A retrospective, quantitative assessment of disease burden in patients with leptomeningeal metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Improvements in detection and molecular characterization of leptomeningeal metastasis from lung cancer (LC-LM) coupled with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-penetrating targeted therapies have altered disease management. A barrier to formal study of these therapies in LM is quantification of disease burden. Also, outcomes of patients with targetable mutations in LC-LM are not well defined. This study employs molecular and radiographic measures of LM disease burden and correlates these with outcome.

METHODS

We reviewed charts of 171 patients with LC-LM treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering. A subset had MRI and CSF studies available. Radiographic involvement (n = 76) was scored by number of gadolinium-enhancing sites in 8 locations. CSF studies included cytopathology, circulating tumor cell (CTC) quantification (n = 16), and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis (n = 21). Clinical outcomes were compared with Kaplan-Meier log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards methodologies.

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 4.2 months (95% CI: 3.6-4.9); 84 patients (49%) harbored targetable mutations. Among bevacizumab-naïve patients with MRI and CSF cytology at time of LC-LM diagnosis, extent of radiographic involvement correlated with risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.02-1.33; P = 0.03), as did CSF CTC (HR: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.01-11.37; P = 0.048) and CSF cfDNA concentration (HR: 2.58; 95% CI: 0.94-7.05; P = 0.06). Those without a targetable mutation were almost 50% more likely to die (HR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.06-2.11; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Extent of radiographic involvement and quantification of CSF CTC and cfDNA show promise as prognostic indicators. These findings support molecular characterization and staging for clinical management, prognostication, and clinical trial stratification of LC-LM.

Patient-reported outcomes after surgical stabilization of spinal tumors: symptom-based validation of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) and surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Neoplastic spinal instability is movement-related pain or neurologic compromise under physiologic loads with the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) developed to facilitate diagnosis. There is a paucity of evidence that mechanical instability correlates with patient-reported symptoms and that surgical stabilization significantly improves these patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to determine if SINS correlates with patient-reported preoperative pain and disability, and if surgical stabilization significantly improves PRO.

STUDY DESIGN

A single-institution prospective cohort study was carried out.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 131 patients who underwent stabilization for metastatic spinal tumor treatment between July 2014 and August 2016 were included.

OUTCOMES MEASURES

Preoperative baseline and mean difference in perioperative PROs as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) were the outcome measures.

METHODS

The SINS was analyzed as a continuous, ordinal, and categorical variable (Stable: 0-6, Indeterminate: 7-12, Unstable: 13-18). Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman rank coefficient (rho), the Kruskal-Wallis test, and an extension of the Cochran-Armitage trend test. The SINS and association between the mean differences in post- and preoperative PRO scores was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant positive correlation between increasing SINS and severity of preoperative pain with BPI average pain (rho=0.20; p=.03) and MDASI pain (rho=0.19; p=.03). Increasing SINS correlated with severity of preoperative disability with BPI walking (rho=0.19; p=.04), MDASI activity (rho=0.24; p=.006), and MDASI walking (rho=0.20; p=.03). Similar associations were noted when SINS was analyzed as an ordinal categorical variable. Stabilization significantly improved nearly all PRO measures for patients with indeterminate and unstable SINS. Significant correlations persisted when controlling for neurologic status and were not affected based on the technique of surgical stabilization used.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-related outcome-based validation of SINS confirms this scoring system for diagnosing neoplastic spinal instability and provides surgeons with a tool to determine which patients will benefit from stabilization. Surgical stabilization of cancer patients with SINS consistent with mechanical instability provides significant reduction in pain and improves patient mobility independent of neurologic status and stabilization technique.

Safety and utility of kyphoplasty prior to spine stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic tumors: a clinical and dosimetric analysis

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of kyphoplasty treatment prior to spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with spine metastases. METHODS A retrospective review of charts, radiology reports, and images was performed for all patients who received SRS (single fraction; either standalone or post-kyphoplasty) at a large tertiary cancer center between January 2012 and July 2015. Patient and tumor variables were documented, as well as treatment planning data and dosimetry. To measure the photon scatter due to polymethyl methacrylate, megavolt photon beam attenuation was determined experimentally as it passed through a kyphoplasty cement phantom. Corrected electron density values were recalculated and compared with uncorrected values. RESULTS Of 192 treatment levels in 164 unique patients who underwent single-fraction SRS, 17 (8.8%) were treated with kyphoplasty prior to radiation delivery to the index level. The median time from kyphoplasty to SRS was 22 days. Four of 192 treatments (2%) demonstrated local tumor recurrence or progression at the time of analysis. Of the 4 local failures, 1 patient had kyphoplasty prior to SRS. This recurrence occurred 18 months after SRS in the setting of widespread systemic disease and spinal tumor progression. Dosimetric review demonstrated a lower than average treatment dose for this case compared with the rest of the cohort. There were no significant differences in dosimetry analysis between the group of patients who underwent kyphoplasty prior to SRS and the remaining patients in the cohort. A preliminary analysis of polymethyl methacrylate showed that dosimetric errors due to uncorrected electron density values were insignificant. CONCLUSIONS In cases without epidural spinal cord compression, stabilization with cement augmentation prior to SRS is safe and does not alter the efficacy of the radiation or preclude physicians from adhering to SRS planning and contouring guidelines.

Prior malignancies in patients harboring glioblastoma: an institutional case-study of 2164 patients

More patients are surviving long-term following a cancer diagnosis and as such are at risk for second malignancies. As the most common primary brain tumor, glioblastoma (GBM) will not infrequently occur in this population. No study has examined the incidence of prior cancer (PC) in patients harboring GBM. Here we evaluate the epidemiological features, as well as the molecular and clinical characteristics of GBM as a second cancer. Utilizing a web-based cancer data management system at our institution, we identified 2164 patients harboring GBM from 2007 to 2014. We collected baseline demographic, molecular, and clinical data. Univariate analysis was performed to compare the cohort of GBM patients with and without PC diagnosis. Survival differences were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and log-rank testing. A Cox-proportional hazards model was fit for multivariable analysis. 170 patients (7.9%) harboring GBM had a PC diagnosis. The median interval between diagnoses was 79 months. The most common pathologies were breast (18.8%) and prostate (18.8%) cancer. Patients with a PC were older at the time of GBM diagnosis than those without PC (66 vs. 59 years, p < 0.001) and were more likely to be white (88.2 vs. 72.8%, p < 0.001). Patients with PC were more likely to harbor an EGFR (20 vs. 12.3%, p < 0.001) or MGMT mutation (17.6 vs. 11.6%, p < 0.001). Median survival was 13 months in the PC cohort and 15 months in the cohort without PC (p = NS). Age, KPS, and diagnosis year were the only factors which influenced outcome in multivariable analysis. Patients who develop GBM following a prior malignancy constitute ~8% of patients with GBM. Despite significant molecular differences these two cohorts appear to have a similar overall prognosis and clinical course. Thus, whether or not a patient harbors a malignancy prior to diagnosis of GBM should not exclude him or her from aggressive treatment or for consideration of novel investigational therapies.