Neoadjuvant Osimertinib Followed by Sequential Definitive Radiation Therapy and/or Surgery in Stage III Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase 2 Study

PURPOSE

The treatment for unresectable, locally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by consolidation durvalumab. This study aimed to evaluate the benefit of neoadjuvant osimertinib as an alternative therapy to this approach with the aim of reducing the radiation field.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This investigation was a nonrandomized, open-label, single-arm, phase 2, prospective, proof-of-concept study. Eligible patients were classified as having treatment-naïve, nonoperable, stage III epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant NSCLC. Patients received 80 mg of oral osimertinib daily for 12 weeks before definitive radiation therapy (RT) and/or surgery. The response was assessed at weeks 6 and 12. For responders, sequential definitive RT and/or surgery were planned. Nonresponders were started on standard CRT. After RT ± surgery or CRT, patients were followed for 2 years without adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), with September 20, 2022, set as the cut-off for data collection. Secondary endpoints were safety and the gross tumor volume (GTV), planned tumor volume (PTV), and the percentage of total lung volume minus GTV exceeding 20 Gy (V20%) before versus after osimertinib. Exploratory analyses included assessments of the presence of plasma circulating tumor-free DNA (ctDNA) before osimertinib treatment, at weeks 6 and 12, at the end of RT, and 6 weeks post-RT.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were included (19 women; median age, 73 years; range, 51-82 years). Nineteen of 24 had never smoked, 20 of 24 had adenocarcinoma, 16 of 24 had exon 19 deletions, and 8 of 24 had exon 21 mutations. Participants had stage IIIA (10), IIIB (9), or IIIC (5) disease. Three patients were excluded from the analysis (1 dropped out and 2 were still undergoing osimertinib treatment at the cut-off date). The ORR to induction osimertinib was 95.2% (17 partial response, 3 complete response, and 1 progressive disease). After induction osimertinib, 13 of 20 patients were definitively radiated, 3 of 20 underwent surgery, and 5 of 20 were excluded. Four patients were restaged as stage IV (contralateral ground-glass opacities responded to osimertinib), and 1 patient withdrew informed consent. Three patients underwent surgery, one of whom was treated with RT. Two patients achieved pT1aN0, and one achieved pathologic complete response. The median GTV, PTV, and V20% before osimertinib treatment were 47.4 ± 76.9 cm3 (13.5-234.9), 227.0 ± 258.8 cm3 (77.8-929.2), and 27.1 ± 16.4% (6.2-60.3), respectively. The values after osimertinib treatment were 27.5 ± 42.3 cm3 (2.99-137.7; -48 ± 20%; P = .02), 181.9 ±198.4 cm3 (54-718.1; -31 ± 20%; P = .01), and 21.8 ± 11.7% (9.1-44.15; -24 ± 40%; P = .04), respectively. PTV/GTV/V20% reduction was associated with tumor size and central location. The median follow-up time was 28.71 months (range, 0.4-45.1 months), and median disease-free survival was not reached (mean, 30.59; standard error, 3.94; 95% confidence interval, 22.86-38.31). ctDNA was detected in 5 patients; 4 of 5 were positive for ctDNA at baseline and became negative during osimertinib induction but were again positive after osimertinib treatment was terminated. Interestingly, 3 patients who were ctDNA negative at baseline became weakly positive after RT and then were negative at follow-up. No significant adverse events were reported during the osimertinib or radiation phases.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant osimertinib therapy is feasible in patients with stage III lung cancer NSCLC, followed by definitive radiation and/or surgery, with an ORR of 95.2% and an excellent safety profile. Osimertinib induction for 12 weeks before definitive radiation (chemo-free) significantly reduced the radiation field by nearly 50% with a linear association with tumor size. Further studies are needed to test this chemo-free approach for long-term outcomes before practices are changed.

[FDG PET/CT FOR TREATMENT RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN CANCER]

FDG PET/CT (fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT)) imaging reflects functional-metabolic changes occurring within the malignant process in response to therapy. Since these changes usually precede anatomic alterations, this imaging technique is highly valuable in assessing response during and after therapy and is superior to CT. FDG PET/CT following initiation of cancer therapy has a prognostic value, predicting progression free survival and overall survival. In some malignancies FDG PET/CT can guide personalized medicine by tailoring therapy in accordance with the metabolic cancer response in the individual patient. In lymphoma patients, including Hodgkin's disease (HD) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), FDG PET/CT is useful for monitoring response and guiding therapy, both after and early during therapy. Various quantitative and visual criteria systems are used for assessing cancer response to therapy by FDG PET/CT. Acquaintance with these interpretation methods and their adjustment to new anti-cancerous mechanisms such as in immunotherapy, is important for accurate imaging and meaningful interpretation. Large prospective meticulously performed studies, using standardized methodology, are required to further establish and expand the use of FDG PET/CT for the assessment of response to therapy in various malignancies.

A multiparous pregnant woman receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in women during the childbearing years. Breast can cer is the most common malignancy presenting during pregnancy and lactation. Treatment with antineoplastic agents in this group of patients is problematic due to their potential teratogenicity. A case report is presented of a pregnant woman who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced carcinoma of the breast. The patient received a total of four courses of cyclophospha mide, doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil, before deliv ery of a child healthy in all systems. We discuss the use of cytotoxic drugs during pregnancy and indi cate some of the dilemas facing the treating physi cian. The authors join in the call for the establish ment of an international registry of children born to mothers who receive cytotoxic drugs during pregnancy.

The diagnostic and prognostic value of ProGRP in lung cancer

AIM

To investigate the diagnostic and prognostic significance of pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) in non-small cell (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and compare this marker with other known serum markers in lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Serum levels of ProGRP, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), CYFRA 21-1 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were measured in 37 patients with benign pulmonary disease (BPD), 88 with advanced NSCLC and 37 with SCLC.

RESULTS

The ProGRP assay showed a better clinical performance than that of NSE in discriminating between SCLC and BPD or NSCLC, especially at specificity higher than 90%. ProGRP and NSE sensitivity in SCLC at 95% specificity versus the BPD group was 78.4% and 48.6%, (p=0.001) and at 97.7% specificity versus NSCLC, 75.7% and 37.8%, respectively (p=0.001). A significant association of low ProGRP levels with high-grade NSCLC tumors was found (p=0.002). A univariate analysis showed a significant association of ProGRP with survival both in NSCLC and SCLC (p=0.03 and p=0.04, respectively). In multivariate analysis, performance status (PS) and CYFRA 21-1 in NSCLC, and PS, CYFRA 21-1 and serum lactic dehydrogenase in SCLC were found as significant variables with an independent impact on survival.

CONCLUSION

ProGRP is a useful marker in SCLC, with diagnostic performance better than that of NSE and demonstrating association with survival in NSCLC and SCLC limited to univariate analysis.

Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer: Applicability of an International Protocol in a Single-Institution Environment

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the applicability of an annual low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening program for lung cancer in a single institution in Israel, which has a relatively lower prevalence of lung cancer compared with other Western countries, and to examine stage distribution of detected lung cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cohort of 842 former and current smokers underwent baseline low-dose CT screening and a total of 942 annual repeat screenings over a period of 68 months. The definition of positive results on baseline and repeat screening and their diagnostic workup were guided by the common International Early Lung Cancer Action Program protocol. Recommendations for biopsy of suspicious nodules were based on nodule size, nodule growth, non-resolution following antibiotic therapy, and positron emission tomography scan.

RESULTS

The test result was positive in 102 of the 842 baseline screenings (12%) and in 45 of the 942 annual repeat screenings (5%), and biopsy was recommended in 12 baseline and 2 annual screenings. Twelve of the 14 cancers diagnosed (86%) were stage I tumors.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that the adoption of a common international protocol is feasible, even in a very different clinical setting, yielding a high proportion of early-stage lung cancers.

The prognostic significance of circulating neuroendocrine markers chromogranin a, pro-gastrin-releasing peptide and neuron-specific enolase in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Chromogranin A (CGA), Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) are known as immunohistochemical tissue markers closely associated with neuroendocrine differentiation in non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The aim of the present study was to assess the value of serum levels of these markers in predicting response to chemotherapy and survival of patients with unresectable NSCLC.

METHODS

The study included 67 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with chemotherapy. Before treatment, serum levels of CGA, ProGRP and NSE were measured with commercial kits.

RESULTS

No association was found between serum NSE and age, gender, histology, performance status or extent of the disease. Distribution of serum CGA differed significantly according to gender and histology, with higher levels being found in men (p = 0.01) and in squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.01). Serum ProGRP levels correlated with disease extent, being higher in patients with metastatic disease (M1) than in those with locoregional disease (M0; p = 0.02). The association of NSE, CGA and ProGRP levels with response to chemotherapy was not significant. While NSE had no impact on survival, the median survival was shorter for patients with elevated serum CGA and longer for patients with high ProGRP levels. Association with survival was significant when the Classification and Regression Tree (CART)-derived or median cutoff points were explored. On inclusion in multivariate Cox models, both CGA and ProGRP retained significance with high levels showing an opposite effect on survival [CART-derived cutoff points: CGA, relative risk (RR) -4.0; p < 0.001, and ProGRP, RR -0.4; p = 0.006, and median cutoff points: CGA, RR -1.8; p = 0.04, and ProGRP, RR -0.5; p = 0.03]. The combined use of CGA, ProGRP and NSE allowed for definition of two sets of patients with significantly different median survival times (25.2 vs. 8.8 months, p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the circulation, CGA and Pro-GRP appear to bear important information related to the prognosis for NSCLC patients before chemotherapy. While a high CGA before treatment was found as an unfavorable prognostic determinant, a high ProGRP conferred a survival advantage. The combined use of serum CGA, ProGRP and NSE may supply additional information to prognosis.

Genetic testing of breast and ovarian cancer patients: clinical characteristics and hormonal risk modifiers

OBJECTIVES

Carriers of the mutations 185delAG and 5382insC in the BRCA1 gene and 6174delT in the BRCA2 gene have a substantial life-time risk for breast and ovarian cancers (BC and OC). The aim of the study was to identify the clinical features and the hormonal risk modifiers in mutation carriers and the implication in suggested guidelines for treatment decisions in BRCA1/2 carrier patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Breast and/or ovarian cancer patients from the Oncology and Cancer Genetic clinics were tested for the three Ashkenazi founder mutations: 87 patients were identified as carriers of one of these mutations. Clinical presentation and age at onset were correlated with the mutations, in patients with bilateral BC or BC and OC, the length of time that elapsed between the diagnosis of the two cancers was recorded. We compared BC and OC patients with regard to ages at menarche, first pregnancy and menopause, number of pregnancies and deliveries, the use of oral contraceptives, hormonal replacement therapy and fertility treatments.

RESULTS

The carriers of the three BRCA1/2 Ashkenazi founder mutations did not differ in clinical presentation nor age at onset. Forty-three patients (74.1%) of 58 BC patients were diagnosed between the ages 30 and 50, only four (6.9%) patients were diagnosed after age 60. Of BC patients diagnosed before age 35, 63.6% developed second BC as compared to 25.5% of those diagnosed after age 35. Ovarian cancer was diagnosed after age 45 in 89.7% of the patients, only one patient was diagnosed under the age of 40. Oral contraceptives use was documented in 61.3% of BC patients as compared to 11.8% of OC patients. Other hormonal factors did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The carriers of the three Ashkenazi founder mutations should be considered at the same risk for BC and for OC and treatment options should be the same. Mutation carriers diagnosed with BC before the age of 35 are at a very high risk for developing second breast cancer. Most ovarian cancers in carriers were diagnosed after age 45, and prophylactic oophorectomy should be postponed to the age of 45. Oral contraceptives might elevate the risk of BC in mutation carriers.

Prognostic value of CYFRA 21-1, TPS and CEA in different histologic types of non-small cell lung cancer

The prognostic value of the tumor markers CYFRA 21-1, tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was investigated in three histologic subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer. Pretreatment serum marker levels were measured in 38 patients with adenocarcinoma (AC), in 43 patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SQC) and in 35 patients with large cell carcinoma (LCC). Univariate analysis in AC showed significant lower survival of patients with elevated levels of TPS, CYFRA 21-1 and CEA. In LCC, elevated levels of TPS and CEA were found to predict lower survival, while in SQC--only TPS was a predictor. A multivariate analysis of survival identified CEA (Relative Risk-5.5; p = 0.004), CYFRA 21-1 (RR-3.4; p = 0.008) and TPS (RR-3.0; p = 0.02) as independent prognostic factors in AC. In SQC, only TPS (RR-2.3; p = 0.03) was such a factor whereas in LC--none of the markers studied retained statistical significance. Thereafter, the combinations of the two strongest prognostic factors in the AC group--CEA and CYFRA 21-1 were explored to divide this group into subsets with different prognosis. In cases where both markers were positive, the relative risk of death was 10.5 times higher as compared to cases where both markers were negative (p = 0.002).

Cytokeratin markers in malignant pleural mesothelioma

Previously available serum tumor markers had a low clinical value in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). The recently developed tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) and CYFRA 21-1 assays identify the soluble cytokeratin 18 and 19 fragments, respectively. In MPM these cytokeratins are expressed and may therefore be used as serum tumor markers. In this preliminary study, TPS and CYFRA 21-1 assays were evaluated to determine their potential for management of patients with MPM. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was evaluated as an additional marker. The study group consisted of 95 patients with benign lung and pleural diseases (BLPD), 14 patients with MPM, 41 patients with adenocarcinoma of lung (AC), and 40 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of lung (SQC). The utilized cutoff points corresponded to a 95% specificity for patients with BLPD. In MPM, TPS showed greater sensitivity (64.3%) than CYFRA 21-1 (50.0%), while CEA showed no sensitivity. In SQC, the marker CYFRA 21-1 had the highest sensitivity (52.5%), whereas in AC the most sensitive marker was CEA (56.1%). Significantly lower levels of CEA were found in MPM compared with BLPD (p < 0.001) or AC and SQC (p < 0.0001). Conversely, TPS levels in MPM were significantly higher than in SQC (p < 0.05). Close correlation of various individual pretreatment marker levels was observed only between TPS and CYFRA 21-1, both in MPM (r = 0.84; p < 0.001) and in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (r = 0.71; p < 0.001). In serial determinations of the markers during chemotherapy of MPM (n = 10), TPS and CYFRA 21-1 were shown to demonstrate more or less the same pattern of reactivity, although the changes in the TPS levels better reflected the clinical response to therapy. In conclusion, TPS seems to be a more sensitive marker than CYFRA 21-1.

Evaluation of tissue polypeptide specific antigen, CYFRA 21-1, and carcinoembryonic antigen in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: does the combined use of cytokeratin markers give any additional information?

BACKGROUND

Recently developed tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS) and CYFRA 21-1 assays determine the soluble cytokeratin 18 and 19 fragments, respectively, in serum. The authors compared the value of TPS, CYFRA 21-1, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for the diagnosis, staging, prognosis, and monitoring of patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS

The study included 85 patients with benign lung diseases and 94 patients with NSCLC. TPS, CYFRA 21-1, and CEA serum levels were measured with commercial kits.

RESULTS

The following were demonstrated: 1) CYFRA 21-1 and TPS levels, but not CEA levels, differed significantly between NSCLC patients with operable disease (Stages I-IIIA) and those with inoperable disease (Stages IIIB-IV). 2) The correlation coefficient between CYFRA 21-1 and TPS increased with the progression of NSCLC from Stages I-IIIA (r = 0.41, P = 0.04) to Stages IIIB-IV (r = 0.70, P < 0.001). 3) Multivariate analysis identified TPS and CYFRA 21-1 as significant predictors of survival, with relative risks of 2.57 (P = 0.001) and 2.05 (P = 0.01), respectively. For cases in which both cytokeratin markers were positive, the relative risk was 6.4 (P < 0.0001) compared with cases in which both were negative. 4) For the group with inoperable disease, the combined use of TPS and CYFRA 21-1 allowed for the definition of 3 sets of patients with significantly different median survival times (14.3 months vs. 7.4 months vs. 2.6 months). 5) The percentages of marker evaluations concordant with results of clinical assessments of response to therapy were 75.0%, 72.2%, and 61.1% for CYFRA 21-1, TPS, and CEA, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that, for NSCLC patients, CYFRA 21-1 and TPS are significant prognostic factors and effective monitors of therapy. The combined use of these cytokeratin markers may provide additional information for prognosis.

Leptomeningeal metastases: evaluation by gadolinium enhanced spinal magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

Leptomeningeal metastases are common in patients with metastatic systemic cancer or certain primary brain tumors. They may be unsuspected clinically and may be missed by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology. We undertook a retrospective study of the diagnostic value of gadolinium enhanced spinal MR imaging in patients with known or at high risk for leptomeningeal metastases (LM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ninety-six gadolinium enhanced MR examinations of the whole spine were performed in 61 patients (26 primary central nervous system tumors, 20 solid tumors and 15 lymphoproliferative neoplasms). All patients had detailed neurological evaluation and concomitant CSF examination.

RESULTS

Sixty-one MR's (62%) were positive, mostly in the lumbar spine. MR's were positive in 92% of patients with positive initial CSF cytology and in 60% of patients with negative CSF cytology. The MR examination was positive in 49% of those without clinical findings related to the spinal region. It showed disease beyond the symptomatic level in 42% of patients with spinal symptomatology. Multi-level spinal involvement was present in 57% of positive MR exams.

CONCLUSION

Enhanced spinal MR is sensitive for the detection of neoplastic spinal seeding. It detects LM in about 50% of high risk patients with negative initial CSF cytology or no spinal symptoms.

The founder mutations 185delAG and 5382insC in BRCA1 and 6174delT in BRCA2 appear in 60% of ovarian cancer and 30% of early-onset breast cancer patients among Ashkenazi women

The mutations 185delAG, 188del11, and 5382insC in the BRCA1 gene and 6174delT in the BRCA2 gene were analyzed in 199 Ashkenazi and 44 non-Ashkenazi Jewish unrelated patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer. Of the Jewish Ashkenazi women with ovarian cancer, 62% (13/21) had one of the target mutations, as did 30% (13/43) of women with breast cancer alone diagnosed before the age 40 years and 10% (15/141) of those with breast cancer diagnosed after the age 40 years. Age at ovarian cancer diagnosis was not associated with carrier status. Of 99 Ashkenazi patients with no family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, 10% carried one of the mutations; in two of them the mutation was proved to be paternally transmitted. One non-Ashkenazi Jewish ovarian cancer patient from Iraq carried the 185delAG mutation. Individual mutation frequencies among breast cancer Ashkenazi patients were 6.7% for 185delAG, 2.2% for 5382insC, and 4.5% for 6174delT, among ovarian cancer patients; 185delAG and 6174delT were about equally common (33% and 29%, respectively), but no ovarian cancer patient carried the 5382insC. More mutations responsible for inherited breast and ovarian cancer probably remain to be found in this population, since 79% of high-incidence breast cancer families and 35% of high-incidence breast/ovarian cancer families had none of the three known founder mutations.

[Genetic counseling for families at high cancer risk]

About 5-10% of the most common cancers, such as breast, colon and melanoma, result from mutations in inherited predisposition genes. Recently some of these genes have been mapped or even cloned. These advances in cancer genetics have made more precise genetic counseling possible for cancer patients and their families. In our clinic for specific genetic counseling 180 families with a history of cancer were seen during a 10-month period. In counseling sessions, the family history was confirmed and interpreted, personal risk was estimated and the availability of molecular genetic testing was presented. Blood samples for DNA testing were drawn from those with certain criteria who wished to be tested. Instructions for early detection were also given, depending on the personal risk of cancer as compared to that of the general population.