1
|
Binotti WW, Nosé RM, Pondelis NJ, Jamali A, Kataguiri P, Akhlaq A, Kenyon KR, Hamrah P. Novel Application of Conjunctival Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography to Assess Ocular Redness. Cornea 2023; 42:1520-1527. [PMID: 36727742 DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000003239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to determine anterior segment optical coherence tomography angiography (AS-OCTA) parameters to assess ocular redness severity. METHODS AS-OCTA analyses of 60 eyes of 40 patients were grouped according to ocular redness stages using the 5-category validated bulbar redness scale in a cross-sectional retrospective study (groups 1-5). A subset of patients with slit-lamp photographs, total 35 eyes of 23 patients, were assessed with 10-category validated bulbar redness scale for comparison. AS-OCTA images of nasal and temporal bulbar conjunctiva were analyzed. Vessel density (VD) represented the blood flow pixels by the total pixels of image (%); vessel diameter index represented the VD by the skeletonized density; fractal dimension, measured with the box-count method, represented the vessel branching complexity. Averaged nasal and temporal parameters for each eye were correlated to validated bulbar redness scales. RESULTS There was no statistical difference between groups for age ( P = 0.118), sex ( P = 0.501), eye laterality (OD/OS; P = 0.111), or location (nasal/temporal; P = 0.932). In the 5-category scale, VD significantly increased from group 1 to 2 (31.5 ± 1.9% and 33.4 ± 2.2%, P = 0.023), 2 to 3 (36.0 ± 3.5%, P < 0.001), and 4 to 5 (40.2 ± 2.9 and 46.5 ± 2.8, P < 0.001). The correlations were 0.805 ( P < 0.001) and 0.893 ( P < 0.001) for the 5-category and 10-category scales, respectively. Vessel diameter index showed a significant increase from 1 to 2 (2.90 ± 0.17 and 3.00 ± 0.15; P = 0.004) and 4 to 5 (2.92 ± 0.31 and 3.33 ± 0.08; P = 0.001). The correlations were 0.550 ( P < 0.001) and 0.625 ( P < 0.001) for the respective scales. The fractal dimension showed no significant differences between subsequent groups. The correlations were 0.445 ( P < 0.001) and 0.583 ( P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Conjunctival AS-OCTA VD was the most reliable parameter to assess ocular redness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William W Binotti
- Center for Translational Ocular Immunology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; and
- Cornea Service, New England Eye Center, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Ricardo M Nosé
- Center for Translational Ocular Immunology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; and
- Cornea Service, New England Eye Center, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Nicholas J Pondelis
- Center for Translational Ocular Immunology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; and
| | - Arsia Jamali
- Center for Translational Ocular Immunology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; and
| | - Paula Kataguiri
- Center for Translational Ocular Immunology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; and
- Cornea Service, New England Eye Center, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Anam Akhlaq
- Center for Translational Ocular Immunology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; and
- Cornea Service, New England Eye Center, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Kenneth R Kenyon
- Cornea Service, New England Eye Center, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Pedram Hamrah
- Center for Translational Ocular Immunology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; and
- Cornea Service, New England Eye Center, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pondelis NJ, Moulton EA. Supraspinal Mechanisms Underlying Ocular Pain. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:768649. [PMID: 35211480 PMCID: PMC8862711 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.768649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Supraspinal mechanisms of pain are increasingly understood to underlie neuropathic ocular conditions previously thought to be exclusively peripheral in nature. Isolating individual causes of centralized chronic conditions and differentiating them is critical to understanding the mechanisms underlying neuropathic eye pain and ultimately its treatment. Though few functional imaging studies have focused on the eye as an end-organ for the transduction of noxious stimuli, the brain networks related to pain processing have been extensively studied with functional neuroimaging over the past 20 years. This article will review the supraspinal mechanisms that underlie pain as they relate to the eye.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J Pondelis
- Brain and Eye Pain Imaging Lab, Pain and Affective Neuroscience Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Eric A Moulton
- Brain and Eye Pain Imaging Lab, Pain and Affective Neuroscience Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.,Department of Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|