Impact analysis of primary and secondary research in radiology journals

INTRODUCTION

Primary and secondary studies are considered the two major research categories. In this study, we examined the scientific and social media impact of primary and secondary publication types in papers published radiological journals during 2010-2020.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed publication type tags were used to filter original articles and systematic review and meta-analysis (SR/MA) articles. Clarivate Web of Science was utilized to obtain a list of all radiology journals from the category "Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging" in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). Automated approach was developed for programmatic extraction of bibliometric and Altmetric yearly citations of each included article using Dimensions API and Altmetric API with Python. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the citation rates between primary and secondary research articles.

RESULTS

A total of 96,684 published articles from 2010 to 2020 were identified and their meta-data collected. The mean 2-year citation count following publication year was 5.8 for primary research and 10.2 for SR/MA articles (p < 0.001). Between 2010 and 2020, the mean number of citations per SR/MA article was 51.3 compared to 30.5 per primary research article (p < 0.001). Mean Altmetric score was 8.2 in SR/MA compared to 3.7 for primary research articles (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Secondary research studies have been increasing in impact in both academia and social media compared to primary research. Our results highlight the importance and impact of systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles as a scientifically influential study type in radiology.

Region-specific interobserver agreement of the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) is a widely used scoring system for evaluating ischemic stroke to determine therapeutic strategy. However, there is variation in the interobserver agreement of ASPECTS. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the interobserver agreement of total and regional ASPECTS.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in the Web of Sciences, PubMed, and Scopus databases to identify relevant studies. Inclusion criteria were studies of noncontrast CT performed within 24 hours of ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies, with 3482 patients, reporting interobserver agreement of total and regional ASPECTS were included in the meta-analysis. The interobserver agreement for total ASPECTS in studies using Kappa coefficient (κ) analysis was substantial (κ = .67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: .57-.78). In studies using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis, agreement was excellent (ICC = .84, 95% CI: .77-.90). Interobserver agreement was higher in studies in which the observer was unblinded to clinical scenario in both groups (κ = .74, 95% CI: .59-.89, and ICC = .82, 95% CI: .79-.85). Per-region analysis showed that the caudate nucleus had the highest agreement (κ = .68, 95% CI: .60-.76, and ICC = .84, 95% CI: .74-.93), while M2 and internal capsule in Kappa studies (κ = .45, 95% CI: .34-.55 and κ = .47, 95% CI: .28-.66), and M4 and internal capsule in ICC studies (ICC = .54, 95% CI: .43-.64 and ICC = .55, 95% CI: .18-.91) had the lowest agreement.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates substantial to excellent interobserver agreement for total ASPECTS, which supports using this method for stroke treatment. However, findings emphasize the need to consider interobserver agreement in specific regions of ASPECTS for treatment decisions.

Alleviative effects of glutamate against chemotherapeutic agent-induced intestinal mucositis

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is one of the most widely used chemotherapeutic agents; however, it often causes intestinal mucositis with severe diarrhea. An efficient treatment strategy to reduce this side effect is lacking. Glutamate (Glu), a nonessential amino acid, is the most important energy source in the small intestine and has been shown to maintain intestinal morphology, barrier function, and antioxidative capacity. However, the effects of Glu on intestinal mucositis induced by chemotherapeutic agents have not been explored. This study aimed to demonstrate the alleviative effects of Glu on 5-FU-induced intestinal mucositis. Mucositis was induced in C57B/6N mice by intraperitoneal injection of 5-FU (50 mg/kg) for 6 days and assessed by histological and physiological analyses. Glu (500 or 1000 mg/kg) was orally administered as a pretreatment twice daily for 7 days before the initial treatment of 5-FU. Cellular proliferation and apoptosis were assessed using Ki-67 immunostaining and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay, respectively. Furthermore, fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran infiltration was assessed to measure intestinal permeability. In vitro experiments using rat intestinal epithelial cells (IEC-6 cells) were performed to clarify the effect of Glu on 5-FU-induced barrier dysfunction. Glu alleviated 5-FU-induced intestinal mucositis by reducing villi shortening, enhancing cell proliferation, and suppressing apoptosis. It also alleviated the 5-FU-induced increased intestinal permeability. In vitro studies revealed significantly increased trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) in Glu-pretreated IEC-6 cells compared to that in 5-FU-treated and control cells. In conclusion, the findings of this study provide evidence for the potential of Glu to protect against 5-FU-induced intestinal mucositis in patients with cancer.