Sleep quality in Behçet's disease: a systematic literature review

Behçet's Disease (BD) can be correlated with sleep impairment and fatigue, resulting in low quality of life (QoL); however, a comprehensive evaluation of this issue is still missing. We performed a systematic literature review (SLR) of existing evidence in literature regarding sleep quality in BD. Fifteen papers were included in the SLR. Two domains were mainly considered: global sleep characteristics (i) and the identification of specific sleep disorders (ii) in BD patients. From our analysis, it was found that patients affected by BD scored significantly higher Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) compared to controls. Four papers out of 15 (27%) studied the relationship between sleep disturbance in BD and disease activity and with regards to disease activity measures, BD-Current Activity Form was adopted in all papers, followed by Behçet's Disease Severity (BDS) score, genital ulcer severity score and oral ulcer severity score. Poor sleep quality showed a positive correlation with active disease in 3 out of 4 studies. Six papers reported significant differences between BD patients with and without sleep disturbances regarding specific disease manifestations. Notably, arthritis and genital ulcers were found to be more severe when the PSQI score increased. Our work demonstrated lower quality of sleep in BD patients when compared to the general population, both as altered sleep parameters and higher incidence of specific sleep disorders. A global clinical patient evaluation should thereby include sleep assessment through the creation and adoption of disease-specific and accessible tests.

AB1152 COVID-19 mRNA VACCINE BOOSTER IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES

Background

Patients with systemic autoimmune diseases (SADs) are often treated with drugs that interfere with the immune system and previous data showed a reduced seroconversion rate after anti-SARS-CoV2 vaccine in these subjects compared to healthy controls1. Administration of a booster dose of the vaccine could be particularly important in these patients, but data available to date are still scarce.

Objectives

To evaluate the antibody response to the booster dose of mRNA SARS-CoV2 vaccine in patients with SADs and to compare it to the response after completion of the first vaccination course. Secondly, to find possible correlations between a low antibody titre and patients’ clinical features, with special regard to ongoing immunosuppressive therapies.

Methods

Consecutive patients with an established diagnosis of SADs undergoing SARS-CoV2 vaccine were prospectively enrolled from January 2021; among them, we selected the patients who received the third vaccination dose between September and December 2021. Demographic and clinical data were collected at enrolment (sex, age, diagnosis, disease duration, ongoing therapies, previous SARS-CoV2 infection, presence of hypogammaglobulinemia); the last three elements were reassessed at each follow-up visit. Blood samples were collected 4 weeks both after the second (W4a) and the third (W4b) dose of the vaccine; a minority of patients was also tested 12 weeks after the second dose (W12). IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) and neutralizing antibodies inhibiting the interaction between RBD and angiotensin converting enzyme 2 were evaluated. IgG anti-RBD were detected by solid phase assay on plates coated with recombinant RBD, while neutralising antibodies by using the kit SPIA (Spike Protein Inhibition Assay). Cut-off values were defined as the 97.5th percentile of a pre-vaccine healthy population. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 20 and GraphPad Prism statistical packages. P values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Forty-five patients (95.6% female; mean age ±SD 55.6±14.1 years; mean disease duration 12.9±10.6 years) were enrolled. Diagnosis was in most cases connective tissue disease (31/45, 68.9%), followed by inflammatory arthritis (11/45, 24.4%) and systemic vasculitis (3/45, 6.7%). Two patients (4.4%) had a previous SARS-CoV2 infection and three had hypogammaglobulinemia (6.7%). At the time of the second dose, 18/45 patients were treated with glucocorticoids (GCs) [mean daily 6-methylprednisolone (6MP) dose 3.9 mg (min. 2, max. 14)], 17/45 with conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and 12/45 with biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs). At the third dose administration, 19/45 patients were treated with GCs [mean daily 6MP dose 4.1 mg (min. 1.5, max. 10)], 18/45 with csDMARDs and 13/45 with bDMARDs. Anti-RBD IgG were positive in 42/45 patients (93.3%) at W4a, in 16/18 (88.9%) at W12 and in 42/45 (93.3%) at W4b. Neutralizing antibodies were present in 38/45 patients (84.4%) at W4a, in 14/18 (77.8%) at W12 and in 42/45 (93.3%) at W4b. Both anti-RBD IgG titers and neutralizing antibody titers significantly increased after the third dose if compared to W4a (p<0.0001 both) (Figure 1). Interestingly, of the 7 patients who had not developed an adequate neutralizing antibody response after the first vaccination course, 5 mounted an adequate titer after the booster. Two non-responder patients were both on combination therapy (one with low dose of GCs plus mycophenolate mofetil, the other with methotrexate and infliximab).

Conclusion

Our data suggest that in patients with SADs there is a decline in the antibody titers developed after COVID-19 vaccination, however the booster dose is effective in restoring an adequate antibody titre. These data consolidate the importance of a booster dose of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with SADs to aid in the generation of an immune response.

References

[1]Jena A et al. Response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in immune mediated inflammatory diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmun Rev. 2022

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the patients who participated in the study and the nurses Sabrina Gori, Rosanna Lo Coco, Lucia Pedrocco, Carla Puccini, Pasqualina Semeraro, Manuela Terachi, Maria Tristano, Valentina Venturini and Catiuscia Zoina who took care of the patients.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS1242 BARICITINIB AND PULSE STEROIDS COMBINED TREATMENT IN SEVERE COVID-19 PNEUMONIA: PRELIMINARY DATA FROM A RHEUMATOLOGIC EXPERIENCE IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

Background

Growing evidence from in vitro and clinical studies have highlighted important similarities between severe COVID-19 and rapidly progressive interstitial lung diseases (ILD) occurring in systemic autoimmune disorders. These data supported the use of anti-rheumatic drugs, baricitinib and glucocorticoids, for the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia.

Objectives

To compare mortality rate and inflammatory response in critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with either a “rheumatologic approach” based on baricitinib plus pulse steroids (BPS) or with a “conventional approach” (Standard of Care, SoC).

Methods

In this retrospective study, we enrolled patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with CT-proven SARS-CoV2 pneumonia, from September 2020 to April 2021. Demographic, laboratory, and clinical data were collected at the admission to ICU and after one week of treatment. SoC included dexamethasone 6 to 8 mg daily plus remdesivir (+/- antibiotics and hydroxychloroquine); BPS approach was based on baricitinib 4 mg daily for 10-14 days plus 6-methylprednisolone pulses (250-500 mg) for three consecutive days followed by rapid tapering. The primary endpoint was the intra-ICU mortality rate; the secondary endpoint was the change in inflammatory biomarkers at week 1 after treatment.

Results

We enrolled a total of 210 consecutive patients with SARS-CoV2 pneumonia (male 61.4%, mean age 66.6 ± 10.9 years); 137/210 (male 59.8%, mean age 66.3 ± 11.9 years) were treated with SoC and 73/210 (male 64.3%, mean age 67.3 ± 8.8 years) with BPS.

At admission in ICU, all patients presented lag time from the first symptom of SARS-CoV2 infection ≤ 10 days, laboratory biomarkers’ alterations suggestive of hyper-inflammatory response (CRP 10.8 ± 11.9 mg/dL, ferritin 1238 ± 1005 µg/L, fibrinogen 575 ± 173 mg/dL, LDH 385 ± 152 U/L) and severe respiratory failure, requiring non-invasive or invasive ventilatory support. Lung-CT pattern showed multiple and diffuse areas of ground glass opacities, septal thickening, and/or consolidation.

No statistically significant differences were found between SoC and BPS groups in terms of demographic, laboratory, and clinical features at enrolment.

59/210 (28.1%) patients died during ICU hospitalization (mean ICU length of stay 14.6 ± 9.6 days). Mortality rate in the BPS group (13/73, 17.8%) resulted significantly lower compared to that in the SoC group (46/137, 33.6%) (p= 0.016). Furthermore, patients in the BPS group had significantly lower levels of CRP (BPS=1.9 ± 2.8 vs SoC 6.1 ± 7.3, p<0.001) and fibrinogen (BPS=335 ± 108 vs SoC 453 ± 172, p<0.001) at one week after the start of treatment.

Conclusion

Our real-life experience, in an ICU setting, showed that baricitinib and pulse steroids combination was associated with a lower mortality rate paralleled by a prompt reduction of inflammatory biomarkers. These results shed new light on the possible usefulness of baricitinib for the treatment of rapidly progressive ILD in patients with systemic autoimmunity and hyper-inflammation.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS1232 LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF COVID-19 VACCINATION IN PATIENTS WITH RARE AND COMPLEX CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASES: AN AD-INTERIM ANALYSIS OF ERN-ReCONNET VACCINATE STUDY

Background

Since the COVID-19 vaccination campaign was launched all over Europe, there has been general agreement on how benefits of SARS-CoV2 vaccines outweigh the risks in patients with rare connective tissue diseases (rCTDs). Yet, there is still limited evidence regarding safety and efficacy of such vaccines in these patients, especially in the long-term. For this reason, in the framework of ERN-ReCONNET, an observational long-term study (VACCINATE) was designed in order to explore the long-term outcome of COVID-19 vaccination in rCTDs patients. The consent form was developed thanks to the involvement of the ERN ReCONNET ePAG Advocates (European Patients Advocacy Group).

Objectives

To evaluate the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccination in rCTDs patients and the potential impact on disease activity. Primary endpoints were the prevalence of adverse events (AEs) and of disease exacerbations post-vaccination. Secondary endpoints were the proportion of serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events of special interest for COVID-19 (adapted from https://brightoncollaboration.us/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/SO2_D2.1.2_V1.2_COVID-19_AESI-update-23Dec2020-review_final.pdf)

Methods

The first ad-interim analysis of the VACCINATE study involved 9 ERN-ReCONNET Network centres. Patients over 18 years of age with a known rCTD and who received vaccine against COVID-19 were eligible for recruitment. Demographic data and diagnoses were collected at the time of enrolment, while the appearance of AEs and potential disease exacerbations were monitored after one week from each vaccination dose, and then after 4, 12 and 24 weeks from the second dose. A disease exacerbation was defined as at least one of the following: new manifestations attributable to disease activity, hospitalization, increase in PGA from previous evaluation, addition of corticosteroids or immunosuppressants.

Results

A cohort of 300 patients (261 females, mean age 52, range 18-85) was recruited. Systemic lupus erythematosus (44%) and systemic sclerosis (16%) were the most frequent diagnoses, followed by Sjogren’s syndrome (SS,12%), idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IMM,10%), undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD,8%), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD,4%), Ehlers-Danlos’s syndrome (EDS,4%), antiphospholipid syndrome (APS,2%). AEs appearing 7 days after the first and second doses were reported in 93 (31%) and 96 (32%) patients respectively, mainly represented by fatigue, injection site reaction, headache, fever and myalgia. Otitis, urticaria, Herpes Simplex-related rash, stomatitis, migraine with aura, vertigo, tinnitus and sleepiness were reported with very low frequency. Less than 2% of patients experienced AEs within 24 weeks from the second dose. No SAEs or AEs of special interest were observed in the study period. There were 25 disease exacerbations (8%), 7 of which severe. The highest number of exacerbations was observed after 4 weeks from the second dose (12 within week 4, 6 within week 12 and 7 within week 24). Disease exacerbation was most frequent in patients with EDS (33%) and MCTD (25%).

Conclusion

This preliminary analysis shows that COVID-19 vaccination is safe in rCTDs patients. AEs appear most often early after vaccination and are usually mild. Disease exacerbations are not frequent, but can be potentially severe and tend to occur most frequently within the first month after vaccination. Exacerbations can also occur 3-6 months after vaccination, although a causal relationship with the vaccination remains to be established. Our present data underline the importance of long-term observational studies.

Table 1.

AEs and disease exacerbations per disease

DiagnosisPatients enrolled (%) (n=300)EAs after 1st and 2nd dose (%)Exacerbations (%)APS25714EDS45033IIM10527MCTD44225SS12598SLE44698SSC16492UCTD850-

Acknowledgements

VACCINATE is a study promoted by the European Reference Network on rare and complex connective tissue diseases, ERN ReCONNET. This publication was funded by the European Union’s Health Programme (2014-2020)

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0588 GIANT CELL ARTERITIS: DO DIFFERENT PHENOTYPES OF PRESENTATION MEAN DIFFERENT CLINICAL ENTITIES?

Background

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) represents the most common primary vasculitis of the elderly, affecting large and medium-sized arterial vessels. GCA often also involves the aorta and its major branches and may lead to aortic aneurysm/dissection as well as large artery stenoses; it seems that unrecognized extra-cranial involvement may be even more common.

Objectives

The primary aim of this study was to explore the different clinical entities in a large cohort of patients with GCA; a secondary aim was to evaluate long-term outcome of GCA patients with at least 5 years of follow-up.

Methods

A cohort of 278 GCA patients (54 males and 224 females, mean ± SD age 75 ± 6 years) were retrospectively studied. Clinical symptoms at disease onset and during the follow-up, time delay until diagnosis, as well as laboratory findings at the time of diagnosis and therapeutic approach were retrospective evaluated. In order to characterize the different clinical phenotypes, overall clinical symptoms were grouped for macro-area (cranial versus systemic). Moreover, long-term outcomes in patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 years were evaluated. A disease flare was defined as the presence of any further clinical manifestation compatible with the clinical spectrum of GCA and an increase of ESR ≥ 30 mm/hour, not otherwise justifiable, that required higher doses or new introduction of glucocorticoids (GC) therapy and/or the introduction of steroid sparing treatments (e.g. tocilizumab, methotrexate).

Results

The most frequent clinical manifestations presented at the onset included: constitutional symptoms 69%, new onset headache and/or scalp pain 64%, jaw claudicatio 32%, vision loss 30%, abnormal temporal artery on examination 19%, neuropsychiatric symptoms 17%, cough not otherwise justifiable 7%, cerebrovascular accidents 6% and hearing loss 3%. Irreversible (mono- or bilateral) blindness was reported in 7% of patients, mainly due to a latency period between onset and treatment of ≥ 3 months. Temporal artery biopsy was performed in 171 patients, resulting positive in 72%. Globally, about 38% of subjects (was characterized by a clinical profile compatible with extra-cranial GCA. In all cases, extra-cranial involvement was confirmed by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). Moreover, patients who presented symptoms compatible with large-vessel involvement were characterized by a more relapsing course compared with patients with cranial involvement GCA profile (both in terms of dose of corticosteroids and use of steroid-sparing agents).

Conclusion

According to the literature data, different phenotypes of GCA exist and they may probably represent different clinical entities, also in terms of prognosis and therapeutic approach. This is particularly crucial in order to plan a tailored therapy and prevent disease damage in the short and long-term follow-up.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared