Osimertinib plus platinum-pemetrexed in newly diagnosed epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: safety run-in results from the FLAURA2 study

Background

The phase III FLAURA2 (NCT04035486) study will evaluate efficacy and safety of first-line osimertinib with platinum–pemetrexed chemotherapy versus osimertinib monotherapy in epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm) advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The safety run-in, reported here, assessed the safety and tolerability of osimertinib with chemotherapy prior to the randomized phase III evaluation.

Patients and methods

Patients (≥18 years; Japan: ≥20 years) with EGFRm locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC received oral osimertinib 80 mg once daily (QD), with either intravenous (IV) cisplatin 75 mg/m² or IV carboplatin target area under the curve 5, plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m² every 3 weeks (Q3W) for four cycles. Maintenance was osimertinib 80 mg QD with pemetrexed 500 mg/m² Q3W until progression/discontinuation. The primary objective was to evaluate safety and tolerability of the osimertinib–chemotherapy combination.

Results

Thirty patients (15 per group) received treatment [Asian, 73%; female, 63%; median age (range) 61 (45-84) years]. Adverse events (AEs) were reported by 27 patients (90%): osimertinib–carboplatin–pemetrexed, 100%; osimertinib–cisplatin–pemetrexed, 80%. Most common AEs were constipation (60%) with osimertinib–carboplatin–pemetrexed and nausea (60%) with osimertinib–cisplatin–pemetrexed. In both groups, 20% of patients reported serious AEs. No specific pattern of AEs leading to dose modifications/discontinuations was observed; one patient discontinued all study treatments including osimertinib due to pneumonitis (study-specific discontinuation criterion). Hematologic toxicities were as expected and manageable.

Conclusions

Osimertinib–chemotherapy combination had a manageable safety and tolerability profile in EGFRm advanced/metastatic NSCLC, supporting further assessment in the FLAURA2 randomized phase.

•

FLAURA2 aims to assess efficacy and safety of first-line osimertinib with platinum–pemetrexed in EGFRm advanced NSCLC.

•

In the FLAURA2 safety run-in period, 30 patients received osimertinib and pemetrexed with carboplatin or cisplatin.

•

Most common AEs were constipation and nausea; no AE patterns leading to dose modifications/discontinuations were observed.

•

The FLAURA2 safety run-in study showed that the safety profile of this combination was as expected and manageable.

Correlation of the siboglinid (Annelida: Siboglinidae) distribution to higher concentrations of hydrocarbons in the Sea of Okhotsk

Siboglinids are a characteristic feature of reducing environments. More than 75% of all siboglinids were found in the Sea of Okhotsk at a depth of less than 400 m, while some species are known to inhabit the abyssal depth in other regions. Among the six species of siboglinids encountered in the Sea of Okhotsk, only two are widespread: Siboglinum caulleryi and Oligobrachia dogieli. A significant number of all findings belong to the area where, according to geological data, the methane concentration varies between 0.22 and 4.46*10⁹ nmol/kg. There is a vast territory in the central part of the Sea of Okhotsk that is not inhabited by siboglinids and is characterized by minimum methane concentration values. Thus, data on the Sea of Okhotsk indicate that siboglinids are related to sites of methane seepage.

Safety and patient-reported outcomes of atezolizumab, carboplatin, and etoposide in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (IMpower133): a randomized phase I/III trial

BACKGROUND

The addition of atezolizumab to carboplatin and etoposide (CP/ET) significantly improved progression-free and overall survival for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in the IMpower133 study (NCT02763579). We have evaluated adverse events (AEs) and patient-reported outcomes in IMpower133 to assess the benefit-risk profile of this regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received four 21-day cycles of CP/ET plus intravenous atezolizumab 1200 mg or placebo (induction phase), followed by atezolizumab or placebo (maintenance phase) until progression or loss of benefit. AEs were assessed and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated every 3 weeks during treatment using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and QLQ-LC13.

RESULTS

Overall, 394 patients were assessable for safety in the induction phase and 318 in the maintenance phase. The frequency of AEs, grade 3-4 AEs, and serious AEs was similar between arms in both phases. Immune-related AEs were more frequent in the atezolizumab arm during both induction (28% versus 17%; leading to atezolizumab/placebo interruption 9% versus 5%, leading to withdrawal 4% versus 0%) and maintenance (26% versus 15%; leading to atezolizumab/placebo interruption, 3% versus 2%, leading to withdrawal 1% versus 1%), most commonly rash (induction 11% versus 9%, maintenance 14% versus 4%), and hypothyroidism (induction 4.0% versus 0%, maintenance 10% versus 1%). Changes in patient-reported treatment-related symptoms commonly associated with quality of life impairment were generally similar during induction and most of the maintenance phase. Patient-reported function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) improved in both arms after initiating treatment, with more pronounced and persistent HRQoL improvements in the atezolizumab arm.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ES-SCLC, atezolizumab plus CP/ET has a comparable safety profile to placebo plus CP/ET, and the addition of atezolizumab did not adversely impact patient-reported HRQoL. These data demonstrate the positive benefit-risk profile of first-line atezolizumab plus CP/ET in ES-SCLC and further support this regimen as a new standard of care in this setting.

CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER

NCT02763579.

AT-101 or placebo (P) with docetaxel (D) in second-line NSCLC with gene signature biomarker development

3577

Background: AT-101 inhibits the Bcl-2 protein family (Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, Mcl-1, Bcl-W) with broad preclinical activity including synergy with D. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, P-controlled phase 2 study. Patients had received 1 prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced NSCLC. Patients received AT-101 (40 mg b.i.d. days 1–3) or P with D (75 mg/m2 day 1) Q 21 days. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent review (IR). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and investigator determined PFS. 102 patients were planned for 70 events (80% power, HR 0.6, 1-sided alpha 0.1). A biomarker of AT-101 activity was developed by treating 55 NSCLC cell lines with AT-101 and using the corresponding gene expression data to identify a genomic predictor of sensitivity to AT-101. Results: 106 patients were randomized. Baseline factors were balanced. Median OS for patients on AT-101+D was 7.3 months versus 5.6 months for P + D arm (HR 0.60, p = 0.05). The median investigator determined PFS was 12.6 weeks and 10.7 weeks for AT-101+D and P+D arms respectively (HR 1.0, p = 0.49); IR is ongoing. Common adverse events were fatigue (18%), anemia (18%), and dyspnea (18%). Grade 1/2 headaches occurred more frequently in the AT-101 arm. Analysis of gene expression data by Bayesian regression revealed a robust 500 gene predictor of sensitivity to AT-101 that was cross validated in a leave one out analysis and in an independent cohort of 32 NSCLC cell lines. Validation of the predictor in patient samples from the trial is ongoing. Conclusions: In this phase II trial AT-101, an oral pan Bcl-2 family inhibitor, had favorable OS compared to placebo when combined with docetaxel in previously treated NSCLC and was well tolerated. A genomic predictor of AT-101 sensitivity is likely to enrich for responders and identify novel therapeutic combinations for future

[Table: see text]