Reference Citation Analysis: Find an Article, Find a Category, Find a Journal, Find a Scholar

Download

Total Articles

8
(from Reference Citation Analysis)

Article PDFs (1)

Cited by > 0 (2)

Searched Name

Natasha McKibben

Ranked By

Results Analysis

Year Published Analysis
Article Type Analysis
Publication Title Analysis
Category Analysis

Results Analysis

Indexed Articles

Year Published

Show more Refine

Article Type

Show more Refine

Article Statistics

Refine

MESH Headings

Show more Refine

First Author

Show more Refine

First Author Affiliations

Show more Refine

Authors

Show more Refine

Publication Titles

Show more Refine

Grant Agencies

Show more Refine

Countries/Regions

Show more Refine

Affiliations

Show more Refine

Corresponding Author Affiliations

Show more Refine

Category

Show more Refine

Number

Citation Analysis

Fairres MJ, Brodke D, O'Hara N, Devana S, Hernandez A, Burke C, Gupta J, McKibben N, O'Toole R, Morellato J, Gillon H, Walters M, Barber C, Perdue P, Dekeyser G, Steffenson L, Marchand L, Black L, Working Z, Roddy E, Naga AE, Hogue M, Gulbrandsen T, Atassi O, Mitchell T, Shymon S, Lee C. Risk Factors of Failure in 228 Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Multicenter Study. J Orthop Trauma 2024;38:273-278. [PMID: 38285064 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify risk factors of reoperation to promote union or to address deep surgical-site infection (DSSI) in periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated with lateral distal femoral locking plates (LDFLPs).

METHODS

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Ten level-I trauma centers.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients with Orthopaedic Trauma Association/Association of Osteosynthesis (OTA/AO) 33A or 33C periprosthetic distal femur fractures who underwent surgical fixation between January 2012 and December 2019 exclusively using LDFLPs were eligible for inclusion. Patients with pathologic fractures or with follow-up less than 3 months without an outcome event (unplanned reoperation to promote union or for deep surgical infection) before this time point were excluded. Fracture fixation constructs used medial plates, intramedullary nails, or hybrid fixation constructs were excluded from analysis.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

To examine the influence of patient demographics, injury characteristics, and features of the fracture fixation construct on the occurrence of unplanned reoperation to promote union or to address a DSSI.

RESULTS

There was an 8.3% rate (19/228) of unplanned reoperation to promote union. Predictive factors for the need for reoperation to promote union included increasing body mass index (odds ratio [OR] = 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.16; P = 0.01), increasing number of screws in the distal fracture segment (OR = 1.73; 95% CI: 1.06-2.95; P = 0.03), and decreasing proportion of proximal segment screws that are locking (OR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.03-0.70; P = 0.02) There was a 4.8% rate (11/228) of reoperation to address DSSI. There were no statistically significant predictive factors identified as risk factors of the need for reoperation to address DSSI ( P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

8.3% of periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated at 10 centers with LDFLPs underwent unplanned reoperation to promote union. Increasing patient body mass index and increasing number of screws in the distal fracture segment were found to be predictive factors, whereas increased locking screws in the proximal segment were found to be protective. 4.8% of patients in this cohort underwent reoperation to address DSSI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Collapse

Richards JT, O’Hara NN, Healy K, Zingas N, McKibben N, Benzel C, Slobogean GP, O’Toole RV, Sciadini MF. Fix or Replace? Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Geriatric Lower Extremity Fractures: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2024;15:21514593241236647. [PMID: 38426150 PMCID: PMC10903189 DOI: 10.1177/21514593241236647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open

Abstract

Introduction

When considering treatment options for geriatric patients with lower extremity fractures, little is known about which outcomes are prioritized by patients. This study aimed to determine the patient preferences for outcomes after a geriatric lower extremity fracture.

Materials and Methods

We administered a discrete choice experiment survey to 150 patients who were at least 60 years of age and treated for a lower extremity fracture at a Level I trauma center. The discrete choice experiment presented study participants with 8 sets of hypothetical outcome comparisons, including joint preservation (yes or no), risk of reoperation at 6 months and 24 months, postoperative weightbearing status, disposition, and function as measured by return to baseline walking distance. We estimated the relative importance of these potential outcomes using multinomial logit modeling.

Results

The strongest patient preference was for maintained function after treatment (59%, P < .001), followed by reoperation within 6 months (12%, P < .001). Although patients generally favored joint preservation, patients were willing to change their preference in favor of joint replacement if it increased function (walking distance) by 13% (SE, 66%). Reducing the short-term reoperation risk (12%, P < .001) was more important to patients than reducing long-term reoperation risk (4%, P = .33). Disposition and weightbearing status were lesser priorities to patients (9%, P < .001 and 7%, P < .001, respectively).

Discussion

After a lower extremity fracture, geriatric patients prioritized maintained walking function. Avoiding short-term reoperation was more important than avoiding long-term reoperation. Joint preservation through fracture fixation was the preferred treatment of geriatric patients unless arthroplasty or arthrodesis provides a meaningful functional benefit. Hospital disposition and postoperative weightbearing status were less important to patients than the other included outcomes.

Conclusions

Geriatric patients strongly prioritize function over other outcomes after a lower extremity fracture.

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

John T. Richards Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Author’s name insert query plzJ. T. Richards is an employee of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C.§105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. §101 defined a US Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employees of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties. The opinions or assertions contained in this paper are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views, policy or positions of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense nor the US Government
Nathan N. O’Hara Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Author’s name insert query plzJ. T. Richards is an employee of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C.§105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. §101 defined a US Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employees of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties. The opinions or assertions contained in this paper are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views, policy or positions of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense nor the US Government
Kathleen Healy Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Author’s name insert query plzJ. T. Richards is an employee of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C.§105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. §101 defined a US Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employees of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties. The opinions or assertions contained in this paper are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views, policy or positions of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense nor the US Government
Nicolas Zingas Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Author’s name insert query plzJ. T. Richards is an employee of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C.§105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. §101 defined a US Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employees of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties. The opinions or assertions contained in this paper are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views, policy or positions of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense nor the US Government
Natasha McKibben Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Author’s name insert query plzJ. T. Richards is an employee of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C.§105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. §101 defined a US Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employees of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties. The opinions or assertions contained in this paper are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views, policy or positions of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense nor the US Government
Caroline Benzel Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Author’s name insert query plzJ. T. Richards is an employee of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C.§105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. §101 defined a US Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employees of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties. The opinions or assertions contained in this paper are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views, policy or positions of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense nor the US Government
Gerard P. Slobogean Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Author’s name insert query plzJ. T. Richards is an employee of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C.§105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. §101 defined a US Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employees of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties. The opinions or assertions contained in this paper are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views, policy or positions of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense nor the US Government
Robert V. O’Toole Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Author’s name insert query plzJ. T. Richards is an employee of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C.§105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. §101 defined a US Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employees of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties. The opinions or assertions contained in this paper are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views, policy or positions of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense nor the US Government
Marcus F. Sciadini Marcus F. Sciadini, MD, Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

Collapse

Stockton DJ, O'Hara NN, Brodke DJ, McKibben N, Healey K, Goch A, Demyanovich H, Devana S, Hernandez A, Burke CE, Gupta J, Marchand LS, Dekeyser GJ, Steffenson L, Shymon SJ, Fairres MJ, Perdue PW, Barber C, Atassi OH, Mitchell TW, Working ZM, Black LO, El Naga AN, Roddy E, Hogue M, Gulbrandsen T, Morellato J, Gillon WH, Walters MM, Hempen E, Slobogean GP, Lee C, O'Toole RV. Technical Factors Contributing to Nonunion in Supracondylar Distal Femur Fractures Treated With Lateral Locked Plating: A Risk-Stratified Analysis. J Orthop Trauma 2024;38:49-55. [PMID: 37559208 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify technical factors associated with nonunion after operative treatment with lateral locked plating.

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Ten Level I trauma centers.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Adult patients with supracondylar distal femur fractures (OTA/AO type 33A or C) treated with lateral locked plating from 2010 through 2019.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Surgery for nonunion stratified by risk for nonunion.

RESULTS

The cohort included 615 patients with supracondylar distal femur fractures. The median patient age was 61 years old (interquartile range: 46 -72years) and 375 (61%) were female. Observed were nonunion rates of 2% in a low risk of nonunion group (n = 129), 4% in a medium-risk group (n = 333), and 14% in a high-risk group (n = 153). Varus malreduction with an anatomic lateral distal femoral angle greater than 84 degrees, was associated with double the odds of nonunion compared to those without such varus [odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-4.2; P = 0.03]. Malreduction by medial translation of the articular block increased the odds of nonunion, with 30% increased odds per 4 mm of medial translation (95% CI, 1.0-1.6; P = 0.03). Working length increased the odds of nonunion in the medium risk group, with an 18% increase in nonunion per 10-mm increase in working length (95% CI, 1.0-1.4; P = 0.01). Increased proximal screw density was protective against nonunion (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.92; P = 0.02) but yielded lower mRUST scores with each 0.1 increase in screw density associated with a 0.4-point lower mRUST (95% CI, -0.55 to -0.15; P < 0.001). Lateral plate length and type of plate material were not associated with nonunion. ( P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Malreduction is a surgeon-controlled variable associated with nonunion after lateral locked plating of supracondylar distal femur fractures. Longer working lengths were associated with nonunion, suggesting that bridge plating may be less likely to succeed for longer fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

David J Stockton Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Nathan N O'Hara Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Dane J Brodke Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Natasha McKibben Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Kathleen Healey Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Abraham Goch Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Haley Demyanovich Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Sai Devana Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Adolfo Hernandez Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Cynthia E Burke Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Jayesh Gupta Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Lucas S Marchand Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT
Graham J Dekeyser Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT
Lillia Steffenson Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT
Stephen J Shymon Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA
Marshall J Fairres Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA
Paul W Perdue Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
Colby Barber Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
Omar H Atassi Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
Thomas W Mitchell Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
Zachary M Working Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
Loren O Black Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
Ashraf N El Naga Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Erika Roddy Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Matthew Hogue Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; and
Trevor Gulbrandsen Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; and
John Morellato Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Mississippi Medical, Center, Jackson, MS
W Hunter Gillon Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Mississippi Medical, Center, Jackson, MS
Murphy M Walters Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Mississippi Medical, Center, Jackson, MS
Eric Hempen Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Gerard P Slobogean Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Christopher Lee Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Robert V O'Toole Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Collapse

Shi BY, Brodke DJ, O'Hara N, Devana S, Hernandez A, Burke C, Gupta J, McKibben N, O'Toole R, Morellato J, Gillon H, Walters M, Barber C, Perdue P, Dekeyser G, Steffenson L, Marchand L, Shymon S, Fairres MJ, Black L, Working Z, Roddy E, El Naga A, Hogue M, Gulbrandsen T, Atassi O, Mitchell T, Lee C. Nail Plate Combination Fixation Versus Lateral Locked Plating for Distal Femur Fractures: A Multicenter Experience. J Orthop Trauma 2023;37:562-567. [PMID: 37828687 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To (1) report on clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes after nail-plate fixation (NPF) of distal femur fractures and (2) compare outcomes after NPF with a propensity matched cohort of fractures treated with single precontoured lateral locking plates.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Ten Level 1 trauma centers.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Patients with OTA/AO 33A or 33C fractures.

INTERVENTION

Fixation with (1) retrograde intramedullary nail combined with lateral locking plate (n = 33) or (2) single precontoured lateral locking plate alone (n = 867).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The main outcomes of interest were all-cause unplanned reoperation and presence of varus collapse at final follow-up.

RESULTS

One nail-plate patient underwent unplanned reoperation excluding infection and 2 underwent reoperation for infection at an average of 57 weeks after surgery. No nail-plate patients required unplanned reoperation to promote union and none exhibited varus collapse. More than 90% were ambulatory with no or minimal pain at final follow-up. In comparison, 7 of the 30 matched lateral locked plating patients underwent all-cause unplanned reoperation excluding infection (23% vs. 3%, P = 0.023), and an additional 3 lateral locked plating patients were found to have varus collapse on final radiographs (10% vs. 0%, P = 0.069).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a high proportion of high-energy, open, and comminuted fractures, no NPF patients underwent unplanned reoperation to promote union or demonstrated varus collapse. Propensity score matched analysis revealed significantly lower rates of nonunion for NPF compared with lateral locked plating alone. Larger studies are needed to identify which distal femur fracture patients would most benefit from NPF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Collapse

Brodke D, O'Hara N, Devana S, Hernandez A, Burke C, Gupta J, McKibben N, O'Toole R, Morellato J, Gillon H, Walters M, Barber C, Perdue P, Dekeyser G, Steffenson L, Marchand L, Fairres MJ, Black L, Working Z, Roddy E, El Naga A, Hogue M, Gulbrandsen T, Atassi O, Mitchell T, Shymon S, Lee C. Predictors of Deep Infection After Distal Femur Fracture: A Multicenter Study. J Orthop Trauma 2023;37:161-167. [PMID: 36302354 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]

Affiliation(s)

Dane Brodke Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Nathan O'Hara Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
Sai Devana Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Adolfo Hernandez Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Cynthia Burke Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
Jayesh Gupta Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
Natasha McKibben Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
Robert O'Toole Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
John Morellato Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS
Hunter Gillon Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS
Murphy Walters Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS
Colby Barber Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
Paul Perdue Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
Graham Dekeyser Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
Lillia Steffenson Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
Lucas Marchand Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
Marshall James Fairres Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, Los Angeles County Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
Loren Black Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
Zachary Working Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
Erika Roddy Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
Ashraf El Naga Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
Matthew Hogue Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA; and
Trevor Gulbrandsen Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA; and
Omar Atassi Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
Thomas Mitchell Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
Stephen Shymon Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, Los Angeles County Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
Christopher Lee Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA

Collapse

Lee C, Brodke D, O'Hara N, Devana S, Hernandez A, Burke C, Gupta J, McKibben N, O'Toole R, Morellato J, Gillon H, Walters M, Barber C, Perdue P, Dekeyser G, Steffenson L, Marchand L, Fairres MJ, Black L, Working Z, Roddy E, El Naga A, Hogue M, Gulbrandsen T, Atassi O, Mitchell T, Shymon S. Risk Factors for Reoperation to Promote Union in 1111 Distal Femur Fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2023;37:168-174. [PMID: 36379069 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]

Mundy LR, Zingas NH, McKibben N, Healey K, O'Hara NN, O'Toole RV, Pensy RA. Financial Toxicity Is Common in Patients After Tibia Fracture. J Orthop Trauma 2023;37:e147-e152. [PMID: 36730601 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]

Missiuna P, Shen J, Nahle I, Shen J, Alanazi M, Rutges J, Rocos B, Miyanji F, Lohkamp L, Grootjen L, Hachem L, Aldebeyan S, Machida M, Padhye K, Rushton P, Jentzsch T, Jentzsch T, Lewis S, Passias P, Pierce K, Lewis S, Passias P, Nielsen C, Glennie A, Crawford E, Schneider N, Ayling O, Christie S, Greene R, Singh S, Beauchamp-Chalifour P, Balasuberamaniam P, Singh S, Mercure-Cyr R, Wilson J, Evaniew N, Martin A, Rienmueller A, Martin A, Karim M, Martin A, Cheung A, Badhiwala J, Diotalevi L, Jaja B, Fallah N, Badhiwala J, Wasim A, Manson N, Lasry O, Crawford E, Brown A, MacLean MA, Khan O, Badhiwala J, Odai KG, Bailly N, Khan O, Evaniew N, Yamamoto S, Singh M, Kashigar A, Persad A, Fernandes RJR, Malakoutian M, Ahuja C, Morris S, Stukas S, Chen T, Babadagli E, Xu M, Nater A, Oitment C, Karim M, Aziz M, Pahuta M, Versteeg A, Sundararajan K, Tanguay R, Stratton A, Cushnie D, Correale M, Sadiq I, Badhiwala J, Passias P, Badhiwala J, McGregor S, Passias P, Badhiwala J, Chen T, Singh S, Ayling O, Bond M, Rienmueller A, Chen T, Lasry O, Lyons F, Ahmed U, Inglis T, Waheed Z, Wilson J, Nater A, Pahuta M, Klein G, McKibben N, Kassam F, Clement A, Kanawati A, Shaikh N, Kanawati A, Alshammari A, Kanawati A, Yamamoto S, Hamilton K, Huschi Z, Peng YN, Huschi Z, Filgueira É, Goulet J, Kashigar A, Chen T, Hadgaonkar S, MacLean M, Chen T, Kerr HL, Meagher J, Wilson J, Stevens M, Rocos B, Pai A, Kingwell S, Thibault J, Touchette C, Moskven E, Greene R, DeVries Z, Sarraj M, Bosakhar B, Thornley P, Donnellan J, Kishta W, Darby P, Nahle I, Alzakri A, Roy-Beaudry M, Joncas J, Turgeon I, Parent S, Shen J, Alzakri A, Roy-Beaudry M, Joncas J, Turgeon I, Parent S, Samson N, Lamontagne-Proulx J, Soulet D, Tremblay Y, Praud JP, Parent S, Parent S, Gross D, Renkens J, Schlösser T, Stadhouder A, Kruyt M, Mostert A, Tee J, de Klerk L, De Kleuver M, Castelein R, Zeller R, Lewis S, Tan T, Lebel D, Rushton P, Petcharaporn M, Samdani A, Newton P, Marks M, Drake J, Dirks P, Rutka J, Kulkarni A, Ibrahim G, Taylor M, Dewan M, Zeller R, Donze S, Damen L, Rutges J, Hokken-Koelega A, Mathieu F, Lamberti-Pasculi M, Hanak B, Zeller R, Kulkarni A, Drake J, Ibrahim G, Rushton P, Ghag R, Miyanji F, Zeller R, Lewis S, Lebel D, Peiro-Garcia A, Benavides B, Parsons D, Ferri-de-Barros F, Aldebeyan S, Ghag R, Miyanji F, Kutschke L, Laux C, Kabelitz M, Schüpbach R, Böni T, Farshad M, Nielsen C, Lewis S, Lenke L, Shaffrey C, Cheung K, Berven S, Qiu Y, Matsuyama Y, Pellisé-Urquiza F, Polly D, Sembrano J, Dahl B, Kelly M, de Kleuver M, Spruit M, Alanay A, Alas H, Kim HJ, Lafage R, Soroceanu A, Hockley A, Ames C, Klineberg E, Burton D, Diebo B, Bess S, Line B, Shaffrey C, Smith J, Schwab F, Lafage V, Passias P, Lafage R, Soroceanu A, Hockley A, Line B, Klineberg E, Bess S, Protopsaltis T, Shaffrey C, Schwab F, Scheer J, Smith J, Lafage V, Ames C, Lenke L, Shaffrey C, Cheung K, Berven S, Qiu Y, Matsuyama Y, Pellisé-Urquiza F, Polly D, Sembrano J, Dahl B, Kelly M, de Kleuver M, Spruit M, Alanay A, Bortz C, Pierce K, Alas H, Brown A, Soroceanu A, Hockley A, Vira S, Ahmad W, Naessig S, Diebo B, Raman T, Protopsaltis T, Buckland A, Gerling M, Lafage R, Lafage V, Lewis S, Lenke L, Shaffrey C, Cheung K, Berven S, Qiu Y, Matsuyama Y, Pellisé-Urquiza F, Polly D, Sembrano J, Dahl B, Kelly M, de Kleuver M, Spruit M, Alanay A, Bailey C, Rampersaud R, Fisher C, Chen T, McIntosh G, Rampersaud R, Karim M, Urquhart J, Fisher C, Street J, Dvorak M, Paquette S, Charest-Morin R, Ailon T, Glennie A, Manson N, Rampersaud R, Thomas K, Rasoulinejad P, Bailey C, Ailon T, Fisher C, Greene R, Glennie A, Duquette D, LeBlanc D, Martell B, Schmidt M, Christie S, Wong DBT, Di Paola C, Ailon T, Charest-Morin R, Dea N, Dvorak M, Fisher C, Kwon B, Paquette S, Street J, Street J, Flexman A, Charest-Morin R, Wasim A, Schwartz C, Stark R, Shrikumar M, Finkelstein J, Gara A, Banaszek D, Wong T, Ailon T, Bryce E, Charest-Morin R, Dea N, Dvorak M, Fisher C, Kwon B, Paquette S, Street J, Persad A, Spiess M, Wu A, Woo A, Hnenny L, Fourney D, Joshi H, Khan O, Badhiwala J, Rampersaud R, Lewis S, Massicotte E, Fehlings M, Cadotte D, Bailey C, Christie S, Dea N, Fisher C, Paquet J, Soroceanu A, Thomas KC, Rampersaud YR, Wilson J, Manson N, Johnson M, Hall H, McIntosh G, Jacobs B, Kalsi-Ryan S, Akbar MA, Badhiwala J, Wilson J, Tetreault L, Nouri A, Rienmuller A, Massicotte E, Fehlings M, Kalsi-Ryan S, Riehm L, Martin A, Badhiwala J, Akbar M, Massicotte E, Fehlings M, Kalsi-Ryan S, Akbar MA, Badhiwala J, Wilson J, Tetreault L, Nouri A, Rienmuller A, Massicotte E, Fehlings M, Jacobs B, Johnson M, Bailey C, Christie S, Paquet J, Nataraj A, Cadotte D, Wilson J, Manson N, Hall H, Thomas K, Rampersaud R, McIntosh G, Fisher C, Dea N, Wilson J, Jentzsch T, Jiang F, Badhiwala J, Moghaddamjou A, Akbar MA, Nater A, Rienmuller A, Ganau M, Massicotte E, Fehlings M, Tu L, Manouchehri N, Kim KT, So K, Webster M, Fisk S, Tigchelaar S, Dalkilic S, Sayre E, Streijger F, Macnab A, Kwon B, Shadgan B, Wilson J, Fehlings M, Bailly N, Wagnac E, Mac-Thiong JM, Goulet J, Petit Y, Badhiwala J, Grossman R, Geisler F, Fehlings M, Wilson J, Rivers C, Kwon B, Waheed Z, Buenaventura J, Humphreys S, Noonan V, Evaniew N, Dvorak M, Wilson J, Fehlings M, Shrikumar M, Balasuberamaniam P, Rapkin B, Schwartz C, Stark R, Finkelstein J, Bigney E, Darling M, Richardson E, El-Mughayyar D, Abraham E, Street J, Radomski L, Rampersaud R, Pierce K, Bortz C, Alas H, Naessig S, Ahmad W, Vira S, Diebo B, Sciubba D, Hassanzadeh H, Hockley A, Soroceanu A, Protopsaltis T, Buckland A, Passias P, Greene R, Christie SD, Badhiwala J, Fehlings M, Witiw C, Wilson J, Fehlings M, Nessek H, Wai E, Phan P, Diotalevi L, Beauséjour MH, Wagnac E, Mac-Thiong JM, Petit Y, Badhiwala J, Fehlings M, Mazlouman S, Belley-Côté E, Jacobs B, Kwon B, Malakoutian M, Theret M, Street J, Brown S, Rossi F, Oxland T, Singh P, Chandra S, Laratta J, Carreon L, Bisson E, Ghogawala Z, Yew A, Mkorombindo T, Mummaneni P, Glassman S, Kindrachuk M, Hnenny L, Wu A, Norton J, Fourney D, Gee A, Kerr HL, Kanawati A, Zdero R, Gurr K, Bailey C, Rasoulinejad P, Yamamoto S, Sadaram S, Speidel J, Liu J, Street J, Brown S, Oxland T, Khazaei M, Walji I, Dadabhoy M, Gulati N, Aiyar N, Ostmeier S, Hasan A, Senthilnathan V, Punjani N, Yao Y, Yue S, Ozdemir G, Lou Z, Luong W, Post A, Tootsi A, Chan P, Fehlings M, Yung A, George S, Prevost V, Bauman A, Kozlowski P, Samadi F, Fournier C, Parker L, Dong K, Streijger F, Moore W, Laule C, Kwon B, Gill J, Cooper J, Dong K, Streijger F, Street J, Paquette S, Ailon T, Charest-Morin R, Fisher C, Dvorak M, Dhall S, Mac-Thiong JM, Parent S, Bailey C, Christie S, Wellington C, Kwon B, Crawford E, Zhang Y, Hardisty M, Finkelstein J, Kureshi N, Julien L, Abidi R, Christie S, Parashin S, Gascoyne T, Goytan M, Chuang J, Liu K, Quraishi N, Pasku D, Wilson J, Fehlings M, Bozzo A, Reinmuller A, Martin A, Hananel SY, Thornley P, Gazendam A, Aoude A, Nielsen C, Rampersaud R, Dea N, Versteeg A, Sahgal A, Verlaan JJ, Morin RC, Rhines L, Sciubba D, Schuster J, Weber M, Lazary A, Fehlings M, Clarke M, Arnold P, Boriani S, Laufer I, Gokaslan Z, Fisher C, Rosenzweig D, Weber M, Fisk F, Versteeg A, Fisher C, Sahgal A, Gokaslan Z, Rhines L, Boriani S, Bettegowda C, Dea N, Gal R, Charest-Morin R, Verlaan JJ, Verkooijen L, Fisher C, Perruccio A, Rampersaud R, Eckenswiller D, Yu A, Klassen K, Lewkonia P, Thomas K, Jacobs B, Miller N, Swamy G, Yang M, Soroceanu A, Phan P, Wai E, Kingwell S, Moravek D, Tierney S, Street J, Sundararajan K, Bosma R, Faclier G, Di Renna T, Rampersaud R, Frederick A, Kassam F, Nicholls F, Swamy G, Lewkonia P, Thomas K, Jacobs B, Miller N, Tanguay R, Soroceanu A, Platt A, Traynelis V, Witiw C, Horn S, Weiser-Horwitz S, Bortz C, Segreto F, Pierce K, Lafage R, Hockley A, Vira S, Lafage V, Witiw C, Wilson J, Nassiri F, da Costa L, Nathens A, Fehlings M, Jacobs B, Alas H, Pierce K, Brown A, Bortz C, Hockley A, Soroceanu A, Vira S, Naessig S, Ahmad W, Lafage R, Lafage V, Witiw C, Wilson J, da Costa L, Nathens A, Fehlings M, Crawford E, McIntosh G, Rampersaud R, Fisher C, Manson N, Thomas K, Hall H, Rampersaud R, Dea N, McIntosh G, Charest-Morin R, Investigators CSORN, Ailon T, Fisher C, Evaniew N, Aldebeyan S, Thomas K, Sundararajan K, Oitment C, Lewis S, Perruccio A, Rampersaud R, Christie S, Yee A, Fisher C, Jarzem P, Roy JF, Bouchard J, Evans D, Kwon B, Splawinski J, Warren D, Street J, Morris S, Costello J, Farrell M, Humphreys S, Kurban D, Rivers C, Jeffrey M, Juutilainen S, Casha S, Christie S, Clarke T, Drew B, Ethans K, Fehlings M, Fox R, Linassi G, Marion T, O’Connell C, Paquet J, Reid J, Scott L, Fourney D, Schouten R, Rivers C, Chen M, Nunnerley J, Croot T, Young L, Patel A, Dvorak M, Kwon B, Rivers C, Buenaventura J, Humphreys S, Noonan V, Fallah N, Evaniew N, Dvorak M, Cronin S, Badhiwala J, Ginsberg H, Fehlings M, Kwon B, Jaglal S, Wilson J, Fehlings M, Fisk F, Versteeg A, Fisher C, Sahgal A, Gokaslan Z, Rhines L, Boriani S, Bettegowda C, Dea N, Martel A, Sahgal A, Finkelstein J, Whyne C, Hardisty M, Baksh N, Nguyen T, Brown S, Jaboin J, Lin C, Yach J, Hardisty M, Whyne C, Fernandez R, Gee A, Urquhart J, Bailey C, Rasoulinejad P, Zhang H, Shewchuk J, Street J, Wilson D, Oxland T, Fernandez R, Gee A, Urquhart J, Bailey C, Rasoulinejad P, Algarni N, Aljarboa N, Jarzem P, Fernandez R, Gee A, Urquhart J, Bailey C, Rasoulinejad P, Whyte T, Van Toen C, Melnyk A, Shewchuk J, Street J, Cripton P, Oxland T, Avila M, Hurlbert RJ, Neuburger L, Ahmed SU, Cheng Y, Fourney D, Hsu HC, Kao CH, Neuburger L, Ahmed SU, Cheng Y, Fourney D, Meves R, de Oliveira AI, da Silva HC, Richard-Denis A, Petit Y, Diotalevi L, Mac-Thiong JM, Laratta J, Bisson E, Carreon L, Yew A, Mkorombindo T, Glassman S, Christie S, Bouchard J, Fisher C, Roy JF, Yee A, Jarzem P, Khurjekar K, Kothari A, Zawar A, Sanchetui P, Shyam A, Touchette C, Han JH, Christie S, Pickett G, Yee A, Bouchard J, Christie S, Fisher C, Jarzem P, Roy JF, Hashem L, Urquhart J, Rasoulinejad P, Gurr K, Siddiqi F, Bailey C, Attabib N, Bigney E, Richardson E, El-Mughayyar D, Darling M, Manson N, Abraham E, Badhiwala J, Jiang F, Wilson J, Fehlings M, Dunning C, Oxner W, Stewart S, Glennie A, Hutchinson J, Oxland T, Zhang H, Shewchuk J, Wilson D, Street J, Wilk S, Wai E, Phan P, Stratton A, Mohammed S, Tsai E, Alkerayf F, Michalowski W, Phan P, Wai E, Hoda M, MacLean M, Brunette-Clément T, Abduljabba F, Weber M, Fourney D, Charest-Morin R, Flexman A, Street J, Frey M, Mackey S, De Carvalho D, Barrowman N, Smit K, Tice A, Mervitz D, Jarvis J, Kingwell S. Canadian Spine SocietyPresentation CPSS1: Spinal insufficiency fracture in the geriatric pediatric spinePresentation CPSS2: The clinical significance of tether breakages in anterior vertebral body growth modulation: a 2-year postoperative analysisPresentation CPSS3: Anterior vertebral body growth modulation for idiopathic scoliosis: early, mid-term and late complicationsPresentation CPSS4: Ovine model of congenital chest wall and spine deformity with alterations of respiratory mechanics: follow-up from birth to 3 monthsPresentation CPSS5: Test–retest reliability and minimum detectable change of the English translation of the Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life questionnaire in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosisPresentation B1. Abstract 31: Incidence of delayed spinal cord injury in pediatric spine deformity surgery seems to be higher than previously assumedPresentation B2. Abstract 155: What is the optimal surgical method for achieving successful symptom relief in pediatric high-grade spondylolisthesis?Presentation B3. Abstract 47: Vertebral body tethering: Truly motion preserving or rather limiting?Presentation B4. Abstract 180: Fusion rates in pediatric patients after posterior cervical spine instrumentationPresentation B5. Abstract 102: Effects of 8 years of growth hormone treatment on the onset and progression of scoliosis in children with Prader–Willi syndromePresentation B6. Abstract 144: Klippel–Feil syndrome: clinical phenotypes associated with surgical treatmentPresentation B7. Abstract 123: Anterior release for idiopathic scoliosis: Is it necessary for curve correction?Presentation B8. Abstract 62: Severe scoliosis: Do we know a better way? A retrospective comparative studyPresentation B9. Abstract 21: Intraoperative skull femoral traction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the correlation of traction with side-bending radiographsPresentation B10. Abstract 147: What is the effect of intraoperative halo-femoral traction on correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?Presentation B11. Abstract 174: Extreme long-term outcome of surgically versus non-surgically treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosisPresentation B12. Abstract 172: The influence of multilevel spinal deformity surgery on the clinical outcome in the elderly: a prospective, observational, multicentre studyPresentation B13. Abstract 49: Demographics of a prospective evaluation of elderly deformity surgery: a prospective international observational multicentre studyPresentation B14. Abstract 119: Timing of conversion to cervical malalignment and proximal junctional kyphosis following surgical correction of adult spinal deformityPresentation B15. Abstract 44: Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patientsPresentation B16. Abstract 50: Outcome of multilevel spinal deformity surgery in patients over 60 years of age: a multicentre international prospective studyPresentation B17. Abstract 122: A simpler, modified frailty index weighted by complication occurrence correlates to pain and disability for adult spinal deformity patientsPresentation B18. Abstract 75: Change in Oswestry Disability Index at 24 months following multilevel spinal deformity surgery in patients over 60 years of age: a multicentre international prospective studyPresentation C19. Abstract 19: A prospective cohort study evaluating trends in the surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis in Canada and the utility of a novel surgical decision aidPresentation C20. Abstract 154: Decompression compared with decompression and fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) studyPresentation C21. Abstract ID 77: Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: factors impacting decision to fusePresentation C22. Abstract 27: Patient-reported outcomes following surgery for lumbar disc herniation: comparison of a universal and multitier health care systemPresentation C23. Abstract 151: Do patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniations fair worse with discectomy than primary operations? A retrospective analysis from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research NetworkPresentation C24. Abstract 136: A province-wide assessment of the appropriateness of lumbar spine MRIPresentation D25. Abstract 32: Surgical site infection reduction — a 10-year quality improvement journeyPresentation D26. Abstract 34: The impact of frailty on patient-reported outcome measures following elective thoraco-lumbar spine surgeryPresentation D27. Abstract 8: Moving toward better health: exercise practice is associated with improved outcomes after spine surgeryPresentation D28. Abstract 33: Preoperative decolonization does not adversely affect the microbiologic spectrum of spine surgical site infectionPresentation D29. Abstract 61: Feedback: reducing after-hours spine cases using an encrypted messaging systemPresentation D30. Abstract 177: Complex spine surgery is safe and effective in the extremely elderly age group: results from an ambispective study of 722 patients over 75 years old from a single institutionPresentation E31. Abstract 38: Clinical predictors of achieving minimal clinically important difference after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an external validation study from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research NetworkPresentation E32. Abstract 66: The natural history of degenerative cervical myelopathy: an ambispective longitudinal cohort studyPresentation E33. Abstract 159: Quantitative assessment of gait characteristics in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM): a prospective studyPresentation E34. Abstract 130: Prognostic factors in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) for patients managed operatively and nonoperativelyPresentation E35. Abstract 175: Efficacy of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of a Canadian prospective multicentre studyPresentation E36. Abstract 67: Interobserver reliability of the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score in degenerative cervical myelopathyPresentation F37. Abstract 128: Continuous optical monitoring of spinal cord hemodynamics during the first 7 days after injury in a porcine model of acute spinal cord injuryPresentation F38. Abstract 106: Development of a prediction model for central cord syndrome: an evaluation of motor recovery and the effectiveness of early surgery in a prospective, multicentre cohortPresentation F39. Abstract 135: Spinal cord dynamics under different clinical configurations of thoracolumbar burst fractures through numerical simulationsPresentation F40. Abstract 60: Predicting the heterogeneity of outcome following sensorimotor complete cervical spinal cord injury: trajectory-based analysis of 655 prospectively enrolled patientsPresentation F41. Abstract 167: Mortality in the year following discharge to the community from inpatient care for acute traumatic spinal cord injury: When and why?Presentation F42. Abstract 104: A novel method to classify patients with cervical incomplete spinal cord injury based on potential for recovery: a group-based trajectory analysis using prospective, multicentre data from over 800 patientsPresentation G43. Abstract 7: Responsiveness of standard spine outcome tools: Do they measure up?Presentation G44. Abstract 142: Patient outcomes: important psychological measuresPresentation G45. Abstract 84: Accuracy of surveillance for surgical site infections after spine surgery: a Bayesian latent class analysis using 4 independent data sourcesPresentation G46. Abstract 169: Econometric modelling: development of a surgical cost calculator for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spinePresentation G47. Abstract 124: The economic impact of nonreimbursable events in open, minimally invasive and robot-assisted lumbar fusion surgeryPresentation G48. Abstract 164: Are there sex differences in preoperative health status and health care delivery for patients undergoing scheduled lumbar surgery? An analysis from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research NetworkPresentation H49. Abstract 41: Patient phenotypes associated with functional outcomes after spinal cord injury: a principal component analysis in 1119 patientsPresentation H50. Abstract 103: Early versus late surgical decompression for acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a pooled analysis of prospective, multicentre data in 1548 patientsPresentation H51. Abstract 79: Clinical outcome correlation of diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance imaging values: a systematic reviewPresentation H52. Abstract 137: A numerical study on the pathogenesis of central cord syndromePresentation H53. Abstract 42: Feasibility and utility of machine learning in prediction of bladder outcomes after spinal cord injury: analysis of 1250 patients from the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI) registryPresentation H54. Abstract 18: Interventions to optimize spinal cord perfusion in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injuries: a systematic reviewPresentation i55. Abstract 55: The effect of posterior lumbar spinal surgery on passive stiffness of rat paraspinal muscles 13 weeks post-surgeryPresentation i56. Abstract 43: A computed tomographic based morphometric analysis of the axis in adult populationPresentation i57. Abstract 92: Is there value to flexion–extension x-rays for degenerative spondylolisthesis? A multicentre retrospective studyPresentation i58. Abstract 98: The novel “7/20 EMG protocol” in combination with O-arm image-guided navigation for accurate lumbar pedicle placement while minimizing diagnostic radiation exposurePresentation i59. Abstract 148: Comparative biomechanical study of 2 types of transdiscal fixation implants for high-grade L5/S1 spine spondylolisthesis in a porcine modelPresentation i60. Abstract 85: The effects of fibre bundle size and vertebral level on passive stiffness of the lumbar paraspinal muscles in a rat modelPresentation J61. Abstract 157: A self-assembling peptide biomaterial to enhance human neural stem cell-based regeneration of the injured spinal cordPresentation J62. Abstract 162: Measuring demyelination, axonal loss and inflammation after human spinal cord injury with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and histopathologyPresentation J63. Abstract 179: Characterization of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) as a fluid biomarker of human traumatic spinal cord injuryPresentation J64. Abstract 13: Utility and role of virtual reality based simulation models in spinal decompression trainingPresentation J65. Abstract 160: Investigating the determinants for predicting surgical patient outcomes through the application of machine learning methodsPresentation J66. Abstract 143: Comparison of screw design and technique on cervical lateral mass screw fixationPresentation K67. Abstract 57: Development of clinical prognostic models for postoperative survival and quality of life in patients with surgically treated metastatic epidural spinal cord compressionPresentation K68. Abstract 170: Sarcomas of the spine: a 20-year survey of disease and treatment strategy in Ontario, CanadaPresentation K69. Abstract 15: Metastatic spine disease: Should patients with short life expectancy be denied surgical care? An international retrospective cohort studyPresentation K70. Abstract 29: Nanoparticle-functionalized polymethyl methacrylate bone cement for sustained chemotherapeutic drug deliveryPresentation K71. Abstract 90: Development of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire – 8 Domain (SOSGOQ-8D)Presentation K72. Abstract 6: Treatment expectations of patients with spinal metastases: What do we tell our patients?Presentation L73. Abstract 48: Factors related to risk of opioid abuse in primary care patients with low back painPresentation L74. Abstract 65: QI/QA of a transitional outpatient pain program for spinePresentation L75. Abstract 168: The effect of preoperative opioid use on hospital length of stay in patients undergoing elective spine surgeryPresentation L76. Abstract 163: Disability or pain: Which best predicts patient satisfaction with surgical outcome? A Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) studyPresentation L77. Abstract 58: Rapid access to interventional pain management for lumbar nerve root pain through collaborative interprofessional provider networksPresentation L78. Abstract 63: Chronic preoperative opioid use associated with higher perioperative resource utilization and complications in adult spinal deformity patientsPresentation M79. Abstract 108: Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a longitudinal analysis of reoperationsPresentation M80. Abstract 46: Preliminary results of randomized controlled trial investigating the role of psychological distress on cervical spine surgery outcomes: a baseline analysisPresentation M81. Abstract 110: Operative versus nonoperative treatment of geriatric odontoid fractures: a study of North American trauma centresPresentation M82. Abstract 74: Clinical outcome of posterior cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusionPresentation M83. Abstract 45: “Reverse Roussouly”: ratios of cervical to thoracic shape curvature in an adult cervical deformity populationPresentation M84. Abstract 109: Treatment of acute traumatic central cord syndrome: a study of North American trauma centresPresentation N85. Abstract 118: Comparing minimally invasive versus traditional open lumbar decompression and fusion surgery: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) studyPresentation N86. Abstract 54: Time to return to work after lumbar spine surgeryPresentation N87. Abstract 28: Patient-reported outcomes following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison of a universal and multitier health care systemPresentation N88. Abstract 93: Outcomes of surgery in older adults with lumbar spinal stenosisPresentation N89. Abstract 162: Functional objective assessment using the TUG test is a useful tool to evaluate outcome in lumbar spinal stenosisPresentation N90. Abstract 36: A Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) matched-cohort study comparing lumbar fusion and disk arthroplastyPresentation o91. Abstract 171: Development of clinical practice guidelines for the management of traumatic spinal column and cord injuries in British Columbia: an approach to standardizing care of spine trauma patientsPresentation o92. Abstract 22: Notes from a small island: stemming the tide of a spinal deluge. The use of encrypted software applications to ensure accountability, quality control and surgical consensus in a national acute adult spinal surgery centrePresentation o93. Abstract 129: Traumatic spinal cord injuries among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations in Canada: an ambispective outcomes studyPresentation o94. Abstract 132: Traumatic spinal cord injury in New Zealand and Canada: a comparative analysisPresentation o95. Abstract 150: Exploring the reasons for readmission following traumatic spinal cord injuryPresentation o96. Abstract 59: Exploring the epidemiology and impact of spinal cord injury in the elderly: a 15-year Canadian population-based cohort studyPresentation P1. Abstract 139: Incidence and management of spinal metastasis in Ontario: a population-based studyPresentation P2. Abstract 91: A general population utility valuation study for the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire – 8DPresentation P3. Abstract 158: Metastatic vertebrae segmentation by augmented 3D convolutional neural networkPresentation P4. Abstract 73: Risk factors for failure of radiation therapy for spinal metastasesPresentation P5. Abstract 68: Significance of extracanalicular cement extravasation in thoracolumbar kyphoplastyPresentation P6. Abstract 120: Modelling fracture in osteoblastic vertebraePresentation P7. Abstract 97: The development of novel 2-in-1 patient-specific, 3D-printed laminar osteotomy guides with integrated pedicle screw guidesPresentation P8. Abstract 56: Effect of pelvic retroversion on pelvic geometry and muscle morphometry from upright magnetic resonance imagingPresentation P9. Abstract 161: Anatomic relationship between the accessory process of the lumbar spine and the pedicle screw entry pointPresentation P10. Abstract 20: Novel chair to measure lumbar spine extensors strength in adultsPresentation P11. Abstract 95: Error measurement between human spine, 3D scans, CT-based models, and 3D-printed modelsPresentation P12. Abstract 52: The diagnostic precision of computed tomography for traumatic cervical spine injury: an in vitro investigationPresentation P13. Abstract 94: Epidural abscess causing spinal cord infarctionPresentation P14. Abstract 83: The nerve root sedimentation sign on magnetic resonance imaging is not only correlated with neurogenic claudication: association with all types of leg-dominant mechanical painPresentation P15. Abstract 3: Accuracy of robot-assisted compared with freehand pedicle screw placement in spine surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsPresentation P16. Abstract 82: A positive nerve root sedimentation sign on magnetic resonance imaging is associated with improved surgical outcomes in patients with back dominant painPresentation P17. Abstract 16: Thoracolumbar burst fracture: McCormack load-sharing classification —systematic review and single-arm meta-analysisPresentation P18. Abstract 86: Morphological features of thoracolumbar burst fractures associated with neurologic recovery after thoracolumbar traumatic spinal cord injuryPresentation P19. Abstract 89: Radiographic parameters of listhesis and instability are not associated with health status or clinical outcomes in grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesisPresentation P20. Abstract 37: Predictive socioeconomic factors following lumbar disk arthroplasty: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) studyPresentation P21. Abstract 25: Effect of in situ fusion in lumbar spondylolisthesis on clinical outcomes and spino-pelvic sagittal balancingPresentation P22. Abstract 10: Sex differences in the surgical management of lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic reviewPresentation P23. Abstract 35: Two-year results of lumbar disk arthroplasty: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) studyPresentation P24. Abstract 78: Does disc morphology affect the success of nonoperative treatment of chronic sciatica from a lumbar disc herniation?Presentation P25. Abstract 141: Opioid prescribing patterns: preliminary investigationPresentation P26. Abstract 133: Frailty is a better predictor of complications than age alone after surgical treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: an ambispective study of 5107 elderly patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databasePresentation P27. Abstract 26: Pathway analysis in spine surgery: a model for evaluating length of stayPresentation P29. Abstract 156: Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have different cervical lordosis than the normal populationPresentation P31. Abstract 64: Investigation of thoracic spinal muscle morphology with upright magnetic resonance imagingPresentation P32. Abstract 80: Postoperative complication prediction between spinal surgeons and a machine learning model: a comparative studyPresentation P33. Abstract 81: Is using a simplified procedural classification as accurate as using current procedural terminology codes to predict future complications in spinal surgery?Presentation P34. Abstract 88: Preoperative patient performance status and frailty phenotype as predictive factors of outcome in surgically treated patients with metastatic spinal disease: a systematic literature reviewPresentation P35. Abstract 101: The measurements of frailty and their application to spine surgeryPresentation P36. Abstract 131: The effect of prolonged sitting on muscle reflexes of the low backPresentation P37. Abstract 87: Implementing a rapid discharge pathway for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Canada. Can J Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.1503/cjs.014720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open