The Prognostic Value of Right Ventricular Function in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure-A Prospective Study

Background: In patients with stable chronic heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) provides limited prognostic value, especially in patients with moderately to severely reduced LVEF. Echocardiographic parameters of right ventricular function may be associated with adverse clinical events in these patients. Therefore, we analyzed 164 patients with HFrEF in a prospective single-center cohort study to evaluate whether the parameters of right ventricular function are associated with worsening heart failure (WHF) hospitalizations, cardiovascular and all-cause deaths and combined endpoints. Methods: Echocardiographic cine loops were analyzed using vendor-independent post-processing software. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed, which were then adjusted for clinical characteristics and left ventricular functional parameters. Results: In these models, higher tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) was significantly associated with lower rates of WHF hospitalizations (HR 0.880, 95%CI 0.800-0.968, p = 0.008), a composite endpoint of WHF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death (HR 0.878, 95%CI 0.800-0.964, p = 0.006), and a composite endpoint of WHF hospitalization and all-cause death (HR 0.918, 95%CI 0.853-0.988, p = 0.023). These associations were more pronounced in patients with LVEF ≤ 35%. Conclusions: In conclusion, in patients with HFrEF, TAPSE is an independent prognosticator for adverse clinical outcomes, warranting further studies to elucidate whether incorporating TAPSE into established risk scores improves their diagnostic accuracy.

Low-grade systemic inflammation and left ventricular dysfunction in hypertensive compared to non-hypertensive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Arterial hypertension (HTN) is associated with excess mortality in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but underlying mechanisms are largely elusive. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between HTN and markers of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and low-grade systemic inflammation in a HCM cohort.

METHODS

This was a single-center cross-sectional case-control study comparing echocardiographic and plasma-derived indices of LV dysfunction and low-grade systemic inflammation between 30 adult patients with HCM and HTN (HTN+) and 30 sex- and age-matched HCM patients without HTN (HTN-). Echocardiographic measures were assessed using post-processing analyses by blinded investigators.

RESULTS

Mean age of the study population was 55.1 ± 10.4 years, 30% were women. Echocardiographic measures of systolic and diastolic dysfunction, including speckle-tracking derived parameters, did not differ between HTN+ and HTN-. Moreover, levels of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide were balanced between cases and controls. Compared with HTN-, HTN+ patients exhibited a higher white blood cell count [8.1 ± 1.8 109/l vs. 6.4 ± 1.6 109/l; p < 0.001] as well as higher plasma levels of interleukin-6 [2.8 pg/ml (2.0, 5.4) vs. 2.1 pg/ml (1.5, 3.4); p = 0.008] and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [2.6 mg/l (1.4, 6.5) vs. 1.1 mg/l (0.9, 2.4); p = 0.004].

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that HTN is associated with indices of low-grade systemic inflammation among HCM patients. Moreover, this analysis indicates that the adverse impact of HTN in HCM patients is a consequence of systemic effects rather than alterations of cardiac function, as measures of LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction did not differ between HTN+ and HTN-.

Prevalence and prognostic impact of bone disease in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

AIMS

Chronic heart failure is associated with a bone-catabolic state and increases the risk of osteoporosis and fractures. Prospective studies investigating the clinical relevance of bone disease in heart failure are lacking. We aimed to assess the prevalence and prognostic impact of osteoporosis and vertebral fractures (VFs) in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Symptomatic outpatients with chronic heart failure and a previous diagnosis of overtly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% on stable, optimal HFrEF therapy and left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% at enrolment were included into a prospective single-centre study. Osteoporosis was determined with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and defined as a T-score ≤ 2.5 at any site. VFs were assessed using X-ray of both thoracic and lumbar spine applying the semiquantitative Genant score. We enrolled 205 patients (22% women), with a median age of 66 (IQR 58-74) years. Median left ventricular ejection fraction was 37 (IQR 30-43) % and median N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide was 964 (IQR 363-2173) pg/mL. Osteoporosis, as defined by bone mineral density, and at least one VF were prevalent in 31 (15%) and 29 patients (14%). Osteoporosis or VF were present in 55 patients (27%) and 5 patients (2%) had both osteoporosis and a VF. During a median follow-up of 4.7 (IQR 4.0-5.3) years, 18 patients (9%) died due to cardiovascular (CV) cause, and 46 patients (22%) had a worsening heart failure (WHF) hospitalization. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, presence of VF independently predicted CV death (HR 2.82, 95% CI 1.04-7.65, P = 0.042), WHF hospitalizations (HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.18-4.82, P = 0.015), and a composite endpoint of CV death and WHF hospitalizations (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.23-4.82, P = 0.011). Osteoporosis was not significantly associated with CV events.

CONCLUSIONS

In a prospective study, bone disease affected every fourth patient with HFrEF, and patients with VF at baseline had a two-fold risk of subsequent CV death or WHF hospitalization. Prevalent bone disease, particularly VF, should be considered as a clinically relevant comorbidity in HFrEF.

Non-eligibility for pivotal HFpEF/HFmrEF outcome trials and mortality in a contemporary heart failure cohort

Pivotal outcome trials targeting heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) and mildly-reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) may have excluded patients at highest risk of poor outcomes. We aimed to assess eligibility for HFpEF/HFmrEF outcome trials in an unselected heart failure cohort and its association with all-cause mortality. Among 32.028 patients presenting to a tertiary care center emergency unit for any reason between August 2018 and July 2019, we identified 407 admissions with evident HFpEF and HFmrEF. Eligibility criteria for pivotal trials CHARM-Preserved, I-PRESERVE, TOPCAT, PARAGON-HF, EMPEROR-Preserved and DELIVER were assessed by chart review. The proportions of admissions fulfilling HFpEF/HFmrEF trial eligibility criteria were 88% for CHARM-Preserved, 40% for I-PRESERVE, 35% for TOPCAT, 28% for PARAGON-HF, 51% for EMPEROR-Preserved, and 49% for DELIVER. During a median follow-up of 1.9 years, death-from-any-cause occurred in 121 cases (30%). Twenty-four-month overall survival estimates for non-eligible and eligible admissions were 53% vs. 76% for CHARM-Preserved (HR=2.32, 95% CI: 1.47-3.67, p<0.001), 62% vs. 87% for I-PRESERVE (HR=2.97, 1.85-4.77, p<0.001), 67% vs. 84% for TOPCAT (HR=2.04, 1.29-3.24, p = 0.002), 68% vs. 85% for PARAGONHF (HR=2.28, 1.33-3.90, p = 0.003), 64% vs. 81% for EMPEROR-Preserved (HR=1.90, 1.27-2.84, p = 0.002), and 65% vs. 80% for DELIVER (HR=1.71, 1.14-2.57, p = 0.010). Exclusion criteria independently predicting death were eGFR <20 ml/min/1.73 m2, COPD with home oxygen therapy, and severe valvular heart disease. Conclusively, in a contemporary HFpEF/HFmrEF cohort, non-eligibility for outcome trials predicted for strongly increased mortality. HFpEF/HFmrEF patients at highest mortality risk were likely underrepresented in previous outcome trials and their treatment remains an unmet medical need.

Timing of SGLT2i initiation after acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological post-MI treatment is routinely initiated at intensive/cardiac care units. However, solid evidence for an early start of these therapies is only available for dual platelet therapy and statins, whereas data on beta blockers and RAAS inhibitors are heterogenous and mainly limited to STEMI and heart failure patients. Recently, the EMMY trial provided the first evidence on the beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) when initiated early after PCI. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, SGLT2i are considered "sick days drugs" and it, therefore, remains unclear if very early SGLT2i initiation following MI is as safe and effective as delayed initiation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The EMMY trial evaluated the effect of empagliflozin on NT-proBNP and functional and structural measurements. Within the Empagliflozin group, 22 (9.5%) received early treatment (< 24 h after PCI), 98 (42.2%) within a 24 to < 48 h window (intermediate), and 111 (48.1%) between 48 and 72 h (late). NT-proBNP levels declined by 63.5% (95%CI: - 69.1; - 48.1) in the early group compared to 61.0% (- 76.0; - 41.4) in the intermediate and 61.9% (- 70.8; - 45.7) in the late group (n.s.) within the Empagliflozin group with no significant treatment groups-initiation time interaction (pint = 0.96). Secondary endpoints of left ventricular function (LV-EF, e/e`) as well as structure (LVESD and LVEDD) were also comparable between the groups. No significant difference in severe adverse event rate between the initiation time groups was detected.

CONCLUSION

Very early administration of SGLT2i after acute myocardial infarction does not show disadvantageous signals with respect to safety and appears to be as effective in reducing NT-proBNP as well as improving structural and functional LV markers as initiation after 2-3 days.

Post-processing measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction compared to direct measurement in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Introduction

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) derived from transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is routinely used to guide therapeutic decisions in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, TTE-based quantification of LVEF is limited by low diagnostic accuracy and poor agreement with gold-standard methods which may be improved by application of post-processing (pp) analysis tools. In our study, we aimed to compare different methods of LVEF quantification, using direct and pp techniques, and their correlations to NT-proBNP plasma concentrations in patients with a previous diagnosis of HFrEF.

Methods

A total of 205 clinically stable patients with HFrEF were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. They underwent a standardized TTE examination performed by two experienced investigators. Biplane LVEF according to Simpson's method was evaluated directly during the examination. Pp evaluation of biplane and triplane LVEF (pp LVEF) using a vendor-independent software on digitally saved echo loops was performed by a blinded investigator who underwent comprehensive training in pp analysis but was otherwise unexperienced in TTE. For correlation analyses patients were subdivided according to the underlying etiology into ischemic and non-ischemic HF.

Results

Pp analysis was feasible in 164 patients. Mean direct biplane LVEF was 36.0±9.1%, mean pp biplane LVEF was 35.8±8.2%, mean pp triplane LVEF was 34.2±8.8%, and median NT-proBNP was 978 [IQR 332–2279] pg/mL. All LVEF parameters had strong and comparable correlations to NT-proBNP (direct biplane r=−0.352; pp biplane r=−0.412; pp triplane r=−0.426; p&lt;0.01 for each). Bland Altman Plot revealed a high variability between direct and pp biplane LVEF, with a mean difference of 0.15±6.2%. Linear regression analysis indicated proportional bias across all LVEF ranges (β=0.154, p=0.049). Among 83 patients with direct biplane LVEF &gt;35%, 16 had a pp biplane LVEF ≤35% (mean pp biplane 43.3±4.5 vs 32.0±2.3%, p&lt;0.001; median NT-proBNP 511 [179–1421] vs 1205 [457–3706] pg/mL, p=0.055). On the other hand, out of 81 patients with direct biplane LVEF ≤35%, 16 patients had pp biplane LVEF &gt;35% (mean pp biplane 28.2±4.8 vs 39.2±3.4%, p&lt;0.001; median NT-proBNP 1644 [711–3113] vs 543 [297–3015] pg/mL, p=0.1). Furthermore, the correlation between biplane LVEF and NT-proBNP was more pronounced in patients with ischemic HF (n=65) using pp than direct measurement (pp r=−0.443, p&lt;0.001; direct r=−0.314, p=0.01). We did not observe such a signal in patients with non-ischemic HF (n=99).

Conclusion

Direct biplane LVEF shows low agreement with pp biplane LVEF in patients with HFrEF. Moreover, application of pp analyses leads to a reclassification from LVEF &gt;35 to ≤35% in one out of five patients. In conclusion, pp biplane LVEF analysis appears to provide more accurate values and should be preferred in examinations with therapeutic implication, particularly in patients with HFrEF of ischemic origin.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.