Curious Case of a Giant Retroperitoneal Cyst

Adrenal cysts are uncommon fluid-filled masses that develop in the adrenal gland. Typically, they are non-functional, asymptomatic, and smaller than 10 cm in diameter when incidentally detected. However, the presence of giant adrenal cysts, exceeding 10 cm in diameter, creates a diagnostic challenge due to the difficulty in determining their origin. Surgical intervention is advised when the cyst surpasses 10 cm in diameter, produces symptoms, causes endocrine abnormalities, exhibits intracystic bleeding, or raises suspicion of malignancy. The preferred treatment approach involves adrenalectomy, performed either through open surgery or laparoscopy. In cases where the diagnosis is unequivocal, ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage serves as an alternative. Here, we present an exceptional case of a massive retroperitoneal mass caused by a rare giant adrenal cyst.

Spontaneous Ascitic Fluid Infection: Are we Experiencing an Epidemiological shift in Causative Organisms?

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous ascitic fluid infection (SAI) is common in cirrhotic patients leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Third-generation cephalosporins are currently recommended as first-line therapy. This is a retrospective observational study that aims to determine bacterial etiology, susceptibility patterns of SAI, and its correlation with model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na) and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study was conducted on 274 consecutive cases admitted in Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India. Cases of cirrhosis (irrespective of etiology) with ascites between the ages of 18-85 years were included in this study. Ascitic fluid of every patient was aspirated under all aseptic measures and was sent for biochemical, culture, and cytological analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 274 patients studied, 34 (12.4%) patients were diagnosed to have SAI. Culture-negative neutrocytic ascites (CNNA) was present in 27 patients, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) was present in six patients, and monomicrobial bacteriascites was seen in one patient. Mean age of patients enrolled was 56.05 ± 2.47 years. Eighty-two percent were males and 18% were females. Alcohol (45.45%) was the leading cause of cirrhosis followed by nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) related cirrhosis (26.47.7%) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) related cirrhosis (11.46%) and cryptogenic cirrhosis (8.82%). Average MELD-Na score was 25 and the CTP class C was most common. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most commonly isolated organism followed by Escherichia coli. The various factors that predispose to development of SBP include low ascitic fluid protein concentration, a high level of serum bilirubin, deranged serum creatinine, high Child-Pugh score, and high MELD-Na score.

CONCLUSION

Ascitic fluid analysis remains the single most important test for identifying and assessing a course of SBP. Early diagnosis and treatment will reduce the mortality rate in these patients.

Cutaneous Metastasis from Breast Carcinoma: a brief report of a rare variant and proposed morphological classification

BACKGROUND

Breast carcinoma is the second commonest cancer in women after non-melanoma skin cancers and, excluding melanoma, the most common tumor to metastasize to the skin in women. Cutaneous metastasis from breast cancer has varied presentations but there is no well-established classification which includes them all.

OBJECTIVE AND CONCLUSION

We report a 69 year-old lady with advanced primary ductal carcinoma of right breast (cT4cN1cM0) who presented five months after radical mastectomy with very extensive cutaneous metastases in absence of distant spread. Skin involvement was in the form of nodules and purpuric papulo-vesicles on a background of erythema which clinically mimicked lymphatic malformation. We also propose a morphological classification of the cutaneous metastasis from breast cancer.

KEYWORDS

Breast Carcinoma, Cutaneous metastasis, lymphatic malformation.

Macroscopic and microscopic measurement of myocardial infarct size. A comparison

Infarct size measured by microscopic method is consistently larger than that measured macroscopically, indicating that certain areas of infarction are missed when observed macroscopically. Existence of a good correlation between the two methods, however, suggests that macroscopic estimation of infarct size would be enough for initial screening of the interventions designed for salvation of ischemic myocardium, as it is an easy method. An additional advantage of this method is that it can be utilized to measure infarct size as early as 72 h after production of infarction. Comparison of weight and volume method of macroscopic estimation of infarct size has shown that they do not give significantly different results. Weight method being less cumbersome and less time-consuming, may be adopted for initial screening of cardioprotective agents.