Preoperative CA19‑9 level and dual time point FDG‑PET/CT as strong biological indicators of borderline resectability in pancreatic cancer: A retrospective study

Tumor resectability, which is increasingly determined based on preoperative chemotherapy, is critical in determining the best treatment for pancreatic cancers. The present study evaluated the usefulness of serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and the preoperative 8F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography standardized uptake value (SUV) percentage change (SUVmax%=[(SUVmax2-SUVmax1)/SUVmax1] ×100, where SUVmax1 and SUVmax2 represent the initial and delayed phases, respectively) as biological factors indicative of tumor resectability. The present study included patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who underwent complete surgical resection, for whom both CA19-9 and SUVmax% were documented using cut-off values of 500 U/ml and 24.25%, respectively. Patients were classified as follows: i) High CA19-9 and SUVmax%: both CA19-9 and SUVmax% were elevated; ii) high CA19-9 or SUVmax%: either CA19-9 or SUVmax% were elevated; or iii) low CA19-9 and SUVmax%: neither value met the cut-off. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated, for which univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Of the 86 patients included, 39 were classified as high CA19-9 or SUVmax% and 12 as high CA19-9 and SUVmax%, with the former group having a significantly worse RFS (vs. low CA19-9 and SUVmax%; P<0.001; vs. high CA19-9 or SUVmax%; P=0.011) and OS (vs. low CA19-9 and SUVmax%, P=0.002; vs. high CA19-9 or SUVmax%, P<0.001). Therefore, high CA19-9 and SUVmax% was an independent predictor of worse RFS (P<0.001) and OS (P=0.003). In conclusion, CA19-9 and SUVmax% can be utilized as biological indicators of resectability.

Impact of Preoperative Tumor Size on Prognosis of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas

BACKGROUND

Tumor size (TS) is a well-established prognostic factor of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, whether a uniform treatment strategy can be applied for all resectable PDACs (R-PDACs) and borderline resectable PDACs (BR-PDACs), regardless of TS, remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative TS on surgical outcomes of patients with R-PDACs and BR-PDACs.

METHODS

Chart data from three institutions were reviewed to select patients who underwent pancreatectomy for R-PDACs and BR-PDACs between January 2006 and December 2020. The patients were divided into TSsmall and TSlarge groups according to a TS cutoff value determined for each of R- and BR-PDAC using the minimum P value approach for the risk of R1 resection.

RESULTS

TS of 35 mm and 24 mm was the best cutoff value in R-PDAC and BR-PDAC, respectively. The R1 rate was higher in the TSlarge than TSsmall group, in both R- (n = 35, 37% versus n = 294, 19%; P = 0.011) and BR-PDAC (n = 89, 37% versus n = 27, 15%; P = 0.030). Overall survival was significantly better in the TSsmall than TSlarge group in R-PDAC (38.2 versus 12.1 months; P < 0.001), but comparable between the two groups in BR-DPAC (21.2 versus 22.7 months; P = 0.363). Multivariate analysis revealed TS > 35 mm as an independent predictor of worse survival in patients with R-PDAC.

CONCLUSION

Larger TS was associated with a higher R1 rate and is a worse prognostic factor in patients with R-PDAC.

Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer Based on Resectability: A Single Center Experience

Although conversion surgery has increasingly been performed for initially unresectable advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the rate of conversion, including that for patients who do not undergo resection, remains unclear. Patients with PDAC who were treated between January 2013 and December 2018 were classified into three groups: resectable (R), borderline resectable (BR), and unresectable (UR). We analyzed patient outcomes, including the rate of surgical resection and survival, in each of these groups. In total, 211 patients (R, 118; BR, 22; UR, 81) were selected. Among them, 117 (99%), 18 (82%), and 15 (19%) patients in the R, BR, and UR groups, respectively, underwent surgical resection. R0 resection rates were 88, 78, and 67%, whereas median overall survival (OS) from treatment initiation were 31, 18, and 11 months (p < 0.0001) in the R, BR, and UR groups, respectively. In patients who underwent surgical resection, relapse-free survival (RFS) and OS were similar among the three groups (R vs. BR vs. UR; median RFS (months), 17 vs. 13 vs. 11, p = 0.249; median OS (months), 31 vs. 26 vs. 32, p = 0.742). Lymph node metastases and incomplete adjuvant chemotherapy were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS. Although the surgical resection rate was low, particularly in the BR and UR groups, the prognosis of patients who underwent surgical resection was similar irrespective of the initial resectability status.

Therapeutic efficacy of dose-reduced adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 in patients with pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment in Asia for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The relative dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy influences survival in pancreatic cancer but does not precisely reflect treatment schedule modifications. We investigated the effects of total dose intensity of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy on the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer and the permissible dose reduction.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical resection during 2011-2019 for pancreatic cancer were selected. We determined the total dose intensity cut-off value that predicted tumor recurrence within 2 years postoperatively using receiver operating characteristic curves and compared the outcomes between the high and low total dose intensity groups.

RESULTS

Patients with total dose intensity ≥ 62.5% (n = 53) showed significantly better overall survival than those with total dose intensity < 62.5% (n = 16) (median survival time: 53.3 vs. 20.2 months, P < 0.001). The median survival of patients without adjuvant chemotherapy (total dose intensity = 0, n = 28) was 24.8 months. Univariate analysis identified lymphatic involvement (P = 0.035), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.034), and total dose intensity (P < 0.001) as factors affecting survival. On multivariate analysis, total dose intensity (P < 0.001) was an independent predictor of worse survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintaining a total dose intensity of at least 60% in S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy seems important to achieve a long postoperative survival in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Clinical Impact of Dual Time Point 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Fusion Imaging in Pancreatic Cancer

We examined the value of preoperative dual time point (DTP) 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (FDG PET/CT) as a predictor of early recurrence or the outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) in DTP FDG PET/CT were performed as preoperative staging. SUVmax1 and SUVmax2 were obtained in 60 min and 120 min, respectively. ΔSUVmax% was defined as (SUVmax2 − SUVmax1)/SUVmax1 × 100. The optimal cut-off values for SUVmax parameters were selected based on tumor relapse within 1 year of surgery. Optimal cut-off values for SUVmax1 and ΔSUVmax% were 7.18 and 24.25, respectively. The combination of SUVmax1 and ΔSUVmax% showed higher specificity and sensitivity, and higher positive and negative predictive values for tumor relapse within 1 year than SUVmax1 alone. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was significantly worse in the subgroups of high SUVmax1 and high ΔSUVmax% (median 7.0 months) than in the other subgroups (p < 0.0001). The multivariate Cox analysis of RFS identified high SUVmax1 and high ΔSUVmax% as independent prognostic factors (p = 0.0060). DTP FDG PET/CT may effectively predict relapse in patients with pancreatic cancer. The combination of SUVmax1 and ΔSUVmax% identified early recurrent patient groups more precisely than SUVmax1 alone.

Co-expression of mesothelin and CA125/MUC16 is a prognostic factor for breast cancer, especially in luminal-type breast cancer patients

The expression of mesothelin correlates with a poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Since mesothelin plays a role in cancer metastasis in association with CA125, we herein examined the expression of mesothelin and CA125, and the clinicopathological meaning and prognosis of the co-expression of mesothelin and CA125 in breast cancer. Our results showed that among 478 patients, mesothelin and CA125 were co-expressed in 48 (10 %), mesothelin only in 75 (16 %), CA125 only in 217 (45 %), and neither in 234 (49 %). A high correlation was observed between the expression of mesothelin and CA125 (P =0.0004). The co-expression of mesothelin and CA125 correlated with poor patient relapse-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.0001) and was identified as an independent predictor of RFS by Cox's multivariate analysis. In conclusion, this is the first to report the prognostic significance of the co-expression of mesothelin and CA125 in breast cancer. The co-expression of mesothelin and CA125 may be clinically useful for prognostication after surgical therapy in patients with breast cancer.

Impact of Lymph Node Metastases Around the Superior Mesenteric Artery on Postoperative Outcomes of Pancreatic Head Cancer

BACKGROUND

The neural plexus and lymph nodes around the superior mesenteric artery (LN#14), are the most frequent sites involved by pancreatic head cancer. However the influence of metastases to LN#14 on patients' prognosis has rarely been evaluated.

METHODS

The patients who underwent pancreatectomy for pancreatic head cancer between January 2010 and December 2018 were selected. The patients with nodal metastases were classified into an LN#14 + or LN#14-group according to LN#14 metastasis. Clinical and pathological characteristics and prognosis were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In total, 99 patients underwent pancreatectomy. Ninety-four patients were positive for lymph node metastases and 14 and 80 were classified as LN#14 + and LN#14 - , respectively. Postoperative median overall survival (OS) of the LN#14 + and LN#14 - groups was 10.2 and 31.1 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Median OS of the LN#14 + group was worse than that of patients with ≥ 4 metastatic nodes in the LN#14 - group (n = 35, 24.7 months, P = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, LN#14 + (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.89, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-8.86) was one of the independent predictors of worse OS.

CONCLUSION

It might be feasible to recognize LN#14 metastases as an important prognostic factor independently from other regional lymph node metastases.

Different role of MSLN and CA125 co-expression as a prognostic predictor between perihilar and distal bile duct carcinoma

Recent studies have suggested that the interaction of mesothelin (MSLN) and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) enhances tumor metastases. The aim of the present study was to clarify the impact of MSLN and CA125 co-expression on the prognosis of patients with extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma (BDC). Tissue samples from patients who underwent surgical resection between 2007 and 2015 for perihilar or distal BDC were immunohistochemically examined. The expression levels of MSLN and CA125 in tumor cells were analyzed. The expression in <50% and ≥50% of the total tumor cells were defined as low- and high-level expression, respectively. Tissue samples were obtained from 31 patients with perihilar BDC and 43 patients with distal BDC. Lymph node metastases were associated with MSLN and CA125 co-expression in patients with perihilar BDC (P=0.002), while there was no association between lymph node metastasis and co-expression in patients with distal BDC (P=0.362). MSLN and CA125 co-expression was associated with a worse overall survival rate in patients with perihilar BDC (5-year overall survival rate, co-expression positive vs. negative, 24 vs. 63%; P=0.038). To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to report an association between co-expression of MSLN and CA125 with a poor prognosis in patients with perihilar BDC. The current findings suggested that the significance of co-expression differed according to the BDC location.