Mieloszyk R, Twede H, Lester J, Wander J, Basu S, Cohn G, Smith G, Morris D, Gupta S, Tan D, Villar N, Wolf M, Malladi S, Mickelson M, Ryan L, Kim L, Kepple J, Kirchner S, Wampler E, Terada R, Robinson J, Paulsen R, Saponas TS. A Comparison of Wearable Tonometry, Photoplethysmography, and Electrocardiography for Cuffless Measurement of Blood Pressure in an Ambulatory Setting.
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2022;
26:2864-2875. [PMID:
35201992 DOI:
10.1109/jbhi.2022.3153259]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
While non-invasive, cuffless blood pressure (BP) measurement has demonstrated relevancy in controlled environments, ambulatory measurement is important for hypertension diagnosis and control. We present both in-lab and ambulatory BP estimation results from a diverse cohort of participants.
METHODS
Participants (N=1125, aged 21-85, 49.2% female, multiple hypertensive categories) had BP measured in-lab over a 24-hour period with a subset also receiving ambulatory measurements. Radial tonometry, photoplethysmography (PPG), electrocardiography (ECG), and accelerometry signals were collected simultaneously with auscultatory or oscillometric references for systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Predictive models to estimate BP using a variety of sensor-based feature groups were evaluated against challenging baselines.
RESULTS
Despite limited availability, tonometry-derived features showed superior performance compared to other feature groups and baselines, yielding prediction errors of 0.329.8 mmHg SBP and 0.547.7 mmHg DBP in-lab, and 0.868.7 mmHg SBP and 0.755.9 mmHg DBP for 24-hour averages. SBP error standard deviation (SD) was reduced in normotensive (in-lab: 8.1 mmHg, 24-hr: 7.2 mmHg) and younger (in-lab: 7.8 mmHg, 24-hr: 6.7 mmHg) subpopulations. SBP SD was further reduced 1520% when constrained to the calibration posture alone.
CONCLUSION
Performance for normotensive and younger participants was superior to the general population across all feature groups. Reference type, posture relative to calibration, and controlled vs. ambulatory setting all impacted BP errors.
SIGNIFICANCE
Results highlight the need for demographically diverse populations and challenging evaluation settings for BP estimation studies. We present the first public dataset of ambulatory tonometry and cuffless BP over a 24-hour period to aid in future cardiovascular research.
Collapse