PACAP-mediated gating of anxiety-controlling circuits

Combining the use of ex vivo and in vivo optogenetics, viral tracing, electrophysiology and behavioral testing, we show that the neuropeptide pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) gates anxiety-controlling circuits by differentially affecting synaptic efficacy at projections from the basolateral amygdala (BLA) to two different subdivisions of the dorsal subdivision of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), modifying the signal flow in BLA-ovBNST-adBNST circuits in such a way that adBNST is inhibited. Inhibition of adBNST is translated into the reduced firing probability of adBNST neurons during afferent activation, explaining the anxiety-triggering actions of PACAP in BNST, as inhibition of adBNST is anxiogenic. Our results reveal how innate, fear-related behavioral mechanisms may be controlled by neuropeptides, PACAP specifically, at the level of underlying neural circuits by inducing long-lasting plastic changes in functional interactions between their different structural components.

Diminishing fear: Optogenetic approach toward understanding neural circuits of fear control

Understanding complex behavioral processes, both learned and innate, requires detailed characterization of the principles governing signal flow in corresponding neural circuits. Previous studies were hampered by the lack of appropriate tools needed to address the complexities of behavior-driving micro- and macrocircuits. The development and implementation of optogenetic methodologies revolutionized the field of behavioral neuroscience, allowing precise spatiotemporal control of specific, genetically defined neuronal populations and their functional connectivity both in vivo and ex vivo, thus providing unprecedented insights into the cellular and network-level mechanisms contributing to behavior. Here, we review recent pioneering advances in behavioral studies with optogenetic tools, focusing on mechanisms of fear-related behavioral processes with an emphasis on approaches which could be used to suppress fear when it is pathologically expressed. We also discuss limitations of these methodologies as well as review new technological developments which could be used in future mechanistic studies of fear behavior.

GluA4 Dependent Plasticity Mechanisms Contribute to Developmental Synchronization of the CA3-CA1 Circuitry in the Hippocampus

During the course of development, molecular mechanisms underlying activity-dependent synaptic plasticity change considerably. At immature CA3-CA1 synapses in the hippocampus, PKA-driven synaptic insertion of GluA4 AMPA receptors is the predominant mechanism for synaptic strengthening. However, the physiological significance of the developmentally restricted GluA4-dependent plasticity mechanisms is poorly understood. Here we have used microelectrode array (MEA) recordings in GluA4 deficient slice cultures to study the role of GluA4 in early development of the hippocampal circuit function. We find that during the first week in culture (DIV2-6) when GluA4 expression is restricted to pyramidal neurons, loss of GluA4 has no effect on the overall excitability of the immature network, but significantly impairs synchronization of the CA3 and CA1 neuronal populations. In the absence of GluA4, the temporal correlation of the population spiking activity between CA3-CA1 neurons was significantly lower as compared to wild-types at DIV6. Our data show that synapse-level defects in transmission and plasticity mechanisms are efficiently compensated for to normalize population firing rate at the immature hippocampal network. However, lack of the plasticity mechanisms typical for the immature synapses may perturb functional coupling between neuronal sub-populations, a defect frequently implicated in the context of developmentally originating neuropsychiatric disorders.

Molecular mechanisms controlling synaptic recruitment of GluA4 subunit-containing AMPA-receptors critical for functional maturation of CA1 glutamatergic synapses

Synaptic recruitment of AMPA receptors (AMPARs) represents a key postsynaptic mechanism driving functional development and maturation of glutamatergic synapses. At immature hippocampal synapses, PKA-driven synaptic insertion of GluA4 is the predominant mechanism for synaptic reinforcement. However, the physiological significance and molecular determinants of this developmentally restricted form of plasticity are not known. Here we show that PKA activation leads to insertion of GluA4 to synaptic sites with initially weak or silent AMPAR-mediated transmission. This effect depends on a novel mechanism involving the extreme C-terminal end of GluA4, which interacts with the membrane proximal region of the C-terminal domain to control GluA4 trafficking. In the absence of GluA4, strengthening of AMPAR-mediated transmission during postnatal development was significantly delayed. These data suggest that the GluA4-mediated activation of silent synapses is a critical mechanism facilitating the functional maturation of glutamatergic circuitry during the critical period of experience-dependent fine-tuning. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Ionotropic glutamate receptors'.

Voltage-dependent and -independent block of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionate receptor channels

Polyamine-containing toxins and synthetic dicationic derivatives of adamantane and phenylcyclohexyl selectively antagonize Ca(2+)-permeable α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionate (AMPA) receptor channels. These compounds demonstrate voltage-dependent open-channel block and are trapped by closed channels. In this study, we describe an alternative mechanism of non-competitive AMPA receptor inhibition caused by 9-aminoacridine and some of its derivatives. These compounds exhibit similar potency against Ca(2+)-permeable and Ca(2+)-impermeable AMPA receptors. The inhibition is largely voltage-independent, binding and unbinding do not require presence of agonist. We conclude that 9-aminoacridine binds to a shallow site in the AMPA receptor, which is located above the activation gate. A comparison of three-dimensional structures of the antagonists suggests that the 'V-like' shape of the hydrophobic headgroup favors voltage-dependent binding to the deep site in the channel pore, whereas the compounds possessing flat aromatic headgroups preferably bind to the shallow site. The characterization of the novel mechanism of AMPA receptor channel antagonism opens a way to develop a new family of pharmacological agents, which can be of scientific and practical importance.