1
|
Donaldson JM, Seddiq M, Fusco MJ, Singla S, Pamuk GE, Lee-Alonso RJ, Mixter BD, Goldberg KB, Amiri-Kordestani L, de Claro RA, Drezner N, Gormley NJ, Kanapuru B, Lemery SJ, Fashoyin-Aje LA, Richardson NC, Singh H, Suzman DL, Theoret MR, Kluetz PG, Pazdur R. Highlights of FDA Oncology Approvals in 2023: Bispecific T-cell Engagers, Pediatric Indications, and Inclusive Drug Development. Cancer Discov 2023; 13:2515-2524. [PMID: 38084090 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-1226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
SUMMARY Cancer drug development remained robust in 2023. Highlights of U.S. drug approvals this year include new immunotherapies and targeted drug development in adult and pediatric patients as well as patients with rare diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua M Donaldson
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Marjilla Seddiq
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Michael J Fusco
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Shyamli Singla
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Gulsum E Pamuk
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Rosa J Lee-Alonso
- Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Bronwyn D Mixter
- Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Kirsten B Goldberg
- Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Laleh Amiri-Kordestani
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
- Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - R Angelo de Claro
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
- Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Nicole Drezner
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Nicole J Gormley
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
- Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Bindu Kanapuru
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Steven J Lemery
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
- Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Lola A Fashoyin-Aje
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
- Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Nicholas C Richardson
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Harpreet Singh
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
- Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Daniel L Suzman
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Marc R Theoret
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
- Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Paul G Kluetz
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
- Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Richard Pazdur
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
- Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baines AC, Sarraf Yazdy M, Kasamon YL, Ershler R, Jen EY, Kanapuru B, Richardson NC, Lane A, Carioti T, Theoret MR, Pazdur R, Gormley NJ. Minimal Residual Disease Data in Hematologic Malignancy Drug Applications and Labeling: An FDA Perspective. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:2748-2752. [PMID: 36892497 PMCID: PMC10440218 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
Minimal residual disease (MRD) is increasingly used as a prognostic biomarker, a measure of clinical efficacy, and a guide for treatment decisions in various hematologic malignancies. We sought to characterize MRD data in registrational trials in hematologic malignancies submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with the ultimate goal of expanding the utility of MRD data in future drug applications. We descriptively analyzed MRD data collected in registrational trials, including the type of MRD endpoint, assay, disease compartment(s) assessed, and the acceptance of MRD data in the U.S. prescribing information (USPI). Of 196 drug applications submitted between January 2014 and February 2021, 55 (28%) included MRD data. Of the 55 applications, MRD data was proposed by the Applicant for inclusion in the USPI in 41 (75%) applications but was included in only 24 (59%). Despite an increasing number of applications that proposed to include MRD data in the USPI, the acceptance rate decreased over time. Although MRD data have the potential to expedite drug development, our analysis identified challenges and specific areas for improvement, including assay validation, standardization of collection methods to optimize performance, and considerations in trial design and statistical methodology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea C. Baines
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Maryam Sarraf Yazdy
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Yvette L. Kasamon
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Rachel Ershler
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Emily Y. Jen
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Bindu Kanapuru
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Nicholas C. Richardson
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Ashley Lane
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Theresa Carioti
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Marc R. Theoret
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
- Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Richard Pazdur
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
- Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Nicole J. Gormley
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Howlader N, Sharon E, Bhattacharya M, Ehrlich LA, Richardson NC, Gormley NJ, de Claro RA, Wood AE, Mariotto AB, Cronin KA. The Impact of Improved Treatments on Survival of Adult US Leukemia Patients: 1990 - 2018. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023:725088. [PMID: 37012203 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-22-1171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Molecularly targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective treatments for BCR-ABL-bearing leukemias. We evaluated the impact of TKIs on historical chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) mortality trends compared to acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and chronic lymphoblastic leukemia (CLL). METHODS Since mortality trends reflect combined effects of leukemia incidence and survival, we also evaluated the contribution of incidence and survival trends to mortality trends by subtypes. We used data from 13 US SEER registries (1992-2017) among US adults. We utilized histology codes to identify cases of CML, ALL, and CLL and death certificate data to calculate mortality. We used Joinpoint to characterize incidence (1992-2017) and mortality (1992-2018) trends by subtype and diagnosis year. RESULTS For CML, mortality rates started declining in 1998 at an average rate of 12% annually. Imatinib was approved by the FDA for treating CML and ALL in 2001, leading to clear benefits for CML patients. Five-year CML survival increased dramatically over time, especially between 1996-2011, 2.3% per year on average. ALL incidence increased 1.5% annually from 1992-2017. ALL mortality decreased 0.6% annually during 1992-2012 and then stopped declining. CLL incidence fluctuated during 1992-2017 while mortality decreased 1.1% annually during 1992-2011 and at a faster rate of 3.6% per year from 2011. Five-year survival increased 0.7% per year on average during 1992-2016. CONCLUSIONS Survival benefit from TKIs and other novel therapies for treating leukemia subtypes has been demonstrated in clinical trials. IMPACT Our study highlights the impact of molecularly targeted therapies at the population level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elad Sharon
- National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | | | - Lori A Ehrlich
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States
| | | | - Nicole J Gormley
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States
| | - R Angelo de Claro
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States
| | - Amy E Wood
- Essex Management, National Cancer Institute Contractor, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brewer KM, Brewer KK, Richardson NC, Berbari NF. Neuronal cilia in energy homeostasis. Front Cell Dev Biol 2022; 10:1082141. [PMID: 36568981 PMCID: PMC9773564 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1082141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A subset of genetic disorders termed ciliopathies are associated with obesity. The mechanisms behind cilia dysfunction and altered energy homeostasis in these syndromes are complex and likely involve deficits in both development and adult homeostasis. Interestingly, several cilia-associated gene mutations also lead to morbid obesity. While cilia have critical and diverse functions in energy homeostasis, including their roles in centrally mediated food intake and peripheral tissues, many questions remain. Here, we briefly discuss syndromic ciliopathies and monogenic cilia signaling mutations associated with obesity. We then focus on potential ways neuronal cilia regulate energy homeostasis. We discuss the literature around cilia and leptin-melanocortin signaling and changes in ciliary G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. We also discuss the different brain regions where cilia are implicated in energy homeostasis and the potential for cilia dysfunction in neural development to contribute to obesity. We close with a short discussion on the challenges and opportunities associated with studies looking at neuronal cilia and energy homeostasis. This review highlights how neuronal cilia-mediated signaling is critical for proper energy homeostasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn M. Brewer
- Department of Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Katlyn K. Brewer
- Department of Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Nicholas C. Richardson
- Department of Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Nicolas F. Berbari
- Department of Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, United States,Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States,Center for Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States,*Correspondence: Nicolas F. Berbari,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Richardson NC, Kasamon Y, Pazdur R, Gormley N. The saga of PI3K inhibitors in haematological malignancies: survival is the ultimate safety endpoint. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:563-566. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00200-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
6
|
Kasamon YL, Price LSL, Okusanya OO, Richardson NC, Li RJ, Ma L, Wu YT, Theoret M, Pazdur R, Gormley NJ. FDA Approval Summary: Selinexor for Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Oncologist 2021; 26:879-886. [PMID: 34132444 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
In June 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted accelerated approval to selinexor for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), not otherwise specified, including DLBCL arising from follicular lymphoma, after at least two lines of systemic therapy. Approval was based on SADAL, a multicenter trial of selinexor monotherapy in patients with DLBCL after two to five systemic regimens. Efficacy was based on independent review committee-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response using Lugano criteria. In 134 patients treated with the approved dosage (60 mg orally on days 1 and 3 of each week), the ORR was 29% (95% confidence interval, 22-38), with complete response in 13% and with 38% of responses lasting at least 6 months. Gastrointestinal toxicity developed in 80% of patients, hyponatremia in 61%, central neurological toxicity (such as dizziness and mental status changes) in 25%, and ocular toxicity in 18%. New or worsening grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, anemia, or hyponatremia developed in ≥15%. Adverse reactions led to selinexor dose interruption in 61% of patients, dose reduction in 49%, and permanent discontinuation in 17%, with thrombocytopenia being the leading cause of dose modifications. Postmarketing studies will evaluate reduced dosages of selinexor and further evaluate clinical benefit in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Selinexor is a new potential option for adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified, in the third-line setting or beyond. Toxicities are typically manageable but can be difficult to tolerate and necessitate close monitoring and supportive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvette L Kasamon
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Lauren S L Price
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Olanrewaju O Okusanya
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Nicholas C Richardson
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Ruo-Jing Li
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Lian Ma
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Yu-Te Wu
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Marc Theoret
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.,Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Richard Pazdur
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.,Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Nicole J Gormley
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Richardson NC, Kasamon YL, Chen H, de Claro RA, Ye J, Blumenthal GM, Farrell AT, Pazdur R. FDA Approval Summary: Brentuximab Vedotin in First-Line Treatment of Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma. Oncologist 2019; 24:e180-e187. [PMID: 30914464 PMCID: PMC6516120 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
This article summarizes the clinical review and basis of approval of brentuximab vedotin in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone as a first‐line regimen for patients with CD30‐expressing peripheral T‐cell lymphoma. In November 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved brentuximab vedotin (BV) for the treatment of adult patients with previously untreated systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma or other CD30‐expressing peripheral T‐cell lymphomas (PTCL), including angioimmunoblastic T‐cell lymphoma and PTCL not otherwise specified, in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (CHP). Approval was based on ECHELON‐2, a randomized, double‐blind, actively controlled trial that compared BV+CHP with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) in 452 patients with newly diagnosed, CD30‐expressing PTCL. Efficacy was based on independent review facility‐assessed progression‐free survival (PFS). The median PFS was 48.2 months with BV+CHP versus 20.8 months with CHOP, resulting in a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54–0.93). The trial also demonstrated improvement in overall survival (HR 0.66; 95% CI: 0.46–0.95), complete response rate (68% vs. 56%), and overall response rate (83% vs. 72%) with BV+CHP. The most common adverse reactions (incidence ≥20%) observed ≥2% more with BV+CHP were nausea, diarrhea, fatigue or asthenia, mucositis, pyrexia, vomiting, and anemia. Peripheral neuropathy rates were similar (52% with BV+CHP, 55% with CHOP). Through the Real‐Time Oncology Review pilot program, which allows FDA early access to key data, FDA granted this approval less than 2 weeks after official submission of the application. Implications for Practice. This is the first U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for treatment of patients with newly diagnosed peripheral T‐cell lymphomas (PTCL). Improvement in progression‐free and overall survival over cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy, which has been the standard of care for decades, is unprecedented. The new regimen represents a major advance for the frontline treatment of patients with CD30‐expressing PTCL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas C Richardson
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Yvette L Kasamon
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Haiyan Chen
- Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - R Angelo de Claro
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Jingjing Ye
- Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Gideon M Blumenthal
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
- Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Ann T Farrell
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Richard Pazdur
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
- Oncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Richardson NC, Behringer B, Warren MD. Barriers to the integration of tobacco cessation programs in primary care practices in Tennessee. J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.e18187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
9
|
Abstract
Your pager sounds at 3 am. You're called to admit a 4-month-old infant who sustained a temporal skull fracture. As the overnight pediatric hospitalist at a community hospital, you're asked to admit this child to observation. The fall was unwitnessed and the floor is hardwood. He vomited twice afterward. Head computed tomography scan reveals no additional intracranial injury apart from the skull fracture. A skeletal survey reveals no additional injuries. On examination, you see bruising of the area. The child is sleepy but neurologically intact. The emergency department has called local child protective services, and you wonder what you will tell them when they ask your opinion, especially when the family has no explanation for what happened.
Collapse
|