 to $1,260 per vial, depending on jurisdiction. A total of 18 studies (58%) demonstrated cost-effectiveness ratios above the jurisdictional WTP threshold. Limitations. Drug prices were not always reported separately, WTP thresholds varied, and funding sources were not consistently reported. Conclusion. Despite the high cost of infliximab, few economic evaluations examined price variation, limiting the ability to infer the effects of biosimilar introduction. Alternative pricing strategies and access to treatment could be considered to enable IBD patients to maintain access to their current medications. Highlights In an effort to reduce public drug expenditures, Canadian and other jurisdictional drug plans have mandated the use of lower cost, but similarly effective, biosimilars in patients with newly diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease or require a nonmedical switch for established patients. This switch has created concerns for patients and clinicians who want to maintain the ability to make treatment decisions and remain with the original biologic.It is customary for economic evaluations to assess the robustness of results to variations in high-cost items such as medications. In the absence of economic evaluations of biosimilars, examining biologic drug price in sensitivity analysis provides insight into the cost-effectiveness of biosimilar alternatives. A total of 31 economic evaluations of infliximab for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease varied the infliximab price in sensitivity analysis.The infliximab price deemed to be cost-effective within each study ranged from CAD $66 to CAD $1,260 per 100-mg vial. A total of 18 studies (58%) demonstrated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio above the jurisdictional willingness-to-pay threshold. If policy decisions are based on price, then originator manufacturers could consider reducing the price or negotiating alternative pricing models to enable patients with inflammatory bowel disease to remain on their current medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naazish S. Bashir
- Program of Child Health Evaluative Sciences,
The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Avery Hughes
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and
Evaluation, the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Wendy J. Ungar
- Wendy J. Ungar, Program of Child Health
Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Peter Gilgan Centre for
Research and Learning, 686 Bay Street, 11th Floor, Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, USA;
()
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Benedetto V, Filipe L, Harris C, Spencer J, Hickson C, Clegg A. Analytical Frameworks and Outcome Measures in Economic Evaluations of Digital Health Interventions: A Methodological Systematic Review. Med Decis Making 2023; 43:125-138. [PMID: 36259354 PMCID: PMC9742632 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x221132741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital health interventions (DHIs) can improve the provision of health care services. To fully account for their effects in economic evaluations, traditional methods based on measuring health-related quality of life may not be appropriate, as nonhealth and process outcomes are likely to be relevant too. PURPOSE This systematic review identifies, assesses, and synthesizes the arguments on the analytical frameworks and outcome measures used in the economic evaluations of DHIs. The results informed recommendations for future economic evaluations. DATA SOURCES We ran searches on multiple databases, complemented by gray literature and backward and forward citation searches. STUDY SELECTION We included records containing theoretical and empirical arguments associated with the use of analytical frameworks and outcome measures for economic evaluations of DHIs. Following title/abstract and full-text screening, our final analysis included 15 studies. DATA EXTRACTION The arguments we extracted related to analytical frameworks (14 studies), generic outcome measures (5 studies), techniques used to elicit utility values (3 studies), and disease-specific outcome measures and instruments to collect health states data (both from 2 studies). DATA SYNTHESIS Rather than assessing the quality of the studies, we critically assessed and synthesized the extracted arguments. Building on this synthesis, we developed a 3-stage set of recommendations in which we encourage the use of impact matrices and analyses of equity impacts to integrate traditional economic evaluation methods. LIMITATIONS Our review and recommendations explored but not fully covered other potentially important aspects of economic evaluations that were outside our scope. CONCLUSIONS This is the first systematic review that summarizes the arguments on how the effects of DHIs could be measured in economic evaluations. Our recommendations will help design future economic evaluations. HIGHLIGHTS Using traditional outcome measures based on health-related quality of life (such as the quality-adjusted life-year) may not be appropriate in economic evaluations of digital health interventions, which are likely to trigger nonhealth and process outcomes.This is the first systematic review to investigate how the effects of digital health interventions could be measured in economic evaluations.We extracted and synthesized different arguments from the literature, outlining advantages and disadvantages associated with different methods used to measure the effects of digital health interventions.We propose a methodological set of recommendations in which 1) we suggest that researchers consider the use of impact matrices and cost-consequence analysis, 2) we discuss the suitability of analytical frameworks and outcome measures available in economic evaluations, and 3) we highlight the need for analyses of equity impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Benedetto
- Valerio Benedetto, Applied health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire (UCLan), Brook Building, Preston, Lancashire PR1 2HE, UK; ()
| | - Luís Filipe
- Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, Merseyside, UK,Department of Health Research, Faculty of Health & Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, Lancashire, UK
| | - Catherine Harris
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, UK,Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, Merseyside, UK
| | - Joseph Spencer
- Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, Merseyside, UK,Research Facilitation and Delivery Unit (RFDU), Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, UK
| | - Carmel Hickson
- Public Advisers’ Forum, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, Merseyside, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, UK,Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, Merseyside, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pelone F, Jacklin P, Francis JM, Purchase B. Health economic evaluations of interventions for supporting adult carers in the UK: a systematic review from the NICE Guideline. Int Psychogeriatr 2022; 34:839-52. [PMID: 33583436 DOI: 10.1017/S1041610220004111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Policy making increasingly needs cost-effectiveness evidence to inform resource allocation. The objective of this review is to identify and to investigate evidence evaluating the cost-effectiveness of interventions aimed to support adult carers, drawing on the National Institute for Health and Care guideline on Supporting Adult Carers. METHODS The protocol of the review was aimed to identify the economic studies published from 2003 onwards on all types of interventions for supporting adult carers. The applicability to the review and methodological quality of included economic evaluations were assessed using pre-established checklists specified in the National Institute for Health and Care (NICE) manual for developing guidelines. RESULTS Our search yielded 10 economic evaluations. The main types of strategies evaluated were psychological and emotional support, training, and education support interventions. We found that the interventions more likely to be cost-effective were usually tailored to the specific carers' circumstances and delivered face-to-face and were multi-component in nature, including elements of psycho-education, training, psychological and practical support. The narrative synthesis of results indicated a wide variation in cost-effectiveness findings and methodological quality. CONCLUSIONS This article indicates that systematic reviews of economic evaluations can be considered as an appropriate means to support decision makers in allocating health and social care resources. Given the high economic and social impact of unpaid caring, and based on the research gaps identified, we recommend that future economics research should be targeted on interventions for identifying carers; and programs for providing carers with support and advice to help them to enter, remain in or return to paid work.
Collapse
|
10
|
Podolsky MI, Present I, Neumann PJ, Kim DD. A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of COVID-19 Interventions: Considerations of Non-Health Impacts and Distributional Issues. Value Health 2022; 25:1298-1306. [PMID: 35398012 PMCID: PMC8986127 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to conduct a systematic review of economic evaluations of COVID-19 interventions and to examine whether and how these studies incorporate non-health impacts and distributional concerns. METHODS We searched the National Institutes of Health's COVID-19 Portfolio as of May 20, 2021, and supplemented our search with additional sources. We included original articles, including preprints, evaluating both the health and economic effects of a COVID-19-related intervention. Using a pre-specified data collection form, 2 reviewers independently screened, reviewed, and extracted information about the study characteristics, intervention types, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). We used an Impact Inventory to catalog the types of non-health impacts considered. RESULTS We included 70 articles, almost half of which were preprints. Most articles (56%) included at least one non-health impact, but fewer (21%) incorporated non-economic consequences. Few articles (17%) examined subgroups of interest. After excluding negative ICERs, the median ICER for the entire sample (n = 243 ratios) was $67,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) (interquartile range [IQR] $9000-$893,000/QALY). Interventions including a pharmaceutical component yielded a median ICER of $93,000/QALY (IQR $4000-$7,809,000/QALY), whereas interventions including a non-pharmaceutical component were slightly more cost-effective overall with a median ICER of $81,000/QALY (IQR $12,000-$1,034,000/QALY). Interventions reported to be highly cost-effective were treatment, public information campaigns, quarantining identified contacts/cases, canceling public events, and social distancing. CONCLUSIONS Our review highlights the lack of consideration of non-health and distributional impacts among COVID-19-related economic evaluations. Accounting for non-health impacts and distributional effects is essential for comprehensive assessment of interventions' value and imperative for generating cost-effectiveness evidence for both current and future pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan I Podolsky
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Isabel Present
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter J Neumann
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David D Kim
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Smith AF, Sadeq A, Kinzel E, Bhambhwani V. A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations Conducted for Interventions to Screen, Treat, and Manage Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2022; 30:1-8. [PMID: 35698819 DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2022.2084757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A systematic literature review (SLR) of economic evaluations (EE) conducted for interventions to screen, treat, and manage retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in the United States (US), United Kingdom (UK), and Canada was performed. METHODS The SLR accessed the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Health Business Elite, Econ. Lit, NHS EED, and Google Scholar databases over the period 1st January 2000 to 4th August 2021. The key Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) search terms used included: Retinopathy of prematurity, Cost-effectiveness analysis, Cost-utility analysis, Cost of illness, Cost-benefit analysis, Cost minimization analysis, Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, Quality adjusted life years, return on investment, burden of illness, disability adjusted life years, and Economic evaluation. Screening was conducted using Covidence, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. Data extraction was performed using MS Excel. RESULTS 1,527 articles were examined with nine (9) papers identified, one (1) from the UK; two (2) from Canada and six (6) from the US. Cost-effectiveness analysis was the main form of EE conducted (n = 5) and telemedicine screening (n = 3) was found to be highly cost-effective for ROP with the ICER values ranging from £446 to £4,240 per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) in 2021 figures. 73% of included studies complied with the CHEERS checklist for EE. CONCLUSIONS ROP screening and treatment strategies reviewed were highly cost-effective. This review may assist eye health policymakers in planning nationwide screening and treatment programs to combat vision loss and blindness due to ROP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew F Smith
- Department of Ophthalmology, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- MedMetrics Inc, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Aaqib Sadeq
- MedMetrics Inc, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Eden Kinzel
- Health Sciences Library, Memorial University, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Vishaal Bhambhwani
- Ophthalmology Services, Department of Surgery, Northern Ontario School of Medicine and Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Augustovski F, García Martí S, Espinoza MA, Palacios A, Husereau D, Pichon-Riviere A. Estándares Consolidados de Reporte de Evaluaciones Económicas Sanitarias: adaptación al español de la lista de comprobación CHEERS 2022. Value Health Reg Issues 2022; 27:110-114. [PMID: 35031081 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2021.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Health economic evaluations (HEEs) are comparative analyses of courses of action in terms of both costs and consequences. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) original version and its adaptation to Spanish were published in 2013. Its objectives were to promote that the HEEs are identifiable, interpretable, and useful for decision making and serve as a reporting guide. The new CHEERS 2022 replaces the previous one and tries to be more easily applied to any HEE and incorporates recent methodological advances and the importance of stakeholder involvement including patients and the general public. METHODS For the present adaptation, the following stages were followed: (1) independent translations of the original list into Spanish, (2) blind back-translations, (3) evaluation of their quality, (4) preparation of a new version in Spanish, (5) review and improvement by the author team, (6) preparation of a new version in Spanish, (7) distribution of the preliminary Spanish version and the original one to the American HTA Network (Red de las Américas de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias) and Spanish-speaking experts for evaluation and feedback, (8) monitoring of changes to the original list under peer review at BritishMedicalJournal, and (9) consolidation of the final adaptation of the Spanish CHEERS 2022 checklist. RESULTS In this article, we detail the process and the Spanish adaptation of the 28-item CHEERS 2022 checklist and its recommendations. CONCLUSIONS This list is intended for researchers reporting HEE in peer-reviewed journals and reviewers, editors, and, among others, health technology assessment bodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Augustovski
- Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Escuela de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Sebastián García Martí
- Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Manuel A Espinoza
- Departamento de Salud Pública, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Unidad de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Alfredo Palacios
- Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Don Husereau
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Economics, Alberta, Canada
| | - Andrés Pichon-Riviere
- Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Escuela de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Veettil SK, Syeed MS, Noviyan R, Thakkinstian A, Chaiyakunapruk N. Does meta-analysis of economic evaluations have the potential to play a role in healthcare decision-making in the United States? J Med Econ 2022; 25:750-754. [PMID: 35621016 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2083347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The current use of economic evidence in the decision-making process in the US is increasing. Meta-analysis of economic evaluations (MAEE) has gained recognition in recent years and can support decision-making at the global level or for countries with resource constraints. The focus of this article is to demonstrate how MAEE may contribute to the decision-making process in the US healthcare system. We demonstrated that MAEE can provide an efficient mechanism to quantitatively summarize cost-effectiveness findings based on all existing studies from the US answering the same question across different assumptions. This sort of evidence is important for US policymakers to support policy decision-making. MAEE methods can streamline the process of reviewing complex economic models and their findings, which has been previously reported by stakeholders as a barrier to the use of economic evidence in decision-making in the US. However, the currently proposed method may not fully address the issue of heterogeneity observed among MAEEs. There is a critical need to explore sources of heterogeneity and develop a standardized approach to handle it to improve the efficiency and acceptability of future MAEEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sajesh K Veettil
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - M Sakil Syeed
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Rini Noviyan
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Udayana University, Jimbaran, Bali, Indonesia
| | - Ammarin Thakkinstian
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi, Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Health Technology Assessment Graduate Program, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- IDEAS Center, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Li T, McClelland MM, Tominey SL, Tracy A. Cost-Effectiveness Analyses on Various Models of The Red Light, Purple Light Self-Regulation Intervention for Young Children. Front Psychol 2021; 12:711578. [PMID: 34721157 PMCID: PMC8551584 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.711578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Early childhood interventions can improve self-regulation, but there are few economic evaluations of such interventions. This study analyzed the cost-effectiveness of an early childhood self-regulation intervention (Red Light Purple Light!; RLPL), comparing three different models of implementation across stages of intervention development: (Model 1) trained research assistants (RAs; graduate students) directly delivered the RLPL intervention to children; (Model 2) RAs trained trainers (e.g., program coaches), who then trained teachers to implement RLPL with children (e.g., train-the-trainer); and (Model 3) program faculty trained teachers to deliver the RLPL intervention to children. We implemented a cost-effectiveness analysis by calculating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. We also conducted a series of sensitivity analyses to adjust for parameter uncertainty. Our base-case analysis suggests that Model 2 was the most cost-effective strategy, in that a cost of $23 per child was associated with a one-unit increase of effect size on self-regulation scores. The “train-the-trainer” model remained the optimal strategy across scenarios in our sensitivity analysis. This study fills an important gap in cost-effectiveness analyses on early childhood self-regulation interventions. Our process and results can serve as a model for future cost-effectiveness analyses of early childhood intervention programs and may ultimately inform decisions related to intervention adoption that optimize resource allocation and improve program design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Li
- Health Management and Policy, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States
| | - Megan M McClelland
- Human Development and Family Sciences and the Hallie E. Ford Center for Healthy Children and Families, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States
| | - Shauna L Tominey
- Extension Family and Community Health and the Hallie E. Ford Center for Healthy Children and Families, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States
| | - Alexis Tracy
- Human Development and Family Sciences and the Hallie E. Ford Center for Healthy Children and Families, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gabrio A. A Bayesian Framework for Patient-Level Partitioned Survival Cost-Utility Analysis. Med Decis Making 2021; 41:1033-1048. [PMID: 34009065 PMCID: PMC8488644 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x211012348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Patient-level health economic data collected alongside clinical trials are an important component of the process of technology appraisal. For end-of-life treatments, the modeling of cost-effectiveness data may involve some form of partitioned survival analysis, in which measures of quality of life and survival for pre- and postprogression periods are combined to generate aggregate measures of clinical benefits (e.g., quality-adjusted survival). In addition, resource use data are often collected and costs are calculated for each type of health service (e.g., treatment, hospital, or adverse events costs). A critical problem in these analyses is that effectiveness and cost data present some complexities, such as nonnormality, spikes, and missingness, which should be addressed using appropriate methods to avoid biased results. This article proposes a general Bayesian framework that takes into account the complexities of trial-based partitioned survival cost-utility data to provide more adequate evidence for policy makers. Our approach is motivated by, and applied to, a working example based on data from a trial assessing the cost-effectiveness of a new treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.[Box: see text].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Gabrio
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dijk HH, Wessels LM, Constanti M, van den Hoofdakker BJ, Hoekstra PJ, Groenman AP. Cost-Effectiveness and Cost Utility of Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2021; 31:578-596. [PMID: 34705525 DOI: 10.1089/cap.2021.0068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Objectives: This systematic review provides an overview of full economic evaluations of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatments, evaluates their outcomes, and highlights gaps in the literature. Data Sources: Electronic databases were searched for full economic evaluations of ADHD treatments for children, adolescents, or adults published in English or Dutch. Results: Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Almost all studies that compared medication or psychosocial treatment to no treatment, placebo, or care as usual indicated that medication and psychosocial treatment were cost-effective compared to the control group. Stimulant treatment appeared to be cost-effective for the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents. Only few studies focus on treatments in adults and psychosocial treatments and the number of studies with long time horizons and without industry funding is limited. Conclusions: Despite the rising interest in cost-effectiveness, this systematic review shows that more cost-effectiveness research of higher quality is warranted to aid in the optimal use of available treatments and resources for individuals with ADHD. Specifically, more studies should focus on treatments in adults and psychosocial treatments, and more studies with long time horizons and without industry funding are warranted. Nevertheless, we can conclude that treating ADHD is generally cost-effective compared to no treatment. PROSPERO: CRD42017060074. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=60074.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermien H Dijk
- Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Accare Child Study Center
| | - Lisa M Wessels
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Accare Child Study Center
| | - Margaret Constanti
- National Guideline Centre, Royal College of Physicians, London, United Kingdom
| | - Barbara J van den Hoofdakker
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Accare Child Study Center
| | - Pieter J Hoekstra
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Accare Child Study Center
| | - Annabeth P Groenman
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Accare Child Study Center
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Olde Keizer RACM, Henneman L, Ploos van Amstel JK, Vissers LELM, Frederix GWJ. Economic evaluations of exome and genome sequencing in pediatric genetics: considerations towards a consensus strategy. J Med Econ 2021; 24:60-70. [PMID: 34915793 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2021.2009725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) is increasingly used for the diagnosis of rare genetic disorders. The aim of this study is to review the different approaches for economic evaluations of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in pediatric care used to date, to identify all costs, effects, and time horizons taken into account. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted to identify published economic evaluations of NGS applications in pediatric diagnostics, i.e. exome sequencing (ES) and/or genome sequencing (GS). Information regarding methodological approach, costs, effects, and time horizon was abstracted from these publications. RESULTS Twenty-eight economic evaluations of ES/GS within pediatrics were identified. Costs included were mainly restricted to direct in-hospital healthcare costs and varied widely in inclusion of sort of costs and time-horizon. Nineteen studies included diagnostic yield and eight studies included cost-effectiveness as outcome measures. Studies varied greatly in terms of included sort of costs data, effects, and time horizon. CONCLUSION Large differences in inclusion of cost and effect parameters were identified between studies. Validity of outcomes can therefore be questioned, which hinders valid comparison and widespread generalization of conclusions. In addition to current health economic guidance, specific guidance for evaluations in pediatric care is therefore necessary to improve the validity of outcomes and furthermore facilitate comparable decision-making for implementing novel NGS-based diagnostic modalities in pediatric genetics and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richelle A C M Olde Keizer
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lisenka E L M Vissers
- Department of Human Genetics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gerardus W J Frederix
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Genetics, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Achieving health equity has proven elusive for two reasons. First, most research has focused on changing the behavior of individuals; however, policies that address socioeconomic factors or change the context to facilitate healthy decisions tend to be more effective. Second, health disparity science and evidence are not consistently used to guide policy makers, even those seeking health equity. In this perspective, we discuss economic evaluation tools that researchers can use to assist decision-makers in conducting research or evaluating policy: self-reported health-related quality of life surveys and cost-benefit analysis evaluations informed with willingness to pay research and analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Isabel Roldós
- City University of New York (CUNY) Institute for Health Equity, Bronx, New York, USA
- Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Sciences, Human Services and Nursing (HS2N), Lehman College–CUNY, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Nancy Breen
- Office of Science Policy, Planning, Evaluation, and Reporting (OSPPER), National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Turner HC, Archer RA, Downey LE, Isaranuwatchai W, Chalkidou K, Jit M, Teerawattananon Y. An Introduction to the Main Types of Economic Evaluations Used for Informing Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in Healthcare: Key Features, Uses, and Limitations. Front Public Health 2021; 9:722927. [PMID: 34513790 PMCID: PMC8424074 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.722927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Economic evidence is increasingly being used for informing health policies. However, the underlining principles of health economic analyses are not always fully understood by non-health economists, and inappropriate types of analyses, as well as inconsistent methodologies, may be being used for informing health policy decisions. In addition, there is a lack of open access information and methodological guidance targeted to public health professionals, particularly those based in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) settings. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive and accessible introduction to economic evaluations for public health professionals with a focus on LMIC settings. We cover the main principles underlining the most common types of full economic evaluations used in healthcare decision making in the context of priority setting (namely cost-effectiveness/cost-utility analyses, cost-benefit analyses), and outline their key features, strengths and weaknesses. It is envisioned that this will help those conducting such analyses, as well as stakeholders that need to interpret their output, gain a greater understanding of these methods and help them select/distinguish between the different approaches. In particular, we highlight the need for greater awareness of the methods used to place a monetary value on the health benefits of interventions, and the potential for such estimates to be misinterpreted. Specifically, the economic benefits reported are typically an approximation, summarising the health benefits experienced by a population monetarily in terms of individual preferences or potential productivity gains, rather than actual realisable or fiscal monetary benefits to payers or society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo C Turner
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel A Archer
- Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Laura E Downey
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai
- Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kalipso Chalkidou
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Jit
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.,Modelling and Economics Unit, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yot Teerawattananon
- Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.,Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sharkawy MN, Dastan I. A scoping review of health economic evaluation in the World Health Organization Eastern Mediterranean region. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2021; 21:877-884. [PMID: 34024232 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1933949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Economic evaluations are widely used tools that greatly contribute to evidence-based health policy and decision-making. However, economic evidence is not commonly used in the countries of the World Health Organization Eastern Mediterranean Region.Areas covered: The aim of this scoping review is to map the existing literature of health economic evaluation studies in the countries of the World Health Organization Eastern Mediterranean Region. Also, the review aims to identify the research gaps in the field of health economic evaluation in the region and finally provide recommendations for research and policy making. We searched six electronic databases. Six items were extracted from each of the included studies: first author, publication year, country of the study, study type, health technology assessed, and perspective.Expert opinion: The quality and quantity of HEE studies should be improved in the region. There is a need to follow evidence-based methodological rigor to aid in informed health-care decision-making and efficient use of health-care resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mennatollah Nagy Sharkawy
- Health Economics and Financing (HEF) unit, Division of Universal Health Systems (UHS), World Health Organization (WHO), Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office (EMRO), Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ilker Dastan
- WHO Country Office for Tajikistan, Dushanbe, Tajikistan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cheung MC, Chan KK, Golden S, Hay A, Pater J, Prica A, Chen BE, Leighl N, Mittmann N. Minimization of resource utilization data collected within cost-effectiveness analyses conducted alongside Canadian Cancer Trials Group phase III trials. Clin Trials 2021; 18:500-504. [PMID: 33866856 PMCID: PMC8290988 DOI: 10.1177/17407745211005045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Cost-effectiveness analyses embedded within randomized trials allow for evaluation of value alongside conventional efficacy outcomes; however, collection of resource utilization data can require considerable trial resources. Methods We re-analyzed the results from four phase III Canadian Cancer Trials Group trials that embedded cost-effectiveness analyses to determine the impact of minimizing potential cost categories on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. For each trial, we disaggregated total costs into component incremental cost categories and recalculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios using (1) only the top 3 cost categories, (2) the top 5 cost categories, and (3) all cost components. Using individual trial-level data, confidence intervals for each incremental cost-effectiveness ratio simulation were generated by bootstrapping and descriptively presented with the original confidence intervals (and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios) from the publications. Results Drug acquisition costs represented the highest incremental cost category in three trials, while hospitalization costs represented the other consistent cost driver and the top incremental cost category in the fourth trial. Recalculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios based on fewer cost components (top 3 and top 5) did not differ meaningfully from the original published results. Based on conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds (US$50,000–US$100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year), none of the re-analyses would have changed the original perception of whether the experimental therapies were considered cost-effective. Conclusions These results suggest that the collection of resource utilization data within cancer trials could be narrowed. Omission of certain cost categories that have minimal impact on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, such as routine laboratory investigations, could reduce the costs and undue burden associated with the collection of data required for cancer trial cost-effectiveness analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew C Cheung
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Odette Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Committee on Economic Analysis, Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada.,Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kelvin Kw Chan
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Odette Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Committee on Economic Analysis, Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Shane Golden
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Annette Hay
- Committee on Economic Analysis, Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Joseph Pater
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Anca Prica
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bingshu E Chen
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Natasha Leighl
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nicole Mittmann
- Committee on Economic Analysis, Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada.,Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wang BC, Chaiyakunapruk N, Zhu S, Babigumira JB, Furnback W, Chitale R, Gamil A, Zhao K, Wasserman M. A systematic literature review of economic evaluations of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in east and southeast Asia (2006-2019). Expert Rev Vaccines 2021; 21:885-898. [PMID: 33682584 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1894933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pneumococcal infections can lead to serious invasive diseases such as meningitis, septicemia and pneumonia, as well as milder but more common illnesses such as sinusitis and otitis media. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the inclusion of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) in infant National Immunization Program (NIP) programs worldwide. Decision-makers in Asian countries planning to introduce PCVs in their respective NIP will need a comprehensive evidence of effectiveness of PCVs at the population level and economic evidence including cost-effectiveness. AREAS COVERED A systematic literature review (from 1/1/2016 to 10/11/2019) of PCVs in East and Southeast Asia to understand (1) the contributing factors to cost-effectiveness results of PCVs and (2) whether gaps in evidence exist suggesting why the region may have yet to implement full NIPs. EXPERT OPINION In East and Southeast Asia, vaccination with PCVs was found to significantly reduce the mortality and morbidity of pneumococcal diseases and was cost-effective compared to no vaccination. Study assumptions, specifically vaccine local acquisition, the inclusion or exclusion of indirect effects (serotype replacement and herd effect), cross-protection, and protection against nontypeable haemophilus influenzae and serotype 3, were the main drivers of cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce Cm Wang
- Health Economics and Real World Evidence , Elysia Group, LLC, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Shuiqing Zhu
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Pfizer Investment Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Wesley Furnback
- Health Economics and Real World Evidence , Elysia Group, LLC, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ramaa Chitale
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amgad Gamil
- Medical and Scientific Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Singapore
| | - Kun Zhao
- Health Technology Assessment, China National Health Development Research Center, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China
| | - Matt Wasserman
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fens T, de Boer PT, van Puijenbroek EP, Postma MJ. Inclusion of Safety-Related Issues in Economic Evaluations for Seasonal Influenza Vaccines: A Systematic Review. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:vaccines9020111. [PMID: 33540633 PMCID: PMC7913116 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9020111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Vaccines for seasonal influenza are a good preventive and cost-effective strategy. However, it is unknown if and how these economic evaluations include the adverse events following immunization (AEFI), and what the impact of such inclusion is on the health economic outcomes. (2) Methods: We searched the literature, up to January 2020, to identify economic evaluations of seasonal influenza vaccines that considered AEFIs. The review protocol was published in PROSPERO (CDR42017058523). (3) Results: A total of 52 economic evaluations considered AEFI-related parameters in their analyses, reflecting 16% of the economic evaluations on seasonal influenza vaccines in the initial study selection. Most studies used the societal perspective (64%) and evaluated vaccination of children (37%). Where considered, studies included direct medical costs of AEFIs (90%), indirect costs (27%), and disutilities/quality-adjusted life years loss due to AEFIs (37%). The majority of these studies accounted for the effects of the costs of AEFI on cost-effectiveness for Guillain–Barré syndrome. In those papers allowing cost share estimation, direct medical cost of AFEIs was less than 2% of total direct costs. (4) Conclusions: Although the overall impact of AEFIs on the cost-effectiveness outcomes was found to be low, we urge their inclusion in economic evaluations of seasonal influenza vaccines to reflect comprehensive reports for the decision makers and end-users of the vaccination strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Fens
- Department of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & -Economics (PTE2), Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands; (P.T.d.B.); (E.P.v.P.); (M.J.P.)
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| | - Pieter T. de Boer
- Department of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & -Economics (PTE2), Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands; (P.T.d.B.); (E.P.v.P.); (M.J.P.)
| | - Eugène P. van Puijenbroek
- Department of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & -Economics (PTE2), Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands; (P.T.d.B.); (E.P.v.P.); (M.J.P.)
- Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb, 5237 MH ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten J. Postma
- Department of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & -Economics (PTE2), Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands; (P.T.d.B.); (E.P.v.P.); (M.J.P.)
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Economics, Econometrics & Finance, Faculty of Economics & Business, University of Groningen, 9747 AE Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60132, Indonesia
- Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45363, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Younis T, Lee A, Coombes ME, Bouganim N, Becker D, Revil C, Jhuti GS. Economic evaluation of adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer and residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant taxane and trastuzumab-based treatment in Canada. Curr Oncol 2020; 27:e578-e589. [PMID: 33380873 PMCID: PMC7755445 DOI: 10.3747/co.27.6517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In the katherine trial, adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine [T-DM1, Kadcyla (Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, U.S.A.)], compared with trastuzumab, significantly reduced the risk of recurrence or death by 50% (unstratified hazard ratio: 0.50; 95% confidence interval: 0.39 to 0.64; p < 0.0001) in patients with her2-positive early breast cancer (ebc) and residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant systemic treatment. A cost-utility evaluation, with probabilistic analyses, was conducted to examine the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (qaly) gained associated with T-DM1 relative to trastuzumab, given the higher per-cycle cost of T-DM1. Methods A Markov model comprising a number of health states was used to examine clinical and economic outcomes over a lifetime horizon from the Canadian public payer perspective. Patients entered the model in the invasive disease-free survival (idfs) state, where they received either T-DM1 or trastuzumab. Transition probabilities between the health states were derived from the katherine trial, Canadian life tables, and published literature from other relevant clinical trials (emilia, cleopatra, and M77001). Resource use, costs, and utilities were derived from katherine, other clinical trials, published literature, provincial fee schedules, and clinical expert opinion. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for key assumptions and model parameters. Results Compared with trastuzumab, adjuvant T-DM1 was associated with a cost savings of $8,300 per patient and a 2.16 incremental qaly gain; thus T-DM1 dominated trastuzumab. Scenario analyses yielded similar results, with T-DM1 dominating trastuzumab or producing highly favourable incremental cost-utility ratios of less than $10,000 per qaly. Conclusions Adjuvant T-DM1 monotherapy is a cost-effective strategy compared with trastuzumab alone in the treatment of patients with her2-positive ebc and residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Younis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Queen Elizabeth ii Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS
| | - A Lee
- Quadrant Health Economics Inc., Cambridge, ON
| | | | - N Bouganim
- Cedars Cancer Centre, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC
| | - D Becker
- Quadrant Health Economics Inc., Cambridge, ON
| | - C Revil
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Limited, Basel, Switzerland
| | - G S Jhuti
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Limited, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cacciatore P, Visser LA, Buyukkaramikli N, van der Ploeg CPB, van den Akker-van Marle ME. The Methodological Quality and Challenges in Conducting Economic Evaluations of Newborn Screening: A Scoping Review. Int J Neonatal Screen 2020; 6:ijns6040094. [PMID: 33238605 PMCID: PMC7712813 DOI: 10.3390/ijns6040094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cost-effectiveness (CEA) and cost-utility analyses (CUA) have become popular types of economic evaluations (EE) used for evidence-based decision-making in healthcare resource allocation. Newborn screening programs (NBS) can have significant clinical benefits for society, and cost-effectiveness analysis may help to select the optimal strategy among different screening programs, including the no-screening option, on different conditions. These economic analyses of NBS, however, are hindered by several methodological challenges. This study explored the methodological quality in recent NBS economic evaluations and analyzed the main challenges and strategies adopted by researchers to deal with them. METHODS A scoping review was conducted according to PRISMA methodology to identify CEAs and CUAs of NBS. The methodological quality of the retrieved studies was assessed quantitatively using a specific guideline for the quality assessment of NBS economic evaluations, by calculating a general score for each EE. Challenges in the studies were then explored using thematic analysis as a qualitative synthesis approach. RESULTS Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. The quantitative analysis showed that the methodological quality of NBS economic evaluations was heterogeneous. Lack of clear description of items related to results, discussion, and discounting were the most frequent flaws. Methodological challenges in performing EEs of neonatal screenings include the adoption of a long time horizon, the use of quality-adjusted life years as health outcome measure, and the assessment of costs beyond the screening interventions. CONCLUSIONS The results of this review can support future economic evaluation research, aiding researchers to develop a methodological guidance to perform EEs aimed at producing solid results to inform decisions for resource allocation in neonatal screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pasquale Cacciatore
- Sezione di Igiene, Istituto di Sanità Pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Laurenske A. Visser
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (L.A.V.); (N.B.)
| | - Nasuh Buyukkaramikli
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (L.A.V.); (N.B.)
| | | | - M. Elske van den Akker-van Marle
- Unit Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Datasciences, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rejesus RM, Jones MS. Perspective: enhancing economic evaluations and impacts of integrated pest management Farmer Field Schools (IPM-FFS) in low-income countries. Pest Manag Sci 2020; 76:3527-3536. [PMID: 32418359 DOI: 10.1002/ps.5912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Revised: 04/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/16/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Over the last few decades, the use of Farmer Field Schools (FFS) have been considered one of the best approaches to disseminate integrated pest management (IPM) practices that aim to reduce reliance on and misuse of chemical pest control methods in agriculture. However, the published empirical literature has been decidedly mixed in terms of the effectiveness of the IPM-FFS approach to improve economic outcomes in the short-term (e.g. reduce chemical use, improve profits), and the potential for scaling-up and IPM dissemination in the medium-term. This article briefly explores the empirical IPM-FFS literature and draws implications for future research directions that can potentially enhance IPM knowledge diffusion methods (including IPM-FFS) and increase the economic impact of IPM techniques in low-income countries. We find that promising research directions to improve understanding of IPM dissemination and IPM impacts will need to involve: (i) interdisciplinary long-run studies using rigorous evaluation methods; (ii) in-depth assessments of spillover effects; (iii) careful examination of IPM and IPM-FFS impact heterogeneity; (iv) evaluation of novel IPM packages with herbicide- and genetics-centered components; (v) piloting and impact assessments of alternative IPM knowledge diffusion structures; and (vi) piloting and impact analysis of IPM dissemination and learning programs with private sector involvement. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roderick M Rejesus
- Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Michael S Jones
- Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ten Ham RMT, Klungel OH, Leufkens HGM, Frederix GWJ. A Review of Methodological Considerations for Economic Evaluations of Gene Therapies and Their Application in Literature. Value Health 2020; 23:1268-1280. [PMID: 32940245 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.1833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Revised: 04/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify methodological considerations discussed in literature addressing economic evaluations (EEs) of gene therapies (GTs). Additionally, we assessed if these considerations are applied in published GT EEs to increase understanding and explore impact. METHODS First a peer-reviewed literature review was performed to identify research addressing methodological considerations of GT EEs until August 2019. Identified considerations were grouped in themes using thematic content analysis. A second literature search was conducted in which we identified published evaluations. The EE quality of reporting was assessed using Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards. RESULTS The first literature search yielded 13 articles discussing methodological considerations. The second search provided 12 EEs. Considerations identified were payment models, definition of perspectives, addressing uncertainty, data extrapolation, discount rates, novel value elements, and use of indirect and surrogate endpoints. All EEs scored satisfactory to good according to Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards. Regarding methodological application, we found 1 methodological element (payment models) was applied in 2 base cases. Scenarios explored alternative perspectives, survival assumptions, and extrapolation methods in 10 EEs. CONCLUSIONS Although EE quality of reporting was considered good, their informativeness for health technology assessment and decision makers seemed limited owing to many uncertainties. We suggest accepted EE methods can broadly be applied to GTs, but few elements may need adjustment. Further research and multi-stakeholder consensus is needed to determine appropriateness and application of individual methodological considerations. For now, we recommend including scenario analyses to explore impact of methodological choices and (clinical) uncertainties. This study contributes to better understanding of perceived appropriate evaluation of GTs and informs best modeling practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renske M T Ten Ham
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Olaf H Klungel
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hubert G M Leufkens
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Lygature, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Geert W J Frederix
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Guertin JR, Conombo B, Langevin R, Bergeron F, Holbrook A, Humphries B, Matteau A, Potter BJ, Renoux C, Tarride JÉ, Durand M. A Systematic Review of Methods Used for Confounding Adjustment in Observational Economic Evaluations in Cardiology Conducted between 2013 and 2017. Med Decis Making 2020; 40:582-595. [PMID: 32627666 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x20937257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background. Observational economic evaluations (i.e., economic evaluations in which treatment allocation is not randomized) are prone to confounding bias. Prior reviews published in 2013 have shown that adjusting for confounding is poorly done, if done at all. Although these reviews raised awareness on the issues, it is unclear if their results improved the methodological quality of future work. We therefore aimed to investigate whether and how confounding was accounted for in recently published observational economic evaluations in the field of cardiology. Methods. We performed a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PsycInfo databases using a set of Medical Subject Headings and keywords covering topics in "observational economic evaluations in health within humans" and "cardiovascular diseases." Any study published in either English or French between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017, addressing our search criteria was eligible for inclusion in our review. Our protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018112391). Results. Forty-two (0.6%) out of 7523 unique citations met our inclusion criteria. Fewer than half of the selected studies adjusted for confounding (n = 19 [45.2%]). Of those that adjusted for confounding, propensity score matching (n = 8 [42.1%]) and other matching-based approaches were favored (n = 8 [42.1%]). Our results also highlighted that most authors who adjusted for confounding rarely justified their methodological choices. Conclusion. Our results indicate that adjustment for confounding is often ignored when conducting an observational economic evaluation. Continued knowledge translation efforts aimed at improving researchers' knowledge regarding confounding bias and methods aimed at addressing this issue are required and should be supported by journal editors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason R Guertin
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.,Axe Santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Blanchard Conombo
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.,Axe Santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | | | | | - Anne Holbrook
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,Department of Health Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Brittany Humphries
- Department of Health Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Alexis Matteau
- Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.,Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.,Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Brian J Potter
- Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.,Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.,Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Christel Renoux
- McGill University, Montreal, Canada.,Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH), The Research Institute of St. Joe's Hamilton, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton.,McMaster Chair in Health Technology Management, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Jean-Éric Tarride
- Department of Health Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,Department of Economics; McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH), The Research Institute of St. Joe's Hamilton, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton.,McMaster Chair in Health Technology Management, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Madeleine Durand
- Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.,Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.,Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Background: The incorporation of spillover effects in health economic research is recognized by regulatory agencies as useful for valuing health interventions and technologies. To date, spillover effects are not universally used within economic evaluations and conceptual definitions of spillover effects are vague within the context of health economics research. Materials & methods: In an effort to enhance awareness of spillover effects for health economic evaluations, a concept analysis using Walker and Avant's approach was performed to elucidate the key attributes, definitions, antecedents and consequences of spillover effects across a range of disciplines. Results: Key attributes included lack of intention, positive and negative impacts, and two entity/domain involvement. Antecedents included an initial action and desired outcome. Consequences involved spillovers across industries, work life to personal life domains, patient to family member domains and across healthcare markets. Conclusion: The analysis provides greater clarification around the dimensions of spillover effects and reveals opportunities to enhance methodological approaches to assessing spillovers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Jane Muir
- Department of Acute and Specialty Care, University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Jessica Keim-Malpass
- Department of Acute and Specialty Care, University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Heslin M, Gellatly J, Pedley R, Knopp-Hoffer J, Hardy G, Arundel C, Bee P, McMillan D, Peckham E, Gega L, Barkham M, Bower P, Gilbody S, Lovell K, Byford S. Out of pocket expenses in obsessive compulsive disorder. J Ment Health 2020; 31:607-612. [PMID: 32357807 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1755028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Background: Despite anecdotal evidence that the out of pocket costs of OCD can be substantial in some cases, there is no evidence on how many people they affect, or the magnitude of these costs.Aims: This paper explores the type and quantity of out of pocket expenses reported by a large sample of adults with OCD.Methods: Data on out of pocket expenses were collected from participants taking part in the OCTET multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Participants were aged 18+, meeting DSM-IV criteria for OCD, and scoring 16+ on the Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. Individual-level resource use data including a description and estimated cost of out of pocket expenses were measured using an adapted version of the Adult Service Use Schedule (AD-SUS): a questionnaire used to collect data on resource use.Results: Forty-five percent (208/465) reported out of pocket expenses due to their OCD. The mean cost of out of pocket expenses was £19.19 per week (SD £27.56 SD), range £0.06-£224.00.Conclusions: Future economic evaluations involving participants with OCD should include out of pocket expenses, but careful consideration of alternative approaches to the collection and costing of this data is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Heslin
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK
| | - Judith Gellatly
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Rebecca Pedley
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Jasmin Knopp-Hoffer
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Gillian Hardy
- Centre for Psychological Services Research, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Penny Bee
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Dean McMillan
- Hull York Medical School & Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Emily Peckham
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Lina Gega
- Hull York Medical School & Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Michael Barkham
- Centre for Psychological Services Research, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Hull York Medical School & Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Karina Lovell
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Byford
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
You R, Zhang Y, Wu DBC, Liu J, Qian X, Luo N, Mori T. Cost-Effectiveness of Zoledronic Acid Versus Oral Alendronate for Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Women in China. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:456. [PMID: 32425768 PMCID: PMC7203488 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of yearly intravenous zoledronic acid treatment versus weekly oral alendronate for postmenopausal osteoporotic women in China. Methods We used a Markov microsimulation model to compare the cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid with alendronate in Chinese postmenopausal osteoporotic women with no fracture history at various ages of therapy initiation from health care payer perspective. Results The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for the zoledronic acid versus alendronate were $23,581/QALY at age 65 years, $17,367/QALY at age 70 years, $14,714/QALY at age 75 years, and $12,169/QALY at age 80 years, respectively. In deterministic sensitivity analyses, the study demonstrated that the two most impactful parameters were the annual cost of zoledronic acid and the relative risk of hip fracture with zoledronic acid. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, the probabilities of zoledronic acid being cost-effective compared with alendronate were 70–100% at a willingness-to-pay of $29,340 per QALY. Conclusions Among postmenopausal osteoporotic women in China, zoledronic acid therapy is cost-effective at all ages examined from health care payer perspective, compared with weekly oral alendronate. In addition, alendronate treatment is shown to be dominant for patients at ages 65 and 70 with full persistence. This study will help clinicians and policymakers make better decisions about the relative economic value of osteoporosis treatments in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruxu You
- Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - David Bin-Chia Wu
- School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia
| | - Jinyu Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xinyu Qian
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nan Luo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Takahiro Mori
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.,Health Services Research and Development Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.,Department of General Internal Medicine, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Background: In Japan, pharmacoeconomic requirements for list-price adjustment were institutionalized in April 2019 following provisional implementation of a new Health Technology Assessment (HTA) program 2016-2019. Since April 2019, submission of cost-effectiveness evidence to the Central Social Insurance Medical Council (Chuikyo) as part of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare has been mandatory for selected pharmaceuticals and medical devices.Methods: Based on a review of publications and commentaries since April 2019, together with views from a group of experts on key issues to be addressed, this report provides an update on recent HTA developments and key challenges still to be addressed.Results and Discussion: Japan's new HTA program is a first step toward development of a universal healthcare system that can be sustainable for many years into the future. Currently, Japan's HTA program requires provision of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) as evidence, with quality-adjusted life years as the preferred outcome measure. Prices can be adjusted both upward and downward according to the degree of the ICER estimate. Japan is the first country to have adopted an algorithmic method for "ICER-based" pricing; however, HTA measures that extend beyond a single ICER estimate are needed to take full advantage of HTA in the future. In particular, generation of evidence of value should support changes to the healthcare system so that incentives for innovation are not diminished while industry and government are not overburdened by the generation or assessment of evidence. There is a need to ensure scientifically sound HTA expertise across all sectors in Japan, and therefore enhancement of HTA literacy and capability among healthcare professionals, academia, government, and industry should be a priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isao Kamae
- Graduate School of Public Policy, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rob Thwaites
- Global Outcomes Research, Takeda International, London, UK
| | - Anna Hamada
- Japan Medical Affairs, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, Burmester GR, Dougados M, Kerschbaumer A, McInnes IB, Sepriano A, van Vollenhoven RF, de Wit M, Aletaha D, Aringer M, Askling J, Balsa A, Boers M, den Broeder AA, Buch MH, Buttgereit F, Caporali R, Cardiel MH, De Cock D, Codreanu C, Cutolo M, Edwards CJ, van Eijk-Hustings Y, Emery P, Finckh A, Gossec L, Gottenberg JE, Hetland ML, Huizinga TWJ, Koloumas M, Li Z, Mariette X, Müller-Ladner U, Mysler EF, da Silva JAP, Poór G, Pope JE, Rubbert-Roth A, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Saag KG, Strangfeld A, Takeuchi T, Voshaar M, Westhovens R, van der Heijde D. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79:685-699. [PMID: 31969328 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1534] [Impact Index Per Article: 383.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Revised: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To provide an update of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management recommendations to account for the most recent developments in the field. METHODS An international task force considered new evidence supporting or contradicting previous recommendations and novel therapies and strategic insights based on two systematic literature searches on efficacy and safety of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) since the last update (2016) until 2019. A predefined voting process was applied, current levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned and participants ultimately voted independently on their level of agreement with each of the items. RESULTS The task force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 12 recommendations concerning use of conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine); glucocorticoids (GCs); biological (b) DMARDs (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab), abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, sarilumab and biosimilar (bs) DMARDs) and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs (the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, upadacitinib). Guidance on monotherapy, combination therapy, treatment strategies (treat-to-target) and tapering on sustained clinical remission is provided. Cost and sequencing of b/tsDMARDs are addressed. Initially, MTX plus GCs and upon insufficient response to this therapy within 3 to 6 months, stratification according to risk factors is recommended. With poor prognostic factors (presence of autoantibodies, high disease activity, early erosions or failure of two csDMARDs), any bDMARD or JAK inhibitor should be added to the csDMARD. If this fails, any other bDMARD (from another or the same class) or tsDMARD is recommended. On sustained remission, DMARDs may be tapered, but not be stopped. Levels of evidence and levels of agreement were mostly high. CONCLUSIONS These updated EULAR recommendations provide consensus on the management of RA with respect to benefit, safety, preferences and cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Robert B M Landewé
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes W J Bijlsma
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gerd R Burmester
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Free University and Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maxime Dougados
- Rhumatologie B, Hopital Cochin, 27 rue du Fbg Saint-Jacques, Paris, France
| | - Andreas Kerschbaumer
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Iain B McInnes
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Alexandre Sepriano
- NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal, and Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maarten de Wit
- EULAR Patient Research Partner; Department Medical Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin Aringer
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, University Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - John Askling
- Department of Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alejandro Balsa
- Servicio de Reumatologia Hospital Universitario La Paz, Instituto de Investigacion IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maarten Boers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maya H Buch
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, University of Manchester; NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Frank Buttgereit
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Free University and Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Roberto Caporali
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, and IRCCS S Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Diederik De Cock
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven; Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Catalin Codreanu
- Center of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Maurizio Cutolo
- Research Laboratory and Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine - University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Christopher John Edwards
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, NIHR Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Yvonne van Eijk-Hustings
- Department of Patient & Care and Department of Rheumatology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Emery
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Axel Finckh
- Division of Rheumatology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Laure Gossec
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris and Pitié Salpêtrière hospital, AP-HP, Rheumatology Department, Paris, France
| | - Jacques-Eric Gottenberg
- Strasbourg University Hospital and University of Strasbourg, CNRS, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Immunopathologie, et Chimie Thérapeutique, Strasbourg, France
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet and Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tom W J Huizinga
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marios Koloumas
- European League Against Rheumatism, Zurich, Switzerland.,Cyprus League against Rheumatism, Nikosia, Cyprus
| | - Zhanguo Li
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Beijing University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xavier Mariette
- Université Paris-Sud, AP-HP, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Ulf Müller-Ladner
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Campus Kerckhoff, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | | | - Jose A P da Silva
- Serviço de Reumatologia, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra Praceta Mota Pinto, and Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (i-CRB), Faculty of Medicine of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Gyula Poór
- National Institute of Rheumatology & Physiology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Janet E Pope
- University of Western Ontario, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Department of Medicine, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Kenneth G Saag
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Brmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Anja Strangfeld
- Programme Area Epidemiology, Deutsches Rheumaforschungszentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Keio University School of Medicine, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Marieke Voshaar
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - René Westhovens
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven; Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
De Martini D. Empowering phase II clinical trials to reduce phase III failures. Pharm Stat 2019; 19:178-186. [PMID: 31729173 DOI: 10.1002/pst.1980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2017] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The large number of failures in phase III clinical trials, which occur at a rate of approximately 45%, is studied herein relative to possible countermeasures. First, the phenomenon of failures is numerically described. Second, the main reasons for failures are reported, together with some generic improvements suggested in the related literature. This study shows how statistics explain, but do not justify, the high failure rate observed. The rate of failures due to a lack of efficacy that are not expected, is considered to be at least 10%. Expanding phase II is the simplest and most intuitive way to reduce phase III failures since it can reduce phase III false negative findings and launches of phase III trials when the treatment is positive but suboptimal. Moreover, phase II enlargement is discussed using an economic profile. As resources for research are often limited, enlarging phase II should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Alternative strategies, such as biomarker-based enrichments and adaptive designs, may aid in reducing failures. However, these strategies also have very low application rates with little likelihood of rapid growth.
Collapse
|
35
|
Ku Abd Rahim KN, Kamaruzaman HF, Dahlui M, Wan Puteh SE. From Evidence to Policy: Economic Evaluations of Healthcare in Malaysia: A Systematic Review. Value Health Reg Issues 2019; 21:91-99. [PMID: 31698173 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2019] [Revised: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify and describe the various economic evaluation studies in Malaysia and to determine the range of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) as reported in these studies. METHODS A comprehensive search of the scientific electronic databases was conducted (Medline, EBM Reviews, Embase, and hand search) to identify all published economic evaluation studies related to Malaysian healthcare. Two researchers assessed the quality of selected studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist and Quality of Health Economic Studies instrument. The assessment was also reviewed by expert members of the Technical Advisory Committee of Health Technology Economic Evaluations (TACHTEE). RESULTS A total of 64 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and included in this systematic review. Thirty studies were partial economic evaluations; the full economic evaluations included 17 cost-effectiveness analyses and 17 cost-utility analyses. From all the reported ICERs, the majority (68%) were categorized as highly cost-effective (ICER of less than 1 gross domestic product (GDP) per capita per quality-adjusted life-years or disability-adjusted life-years gained). CONCLUSION This review identifies information gaps and loopholes in health economics research in Malaysia. Additionally, this study provides the information that the majority of published interventions in Malaysia fell within the cost-effectiveness threshold of 1 GDP per capita per quality-adjusted life-years or disability-adjusted life-years gained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ku Nurhasni Ku Abd Rahim
- Malaysian Health Technology Assessment Section, Medical Development Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Federal Territory of Putrajaya, Malaysia
| | - Hanin Farhana Kamaruzaman
- Malaysian Health Technology Assessment Section, Medical Development Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Federal Territory of Putrajaya, Malaysia.
| | - Maznah Dahlui
- Centre of Population Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Djalalov S, Djalalova D, Krahn M, Matveev N, Hoch JS. Review of Pharmacoeconomic Studies in Russian Cancer Research: An Outside View. Value Health Reg Issues 2019; 19:138-44. [PMID: 31472421 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2018] [Revised: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an increasing number of Russian economic evaluation studies in oncology, the scope and quality of which are unknown. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the scope and quality of economic evaluations in oncology, with the goal of elucidating implications for improving their use in Russia. METHODS Online databases were searched for oncologic economic evaluations written in Russian. Data were extracted and assessed with the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument. In addition, the QHES was modified to overcome double-barreled items in a single criterion. RESULTS Of 29 articles identified, 15 met study criteria and were included in the review. Most studies analyzed cost-effectiveness of first- and second-line therapies for lung and kidney cancer. The others analyzed prostate, breast, and colorectal cancers and lymphoma. The QHES mean quality score for the reviewed studies was 74 (and 69 with the modified tool). Comparison of the quality of different study types revealed that cost utility studies and studies that used decision trees and Markov models had the highest mean quality score. Clear statements regarding bias, study limitations, uncertainty, study perspectives, and funding source were commonly absent in the reviewed studies. CONCLUSION Our review indicates that oncologic economic evaluations published in Russian are limited in scope and number. In addition, they demonstrate opportunities for improvement in several important technical areas.
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Research is of little use if its results are not effectively communicated. Data visualised in graphs (and tables) are key components in any scientific report, but their design leaves much to be desired. This viewpoint focuses on graph design, following two general principles: clear vision and clear understanding. Clear vision is achieved by maximising the signal to noise ratio. In a graph, the signal is the data in the form of symbols, lines or other graphic elements, and the noise is the support structure necessary to interpret the data. Clear understanding is achieved when the story in the data is told effectively, through organisation of the data and use of text. These principles are illustrated by original and improved graphs from recent publications, completed by tutorial material online (appendices, web pages and film clips). The popular matrix form (multiple graphs in one frame) is discussed as a special case. Differences between publication (including the proofing stage) and presentation are outlined. Suggestions are made for better peer review and processing of graphs in the publication stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten Boers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and immunology Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Turner HC, Walker M, Pion SDS, McFarland DA, Bundy DAP, Basáñez M. Economic evaluations of onchocerciasis interventions: a systematic review and research needs. Trop Med Int Health 2019; 24:788-816. [PMID: 31013395 PMCID: PMC6617745 DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a systematic review of economic evaluations that has been conducted for onchocerciasis interventions, to summarise current key knowledge and to identify research gaps. METHOD A systematic review of the literature was conducted on the 8th of August 2018 using the PubMed (MEDLINE) and ISI Web of Science electronic databases. No date or language stipulations were applied to the searches. RESULTS We identified 14 primary studies reporting the results of economic evaluations of onchocerciasis interventions, seven of which were cost-effectiveness analyses. The studies identified used a variety of different approaches to estimate the costs of the investigated interventions/programmes. Originally, the studies only quantified the benefits associated with preventing blindness. Gradually, methods improved and also captured onchocerciasis-associated skin disease. Studies found that eliminating onchocerciasis would generate billions in economic benefits. The majority of the cost-effectiveness analyses evaluated annual mass drug administration (MDA). The estimated cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted of annual MDA varies between US$3 and US$30 (cost year variable). CONCLUSIONS The cost benefit and cost effectiveness of onchocerciasis interventions have consistently been found to be very favourable. This finding provides strong evidential support for the ongoing efforts to eliminate onchocerciasis from endemic areas. Although these results are very promising, there are several important research gaps that need to be addressed as we move towards the 2020 milestones and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo C. Turner
- Oxford University Clinical Research UnitWellcome Africa Asia ProgrammeHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global HealthNuffield Department of MedicineUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Martin Walker
- London Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease ResearchDepartment of Pathobiology and Population SciencesRoyal Veterinary CollegeHatfieldUK
- London Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease ResearchDepartment of Infectious Disease EpidemiologySchool of Public HealthImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - Sébastien D. S. Pion
- Institut de Recherche pour le DéveloppementUMI 233‐INSERMU1175‐Montpellier UniversityMontpellierFrance
| | | | | | - María‐Gloria Basáñez
- London Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease ResearchDepartment of Infectious Disease EpidemiologySchool of Public HealthImperial College LondonLondonUK
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease AnalysisDepartment of Infectious Disease EpidemiologySchool of Public HealthImperial College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Duarte R, Lloyd A, Kotas E, Andronis L, White R. Are acceptance and mindfulness-based interventions 'value for money'? Evidence from a systematic literature review. Br J Clin Psychol 2019; 58:187-210. [PMID: 30499217 PMCID: PMC6588093 DOI: 10.1111/bjc.12208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Acceptance and mindfulness-based interventions (A/MBIs) are recommended for people with mental health conditions. Although there is a growing evidence base supporting the effectiveness of different A/MBIs for mental health conditions, the economic case for these interventions has not been fully explored. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and appraise all available economic evidence of A/MBIs for the management of mental health conditions. METHODS Eight electronic bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, Web of Science, NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database, and EconLit) were searched for relevant economic evaluations published from each database's inception date until November 2017. Study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction were carried out according to published guidelines. RESULTS Ten relevant economic evaluations presented in 11 papers were identified. Seven of the included studies were full economic evaluations (i.e., costs and effects assessed), and three studies were partial economic evaluations (i.e., only costs were considered in the analysis). The A/MBIs that had been subjected to economic evaluation were acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT), mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). In terms of clinical presentations, the evaluation of cost-effectiveness of A/MBIs has been more focused on depression and emotional unstable personality disorder with three and four economic evaluations, respectively. Three out of seven full economic evaluations observed that A/MBIs were cost-effective for the management of mental health conditions. Nevertheless, the heterogeneity of included populations, interventions, and economic evaluation study types limits the extent to which firm conclusions can currently be made. CONCLUSION This first substantive review of economic evaluations of A/MBIs indicates that more research is needed before firm conclusions can be reached on the cost-effectiveness of A/MBIs for mental health conditions. PRACTITIONER POINTS The findings of the review provide information that may be relevant to mental health service commissioners and decision-makers as all economic evidence available on acceptance and mindfulness-based interventions for mental health conditions is summarized. Evidence relating to the cost-effectiveness and cost-saving potential of acceptance and mindfulness-based interventions is focused mainly on depression and emotional unstable personality disorder to date. Heterogeneity in the specific forms of acceptance and mindfulness-based interventions may limit generalizability of the findings. The number of health economic evaluations relating to acceptance and mindfulness-based interventions remains relatively small. Further research in this area is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Duarte
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation GroupUniversity of LiverpoolUK
| | | | - Eleanor Kotas
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation GroupUniversity of LiverpoolUK
| | - Lazaros Andronis
- Populations, Evidence and Technologies GroupDivision of Health SciencesUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
- Division of Clinical TrialsUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
| | - Ross White
- School of PsychologyUniversity of LiverpoolUK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Reckers-Droog VT, Goorden M, Dijkgraaf MGW, Van Eeren HV, McCollister KE, Hakkaart-van Roijen L. Unit Costs of Delinquent Acts for Use in Economic Evaluations. J Ment Health Policy Econ 2019; 22:71-79. [PMID: 31319377 PMCID: PMC6839943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 05/19/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Youth mental health interventions aimed at reducing substance use and delinquency in adolescents compete with other types of interventions for reimbursement from public funding. Within the youth mental health domain, delinquent acts impose high costs on society. These costs should be included in economic evaluations conducted from a societal perspective. Although the relevance of these costs is recognized, they are often left out because the unit costs of delinquent acts are unknown. AIMS OF THE STUDY This study aims to provide a method for estimating the unit costs per perpetrator of 14 delinquent acts common in the Netherlands and included in self reported delinquency questionnaires: robbery/theft with violence, simple theft/pickpocketing, receiving stolen goods, destruction/vandalism of private or public property, disorderly conduct/discrimination, arson, cybercrime, simple and aggravated assault, threat, forced sexual contact, unauthorised driving, driving under the influence, dealing in soft drugs, and dealing in hard drugs. METHODS Information on government expenditures and the incidence of crimes, number of perpetrators, and the percentage of solved and reported crimes was obtained from the national database on crime and justice of the Research and Documentation Centre of the Ministry of Justice and Security, Statistics Netherlands, and the Council for the Judiciary in the Netherlands. We applied a top-down micro costing approach to calculate the point estimate of the unit costs for each of the delinquent acts and, subsequently, estimated the mean (SD) unit costs for each of the delinquent acts by taking random draws from a triangular distribution while taking into account a 10% uncertainty associated with the associated point estimate. RESULTS The mean (SD) unit costs per delinquent act per perpetrator ranged between EUR495 (EUR1.30) for "Driving under the influence" and EUR33,813 (EUR78.30) for a "Cybercrime". These unit costs may be considered as outliers as most unit costs ranged between EUR 2,600 and EUR 13,500 per delinquent act per perpetrator. DISCUSSION This study is the first to estimate the unit costs per delinquent act per perpetrator in the Netherlands. The results of this study enable the inclusion of government expenditures associated with crime and justice in economic evaluations conducted from a societal perspective. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE PROVISION AND USE Youth mental health interventions aimed at reducing substance use and delinquency in adolescents are increasingly subjected to economic evaluations. These evaluations are used to inform decisions concerning the allocation of scarce healthcare resources and should cover all the costs and benefits for society, including those associated with delinquent acts. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES The results of this study facilitate economic evaluations of youth mental health interventions aimed at reducing substance use and delinquency in adolescents, conducted from a societal perspective. IMPLICATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH Based on health-economic evaluations conducted in the field of youth mental health and the results of the current study, we recommend including the estimated unit costs in guidelines for health-economic evaluations conducted from a societal perspective. Future research could aim at examining whether these unit costs require regular updating. The methodology applied in this study allows for this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian T Reckers-Droog
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, the Netherlands,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Afentou N, Jarl J, Gerdtham U, Saha S. Economic Evaluation of Interventions in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Literature Review. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2019; 6:282-290. [PMID: 31061835 PMCID: PMC6476603 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.12755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Revised: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parkinson's disease (PD) management comprises of drug treatments, surgery, and physical activity/occupational therapies to relieve PD's symptoms. The aim of this study is twofold; first, to appraise recent economic evaluation studies on PD management in order to update the existing knowledge; and second, to facilitate decision making on PD management by assessing the cost-effectiveness of all types of PD interventions. METHODS A systematic search for studies published between 2010 and 2018 was conducted. The inclusion and exclusion of the articles were based on criteria relevant to population, intervention, comparison, outcomes, and study design (PICO). The reporting quality of the articles was assessed according to Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards. RESULTS Twenty-eight articles were included, 10 of which were evaluations of drug treatments, 10 deep brain stimulation (DBS), and eight physical/occupational therapies. Among early-stage treatments, Ti Ji dominated all physical activity interventions; however, its cost-effectiveness should be further explored in relation to its duration, intensity, and frequency. Multidisciplinary interventions of joint medical and nonmedical therapies provided slightly better health outcomes for the same costs. In advanced PD patients, adjunct drug treatments could become more cost-effective if introduced during early PD and, although DBS was more cost-effective than adjunct drug therapies, the results were time-bound. CONCLUSIONS Conditionally, certain PD interventions are cost-effective. However, PD progression differs in each patient; thus, the cost-effectiveness of individually tailored combinations of interventions that could provide more time in less severe disease states and improve patients' and caregivers' quality of life, should be further explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nafsika Afentou
- Health Economics Unit, Department of Clinical Science (Malmö)Lund UniversityLundSweden
- Health Economics UnitInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of BirminghamBirminghamUnited Kingdom
| | - Johan Jarl
- Health Economics Unit, Department of Clinical Science (Malmö)Lund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Ulf‐G Gerdtham
- Health Economics Unit, Department of Clinical Science (Malmö)Lund UniversityLundSweden
- Centre for Economic DemographyLund UniversityLundSweden
- Department of EconomicsLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Sanjib Saha
- Health Economics Unit, Department of Clinical Science (Malmö)Lund UniversityLundSweden
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Unger J, Putrik P, Buttgereit F, Aletaha D, Bianchi G, Bijlsma JWJ, Boonen A, Cikes N, Dias JM, Falzon L, Finckh A, Gossec L, Kvien TK, Matteson EL, Sivera F, Stamm TA, Szekanecz Z, Wiek D, Zink A, Dejaco C, Ramiro S. Workforce requirements in rheumatology: a systematic literature review informing the development of a workforce prediction risk of bias tool and the EULAR points to consider. RMD Open 2018; 4:e000756. [PMID: 30714580 PMCID: PMC6336097 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2018] [Revised: 09/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarise the available information on physician workforce modelling, to develop a rheumatology workforce prediction risk of bias tool and to apply it to existing studies in rheumatology. METHODS A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed in key electronic databases (1946-2017) comprising an update of an SLR in rheumatology and a hierarchical SLR in other medical fields. Data on the type of workforce prediction models and the factors considered in the models were extracted. Key general as well as specific need/demand and supply factors for workforce calculation in rheumatology were identified. The workforce prediction risk of bias tool was developed and applied to existing workforce studies in rheumatology. RESULTS In total, 14 studies in rheumatology and 10 studies in other medical fields were included. Studies used a variety of prediction models based on a heterogeneous set of need/demand and/or supply factors. Only two studies attempted empirical validation of the prediction quality of the model. Based on evidence and consensus, the newly developed risk of bias tool includes 21 factors (general, need/demand and supply). The majority of studies revealed high or moderate risk of bias for most of the factors. CONCLUSIONS The existing evidence on workforce prediction in rheumatology is scarce, heterogeneous and at moderate or high risk of bias. The new risk of bias tool should enable future evaluation of workforce prediction studies. This review informs the European League Against Rheumatism points to consider for the conduction of workforce requirement studies in rheumatology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Unger
- Department of Health Studies, Institute of Occupational Therapy, FH JOANNEUM University of Applied Sciences, Bad Gleichenberg, Austria
| | - Polina Putrik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center and CAPHRI Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Buttgereit
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charitè University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gerolamo Bianchi
- Division of Rheumatology, ASL3-Azienda Sanitaria Genovese, Genova, Italy
| | - Johannes W J Bijlsma
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center and CAPHRI Research Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Nada Cikes
- Division of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - João Madruga Dias
- Department of Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar Médio Tejo, Torres Novas, Portugal
| | - Louise Falzon
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Axel Finckh
- Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Laure Gossec
- Rheumatology Department, Sorbonne Université, Paris, and Pitié Salpêtrière Hhospital APHP, Paris, France
| | - Tore K Kvien
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eric L Matteson
- Division of Rheumatology and Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Francisca Sivera
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital General Universitario de Elda, Elda, Spain
| | - Tanja A Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Medical Unversity Viennna, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Vienna, Austria
| | - Zoltan Szekanecz
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Dieter Wiek
- EULAR Standing Committee of PARE, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Angela Zink
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charitè University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
- Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Dejaco
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital of Bruneck, Bruneck, Italy
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Styria, Austria
| | - Sofia Ramiro
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, and Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
In August 2018, CVS Health released a position paper detailing policies in place and those being implemented to help reduce the costs of drugs. This paper introduced three new strategies for reducing costs. These are (i) zero out of pocket costs for chronic disease through a preventive drug list; (ii) reducing the launch price through adoption of modeled cost-per-QALY outcomes by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) to guide clients to exclude drugs launched at a price of greater than $100,000 per QALY; and (iii) introducing tools to be used by doctors, pharmacists and consumers to create greater transparency in understanding the real cost of drugs. The purpose of this commentary is to consider the second of these strategies, the application of a willingness to pay threshold as a viable strategy for impacting launch costs. The arguments presented here are that while modeled cost-per-QALY claims are a staple of formulary committee deliberations in many single payer health systems, their adoption by CVS Health fails to take into account not only the imaginary nature of the modeled construct utilized to generate the cost-per-QALY estimate and its shortcomings but the fact that alternative model structures may render invalid the application of willingness-to-pay thresholds. The case is made that CVS Health could adopt a more rigorous process of formulary assessment to support both preliminary assessments of new products and also an ongoing process of formulary review that challenge manufacturers to justify pricing over product patent life. This process should capitalize on the development of formulary evaluation platforms, potentially involving blockchain technology and smart contracting, for therapy interventions in targeted patient populations. Introducing a more rigorous formulary process, in particular the requirement for claims evaluation protocols, will not only assist CVS Health in restraining price increases over the life of the product but, for the first time in the US, put manufacturers on notice that patently unreasonable pricing policies and claims for product performance can be systematically and effectively challenged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul C Langley
- Adjunct Professor, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Gabrio A, Mason AJ, Baio G. A full Bayesian model to handle structural ones and missingness in economic evaluations from individual-level data. Stat Med 2018; 38:1399-1420. [PMID: 30565727 DOI: 10.1002/sim.8045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2017] [Revised: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 11/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Economic evaluations from individual-level data are an important component of the process of technology appraisal, with a view to informing resource allocation decisions. A critical problem in these analyses is that both effectiveness and cost data typically present some complexity (eg, nonnormality, spikes, and missingness) that should be addressed using appropriate methods. However, in routine analyses, standardised approaches are typically used, possibly leading to biassed inferences. We present a general Bayesian framework that can handle the complexity. We show the benefits of using our approach with a motivating example, the MenSS trial, for which there are spikes at one in the effectiveness and missingness in both outcomes. We contrast a set of increasingly complex models and perform sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness of the conclusions to a range of plausible missingness assumptions. We demonstrate the flexibility of our approach with a second example, the PBS trial, and extend the framework to accommodate the characteristics of the data in this study. This paper highlights the importance of adopting a comprehensive modelling approach to economic evaluations and the strategic advantages of building these complex models within a Bayesian framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Gabrio
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alexina J Mason
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Gianluca Baio
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Cannizzo S, Lorenzoni V, Palla I, Pirri S, Trieste L, Triulzi I, Turchetti G. Rare diseases under different levels of economic analysis: current activities, challenges and perspectives. RMD Open 2018; 4:e000794. [PMID: 30488003 PMCID: PMC6241967 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Rare diseases imply clinical and economic burden as well as a significant challenge for health systems. One relevant objective of the activities planned within the European Reference Network on Rare and Complex Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ERN ReCONNET) is to address the economic dimensions of rare diseases to identify, develop and suggest strategies to improve research and patients' access to orphan drugs (ODs) and highly specialised health technologies. This paper presents a preliminary review of the existing policies on rare diseases in the countries of the Network members. It also introduces and discusses the theme of how to perform health economic evaluations of rare diseases and of existing or new treatments for rare diseases. To obtain a preliminary overview aiming at defining the state of the art of rare diseases policies and initiatives in ERN ReCONNET countries, we collected and analysed the rare diseases national plans of all the eight countries of the ERN ReCONNET participants. The preliminary overview that has been performed showed that in all the ERN ReCONNET countries are in place national plans for rare diseases; however, heterogeneity exists in the reimbursement of ODs, direct provision by the healthcare system, involvement of patients' associations in decision making and implementation of clinical practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Cannizzo
- Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Ilaria Palla
- Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Salvatore Pirri
- Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Leopoldo Trieste
- Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Isotta Triulzi
- Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bogavac-Stanojević N. Economic Evaluation as a Tool in Emerging Technology Assessment. EJIFCC 2018; 29:196-200. [PMID: 30479603 PMCID: PMC6247126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
Medical technologies are part of health technologies and they include medical devices (MD) and in vitro diagnostics (IVD). They have become a vital part of modern healthcare. Framework for introduction of new technology in the healthcare system includes a few steps: analytical and clinical accuracy assessment, clinical utility determination and economic evaluation. In addition, payers are interested whether new technology is adequate for reimbursement. There are fairly enough specific guidelines for implementation of economic methods at the early stage of IVD development. Searching the available literature in this field, this paper discusses the economic evaluations of emerging medical technologies with focus on point of care testing (POCT) and genetic testing. Results of POCT economy studies depend on investigated perspective (payers, policy makers or society), used effectiveness values (utility, effectiveness or consequence estimated as monetary value) and understanding of clinical pathway. There is a need for better understanding of the care pathway, resource utilisation and how they change with the introduction of POCT. Introduction of genetic testing before drug therapy was recommended with the aim to improve treatment benefit and to reduce costs of adverse drug reaction. Clinical utility and cost-effectiveness analyses should be considered for novel genetic testing - guided treatments. Most of the studies considering genetic testing - guided treatments showed that those combinations were cost-saving or cost-effective compared to standard care. For medical tehnology there is no universal guidance for outcomes measurement, cost calculation, performance requirements, use of a certain type of economic studies and economic thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nataša Bogavac-Stanojević
- Corresponding author: Nataša Bogavac-Stanojević Department of Medical Biochemistry Faculty of Pharmacy POB 146, 11000 Belgrade Serbia Phone: +381 11 3951279 Fax: + 381 11 3972840 E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
den Broeder N, Bouman CAM, Kievit W, van Herwaarden N, van den Hoogen FHJ, van Vollenhoven RF, Bijlsma HWJ, van der Maas A, den Broeder AA. Three-year cost-effectiveness analysis of the DRESS study: protocolised tapering is key. Ann Rheum Dis 2018; 78:141-142. [PMID: 30150367 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Revised: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Chantal A M Bouman
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wietske Kievit
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank H J van den Hoogen
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald F van Vollenhoven
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans W J Bijlsma
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Utrecht University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Aatke van der Maas
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands .,Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Rodrigues Manica S, Sepriano A, Ramiro S, Pimentel Santos F, Putrik P, Nikiphorou E, Norton S, Molto A, Dougados M, van der Heijde D, Landewé RBM, van den Bosch FE, Boonen A. Work participation in spondyloarthritis across countries: analysis from the ASAS-COMOSPA study. Ann Rheum Dis 2018; 77:1303-1310. [PMID: 29860232 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2018] [Revised: 05/15/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the role of individual and country level socioeconomic (SE) factors on employment, absenteeism and presenteeism in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) across 22 countries worldwide. METHODS Patients with a clinical diagnosis of SpA fulfilling the ASAS classification criteria and in working age (≤65 years) from COMOSPA were included. Outcomes of interest were employment status, absenteeism and presenteeism, assessed by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Specific General Health questionnaire. Three multivariable models were built (one per outcome) using mixed-effects binomial (for work status) or ordinal regressions (for absenteeism and presenteeism), with country as random effect. The contribution of SE factors at the individual-level (eg, gender, education, marital status) and country-level (healthcare expenditure (HCE) per capita, Human Development Index (HDI) and gross domestic product per capita) SE factors, independent of clinical factors, was assessed. RESULTS In total, 3114 patients with SpA were included of which 1943 (62%) were employed. Physical function and comorbidities were related to all work outcomes in expected directions and disease activity also with absenteeism and presenteeism. Higher education (OR 4.2 (95% CI 3.1 to 5.6)) or living in a country with higher HCE (OR 2.3 (1.5 to 3.6)) or HDI (OR 1.9 (1.2 to 3.3)) was positively associated with being employed. Higher disease activity was associated with higher odds for absenteeism (OR 1.5 (1.3 to 1.7)) and presenteeism (OR 2.1 (1.8 to 2.4)). No significant association between individual-level and country-level SE factors and absenteeism or presenteeism was found. CONCLUSIONS Higher education level and higher country SE welfare are associated with a higher likelihood of keeping patients with SpA employed. Absenteeism and presenteeism are only associated with clinical but not with individual-level or country-level SE factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Rodrigues Manica
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, Portugal.,NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Alexandre Sepriano
- NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.,Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sofia Ramiro
- NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.,Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Fernando Pimentel Santos
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, Portugal.,NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Academic Rheumatology, King's College of London (KCL), London, UK
| | - Sam Norton
- Academic Rheumatology, King's College of London (KCL), London, UK.,Psychology Department, King's College of London (KCL), London, UK
| | - Anna Molto
- Rheumatology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.,INSERM (U1153): Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, PRES Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Maxime Dougados
- Rheumatology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.,INSERM (U1153): Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, PRES Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Filip E van den Bosch
- Department of Internal Medicine, VIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Maciel G, Servioli L, Nannini C, Berti A, Crowson CS, Achenbach SJ, Matteson EL, Cornec D. Hospitalisation rates among patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome: a population-based study, 1995-2016. RMD Open 2018; 4:e000575. [PMID: 29531781 PMCID: PMC5845402 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2017] [Revised: 12/29/2017] [Accepted: 02/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine rates and primary discharge diagnoses of hospitalisation in a cohort of patients with incident primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) compared with the general population. METHODS This was a retrospective population-based cohort study focused on Olmsted County, Minnesota. The pSS cohort consisted of patients with incident pSS in the 1976-2015 period and was compared with a cohort of individuals without pSS matched 3:1 for age, sex and calendar year, randomly selected from the same population. Hospitalisations in 1995-2016 were examined. Discharge diagnoses were categorised using the Clinical Classifications Software for International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification. RESULTS A total of 385 hospitalisations occurred in the 160 patients with pSS during 1592 person-years of follow-up. Among 466 comparators, there were 899 hospitalisations during 4660 person-years of follow-up, resulting in a significantly higher rate of hospitalisations in patients with pSS (rate ratio (RR): 1.25, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.41). Rates of hospitalisation were increased among patients with pSS for endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases and immunity disorders (RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.98), diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.05) and for injuries and poisoning (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.06). While not significantly increased overall, hospitalisations for diseases of the circulatory system were significantly increased in patients with pSS aged ≥75 years (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.11). CONCLUSIONS Patients with pSS experienced higher rates of hospitalisation than the general population. Hospitalisations for endocrine/metabolic disorders, diseases of the circulatory system, diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue disorders, and injuries were more common among patients with pSS than comparators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Maciel
- Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Office for Autoimmune Diseases, Medical Clinic 1, Hospital Maciel, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Luisa Servioli
- Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Office for Autoimmune Diseases, Medical Clinic 1, Hospital Maciel, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Carlotta Nannini
- Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital of Prato, Prato, Italy
| | - Alvise Berti
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Immunology, Rheumatology, Allergy and Rare Diseases Department, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Cynthia S Crowson
- Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sara J Achenbach
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eric L Matteson
- Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Divi Cornec
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- INSERM UMR1227, Lymphocytes B et Autoimmunité, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Rhumatologie, CHU de Brest, Brest, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Frempong SN, Sutton AJ, Davenport C, Barton P. Economic evaluation of medical tests at the early phases of development: a systematic review of empirical studies. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2018; 18:13-23. [PMID: 29183175 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1411194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is little specific guidance on the implementation of cost-effectiveness modelling at the early stage of test development. The aim of this study was to review the literature in this field to examine the methodologies and tools that have been employed to date. AREAS COVERED A systematic review to identify relevant studies in established literature databases. Five studies were identified and included for narrative synthesis. These studies revealed that there is no consistent approach in this growing field. The perspective of patients and the potential for value of information (VOI) to provide information on the value of future research is often overlooked. Test accuracy is an essential consideration, with most studies having described and included all possible test results in their analysis, and conducted extensive sensitivity analyses on important parameters. Headroom analysis was considered in some instances but at the early development stage (not the concept stage). EXPERT COMMENTARY The techniques available to modellers that can demonstrate the value of conducting further research and product development (i.e. VOI analysis, headroom analysis) should be better utilized. There is the need for concerted efforts to develop rigorous methodology in this growing field to maximize the value and quality of such analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel N Frempong
- a Institute of Applied Health Research , University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
| | - Andrew J Sutton
- b Faculty of Medicine and Health , Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds , Leeds , UK
- c NHIR Diagnostic Evidence Co-operative Leeds , UK
| | - Clare Davenport
- a Institute of Applied Health Research , University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
| | - Pelham Barton
- a Institute of Applied Health Research , University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
| |
Collapse
|